Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches in the treatment of tibia intramedullary nailing: a retrospective cohort study

Anterior Knee Pain and Knee Functional Scores Following Common Approaches to Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review

Background

Tibial shaft fractures are common, causing substantial morbidity. Intramedullary nailing offers advantages but often leads to anterior knee pain and functional issues.

Methods

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review on outcomes for different surgical approaches-suprapatellar (SP), infrapatellar (IP), medial parapatellar (MPP), and lateral parapatellar (LPP). Searches across Ovid, Embase, and PubMed identified studies from 2000 to 2023, including retrospective and prospective studies, randomized controlled trials, and case series on anterior knee pain and functional outcomes postsurgery. Bias was assessed using Cochrane's RoB2.

Results

Of 27 studies, 8 were noncomparative (3 SP, 3 IP, 1 MPP, 1 LPP), showing varied anterior knee pain and function outcomes. Comparative studies (12 SP vs. IP, 5 MPP vs. IP) indicated better patient-reported outcomes for SP over IP in anterior knee pain and knee function. Comparative data for MPP and LPP remain limited. Overall RoB was low.

Conclusion

SP has better patient-reported outcomes and lower anterior knee pain than IP. MPP and LPP approaches are promising but lack robust comparative data. Further large, prospective trials are needed to clarify optimal approaches for tibial shaft fractures.

Level of Evidence

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of the efficacy of intramedullary nailing via the lateral parapatellar approach versus the infrapatellar approach in the treatment of tibial metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy of intramedullary nailing via the lateral parapatellar approach versus the infrapatellar approach in treating fractures at the tibial metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 45 patients with proximal or distal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nailing via lateral parapatellar approach (n = 23) or infrapatellar approach (n = 22) between January 2019 and March 2023. We recorded and compared the operative time, intraoperative blood loss/fluoroscopies, success rate of closed reduction, anteroposterior and lateral entry point accuracy, postoperative infection, fracture healing time, as well as NRS pain scores, Lysholm knee function scores, and knee range of motion.

RESULTS

Both groups completed the surgery without any complications. The lateral parapatellar approach group had significantly better results regarding shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies compared to the infrapatellar approach group (P < 0.05). All cases in the lateral parapatellar approach group achieved closed reduction, while 10 cases in the infrapatellar approach group required open reduction. Fractures in both groups healed successfully, without statistically difference in healing time (P > 0.05). The accuracy of anteroposterior and lateral entry points was better with lateral parapatellar approach (P < 0.05). At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, lateral parapatellar approach showed better Lysholm and NRS scores compared to infrapatellar approach (P < 0.05). Two groups had no significant difference in range of motion (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral parapatellar approach combined with the blocking screw technique provides superior clinical outcomes compared to infrapatellar approach in the treatment of proximal or distal tibial fractures, making it suitable for further investigation.

The efficacy of suprapatellar, parapatellar and infrapatellar intramedullary nailing in the treatment of tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tibial fractures are common and challenging orthopedic injuries that are commonly treated with intramedullary nailing techniques via suprapatellar (SP), parapatellar (PP), and infrapatellar (IP) approaches. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of the efficacy of different treatment approaches based on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a detailed search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for clinical studies comparing suprapatellar, parapatellar, and infrapatellar approaches in intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies involving patients aged 18 and older, comparing outcomes of these surgical techniques. Exclusion criteria included studies with insufficient data, non-English publications, and those focusing on non-tibial fractures.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies involving 1396 patients were included in meta-analysis. Pooled results indicated that, compared to IP nailing, the SP approach significantly reduced fluoroscopy time (MD = - 35.63, 95% CI - 39.37 to - 31.89, p < 0.001), operative time (MD = - 10.72, 95% CI - 17.30 to - 4.15, p = 0.001), pain scores (SMD = - 1.49, 95% CI - 2.36 to - 0.62, p < 0.001), and improved Lysholm scores (MD = 5.74, 95% CI 3.29 to 8.19, p < 0.001) and malalignment rate (RR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.68, p = 0.008). Quality of life assessments also indicated higher physical component scores for the SP group (MD = 6.68, 95% CI 5.19 to 8.17, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The SP approach provides significant intraoperative and postoperative benefits, reducing surgery time and improving patient outcomes in pain management and knee joint function. These findings support the SP approach as a preferred option for surgical treatment of tibial fractures.

