Provision of physical activity advice for patients with chronic diseases in Shenzhen, China

Prevalence of physical activity counseling in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This systematic review aimed to summarize and evaluate the prevalence of physical activity (PA) counseling in primary care.

Methods

Five databases (CINAHL Complete, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) were searched. Primary epidemiological studies on PA counseling in primary care were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data was used to assess the quality of studies. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021284570).

Results

After duplicate removal, 4990 articles were screened, and 120 full-text articles were then assessed. Forty studies were included, with quality assessment scores ranging from 5/9 to 9/9. The pooled prevalence of PA counseling based on 35 studies (199830 participants) was 37.9% (95% CI 31.2 to 44.6). The subgroup analyses showed that the prevalence of PA counseling was 33.1% (95% CI: 22.6 to 43.7) in females (10 studies), 32.1% (95% CI: 22.6 to 41.7) in males (10 studies), 65.5% (95% CI: 5.70 to 74.1) in people with diabetes mellitus (6 studies), 41.6% (95% CI: 34.9 to 48.3) in people with hypertension (5 studies), and 56.8% (95% CI: 31.7 to 82.0) in people with overweight or obesity (5 studies). All meta-analyses showed high levels of heterogeneity (I2=93% to 100%).

Conclusion

The overall prevalence of PA counseling in primary care was low. The high levels of heterogeneity suggest variability in the perspectives and practices of PA counseling in primary care. PA counseling should be standardized to ensure its optimum effectiveness in primary care.

Factors associated with physical activity promotion efforts in individuals with chronic diseases: A systematic review from the perspective of patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine factors associated with healthcare provider physical activity (PA) promotion in individuals with chronic diseases from the perspective of patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was conducted between March and April 2022 by searching five databases. Studies were included if they used survey data, published in English or Chinese, and investigated factors influencing healthcare provider PA promotion in chronic diseases from the perspective of adult patients. Retrieved factors were extracted and mapped to Anderson's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Quality of each study was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles were included for final analysis. The quality of the included studies ranged from fair to good. A series of factors were positively related to healthcare provider PA promotion (e.g., having emotional support or public programs for PA). Conflicting results were found for other factors (e.g., age and gender).

CONCLUSIONS

A series of factors may impact the incorporation of PA promotion into clinical care. More studies with well-designed surveys using primary data collection are suggested to confirm these findings.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Factors identified from this review provide insights for developing of strategies related to healthcare provider PA promotion for individuals with chronic diseases.