A retrospective analysis of risk factors for massive hemoptysis in patients with bronchiectasis

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting hemoptysis recurrence in cystic bronchiectasis patients following bronchial artery embolization

Background

Hemoptysis is a life-threatening manifestation frequently observed in patients with cystic bronchiectasis (CB), a radiologically defined subtype of bronchiectasis. Bronchial artery embolization (BAE) is widely employed as an effective interventional therapy for controlling hemoptysis. Despite its clinical utility, the risk of recurrence remains high, particularly in patients with CB. Currently, no reliable predictive model specifically targeting CB-related hemoptysis recurrence following BAE has been established, highlighting the need for a tailored prognostic tool in this population.

Objective

This study aimed to develop and validate a model to predict the recurrence of hemoptysis in CB patients following BAE, enabling individualized clinical management and prevention strategies.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 111 CB patients who underwent BAE between January 2015 and June 2020. Clinical, radiological, and laboratory data were collected for analysis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was applied to identify relevant predictive variables, followed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to determine independent prognostic factors. Based on these predictors, a nomogram was constructed. Its performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Five independent predictors were identified: history of hemoptysis (HR = 3.42, 95% CI: 1.64-7.12, p = 0.001), diabetes (HR = 15.0, 95% CI: 4.69-48.1, p < 0.001), pleural thickening (HR = 3.78, 95% CI: 1.07-13.4, p = 0.039), prolonged hospitalization (HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.08-3.67, p = 0.028), and positive sputum culture (HR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.26-4.19, p = 0.007). The nomogram showed good discriminatory ability, with AUCs of 0.778, 0.797, and 0.829 at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-ups, respectively. The integrated Brier score was 0.147, reflecting good overall accuracy. Time-dependent AUC and C-index curves further confirmed the model's prognostic robustness. Calibration plots demonstrated close agreement between predicted and observed recurrence, and decision curve analysis indicated favorable clinical utility. Recurrence-free time was significantly shorter in the high-risk group (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The nomogram is a reliable tool for predicting hemoptysis recurrence in CB patients after BAE. It facilitates early identification of high-risk patients, enabling timely, targeted interventions and improved outcomes.

Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolation is an independent risk factor for recurrent hemoptysis after bronchial artery embolization in patients with idiopathic bronchiectasis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is a lack of research on multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) isolation in bronchiectasis-related hemoptysis. The aim of this study to analyze the risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis following bronchial artery embolization (BAE) and compare the recurrent hemoptysis-free rates between MDR-PA, non-MDR-PA, and non-PA isolation.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of patients diagnosed with idiopathic bronchiectasis-related recurrent hemoptysis who underwent BAE at an university-affiliated hospital. Patients were categorized based on PA susceptibility tests into non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were conducted to identify independent risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis. The Kaplan-Meier curves was conducted to compare recurrent hemoptysis-free rates after BAE for non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA.

RESULTS

A total of 432 patients were included. 181 (41.90%) patients experienced recurrent hemoptysis during a median follow-up period of 25 months. MDR-PA isolation (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.120; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.249, 3.597], p = 0.005) was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrent hemoptysis. Antibiotic treatment (aHR 0.666; 95% CI [0.476, 0.932], p = 0.018) reduced the risk of recurrent hemoptysis. The cumulative recurrent hemoptysis-free rates for non-PA, non-MDR-PA, and MDR-PA were as follows: at 3 months, 88.96%, 88.24%, and 75.86%, respectively; at 1 year, 73.13%, 69.10%, and 51.72%; and at 3 years, 61.91%, 51.69%, and 41.10% (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

MDR-PA isolation was an independent risk factor of recurrent hemoptysis post-BAE. Reducing the occurrence of MDR-PA may effectively decrease the recurrence rates of hemoptysis.

The efficacy and safety of combined therapy with endobronchial tamponade and bronchial artery embolization for massive hemoptysis

BACKGROUND

Massive hemoptysis is characterized by its life-threatening nature, potentially leading to airway obstruction and asphyxia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of combining endobronchial tamponade with bronchial artery embolization (BAE) in the treatment of massive hemoptysis.

