Antenatal and postnatal diagnoses of visible congenital malformations in a sub-Saharan African setting: a prospective multicenter cohort study

Screening methods for congenital anomalies in low and lower-middle income countries: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Surgically correctable congenital anomalies are responsible for a significant burden of morbidity and mortality in children from low-and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Early identification through fetal and neonatal screening is critical to reducing death and disability. This study aims to identify feasible screening methods for surgically correctable congenital anomalies in LMICs.

METHODS

A systematic search looking at screening for congenital anomalies in LMIC was conducted in seven databases from 2000 until May 25, 2020, with no language restriction. All articles discussing screening methods for surgically correctable congenital anomalies in LMICs were included. Articles were screened by two independent contributors using Rayyan software, with a third contributor resolving conflicts. Feasibility of the screening method and its risk of bias were assessed using the MINORS scale.

RESULTS

Of 3473 articles, 24 were included in the full-text review. Nine screening methods (three prenatal and six postnatal) were identified - the most frequently utilized being physician clinical examination (45.8%), pulse oximetry (33.3%) and fetal ultrasound (20.8%). The use of a birth defect picture toolkit was the most feasible screening method. The risk of bias scale yielded an average of 11.9 points, which corresponds to a moderate level of bias.

CONCLUSION

Despite clear benefits, prenatal and neonatal screening methods are infrequently used in LMICs to identify surgically correctable congenital anomalies in neonates, likely due to financial, material, and human resource constraints. Further research into the development of low-cost feasible methods is needed within these settings.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020192051.

TYPE OF STUDY

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Regional variations and socio-economic disparities in neonatal mortality in Angola: a cross-sectional study using demographic and health surveys

BACKGROUND

Inequalities in neonatal mortality rates (NMRs) in low- and middle-income countries show key disparities at the detriment of disadvantaged population subgroups. There is a lack of scholarly evidence on the extent and reasons for the inequalities in NMRs in Angola.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the socio-economic, place of residence, region and gender inequalities in the NMRs in Angola.

METHODS

The World Health Organization Health Equity Assessment Toolkit software was used to analyse data from the 2015 Angola Demographic and Health Survey. Five equity stratifiers: subnational regions, education, wealth, residence and sex were used to disaggregate NMR inequality. Absolute and relative inequality measures, namely, difference, population attributable fraction (PAF), population attributable risk (PAR) and ratio, were calculated to provide a broader understanding of the inequalities in NMR. Statistical significance was calculated at corresponding 95% uncertainty intervals.

FINDINGS

We found significant wealth-driven [PAR = -14.16, 95% corresponding interval (CI): -15.12, -13.19], education-related (PAF = -22.5%, 95% CI: -25.93, -19.23), urban-rural (PAF = -14.5%, 95% CI: -16.38, -12.74), sex-based (PAR = -5.6%, 95% CI: -6.17, -5.10) and subnational regional (PAF = -82.2%, 95% CI: -90.14, -74.41) disparities in NMRs, with higher burden among deprived population subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

High NMRs were found among male neonates and those born to mothers with no formal education, poor mothers and those living in rural areas and the Benguela region. Interventions aimed at reducing NMRs, should be designed with specific focus on disadvantaged subpopulations.