Correlation analysis between the magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty: a prospective cohort study

Appropriate Use Criteria for Osteoporotic Compression Fractures

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There is a lack of consensus regarding optimal indications for treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. An opportunity exists to improve outcomes if these indications can be clarified.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the North American Spine Society (NASS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) was to determine the appropriate (i.e. reasonable) multidisciplinary treatment recommendations for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures across a spectrum of more common clinical scenarios.

STUDY DESIGN

A Modified Delphi process.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Modified consensus based guideline OUTCOME MEASURES: Final rating for treatment recommendations as either "Appropriate", "Uncertain", or "Rarely Appropriate" based on the median final rating among the raters.

METHODS

The methodology was based on the AUC development process established by the Research AND Development (RAND) Corporation. The topic of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture was selected by NASS for its Clinical Practice Guideline development (CPG). In conjunction, the AUC committee determined key modifiers and adapted the standard definitions developed by the CPG with minimal modifications. A literature search and evidence analysis performed by the CPG were reviewed by the AUC work group. A separate multidisciplinary rating group was assembled. Clinical scenarios were generated based on a matrix of the modifiers, to rate the appropriateness of medical management, cement augmentation, or surgery. Based on the literature, provider experience, and group discussion, each scenario was scored on a nine-point scale on two separate occasions: once without discussion and again following discussion of the initial responses. The median rating for each scenario and level of agreement was then used to determine final indications as rarely appropriate with agreement (1 - 3), uncertain or disagreement (4-6), or appropriate with agreement (7-9). Consensus was not mandatory.

RESULTS

Medical management was appropriate across all scenarios. Cement augmentation was rarely appropriate in 60% of scenarios and uncertain or disagreement in 35% of scenarios. In the 5% of scenarios rated as appropriate with agreement for cement augmentation, high pain scores, acute duration, and simple fracture pattern were always present. Surgery was appropriate in 35% of scenarios and strongly influenced by instability and stenosis with neurological findings. Surgery was rarely appropriate in 18%, and uncertain or disagreement in 47% of scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary appropriate treatment criteria for osteoporotic vertebral fractures were generated based on the RAND methodology. This document provides comprehensive evidence-based recommendations for evaluation and treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The document in its entirety will be found on the NASS website (https://www.spine.org/Research-Clinical-Care/Quality-Improvement/Appropriate-Use-Criteria).

Guideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The North American Spine Society's (NASS) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures features evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating adult patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The guideline is intended to reflect contemporary treatment concepts for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures as reflected in the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of September 2020.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the guideline is to provide an evidence-based educational tool to assist spine specialists when making clinical decisions for adult patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. This article provides a brief summary of the evidence-based guideline recommendations for diagnosing and treating patients with this condition.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a guideline summary review.

METHODS

This guideline is the product of NASS' Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. The methods used to develop this guideline are detailed in the complete guideline and technical report available on the NASS website. In brief, a multidisciplinary work group of spine care specialists convened to identify clinical questions to address in the guideline. The literature search strategy was developed in consultation with a medical librarian. Upon completion of the systematic literature search, evidence relevant to the clinical questions posed in the guideline was reviewed. Work group members utilized NASS evidentiary table templates to summarize study conclusions, identify study strengths and weaknesses, and assign levels of evidence. Work group members participated in recommendation meetings to update and formulate evidence-based recommendations and incorporate expert opinion when necessary. The draft guideline was submitted to an internal and external peer review process and ultimately approved by the NASS Board of Directors.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine clinical questions were addressed, and the answers are summarized in this article. The respective recommendations were graded according to the levels of evidence of the supporting literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence-based clinical guideline has been created using techniques of evidence-based medicine and best available evidence to aid practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, literature search parameters, literature attrition flowchart, suggestions for future research, and all of the references, is available electronically on the NASS website at http://www.spine.org/guidelines.

Effect of different cement distribution in bilateral and unilateral Percutaneous vertebro plasty on the clinical efficacy of vertebral compression fractures

BACKGROUND

The ramifications of osteoporotic fractures and their subsequent complications are becoming progressively detrimental for the elderly population. This study evaluates the clinical ramifications of postoperative bone cement distribution in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) who underwent both bilateral and unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty (PVP).

