1
|
Corbo A, Tzeng JP, Scott S, Cheves E, Cope H, Peay H. Parent perspectives following newborn screening resulting in diagnoses of fragile X syndrome or fragile X premutation. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2024; 148:104719. [PMID: 38507982 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited cause of intellectual disability. Early Check, a voluntary newborn screening study, screened 18,833 newborns for FXS over ∼3 years. Exploring parental attitudes and perspectives can provide insight to the potential future acceptability of public health screening. METHODS AND PROCEDURES Mothers of infants who received a screen positive result for FXS (n = 6) or fragile X premutation (FXPM; n = 18) were interviewed about their perceptions and experiences. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS Mothers of children with FXS described utility in receiving information about their child, particularly to monitor for potential developmental issues and intervene early; overall mothers did not regret participating. Mothers reported various reactions to receiving the FXS or FXPM results including (1) stress and worry; (2) guilt; (3) sadness and disappointment; (4) neutrality, relief, and acceptance; and (5) confusion and uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Despite initial reactions such as sadness, stress, and worry, mothers found value in learning of their child's presymptomatic diagnosis of FXS, particularly the anticipated long-term benefits of early diagnosis to their child's health and wellbeing. Our results indicate that professionals returning positive newborn screening results should anticipate and prepare for reactions such as parental shock, guilt, sadness, and uncertainty. Genetic counseling and psychosocial support are critical to supporting families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson Corbo
- Center for Communication and Engagement Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Janice P Tzeng
- Center for Communication and Engagement Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Samantha Scott
- Genomics and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Emily Cheves
- Genomics and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Heidi Cope
- Genomics and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Holly Peay
- Genomics and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Minten T, Gold NB, Bick S, Adelson S, Gehlenborg N, Amendola LM, Boemer F, Coffey AJ, Encina N, Russell BE, Servais L, Sund KL, Tsipouras P, Bick D, Taft RJ, Green RC. Determining the characteristics of genetic disorders that predict inclusion in newborn genomic sequencing programs. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.03.24.24304797. [PMID: 38585998 PMCID: PMC10996735 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.24.24304797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Over 30 international research studies and commercial laboratories are exploring the use of genomic sequencing to screen apparently healthy newborns for genetic disorders. These programs have individualized processes for determining which genes and genetic disorders are queried and reported in newborns. We compared lists of genes from 26 research and commercial newborn screening programs and found substantial heterogeneity among the genes included. A total of 1,750 genes were included in at least one newborn genome sequencing program, but only 74 genes were included on >80% of gene lists, 16 of which are not associated with conditions on the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel. We used a linear regression model to explore factors related to the inclusion of individual genes across programs, finding that a high evidence base as well as treatment efficacy were two of the most important factors for inclusion. We applied a machine learning model to predict how suitable a gene is for newborn sequencing. As knowledge about and treatments for genetic disorders expand, this model provides a dynamic tool to reassess genes for newborn screening implementation. This study highlights the complex landscape of gene list curation among genomic newborn screening programs and proposes an empirical path forward for determining the genes and disorders of highest priority for newborn screening programs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kucera KS, Boyea BL, Migliore B, Potter SN, Robles VR, Kutsa O, Cope H, Okoniewski KC, Wheeler A, Rehder CW, Smith EC, Peay HL. Two years of newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy as a part of the statewide Early Check research program in North Carolina. Genet Med 2024; 26:101009. [PMID: 37864479 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.101009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Current and emerging treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) position DMD as a candidate condition for newborn screening (NBS). In anticipation of the nomination of DMD for universal NBS, we conducted a prospective study under the Early Check voluntary NBS research program in North Carolina, United States. METHODS We performed screening for creatine kinase-MM (CK-MM), a biomarker of muscle damage, on residual routine newborn dried blood spots (DBS) from participating newborns. Total creatine kinase testing and next generation sequencing of an 86-neuromuscular gene panel that included DMD were offered to parents of newborns who screened positive. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess effects of biological and demographic predictors on CK-MM levels in DBS. RESULTS We screened 13,354 newborns and identified 2 males with DMD. The provisional 1626 ng/mL cutoff was raised to 2032 ng/mL to improve specificity, and additional cutoffs (900 and 360 ng/mL) were implemented to improve sensitivity for older and low-birthweight newborns. CONCLUSION Population-scale screening for elevated CK-MM in DBS is a feasible approach to identify newborns with DMD. Inclusion of birthweight- and age-specific cutoffs, repeat creatine kinase testing after 72 hours of age, and DMD sequencing improve sensitivity and specificity of screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Oksana Kutsa
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC
| | - Heidi Cope