Assessment of functional and radiological outcomes of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches of tibial nailing in patients with tibial shaft fracture: A randomized control study

Background

The study aimed to assess functional and radiological outcomes of the suprapatellar approach (SPA) and infrapatellar approaches (IPA) of tibial nailing in patients with closed tibia shaft fractures.

Method

After Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) and Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI) approval, patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture type 42 were enrolled from August 2021 and August 2022 at a level I trauma centre and randomized to SPA and IPA with informed consent. Demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical grading, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operative duration, bleeding, postoperative radiographic alignment, and union were compared among both approaches. Functional parameters like Lysholm knee score, Anterior knee pain (AKP), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score upon kneeling, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), KOOS Patellofemoral score (KOOS PF), EuroQol (EQ5D5L), Forgotten joint score (FJS), Range of motion (ROM) of knee and any complications were assessed at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

Per protocol analysis of 50 patients (25 SPA, 25 IPA) done at the end of the study. SPA group had significantly lesser fluoroscopy time (91.28 ± 12.40s vs. 105.36 ± 9.23s, p < 0.001) and operative duration (mins) (123.80 ± 24.25 vs. 130.00 ± 18.20, p < 0.001) than IPA. No significant differences were noted in Lysholm knee score at three months (p = 0.094), six months (p = 0.406), and 12 months (p = 0.071). The SPA group showed significantly lower VAS Score upon kneeling at six months (p < 0.0001). Similarly, KOOS (p < 0.001), KOOS PF (p = 0.01), and EQ 5D5L (p = 0.03) were significantly better in the SPA group at six months postoperatively. Lower Coronal translation was found in SPA [0 (0-1.8) vs. 1.4 (0.9-1.8), p = 0.010]. Whereas, IPA had higher range of flexion at 3 months [130.0 (129.0-135.0) vs 123.1 (120.0-130.5), p = 0.047]. However, no significant differences were noted in blood loss, AKP, FJS, EQ-VAS, coronal angulation, sagittal malalignment, time to union, return to work and postoperative complications among the groups.

Conclusion

SPA has lesser surgery time, more straightforward anatomic fracture reduction, better fracture alignment, lesser radiation exposure for both patients and surgeons, quicker recovery time, and promotes early kneeling activities with similar long-term functional outcomes and union rates, and can be considered in routine clinical practice than conventional IPA.

Infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve lesion following tibial nailing: it is possible to avoid it?

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic injury to the infrapatellar branches of saphenous nerve is a common complication following tibial nailing. This lesion seems to be directly related to the surgical approach adopted for nail insertion. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the current literature in order to assess the eventual superiority of one surgical approach for tibial nailing over the others in limiting the neurological impairment related to infrapatellar branch injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The available literature was systematically screened searching papers dealing with iatrogenic injury to the infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve after intramedullary tibial nailing. The terms "Saphenous" and "Infrapatellar branch" were used in combination with "intramedullary nailing" and "tibial fractures", supplying no limits regarding the publication year. Only publications in English were considered. Case reports, technical notes, instructional course, literature reviews, biomechanical and/ or in vitro studies were all excluded. Coleman methodological score was performed in all the retained articles.

RESULTS

Four articles matched the inclusion criteria. There were one original article and three retrospective study. Hypoesthesia and a larger extension of the area of sensory-loss were more frequently observed after vertical incision approach in three out of four articles. A trend towards a lower rate of iatrogenic nerve damage using a transverse incision was found in the remaining one, without any statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to avoid infrapatellar nerve lesion, horizontal or oblique incisions or percutaneous approaches should be favored, although in some cases a longitudinal incision is required. Limited-extension incisions could minimize the risk and the incidence of this complication.