OBJECTIVE

The research aims to discern the influence of bone cement distribution on the clinical outcomes of both bilateral and unilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty. The overarching intention is to foster efficacious preventive and therapeutic strategies to mitigate postoperative vertebral fractures and thereby enhance surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive evaluation was undertaken on 139 patients who received either bilateral or unilateral PVP in our institution between January 2018 and March 2022. These patients were systematically classified into three distinct groups: unilateral PVP (n = 87), bilateral PVP with a connected modality (n = 29), and bilateral PVP with a disconnected modality (n = 23). Several operational metrics were juxtaposed across these cohorts, encapsulating operative duration, aggregate hospital expenses, bone cement administration metrics, VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) scores, ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) scores relative to lumbar discomfort, postoperative vertebral height restitution rates, and the status of the traumatized and adjacent vertebral bodies. Preliminary findings indicated that the VAS scores for the January and December cohorts were considerably reduced compared to the unilateral PVP group (P = 0.015, 0.032). Furthermore, the recurrence of fractures in the affected and adjacent vertebral structures was more pronounced in the unilateral PVP cohort compared to the bilateral PVP cohorts. The duration of the procedure (P = 0.000) and the overall hospitalization expenses for the unilateral PVP group were markedly lesser than for both the connected and disconnected bilateral PVP groups, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.015, P = 0.024, respectively). Nevertheless, other parameters, such as the volume of cement infused, incidence of cement spillage, ODI scores for lumbar discomfort, post-surgical vertebral height restitution rate, localized vertebral kyphosis, and the alignment of cement and endplate, did not exhibit significant statistical deviations (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In juxtaposition with unilateral PVP, the employment of bilateral PVP exhibits enhanced long-term prognostic outcomes for patients afflicted with vertebral compression fractures. Notably, bilateral PVP significantly curtails the prevalence of subsequent vertebral injuries. Conversely, the unilateral PVP cohort is distinguished by its abbreviated operational duration, minimal invasiveness, and reduced overall hospitalization expenditures, conferring it with substantial clinical applicability and merit.

A Deep Learning-Based Model for Classifying Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebral Fractures on Radiographs: A Retrospective Model Development and Validation Study

Early diagnosis and initiation of treatment for fresh osteoporotic lumbar vertebral fractures (OLVF) are crucial. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is generally performed to differentiate between fresh and old OLVF. However, MRIs can be intolerable for patients with severe back pain. Furthermore, it is difficult to perform in an emergency. MRI should therefore only be performed in appropriately selected patients with a high suspicion of fresh fractures. As radiography is the first-choice imaging examination for the diagnosis of OLVF, improving screening accuracy with radiographs will optimize the decision of whether an MRI is necessary. This study aimed to develop a method to automatically classify lumbar vertebrae (LV) conditions such as normal, old, or fresh OLVF using deep learning methods with radiography. A total of 3481 LV images for training, validation, and testing and 662 LV images for external validation were collected. Visual evaluation by two radiologists determined the ground truth of LV diagnoses. Three convolutional neural networks were ensembled. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.89, 0.83, and 0.92 in the test and 0.84, 0.76, and 0.89 in the external validation, respectively. The results suggest that the proposed method can contribute to the accurate automatic classification of LV conditions on radiography.

Correlation Analysis between Residual Pain after Vertebral Augmentation and the Diffusion Distribution of Bone Cement: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

To explore the influence and potential factors of the bone cement dispersion state on residual pain after vertebral augmentation.

Methods

The cases included in this retrospective cohort study were patients treated with vertebral augmentation (VA) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) between July 2018 and June 2021. According to the type of cement diffusion distribution, the patients were divided into a sufficient diffusion group (Group A) and an insufficient diffusion group (Group B). The differences in the baseline data, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index score (ODI), injured vertebral height (IVH), and local kyphosis angle (LKA) between the two groups were analyzed. Assessments were performed preoperatively on the 2nd day postoperation and at the last follow-up. The imaging data of injured vertebrae were accurately reconstructed by a GE AW4.7 workstation, and the differences in the vertebral body volume, bone cement volume, and bone cement volume ratio were compared between the groups.

Result

After screening, 36 patients were included. (1) The postoperative VAS and ODI scores of the two groups were significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores. (2) On the 2nd day postoperation and the last follow-up, the VAS and ODI scores of Group A were significantly different from those of Group B, and Group A outperformed Group B. (3) The IVH and LKA of the two groups were improved after the operation, and no significant difference was found between the groups. (4) Significant differences were found in the bone cement volume and bone cement volume ratio between the groups, and Group A was larger than Group B.

