Refractive corneal inlay for presbyopia in emmetropic patients in Asia: 6-month clinical outcomes

BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Management with corneal techniques

Corneal techniques for enhancing near and intermediate vision to correct presbyopia include surgical and contact lens treatment modalities. Broad approaches used independently or in combination include correcting one eye for distant and the other for near or intermediate vision, (termed monovision or mini-monovision depending on the degree of anisometropia) and/or extending the eye's depth of focus [1]. This report reviews the evidence for the treatment profile, safety, and efficacy of the current range of corneal techniques for managing presbyopia. The visual needs and expectations of the patient, their ocular characteristics, and prior history of surgery are critical considerations for patient selection and preoperative evaluation. Contraindications to refractive surgery include unstable refraction, corneal abnormalities, inadequate corneal thickness for the proposed ablation depth, ocular and systemic co-morbidities, uncontrolled mental health issues and unrealistic patient expectations. Laser refractive options for monovision include surface/stromal ablation techniques and keratorefractive lenticule extraction. Alteration of spherical aberration and multifocal ablation profiles are the primary means for increasing ocular depth of focus, using surface and non-surface laser refractive techniques. Corneal inlays use either small aperture optics to increase depth of field or modify the anterior corneal curvature to induce corneal multifocality. In presbyopia correction by conductive keratoplasty, radiofrequency energy is applied to the mid-peripheral corneal stroma, leading to mid-peripheral corneal shrinkage and central corneal steepening. Hyperopic orthokeratology lens fitting can induce spherical aberration and correct some level of presbyopia. Postoperative management, and consideration of potential complications, varies according to technique applied and the time to restore corneal stability, but a minimum of 3 months of follow-up is recommended after corneal refractive procedures. Ongoing follow-up is important in orthokeratology and longer-term follow-up may be required in the event of late complications following corneal inlay surgery.

BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Evaluation and diagnosis

It is important to be able to measure the range of clear focus in clinical practice to advise on presbyopia correction techniques and to optimise the correction power. Both subjective and objective techniques are necessary: subjective techniques (such as patient reported outcome questionnaires and defocus curves) assess the impact of presbyopia on a patient and how the combination of residual objective accommodation and their natural DoF work for them; objective techniques (such as autorefraction, corneal topography and lens imaging) allow the clinician to understand how well a technique is working optically and whether it is the right choice or how adjustments can be made to optimise performance. Techniques to assess visual performance and adverse effects must be carefully conducted to gain a reliable end-point, considering the target size, contrast and illumination. Objective techniques are generally more reliable, can help to explain unexpected subjective results and imaging can be a powerful communication tool with patients. A clear diagnosis, excluding factors such as binocular vision issues or digital eye strain that can also cause similar symptoms, is critical for the patient to understand and adapt to presbyopia. Some corrective options are more permanent, such as implanted inlays / intraocular lenses or laser refractive surgery, so the optics can be trialled with contact lenses in advance (including differences between the eyes) to better communicate with the patient how the optics will work for them so they can make an informed choice.

Visual Outcomes and Safety of a Refractive Corneal Inlay for Presbyopia: One-Year Results

PURPOSE

To determine the visual outcomes and safety 12 months after implantation of the Presbia Flexivue Microlens refractive corneal inlay.

METHODS

In this prospective, non-randomized trial, 22 patients with a mean age of 52.54 ± 2.86 years were implanted with the Flexivue Microlens refractive corneal inlay in the non-dominant eye at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Corrected near, intermediate, and distance (CNVA, CIVA, and CDVA) visual acuity and uncorrected near, intermediate, and distance (UNVA, UIVA, and UDVA) visual acuity, manifest refraction, subjective quality of vision, endothelial cell count, and contrast sensitivity were measured 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

For binocular CDVA, no patient lost two or more lines and 30% lost only one line at the 12-month visit. In the eye that had surgery, 85% of the patients lost two or more lines of UDVA, which was statistically significant. Sixty-five percent of the patients gained one or more lines in binocular UIVA, and 80% achieved 20/40 or better in DCIVA. UNVA showed a statistically significant improvement, with 90% of the patients achieving 20/40 or better 12 months after implantation. A total of 85% gained two or more lines in binocular UNVA.

