Association between braced curve behavior by pubertal growth peak and bracing effectiveness in female idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal cohort study

The Utility of a Novel Proximal Femur Maturity Index for Staging Skeletal Growth in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

For growing patients, it is ideal to have a growth plate visible in routine radiographs for skeletal maturity assessment without additional radiation. The proximal femoral epiphyseal ossification is in proximity to the spine; however, whether it can be used for assessing a patient's growth status remains unknown.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty sets of radiographs of the spine and the left hand and wrist of patients with idiopathic scoliosis were assessed for skeletal maturity and reliability testing. Risser staging, Sanders staging (SS), distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification, the proximal humeral ossification system (PHOS), and the novel proximal femur maturity index (PFMI) were used. The PFMI was newly developed on the basis of the radiographic appearances of the femoral head, greater trochanter, and triradiate cartilage. It consists of 7 grades (0 to 6) associated with increasing skeletal maturity. The PFMI was evaluated through its relationship with pubertal growth (i.e., the rate of changes of standing and sitting body height [BH] and arm span [AS]) and with established skeletal maturity indices. Longitudinal growth data and 780 corresponding spine radiographs were assessed to detect peak growth using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The PFMI was found to be correlated with chronological age (τ b = 0.522), growth rates based on standing BH (τ b = -0.303), and AS (τ b = -0.266) (p < 0.001 for all). The largest growth rate occurred at PFMI grade 3, with mean standing BH growth rates (and standard deviations) of 0.79 ± 0.44 cm/month for girls and 1.06 ± 0.67 cm/mo for boys. Growth rates of 0.12 ± 0.23 cm/mo (girls) and 0 ± 0 cm/mo (boys) occurred at PFMI grade 6, indicating growth cessation. Strong correlations were found between PFMI gradings and Risser staging (τ b = 0.743 and 0.774 for girls and boys), Sanders staging (τ b = 0.722 and 0.736, respectively), and radius (τ b = 0.792 and 0.820) and ulnar gradings (τ b = 0.777 and 0.821), and moderate correlations were found with PHOS stages (τ b = 0.613 and 0.675) (p < 0.001 for all). PFMI gradings corresponded to as young as SS1, R4, U1, and PHOS stage 1. Fair to excellent interrater and intrarater reliabilities were observed. PFMI grade 3 was most prevalent and predictive for peak growth based on ROC results.

CONCLUSIONS

The PFMI demonstrated clear pubertal growth phases with satisfactory reliability. Grade 3 indicates peak growth and grade 6 indicates growth cessation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of PFMI can benefit patients by avoiding additional radiation in skeletal maturity assessment and can impact current clinical protocol of patient visits. PFMI gradings had strong correlations with SS, DRU gradings, and Risser staging, and they cross-referenced to their established grades at peak growth and growth cessation. PFMI may aid in clinical decision making.

How to Select the Lower Instrumented Vertebra in Traditional Growing Rods Index Surgery

BACKGROUND

There are still no consensus criteria on how to select the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) for traditional growing rods (TGRs) at index surgery. The aim was to evaluate whether the criteria used for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis fusion adapts to early onset scoliosis (EOS).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively longitudinal collected data in a consecutive cohort of patients with EOS treated with TGR, expanding from index surgery to 2 years after graduation. The LIV was analyzed regarding its relation to the stable vertebra (SV), substantially touched vertebra (STV), and not STV (NSTV). Failure of LIV selection was considered when revision surgery with distal extension was needed during follow up, due to adding on (ΔLIV tilt > 10°).

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 8.6 ± 3 (at index surgery), 15.1 ± 1.8 (at graduation), and 17.8 ± 1.6 (at final follow up). The most frequent LIV at index surgery was L3 (13/25); in 13 cases, STV was selected as LIV; in 7, it was NSTV; and in 5, SV on the standard postero-anterior radiographs. During follow up, a significant increase in the mean LIV tilt (P = .049) and distal junctional angle (P = .017) was found. Nine of the 25 patients (36%) developed adding on: 20% (1/5) of those with LIV at SV, 38.5% (5/13) at STV, and 42.8% (3/7) at NSTV. Of those 9 cases of adding on, only four needed distal extension (mean LIV tilt = 17.6°): 2 STV patients (15.4%), and 2 NSTV patients (28.6%). None of the patients with the LIV chosen at SV needed distal extension due to adding on.

CONCLUSIONS

The more cranial the selection of the LIV above the SV, the higher the risk of adding on and of revision surgery with distal extension during follow up. Saving motion segments could be justified by choosing STV as LIV because the need for distal extension is not high, and it can be scheduled during lengthening procedures or at graduation surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Choosing the correct LIV in TGR index surgery is crucial to have a secure distal foundation, control and correct the deformity during growth, and save distal segments to allow growth and mobility.