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC
| | | | - Anne Wheeler
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - Holly L Peay
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tarini BA, Atkins AE. The Krabbe Conundrum Is Really a Newborn Screening Conundrum. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177:1007-1008. [PMID: 37548985 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.2683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Beth A Tarini
- Center for Translational Research, Children's National Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Anne E Atkins
- Center for Translational Research, Children's National Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tassone F, Protic D, Allen EG, Archibald AD, Baud A, Brown TW, Budimirovic DB, Cohen J, Dufour B, Eiges R, Elvassore N, Gabis LV, Grudzien SJ, Hall DA, Hessl D, Hogan A, Hunter JE, Jin P, Jiraanont P, Klusek J, Kooy RF, Kraan CM, Laterza C, Lee A, Lipworth K, Losh M, Loesch D, Lozano R, Mailick MR, Manolopoulos A, Martinez-Cerdeno V, McLennan Y, Miller RM, Montanaro FAM, Mosconi MW, Potter SN, Raspa M, Rivera SM, Shelly K, Todd PK, Tutak K, Wang JY, Wheeler A, Winarni TI, Zafarullah M, Hagerman RJ. Insight and Recommendations for Fragile X-Premutation-Associated Conditions from the Fifth International Conference on FMR1 Premutation. Cells 2023; 12:2330. [PMID: 37759552 PMCID: PMC10529056 DOI: 10.3390/cells12182330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The premutation of the fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 (FMR1) gene is characterized by an expansion of the CGG trinucleotide repeats (55 to 200 CGGs) in the 5' untranslated region and increased levels of FMR1 mRNA. Molecular mechanisms leading to fragile X-premutation-associated conditions (FXPAC) include cotranscriptional R-loop formations, FMR1 mRNA toxicity through both RNA gelation into nuclear foci and sequestration of various CGG-repeat-binding proteins, and the repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN)-initiated translation of potentially toxic proteins. Such molecular mechanisms contribute to subsequent consequences, including mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal death. Clinically, premutation carriers may exhibit a wide range of symptoms and phenotypes. Any of the problems associated with the premutation can appropriately be called FXPAC. Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI), and fragile X-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (FXAND) can fall under FXPAC. Understanding the molecular and clinical aspects of the premutation of the FMR1 gene is crucial for the accurate diagnosis, genetic counseling, and appropriate management of affected individuals and families. This paper summarizes all the known problems associated with the premutation and documents the presentations and discussions that occurred at the International Premutation Conference, which took place in New Zealand in 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flora Tassone
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA;
- MIND Institute, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95817, USA; (B.D.); (D.H.); (V.M.-C.)
| | - Dragana Protic
- Department of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11129 Belgrade, Serbia;
- Fragile X Clinic, Special Hospital for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Neurology, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Emily Graves Allen
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; (E.G.A.); (P.J.); (K.S.)
| | - Alison D. Archibald
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Genomics in Society Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Anna Baud
- Department of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 6, 61-614 Poznan, Poland; (A.B.); (K.T.)
| | - Ted W. Brown
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
- Fragile X Association of Australia, Brookvale, NSW 2100, Australia;
- NYS Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, New York, NY 10314, USA
| | - Dejan B. Budimirovic
- Department of Psychiatry, Fragile X Clinic, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences-Child Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Jonathan Cohen
- Fragile X Alliance Clinic, Melbourne, VIC 3161, Australia;
| | - Brett Dufour
- MIND Institute, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95817, USA; (B.D.); (D.H.); (V.M.-C.)
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Shriners Hospitals for Children of Northern California, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA;
| | - Rachel Eiges
- Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Affiliated with the Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem 91031, Israel;
| | - Nicola Elvassore
- Veneto Institute of Molecular Medicine (VIMM), 35129 Padova, Italy; (N.E.); (C.L.)
- Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
| | - Lidia V. Gabis
- Keshet Autism Center Maccabi Wolfson, Holon 5822012, Israel;
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Samantha J. Grudzien
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, 4148 BSRB, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (S.J.G.); (P.K.T.)
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Deborah A. Hall
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - David Hessl
- MIND Institute, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95817, USA; (B.D.); (D.H.); (V.M.-C.)
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Abigail Hogan
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; (A.H.); (J.K.)
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; (J.E.H.); (S.N.P.); (M.R.); (A.W.)
| | - Peng Jin
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; (E.G.A.); (P.J.); (K.S.)
| | - Poonnada Jiraanont
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand;
| | - Jessica Klusek
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; (A.H.); (J.K.)
| | - R. Frank Kooy
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium;
| | - Claudine M. Kraan
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Diagnosis and Development, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Cecilia Laterza
- Veneto Institute of Molecular Medicine (VIMM), 35129 Padova, Italy; (N.E.); (C.L.)
- Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
| | - Andrea Lee
- Fragile X New Zealand, Nelson 7040, New Zealand;
| | - Karen Lipworth
- Fragile X Association of Australia, Brookvale, NSW 2100, Australia;
| | - Molly Losh
- Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60201, USA;
| | - Danuta Loesch
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia;
| | - Reymundo Lozano
- Departments of Genetics and Genomic Sciences and Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Marsha R. Mailick
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA;
| | - Apostolos Manolopoulos
- Intramural Research Program, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA;
| | - Veronica Martinez-Cerdeno
- MIND Institute, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95817, USA; (B.D.); (D.H.); (V.M.-C.)
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Shriners Hospitals for Children of Northern California, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA;
| | - Yingratana McLennan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Shriners Hospitals for Children of Northern California, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA;
| | | | - Federica Alice Maria Montanaro
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy;
- Department of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Matthew W. Mosconi
- Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA;
- Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
- Kansas Center for Autism Research and Training (K-CART), University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
| | - Sarah Nelson Potter
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; (J.E.H.); (S.N.P.); (M.R.); (A.W.)
| | - Melissa Raspa
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; (J.E.H.); (S.N.P.); (M.R.); (A.W.)
| | - Susan M. Rivera
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA;
| | - Katharine Shelly
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; (E.G.A.); (P.J.); (K.S.)
| | - Peter K. Todd
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, 4148 BSRB, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (S.J.G.); (P.K.T.)
- Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Healthcare, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - Katarzyna Tutak
- Department of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 6, 61-614 Poznan, Poland; (A.B.); (K.T.)
| | - Jun Yi Wang
- Center for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95618, USA;
| | - Anne Wheeler
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; (J.E.H.); (S.N.P.); (M.R.); (A.W.)
| | - Tri Indah Winarni
- Center for Biomedical Research (CEBIOR), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 502754, Central Java, Indonesia;
| | - Marwa Zafarullah
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA;
| | - Randi J. Hagerman
- MIND Institute, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95817, USA; (B.D.); (D.H.); (V.M.-C.)
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parisi MA, Caggana M, Cohen JL, Gold NB, Morris JA, Orsini JJ, Urv TK, Wasserstein MP. When is the best time to screen and evaluate for treatable genetic disorders?: A lifespan perspective. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS. PART C, SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2023; 193:44-55. [PMID: 36876995 PMCID: PMC10475244 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
This paper focuses on the question of, "When is the best time to identify an individual at risk for a treatable genetic condition?" In this review, we describe a framework for considering the optimal timing for pursuing genetic and genomic screening for treatable genetic conditions incorporating a lifespan approach. Utilizing the concept of a carousel that represents the four broad time periods when critical decisions might be made around genetic diagnoses during a person's lifetime, we describe genetic testing during the prenatal period, the newborn period, childhood, and adulthood. For each of these periods, we describe the objectives of genetic testing, the current status of screening or testing, the near-term vision for the future of genomic testing, the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, and the feasibility and ethical considerations of testing and treating. The notion of a "Genomics Passbook" is one where an early genomic screening evaluation could be performed on each individual through a public health program, with that data ultimately serving as a "living document" that could be queried and/or reanalyzed at prescribed times during the lifetime of that person, or in response to concerns about symptoms of a genetic disorder in that individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A Parisi
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Michele Caggana
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Division of Genetics, Albany, New York, USA
| | | | - Nina B Gold
- Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jill A Morris
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Joseph J Orsini
- New York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Tiina K Urv
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Melissa P Wasserstein
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wheeler AC, Okoniewski KC, Scott S, Edwards A, Cheves E, Turner-Brown L. Pilot protocol for the Parent and Infant Inter(X)action Intervention (PIXI) feasibility study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0270169. [PMID: 37141305 PMCID: PMC10159119 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper provides the detailed protocol for a pilot study testing the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a targeted two-phase, remotely delivered early intervention program for infants with neurogenetic conditions (NGC) and their caregivers. The Parent and Infant Inter(X)action Intervention (PIXI) is designed to support parents and infants with a NGC diagnosed in the first year of life. PIXI is implemented in two phases, with the first phase focusing on psychoeducation, parent support, and how to establish routines for supporting infant development. Phase II helps parents learn targeted skills to support their infant's development as symptoms may begin to emerge. The proposed non-randomized feasibility pilot study will establish the feasibility of a year-long virtually implemented intervention program to support new parents of an infant diagnosed with an NGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne C Wheeler
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | | | - Samantha Scott
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Anne Edwards
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Emily Cheves
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Lauren Turner-Brown