CONCLUSIONS

This refractive corneal inlay showed an improvement in binocular UNVA, UIVA, CNVA, and CIVA, whereas binocular CDVA and UDVA were not statistically affected. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(1):e1-e9.].

Increasing depth of focus with allogeneic presbyopic inlays: 3-year results

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of allogenic corneal inlays designed to increase the depth of focus (DoF) in treated eyes.

SETTINGS

Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

This study includes 50 eyes of 25 patients with a follow-up of 3 years. Emmetropic patients with presbyopia had implantation of allogenic corneal inlays in the nondominant eye. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) were evaluated in all eyes. A subjective visual acuity test system (Multifocal Lens Analyzer 3.0 application) was used to analyze the DoF by measuring the defocus curves.

RESULTS

No significant difference between the treated and fellow eyes in UDVA and CDVA was found, whereas UNVA was significantly better in the treated eyes ( P = .20, P = .07, P < .01, respectively). Comparing to the preoperative CDVA, there was a 1-line decrease in CDVA in 6 (%24) patients. The mean defocus curves reveal a DoF of 1.1 diopters (D) for the untreated eye at the logMAR = 0.2 threshold. By contrast, the mean DoF of the treated eye and binocularly was 2.8 D. The areas under the curve were significantly better in the near, intermediate, and total distances in the treated eyes, whereas it was better for the far distances in the untreated eyes. All values were significant ( P = .023 total, P < .01 others).

CONCLUSIONS

Allogenic presbyopic inlay implantation may be safe and provided a clinically and statistically significant increase in the DoF leading to good far, intermediate, and near-visual acuity in emmetropic presbyopic patients.

Surgical Technique to Treat Presbyopic Inlay-Associated Corneal Haze With Sequential Excimer Photoablation: A Case Series

PURPOSE

To describe an approach using sequential excimer laser ablation of the stromal surface of the corneal flap with or without subsequent excimer ablation to the stromal bed to reduce presbyopic inlay-associated corneal haze.

METHODS

Twelve patients who underwent KAMRA inlay (Acufocus) explantation due to corneal haze were included. The mean interval between explantation and the primary surgery (phototherapeutic keratotomy [PTK] to corneal flap) was 16.2 ± 29.7 months (range = 1 to 83 months). The corneal flap was lifted and laid on an evisceration spoon and an excimer laser was used to ablate the flap stroma by 30 to 40 µm depth. Subsequently, an excimer laser was used to ablate and treat the stromal bed following a second flap lift according to the manifest refraction, leaving a minimal residual stromal bed thickness of greater than 300 µm. For both procedures, mitomycin C 0.02% was applied to the stromal bed before the flap was replaced and a bandage contact lens applied.

RESULTS

Reductions in corneal haze were observed, following PTK to the corneal flap with or without photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to the stromal bed, both clinically and on imaging. No significant changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity (P = .442) and corrected distance visual acuity (P = .565) were observed. Improvements were observed for both spherical equivalent refractive errors (P = .036) and corneal light backscatter (P = .019). There were significant improvements in spherical aberrations (P = .014) but no changes in total lower and higher order aberrations.

CONCLUSIONS

PTK to the corneal flap with or without subsequent stromal bed PRK is an effective technique in treating corneal haze following presbyopic inlay explantation. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(9):639-646.].

Correction of presbyopia

Presbyopia, a progressive visual difficulty caused by weakened physiological regulation, is one of the main causes of visual impairment in people over 40 years old. Currently, the main methods of correction of presbyopia include optical correction, surgical correction, and drug treatment, which can improve the visual nearness disorder to some extent. Optical correction is the most common way with advantages of safety, which can adjust the lens parameters at any time, while cause kinds of inconvenience in life by wearing and taking off glasses frequently. Surgical intervention, including corneal surgery, lens surgery and scleral surgery, with certain advantages and disadvantages in each operation style. New pharmaceutical agents are expected to be a new and effective method for the treatment of presbyopia, but it lacks multicenter randomized controlled trials and evidence-based medicine evidence to evaluate the safety and effectiveness.

