Vitrectomy combined with intravitreal antifungal therapy for posttraumatic fungal endophthalmitis in eastern China

Fungal Endophthalmitis: Clinical Characteristics, Pathogens, and Factors Affecting Visual Outcome

AIMS

The aims of this study are to investigate the etiology, microbiological spectrum, and risk factors associated with visual outcomes of fungal endophthalmitis (FE) in a tertiary eye specialty hospital in Shanghai, China.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center case series. The clinical characteristics, etiology, microbiological spectrum, and management, as well as the visual outcomes, were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors related to visual outcomes.

RESULTS

This study involved 102 eyes of 92 patients with FE, including 63 males (66.3%). The mean age was 44.4 ± 19.8 years. The most common etiology of FE was trauma (56.5%). The predominant fungal species isolated were Aspergillus spp. (31/93, 33.3%). Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and intravitreal antifungal agents was performed initially in 86 (84.3%) and 83 (81.4%) eyes, respectively. Only 35 (34.3%) eyes achieved final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/400 or better. Ten (9.8%) eyes had a final BCVA of light perception or worse, and five (4.9%) had to be enucleated. The factors determining better visual outcomes included initial visual acuity better than finger-counting (FC) (odds ratio (OR) 5.811, p = 0.036), the absence of corneal infiltrate (OR 10.131, p = 0.002), and Candida species infection (OR 6.325, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Early diagnosis of FE and a timely vitrectomy, combined with an intravitreal injection of an antifungal drug, can mitigate the devastating results of intraocular fungal infection. Not being infected by Aspergillus spp., an initial BCVA that was no worse than FC, and the absence of corneal involvement were related to better visual prognosis.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Intravitreal Injections of Voriconazole in the Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: A Systematic Review

Background: Fungus endophthalmitis is a rare and serious infection that is treated with systemic and topical antifungal drugs. There is no clear consensus on the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis with intravitreal injections (IVIs) of voriconazole. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature on IVIs of voriconazole for fungal endophthalmitis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the effectiveness and safety of IVIs of voriconazole in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis. We searched databases such as PubMed and Embase using the following search terms "Endophthalmitis" AND "Intravitreal Injections" AND "Voriconazole" with date limits of January 1, 1900, to December 31, 2022. We included all reports on humans, which described clinical outcomes of IVIs of voriconazole in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case series. A descriptive synthesis of the data was conducted with a pooling of data for interventions. Results: One RCT and 21 retrospective studies were analyzed in this review. In these reports, a wide range of heterogeneous treatment regimens was used, including IVI in combination with other drugs, systemic therapy in combination with other agents, and surgery. Combined with other treatments, intravitreal voriconazole results in a favorable anatomical and clinical cure that was well tolerated. Conclusions: Reports on IVIs of voriconazole for fungal endophthalmitis demonstrate a heterogeneous approach to treatment. Of these, IVIs of voriconazole in anatomical and clinical outcomes appeared to be highly effective, although more data on its safety are needed.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: An Update

In recent, large case series of fungal endophthalmitis (FE) that were published by Asian authors, the most frequent etiologic agents for all types of FE are molds (usually Aspergillus species, while Fusarium is the prevalent etiology in keratitis-related FE). Candida was the organism found in most cases of endogenous FE. However, we must keep in mind that prevalence of fungal species varies with the geographical area. Lately, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was increasingly used for the diagnosis of FE, allowing for very high diagnostic sensitivity, while the costs become more affordable with time. The most important shortcoming of PCR—the limited number of pathogens that can be simultaneously searched for—may be overcome by newer techniques, such as next-generation sequencing. There are even hopes of searching for genetic sequences that codify resistance to antifungals. We must not forget the potential of simpler tests (such as galactomannan and β-d-glucan) in orienting towards a diagnosis of FE. There are few reports about the use of newer antifungals in FE. Echinocandins have low penetration in the vitreous cavity, and may be of use in cases of fungal chorioretinitis (without vitritis), or injected intravitreally as an off-label, salvage therapy.