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peay HL, Gwaltney AY, Moultrie R, Cope H, Boyea BL, Porter KA, Duparc M, Alexander AA, Biesecker BB, Isiaq A, Check J, Gehtland L, Bailey DB, King NMP. Education and Consent for Population-Based DNA Screening: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Early Check Newborn Screening Pilot Study. Front Genet 2022; 13:891592. [PMID: 35646095 PMCID: PMC9133477 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.891592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
A challenge in implementing population-based DNA screening is providing sufficient information, that is, understandable and acceptable, and that supports informed decision making. Early Check is an expanded newborn screening study offered to mothers/guardians whose infants have standard newborn screening in North Carolina. We developed electronic education and consent to meet the objectives of feasibility, acceptability, trustworthiness, and supporting informed decisions. We used two methods to evaluate Early Check among mothers of participating infants who received normal results: an online survey and interviews conducted via telephone. Survey and interview domains included motivations for enrollment, acceptability of materials and processes, attitudes toward screening, knowledge recall, and trust. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and assessment of factors associated with knowledge recall and trust. Qualitative data were coded, and an inductive approach was used to identify themes across interviews. Survey respondents (n = 1,823) rated the following as the most important reasons for enrolling their infants: finding out if the baby has the conditions screened (43.0%), and that no additional blood samples were required (20.1%). Interview respondents (n = 24) reported the value of early knowledge, early intervention, and ease of participation as motivators. Survey respondents rated the study information as having high utility for decision making (mean 4.7 to 4.8 out of 5) and 98.2% agreed that they had sufficient information. Knowledge recall was relatively high (71.8–92.5% correct), as was trust in Early Check information (96.2% strongly agree/agree). Attitudes about Early Check screening were positive (mean 0.1 to 0.6 on a scale of 0–4, with lower scores indicating more positive attitudes) and participants did not regret participation (e.g., 98.6% strongly agreed/agreed Early Check was the right decision). Interview respondents further reported positive attitudes about Early Check materials and processes. Early Check provides a model for education and consent in large-scale DNA screening. We found evidence of high acceptability, trustworthiness and knowledge recall, and positive attitudes among respondents. Population-targeted programs need to uphold practices that result in accessible information for those from diverse backgrounds. Additional research on those who do not select screening, although ethically and practically challenging, is important to inform population-based DNA screening practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly L Peay
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Angela You Gwaltney
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Rebecca Moultrie
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Heidi Cope
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Beth Lincoln- Boyea
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Katherine Ackerman Porter
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Martin Duparc
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Amir A Alexander
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, United States
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Aminah Isiaq
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Jennifer Check
- Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Lisa Gehtland
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Donald B Bailey
- Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Unites States
| | - Nancy M P King
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Minear MA, Phillips MN, Kau A, Parisi MA. Newborn screening research sponsored by the NIH: From diagnostic paradigms to precision therapeutics. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS. PART C, SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS 2022; 190:138-152. [PMID: 36102292 PMCID: PMC10328555 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) is a successful public health initiative that effectively identifies pre-symptomatic neonates so that treatment can be initiated before the onset of irreversible morbidity and mortality. Legislation passed in 2008 has supported a system of state screening programs, educational resources, and an evidence-based review process to add conditions to a recommended universal newborn screening panel (RUSP). The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), NIH, has promoted NBS research to advance legislative goals by supporting research that will uncover fundamental mechanisms of disease, develop treatments for NBS disorders, and promote pilot studies to test implementation of new conditions. NICHD's partnerships with other federal agencies have contributed to activities that support nominations of new conditions to the RUSP. The NIH's Newborn Sequencing In Genomic Medicine and Public Health (NSIGHT) initiative funded research projects that considered how genomic sequencing could be integrated into NBS and its ethical ramifications. Recently, the workshop, "Gene Targeted Therapies: Early Diagnosis and Equitable Delivery," has explored the possibility of expanding NBS to include genetic diagnosis and precision, gene-based therapies. Although hurdles remain to realize such a vision, broad engagement of multiple stakeholders is essential to advance genomic medicine within NBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mollie A. Minear
- Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Megan N. Phillips
- Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Present address: Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alice Kau
- Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Melissa A. Parisi
- Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goddard KAB, Lee K, Buchanan AH, Powell BC, Hunter JE. Establishing the Medical Actionability of Genomic Variants. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2022; 23:173-192. [PMID: 35363504 PMCID: PMC10184682 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-111021-032401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Actionability is an important concept in medicine that does not have a well-accepted standard definition, nor is there a general consensus on how to establish it. Medical actionability is often conflated with clinical utility, a related but distinct concept. This lack of clarity contributes to practice variation and inconsistent coverage decisions in genomic medicine, leading to the potential for systematic bias in the use of evidence-based interventions. We clarify how medical actionability and clinical utility are distinct and then discuss the spectrum of actionability, including benefits for the person, the family, and society. We also describe applications across the life course, including prediction, diagnosis, and treatment. Current challenges in assessing the medical actionability of identified genomic variants include gaps in the evidence, limited contexts with practice guidelines, and subjective aspects of medical actionability. A standardized and authoritative assessment of medical actionability is critical to implementing genomic medicine in a fashion that improves population health outcomes and reduces health disparities. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, Volume 23 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA; .,Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; , .,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA; .,Genomics, Ethics, and Translational Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA;
| | - Kristy Lee
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA; .,Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; , .,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA; .,Genomics, Ethics, and Translational Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA;
| | - Adam H Buchanan
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA; .,Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; , .,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA; .,Genomics, Ethics, and Translational Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA;
| | - Bradford C Powell
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA; .,Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; , .,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA; .,Genomics, Ethics, and Translational Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA;
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA; .,Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; , .,Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA; .,Genomics, Ethics, and Translational Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Andrews SM, Porter KA, Bailey DB, Peay HL. Preparing newborn screening for the future: a collaborative stakeholder engagement exploring challenges and opportunities to modernizing the newborn screening system. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22:90. [PMID: 35151296 PMCID: PMC8840788 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-03035-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives Projections that 60 transformative cell and gene therapies could be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) within 10 years underscore an urgent need to modernize the newborn screening (NBS) system. This study convened expert stakeholders to assess challenges to the NBS system and propose solutions for its modernization. Methods NBS stakeholders (researchers, clinicians, state NBS leaders, advocates, industry professionals, and current/former advisory committee members) participated in one of five mixed-stakeholder panel discussions. Prior to panels, participants completed a survey in which they reviewed and ranked NBS challenges generated from relevant literature. During panels, participants deliberated on challenges and explored potential solutions. Pre-panel survey data were analyzed descriptively. Data from panel discussions were analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis. Results Median scores of the ranked challenges (1 = most important) reveal the top three most important barriers to address: critical missing data for NBS decision-making (Median = 2), burden on state NBS laboratories (Median = 3), and the amount of time required for state-level implementation of screening for new conditions (Median = 4). Panel discussions were rooted in recurring themes: the infant’s well-being should be the focal point; the transformative therapy pipeline, although undeniably positive for individuals with rare diseases, is a threat to NBS capacity; decisions about modernizing NBS should be evidence-based; additional financial support is required but not sufficient for modernization; and modernization will require participation of multiple NBS stakeholders. This final overarching theme is reported in depth, including expertise, coordination, and collaboration challenges facing NBS and novel approaches to oversight, partnership, and coordination that were suggested by participants. Conclusions This study engaged representatives from multiple stakeholder groups to generate potential solutions to challenges facing NBS in the United States. These solutions provide a rich starting point for policy makers and other stakeholders who desire to maximize the impact of new transformative therapies for babies, families, and society. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-021-03035-x.
Collapse
|
12
|
Gehtland LM, Paquin RS, Andrews SM, Lee AM, Gwaltney A, Duparc M, Pfaff ER, Bailey DB. Using a Patient Portal to Increase Enrollment in a Newborn Screening Research Study: Observational Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2022; 5:e30941. [PMID: 35142618 PMCID: PMC8874929 DOI: 10.2196/30941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many research studies fail to enroll enough research participants. Patient-facing electronic health record applications, known as patient portals, may be used to send research invitations to eligible patients. OBJECTIVE The first aim was to determine if receipt of a patient portal research recruitment invitation was associated with enrollment in a large ongoing study of newborns (Early Check). The second aim was to determine if there were differences in opening the patient portal research recruitment invitation and study enrollment by race and ethnicity, age, or rural/urban home address. METHODS We used a computable phenotype and queried the health care system's clinical data warehouse to identify women whose newborns would likely be eligible. Research recruitment invitations were sent through the women's patient portals. We conducted logistic regressions to test whether women enrolled their newborns after receipt of a patient portal invitation and whether there were differences by race and ethnicity, age, and rural/urban home address. RESULTS Research recruitment invitations were sent to 4510 women not yet enrolled through their patient portals between November 22, 2019, through March 5, 2020. Among women who received a patient portal invitation, 3.6% (161/4510) enrolled their newborns within 27 days. The odds of enrolling among women who opened the invitation was nearly 9 times the odds of enrolling among women who did not open their invitation (SE 3.24, OR 8.86, 95% CI 4.33-18.13; P<.001). On average, it took 3.92 days for women to enroll their newborn in the study, with 64% (97/161) enrolling their newborn within 1 day of opening the invitation. There were disparities by race and urbanicity in enrollment in the study after receipt of a patient portal research invitation but not by age. Black women were less likely to enroll their newborns than White women (SE 0.09, OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.55; P<.001), and women in urban zip codes were more likely to enroll their newborns than women in rural zip codes (SE 0.97, OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.62-5.67; P=.001). Black women (SE 0.05, OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.57-0.78; P<.001) and Hispanic women (SE 0.07, OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.89; P=.002) were less likely to open the research invitation compared to White women. CONCLUSIONS Patient portals are an effective way to recruit participants for research studies, but there are substantial racial and ethnic disparities and disparities by urban/rural status in the use of patient portals, the opening of a patient portal invitation, and enrollment in the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03655223; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03655223.