METHODS

Between March 2018 and March 2022, a total of 67 patients with massive hemoptysis who underwent BAE were divided into two groups: the combination group (n = 26) and the BAE group (n = 41). Technical and clinical success rates were assessed, and adverse events were monitored following the treatment. Blood gas analysis and coagulation function indicators were collected before and after the treatment, and recurrence and survival rates were recorded during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

All patients achieved technical success. There were no significant differences in the clinical success rate, recurrence rates at 3 and 6 months, and mortality rates at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year between the combination group and the BAE group. However, the hemoptysis recurrence rate at 1 year was significantly lower in the combination group compared to the BAE group (15.4% vs. 39.0%, P = 0.039). No serious adverse events were reported in either group. After treatment, the combination group showed higher levels of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), fibrinogen (FIB), and D-dimer (D-D) compared to the BAE group (P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between combined therapy and hemoptysis-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy, compared to embolization alone, exhibits superior efficacy in improving respiratory function, correcting hypoxia, stopping bleeding, and preventing recurrence. It is considered an effective and safe treatment for massive hemoptysis.

Bronchiectasis in Asia: a review of current status and challenges

Recent bronchiectasis studies from large-scale multinational, multicentre registries have demonstrated that the characteristics of the disease vary according to geographic region. However, most perspectives on bronchiectasis are dominated by data from Western countries. This review intends to provide an Asian perspective on the disease, focusing on the established registries in India, Korea and China. Asian patients with bronchiectasis are less likely to show female predominance and experience exacerbations, are more likely to be younger, have milder disease, and have fewer options for guideline-recommended treatment than those living in other global regions. Furthermore, Asian bronchiectasis patients demonstrate different comorbidities, microbiological profiles and unique endophenotypes, including post-tuberculosis and dry bronchiectasis. Notably, each Asian region reveals further geographic variations and inter-patient differences. Future studies are warranted to better characterise Asian patients with bronchiectasis.

A Case of New-Onset Atrial Tachyarrhythmias With Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Bronchiectasis in a Very Elderly Patient: A Therapeutic Dilemma

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a primary myocardial disease that is genetically transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait. Even apical HCM (ApHCM) induces atrial fibrillation (AF) based on underlying left ventricle (LV) diastolic dysfunction, where anticoagulation therapy is recommended. However, anticoagulation for AF in patients at high risk of bleeding is a double-edged sword. A 98-year-old woman living in a nursing home presented to our hospital with sudden-onset dyspnea and palpitation persisting for two hours. The patient had a history of apical HCM and bronchiectasis. An electrocardiogram showed a regular tachycardia with a heart rate of 130 bpm, suggesting atrial flutter with 2:1 atrioventricular conduction. Intravenous verapamil (5 mg) resulted in the conversion into AF, and subsequent cibenzoline (70 mg) failed to restore sinus rhythm. Given the impossibility of continuous anticoagulation, electrical cardioversion was planned. Electrical cardioversion was successful in converting AF into sinus rhythm. Given the very high risk of hemoptysis, anticoagulation was avoided. This case gives an insight into how to manage a practical therapeutic problem, which is the coexistence of AF and bronchiectasis. A variety of individual factors should be considered for clinical decision-making and management of patients with concomitant HCM and AF.