Review of Presbyopia Treatment with Corneal Inlays and New Developments

Presbyopia may represent the largest segment of refractive errors that is without an established and effective refractive surgery treatment. Corneal Inlays are materials (synthetic or allogenic) implanted in the stroma of patients’ corneas to improve presbyopia. These inlays, introduced into the United States in 2015 via the small-aperture corneal inlay (KAMRA^TM, SightLife Surgical/CorneaGen, Seattle, Washington, United States), were met with an initial wave of enthusiasm. Subsequent models like the shape-changing corneal inlay (RAINDROP^TM, Revision Optics, Lake Forest, California, United States) offered excellent results for patients, but longer-term research raised questions about patient safety. At the time of this article, no synthetic corneal inlays are available in the United States for the correction of presbyopia. Other options for presbyopia correction include allograft corneal inlays, trifocal synthetic corneal inlays, pharmacologic therapies, scleral incisions or additive techniques and PresbyLASIK. Presently, allograft inlays consist of corneal lenticules removed from patients undergoing Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). We will review corneal inlays and other alternative procedures that may provide effective and predictable treatments for patients with presbyopia.

Refractive corneal inlay implantation outcomes: a preliminary systematic review

PURPOSE

To review all case series of refractive corneal inlay implantation: Flexivue (Presbia, Netherlands), Invue (BioVision, Brügg, Switzerland) and Icolens (Neoptics, Hünenberg, Switzerland) performed in presbyopia patients and to evaluate the reported visual outcomes. In addition, our aim is to provide assessment for complications and to report the satisfaction rates.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were consulted using "refractive corneal inlay", "Flexivue Inlay", "Invue Inlay" and "Icolens inlay" as keywords. 147 articles were found, and they were assessed considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After filtering, this systemic review included ten articles, published between 2011 and 2020.

RESULTS

308 eyes from 308 participants were enrolled in this systematic review. Mean maximum follow-up was 13.9 months. Nine of the ten case series included used femtosecond laser for the corneal pocket creation. Mean pocket depth was 293.75 µm. 77.5% of the eyes reported a postoperative uncorrected near visual acuity of 20/32 or better, and 19.20% of the inlay-implanted eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. The most prominent complications were halos, pain, photophobia, and poor distance visual acuity. 27 eyes (8.7%) had to be explanted due to complications, such as near-distance spectacle dependence or blurred distance vision.

CONCLUSION

Refractive corneal inlay outcomes demonstrated high efficacy, safety, and satisfaction rates. Furthermore, it is a reversible technique. However, the findings must be viewed with caution due potential conflict of interest. Further research with higher sample size is needed to validate these findings.

A new trifocal corneal inlay for presbyopia

Corneal inlays (CIs) are the most recent surgical procedure for the treatment of presbyopia in patients who want complete independence from the use of glasses or contact lenses. Although refractive surgery in presbyopic patients is mostly performed in combination with cataract surgery, when the implantation of an intraocular lens is not necessary, the option of CIs has the advantage of being minimally invasive. Current designs of CIs are, either: small aperture devices, or refractive devices, however, both methods do not have good performance simultaneously at intermediate and near distances in eyes that are unable to accommodate. In the present study, we propose the first design of a trifocal CI, allowing good vision, at the same time, at far, intermediate and near vision in presbyopic eyes. We first demonstrate the good performance of the new inlay in comparison with a commercially available CI by using optical design software. We next confirm experimentally the image forming capabilities of our proposal employing an adaptive optics based optical simulator. This new design also has a number of parameters that can be varied to make personalized trifocal CI, opening up a new avenue for the treatment of presbyopia.