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Gehtland
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Ryan S Paquin
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Sara M Andrews
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Adam M Lee
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Angela Gwaltney
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Martin Duparc
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Emily R Pfaff
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Donald B Bailey
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Migliore BA, Zhou L, Duparc M, Robles VR, Rehder CW, Peay HL, Kucera KS. Evaluation of the GSP Creatine Kinase-MM Assay and Assessment of CK-MM Stability in Newborn, Patient, and Contrived Dried Blood Spots for Newborn Screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Int J Neonatal Screen 2022; 8:ijns8010012. [PMID: 35225934 PMCID: PMC8883886 DOI: 10.3390/ijns8010012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a fatal X-linked disorder with a birth prevalence of 19.8:100,000 males worldwide. Elevated concentration of the muscle enzyme creatine kinase-MM (CK-MM) allows for presymptomatic screening of newborns using Dried Blood Spots (DBS). We evaluated imprecision and carryover of the FDA-approved PerkinElmer GSP Neonatal CK-MM kit over multiple runs, days, and operators, followed by quantification of CK-MM loss in stored newborn, contrived, and non-newborn patient DBS resulting from exposure to ambient versus low humidity (50-day trial), and high humidity and high temperature (8-day trial). Imprecision %CV was ≤14% for all verification comparisons and over 6 months of testing. On average, the mean CK-MM recovery after 50 days was >80% of initial concentration for all sample types stored in low humidity and <80% in ambient humidity. After 8 days of storage in high humidity and high temperature, the mean recovery for newborn samples was <80%. Verification results for the GSP Neonatal CK-MM assay were concordant with kit parameters and the assay performed consistently over 6 months. CK-MM degradation in ambient storage can be mitigated by reducing exposure to humidity. Assessment of DBS shipping and storage conditions is recommended prior to implementing DMD screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke A. Migliore
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA; (B.A.M.); (L.Z.); (M.D.); (V.R.R.); (H.L.P.)
| | - Linran Zhou
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA; (B.A.M.); (L.Z.); (M.D.); (V.R.R.); (H.L.P.)
| | - Martin Duparc
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA; (B.A.M.); (L.Z.); (M.D.); (V.R.R.); (H.L.P.)
| | - Veronica R. Robles
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA; (B.A.M.); (L.Z.); (M.D.); (V.R.R.); (H.L.P.)
| | | | - Holly L. Peay
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA; (B.A.M.); (L.Z.); (M.D.); (V.R.R.); (H.L.P.)
| | - Katerina S. Kucera
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA; (B.A.M.); (L.Z.); (M.D.); (V.R.R.); (H.L.P.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(919)-541-6000
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pesch MH, Muldoon KM. Congenital Cytomegalovirus Knowledge, Practices, and Beliefs Among Primary Care Physicians and Newborn Hospitalists. J Prim Care Community Health 2022; 13:21501319221106880. [PMID: 35758615 PMCID: PMC9244937 DOI: 10.1177/21501319221106880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) affects 1 in every 200 United States infants, at present there are 9 states which mandate newborn cCMV screening. With more infants being diagnosed, more children will need continuing care from providers who are knowledgeable about cCMV. OBJECTIVES To examine pediatric provider knowledge, practices, and beliefs around cCMV. METHODS Primary care and newborn hospitalist pediatricians (N = 103) from Michigan, who "regularly care for infants" were invited to participate in a survey about their cCMV-related knowledge, clinical practices, and beliefs. RESULTS Respondents had low knowledge of typical cCMV presentation and sequelae, with mixed knowledge of screening and testing standards. Most (68%) reported rarely/never screening for cCMV, though 71% strongly agreed/agreed that primary care providers should test for cCMV. Most (90%) strongly agreed/agreed that infants who fail/refer on their newborn hearing screen should be tested for cCMV, yet 81% expressed not being comfortable diagnosing and managing cCMV. Most (72%) felt that cCMV was not sufficiently covered in their medical training; almost all respondents endorsed interest in learning more. CONCLUSIONS Primary care and newborn hospitalists in this study expressed mixed knowledge about, infrequent practice of and low comfort with screening and caring for children with cCMV. This may present a prime opportunity for education and clinician support by professional organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan H Pesch