Conclusions

Sufficient bone cement diffusion can reduce residual pain after vertebral augmentation.

Value of MRI in assessing back pain after thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and discussion on the underlying mechanisms by tissue biopsy

PURPOSE

The specific radiological feature of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) is bone marrow oedema (BME) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the relationship between BME and back pain (BP) is unclear. We investigated the value of MRI in assessing BP and discussed the relevant mechanisms by tissue biopsy.

METHODS

One hundred nineteen patients with thoracolumbar OVCFs were included in this study. We divided all patients into two groups: the low-oedema group (BME ≤ 75%) and the high-oedema group (BME > 75%). To reduce the error generated in the acute phase of fracture, we separately analysed patients in phases I (within one month) and II (more than one month). We compared the differences between the groups using the Mann-Whitney U test and investigated the correlations using Spearman's correlation test.

RESULTS

The degree of BP was significantly correlated with BME (p < 0.001; p < 0.001) and fibrous tissue content (p = 0.006; p = 0.035) in both phases. Further, the fibrous tissue content in the low-oedema group (12.49 ± 7.37%; 15.25 ± 13.28%) was significantly lower than that in the high-oedema group (25.68 ± 20.39%, p = 0.014; 23.92 ± 14.61%, p = 0.022) in both phases. The lamellar bone content was significantly correlated with BP (p = 0.021) in phase II.

CONCLUSIONS

BME signals on MRI can accurately predict the degree of BP, and the main mechanisms are related to the stimulation of fibrous tissue.

The Correlation Between the Diffusion Coefficient of Bone Cement and Efficacy in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

This study investigated the effect of bone mineral density (BMD) on the diffusion coefficient (DC) of bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and the correlation between the DC and the efficacy after PVP. This was a retrospective study of PVP cases with follow-up longer than 12 months. The cases were assigned to 3 groups according to the BMD: BMD decrease group, osteoporosis group, and severe osteoporosis group. The 3 groups were compared regarding bone cement injection volume (IV), diffusion volume (DV), DC, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and vertebral height loss ratio (VHLR). The correlation between DC and BMD, IV, DV, and VHLR was analyzed. The least significant difference test was used for comparison among the 3 groups, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was used for correlation analysis. There were a total of 132 cases, including 34 males and 98 females with a mean age of 76.5±9.6 years. The DV was larger than the IV in each group (P<.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the IV, VAS score, and ODI among the 3 groups (P>.05). However, there were significant differences in the DC and VHLR among the 3 groups (P<.05). Correlation analysis showed that there were significant correlations between BMD and IV (-0.716), BMD and DC (0.754), IV and DV (0.502), and IV and DC (-0.666) (P<.01). Scatter plot showed that the correlation between IV and BMD was r=0.716, R²=0.513, and the correlation between DC and BMD was r=0.754, R²=0.568. The DV was larger than the IV in PVP, and BMD was closely related to the DC. The higher the BMD, the higher the DC. Short-term follow-up revealed that the DC was inversely proportional to the VHLR. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):e95-e100.].

Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in elderly patients: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To contrast the effects and complications in unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in elderly patients.

METHODS

Multiple databases were adopted to search relevant studies, and the articles eventually satisfied the criteria were included. All the meta-analyses were conducted with the Review Manager 5.2. To estimate the quality of each article, risk of bias table was performed.

RESULTS

Finally, 627 patients were enrolled in 9 studies and ultimately met the eligibility criteria. The unilateral and bilateral surgical samples were 314 and 313, respectively. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in Visual Analog Scale/Score (VAS) (MD = -0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.24, 0.13], P = .57), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (MD = 0.03, 95% CI [-0.57, 0.62], P = .93) and cement leakage (OR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.67, 1.50], P = 1.00) between unilateral group and bilateral group. The surgery time of unilateral PVP is much less than that of bilateral PVP (MD = -8.42, 95% CI [-13.17, -3.66], P = .0005). Patients with bilateral PVP surgery have been injected more cement than patients with a unilateral surgery (MD = -2.56, 95% CI [-2.79, -2.33], P <.00001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated unipedicular approach is the preferred surgical technique for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) compared with bilateral PVP since unipedicular approach injects less cement and cost less surgery time.