Which Is the Best Way to Treat Massive Hemoptysis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

INTRODUCTION

Hemoptysis is one of the most common symptoms of respiratory system diseases. Common causes include bronchiectasis, tumors, tuberculosis, aspergilloma, and cystic fibrosis. The severity of hemoptysis varies from mild to moderate to massive hemoptysis and can easily lead to hemodynamic instability and death from suffocation or shock. Nevertheless, the most threatening hemoptysis that is presented to the emergency department and requires hospitalization is the massive one. In these cases, today, the most common way to manage hemoptysis is bronchial artery embolization (BAE).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus from January 2017 (with the aim of selecting the newest possible reports in the literature) until May 2023 for studies reporting massive hemoptysis. All studies that included technical and clinical success rates of hemoptysis management, as well as rebleeding and mortality rates, were included. A proportional meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 30 studies included in this systematic review, 26 used bronchial artery embolization as a means of treating hemoptysis, with very high levels of both technical and clinical success (greater than 73.7% and 84.2%, respectively). However, in cases where it was not possible to use bronchial artery embolization, alternative methods were used, such as dual-vessel intervention (80% technical success rate and 66.7% clinical success rate), customized endobronchial silicone blockers (92.3% technical success rate and 92.3% clinical success rate), antifibrinolytic agents (50% clinical success rate), and percutaneous transthoracic embolization (93.1% technical success rate and 88.9% clinical success rate), which all had high success rates apart from antifibrinolytic agents. Of the 2467 patients included in these studies, 341 experienced rebleeding during the follow-up period, while 354 other complications occurred, including chest discomfort, fever, dysphagia, and paresis. A total of 89 patients died after an episode of massive hemoptysis or during the follow-up period. The results of the meta-analysis showed a pooled technical success of bronchial artery embolization equal to 97.22% and a pooled clinical success equal to 92.46%. The pooled recurrence was calculated to be 21.46%, while the mortality was 3.5%. These results confirm the ability of bronchial artery embolization in the treatment of massive hemoptysis but also emphasize the high rate of recurrence following the intervention, as well as the risk of death.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, massive hemoptysis can be treated with great clinical and technical success using bronchial artery embolization, reducing mortality. Mortality has now been reduced to a small percentage of cases.

Which Is the Best Way to Treat Massive Hemoptysis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Introduction: Hemoptysis is one of the most common symptoms of respiratory system diseases. Common causes include bronchiectasis, tumors, tuberculosis, aspergilloma, and cystic fibrosis. The severity of hemoptysis varies from mild to moderate to massive hemoptysis and can easily lead to hemodynamic instability and death from suffocation or shock. Nevertheless, the most threatening hemoptysis that is presented to the emergency department and requires hospitalization is the massive one. In these cases, today, the most common way to manage hemoptysis is bronchial artery embolization (BAE). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus from January 2017 (with the aim of selecting the newest possible reports in the literature) until May 2023 for studies reporting massive hemoptysis. All studies that included technical and clinical success rates of hemoptysis management, as well as rebleeding and mortality rates, were included. A proportional meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. Results: Of the 30 studies included in this systematic review, 26 used bronchial artery embolization as a means of treating hemoptysis, with very high levels of both technical and clinical success (greater than 73.7% and 84.2%, respectively). However, in cases where it was not possible to use bronchial artery embolization, alternative methods were used, such as dual-vessel intervention (80% technical success rate and 66.7% clinical success rate), customized endobronchial silicone blockers (92.3% technical success rate and 92.3% clinical success rate), antifibrinolytic agents (50% clinical success rate), and percutaneous transthoracic embolization (93.1% technical success rate and 88.9% clinical success rate), which all had high success rates apart from antifibrinolytic agents. Of the 2467 patients included in these studies, 341 experienced rebleeding during the follow-up period, while 354 other complications occurred, including chest discomfort, fever, dysphagia, and paresis. A total of 89 patients died after an episode of massive hemoptysis or during the follow-up period. The results of the meta-analysis showed a pooled technical success of bronchial artery embolization equal to 97.22% and a pooled clinical success equal to 92.46%. The pooled recurrence was calculated to be 21.46%, while the mortality was 3.5%. These results confirm the ability of bronchial artery embolization in the treatment of massive hemoptysis but also emphasize the high rate of recurrence following the intervention, as well as the risk of death. Conclusion: In conclusion, massive hemoptysis can be treated with great clinical and technical success using bronchial artery embolization, reducing mortality. Mortality has now been reduced to a small percentage of cases.