- University of Michigan and CS Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wheeler AC, Gwaltney A, Raspa M, Okoniewski KC, Berry-Kravis E, Botteron KN, Budimirovic D, Hazlett HC, Hessl D, Losh M, Martin GE, Rivera SM, Roberts JE, Bailey DB. Emergence of Developmental Delay in Infants and Toddlers With an FMR1 Mutation. Pediatrics 2021; 147:peds.2020-011528. [PMID: 33911031 PMCID: PMC8086007 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-011528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with FMR1 gene expansions are known to experience a range of developmental challenges, including fragile X syndrome. However, little is known about early development and symptom onset, information that is critical to guide earlier identification, more accurate prognoses, and improved treatment options. METHODS Data from 8 unique studies that used the Mullen Scales of Early Learning to assess children with an FMR1 gene expansion were combined to create a data set of 1178 observations of >500 young children. Linear mixed modeling was used to explore developmental trajectories, symptom onset, and unique developmental profiles of children <5 years of age. RESULTS Boys with an FMR1 gene full mutation showed delays in early learning, motor skills, and language development as young as 6 months of age, and both sexes with a full mutation were delayed on all developmental domains by their second birthday. Boys with a full mutation continued to gain skills over early childhood at around half the rate of their typically developing peers; girls with a full mutation showed growth at around three-quarters of the rate of their typically developing peers. Although children with a premutation were mostly typical in their developmental profiles and trajectories, mild but significant delays in fine motor skills by 18 months were detected. CONCLUSIONS Children with the FMR1 gene full mutation demonstrate significant developmental challenges within the first 2 years of life, suggesting that earlier identification is needed to facilitate earlier implementation of interventions and therapeutics to maximize effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne C. Wheeler
- Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Angela Gwaltney
- Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Melissa Raspa
- Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Kelly N. Botteron
- Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, School of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Heather Cody Hazlett
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - David Hessl
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MIND Institute, Sacramento, California
| | - Molly Losh
- School of Communication, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Gary E. Martin
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, St. John’s University, Staten Island, New York
| | - Susan M. Rivera
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MIND Institute, Sacramento, California;,Department of Psychology, College of Letters and Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; and
| | - Jane E. Roberts
- Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Donald B. Bailey
- Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
DeCristo DM, Milko LV, O'Daniel JM, Foreman AKM, Mollison LF, Powell BC, Powell CM, Berg JS. Actionability of commercial laboratory sequencing panels for newborn screening and the importance of transparency for parental decision-making. Genome Med 2021; 13:50. [PMID: 33781310 PMCID: PMC8008582 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00867-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Newborn screening aims to identify individual patients who could benefit from early management, treatment, and/or surveillance practices. As sequencing technologies have progressed and we move into the era of precision medicine, genomic sequencing has been introduced to this area with the hopes of detecting variants related to a vastly expanded number of conditions. Though implementation of genomic sequencing for newborn screening in public health and clinical settings is limited, commercial laboratories have begun to offer genomic screening panels for neonates. METHODS We examined genes listed on four commercial laboratory genomic screening panels for neonates and assessed their clinical actionability using an established age-based semi-quantitative metric to categorize them. We identified genes that were included on multiple panels or distinct between panels. RESULTS Three hundred and nine genes appeared on one or more commercial panels: 74 (23.9%) genes were included in all four commercial panels, 45 (14.6%) were on only three panels, 76 (24.6%) were on only two panels, and 114 (36.9%) genes were listed on only one of the four panels. Eighty-two genes (26.5%) listed on one or more panels were assessed by our method to be inappropriate for newborn screening and to require additional parental decision-making. Conversely, 249 genes that we previously identified as being highly actionable were not listed on any of the four commercial laboratory genomic screening panels. CONCLUSIONS Commercial neonatal genomic screening panels have heterogeneous content and may contain some conditions with lower actionability than would be expected for public health newborn screening; conversely, some conditions with higher actionability may be omitted from these panels. The lack of transparency about how conditions are selected suggests a need for greater detail about panel content in order for parents to make informed decisions. The nuanced activity of gene list selection for genomic screening should be iteratively refined with evidence-based approaches to provide maximal benefit and minimal harm to newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela M DeCristo
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Laura V Milko
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Julianne M O'Daniel
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Ann Katherine M Foreman
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Lonna F Mollison
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Bradford C Powell
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Cynthia M Powell
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetics and Metabolism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
A Voluntary Statewide Newborn Screening Pilot for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Results from Early Check. Int J Neonatal Screen 2021; 7:ijns7010020. [PMID: 33801060 PMCID: PMC8006221 DOI: 10.3390/ijns7010020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Prior to statewide newborn screening (NBS) for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in North Carolina, U.S.A., we offered voluntary screening through the Early Check (EC) research study. Here, we describe the EC experience from October 2018 through December 2020. We enrolled a total of 12,065 newborns and identified one newborn with 0 copies of SMN1 and two copies of SMN2, consistent with severe early onset of SMA. We also detected one false positive result, likely stemming from an unrelated blood disorder associated with a low white blood cell count. We evaluated the timing of NBS for babies enrolled prenatally (n = 932) and postnatally (n = 11,133) and reasons for delays in screening and reporting. Although prenatal enrollment led to faster return of results (median = 13 days after birth), results for babies enrolled postnatally were still available within a timeframe (median = 21 days after birth) that allowed the opportunity to receive essential treatment early in life. We evaluated an SMA q-PCR screening method at two separate time points, confirming the robustness of the assay. The pilot project provided important information about SMA screening in anticipation of forthcoming statewide expansion as part of regular NBS.
Collapse
|
18
|
Paquin RS, Lewis MA, Harper BA, Moultrie RR, Gwaltney A, Gehtland LM, Peay HL, Duparc M, Raspa M, Wheeler AC, Powell CM, King NMP, Shone SM, Bailey DB. Outreach to new mothers through direct mail and email: recruitment in the Early Check research study. Clin Transl Sci 2021; 14:880-889. [PMID: 33382929 PMCID: PMC8212727 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Meeting recruitment targets for clinical trials and health research studies is a notable challenge. Unsuccessful efforts to recruit participants from traditionally underserved populations can limit who benefits from scientific discovery, thus perpetuating inequities in health outcomes and access to care. In this study, we evaluated direct mail and email outreach campaigns designed to recruit women who gave birth in North Carolina for a statewide research study offering expanded newborn screening for a panel of rare health conditions. Of the 54,887 women who gave birth in North Carolina from September 28, 2018, through March 19, 2019, and were eligible to be included on the study’s contact lists, we had access to a mailing address for 97.9% and an email address for 6.3%. Rural women were less likely to have sufficient contact information available, but this amounted to less than a one percentage point difference by urbanicity. Native American women were less likely to have an email address on record; however, we did not find a similar disparity when recruitment using direct‐mail letters and postcards was concerned. Although we sent letters and emails in roughly equal proportion by urbanicity and race/ethnicity, we found significant differences in enrollment across demographic subgroups. Controlling for race/ethnicity and urbanicity, we found that direct‐mail letters and emails were effective recruitment methods. The enrollment rate among women who were sent a recruitment letter was 4.1%, and this rate increased to 5.0% among women who were also sent an email invitation. Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC?
Under‐representation by traditionally underserved populations in clinical trials and health research is a challenge that may in part reflect inequitable opportunities to participate.
WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS?
Are direct‐mail and email outreach strategies effective for reaching and recruiting women from traditionally underserved and rural populations to participate in large‐scale, population‐based research?
WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE?
Despite sending recruitment letters and email invitations in roughly equal proportion by urbanicity and race/ethnicity, women living in rural areas were less likely to enroll (2.8%) than women from urban areas (4.2%). Additionally, enrollment rates decreased as the probability that women were members of a racial or ethnic minority group increased.
HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE?
Results from this study might encourage researchers to take a holistic and participant‐centered view of barriers to study enrollment that may disproportionately affect underserved communities, including differences in willingness to participate, trust, and access to resources needed for uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S Paquin
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Megan A Lewis
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Blake A Harper
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Angela Gwaltney
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa M Gehtland
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Holly L Peay
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Martin Duparc
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melissa Raspa
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne C Wheeler
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Cynthia M Powell
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nancy M P King
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Scott M Shone
- North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Donald B Bailey
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Esquerda M, Palau F, Lorenzo D, Cambra FJ, Bofarull M, Cusi V, Interdisciplinar En Bioetica G. Ethical questions concerning newborn genetic screening. Clin Genet 2020; 99:93-98. [PMID: 32779199 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Newborn screening is a public health strategy used to identify certain diseases in the first days of life and, therefore, facilitate early treatment before the onset of symptoms. The decision of which diseases should be included in a screening goes beyond the medical perspective, including reasons for public health and health economics. There are a number of characteristics to include a disease in the screening, such as that the disorder must be a significant health problem, the natural history of the disease must be well known, a feasible and accurate test must be available, there must be a treatment that is most effective when applied before the onset of clinical symptoms and a health system must be in place that is capable of performing the procedure and subsequent monitoring. Currently, newborn screening programs are currently based on the use of biochemical markers that detect metabolites, hormones or proteins, but recently, the availability of new technology has allowed the possibility of a genetic screening. In addition to technical problems, the possibility of neonatal screening also presents a number of ethical problems. We identified and discussed six areas of particular concern: type of illness, overdiagnosis or overtreatment, information management and informed consent, data confidentiality and protection, justice and legal regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Montserrat Esquerda
- Institut Borja de Bioètica (Universitat Ramon LIuII); Universitat de Lleida - Facultat de Medicina, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Palau
- Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain.,Fundacion Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Lorenzo
- Institut Borja de Bioètica (Universitat Ramon LIuII); Sant Joan de Deu School of Nursing, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Jose Cambra
- Institut Borja de Bioètica (Universitat Ramon LIuII); Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Victoria Cusi
- Institut Borja de Bioètica (Universitat Ramon LIuII), Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|