Chronic knee pain following infrapatellar/suprapatellar magnetic intramedullary lengthening nails versus external fixators in limb length discrepancy: A retrospective review

Aims & objectives

Prior to the popularization of magnetic intramedullary nails (MILNs), gradual deformity correction using external fixation was the norm in limb lengthening. Trauma literature has shown MILN via a suprapatellar approach (SP) to be associated with less knee pain than either an infrapatellar entry (IP) or external fixation. Yet, no research has investigated chronic knee pain and MILNs. We assessed differences in chronic knee pain following lengthening via an IP or SP approach with an MILN versus external fixation.

Materials & methods

We reviewed 147 limbs (55 MILN/IP, 22 MILN/SP, 71 external fixator) in 124 patients who underwent tibial lengthening with ≥12 months follow-up between February 2012 and July 2020. Knee pain was assessed pre- and postoperatively at 6 and 12 months, with the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKSS) and numeric pain scale (0-10). Differences in knee pain outcomes were compared across methods, with subgroup analysis of MILN/SP and MILN/IP.

Results

Mean LKSS was 96.3 for external fixation and 88.5 for MILN (P = .011). In the MILN subgroups, mean LKSS was 91.7 for IP and 85.3 for SP. The IP group reported a lesser mean pain score (0.6 versus 2.1) at 12 months. Bilateral nail recipients demonstrated no knee pain differences versus unilateral. At 12 months postoperative, external fixation had better knee outcomes.

Conclusion

Tibial lengthening with external fixation was associated with less chronic anterior knee pain and better functional outcomes than MILN overall. In terms of MILN approach, IP surpassed SP on subjective pain scores. Larger tibial lengthening and knee pain studies are warranted.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach intramedullary nailing for tibal shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

The application of the suprapatellar (SP) approach has challenged the traditional infrapatellar (IP) approach in the surgery treatment of tibial shaft fractures, yet the advantages and disadvantages still remain controversial. We included more high-quality studies for this meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognosis of both approaches and thus to provide new ideas for surgeons.

METHOD

We searched literatures from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases from January 2000 to December 2022. We extracted general information including sample size, gender, proportion of open fracture, follow-up time, and outcome indicators including entrance accuracy, fluoroscopy time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, Lysholm score, VAS pain score, range of motion (ROM) function score, reposition accuracy, and revision cases. Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to evaluate literature qualities. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were generated that qualified for inclusion, 17 of which were used for meta-analysis. This study found statistically significant differences in coronal plane entrance accuracy, fluoroscopy time, Lysholm score, and VAS pain score.

CONCLUSION

The results of our meta-analysis showed that the SP approach was significantly better than the IP approach in angle and distance entrance accuracy of coronal plane, angle entrance accuracy of sagittal plane, fluoroscopy time, Lysholm score, and VAS pain score. There were no significant differences in sagittal angle accuracy, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and ROM score.

Wound infection and healing in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis compared with intramedullary nail for distal tibial fractures: A meta-analysis

To systematically explore the effects of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus intramedullary nail (IMN) on wound infection and wound healing in patients with distal tibia fractures. A computerised search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was performed, from their inception to October 2023, to identify relevant studies on the application of MIPO and IMN in patients with distal tibial fractures. The quality of the included literature was evaluated by two researchers based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and basic information of the literature was collected, with wound infection, postoperative complications and wound healing time as the main indicators for analysis. Stata 17.0 software was applied for analysis. Overall, 23 papers and 2099 patients were included, including 1026 patients in the MIPO group and 1073 patients in the IMN group. The results revealed, when compared with IMN treatment, patients with distal tibia fractures who underwent MIPO treatment had a lower incidence of postoperative complications (OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.25-0.42, p < 0.001) and a shorter wound healing time (SMD = -1.00, 95% CI: -1.51 to -0.49, p < 0.001), but the incidence of postoperative wound infection was higher (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.35-3.01, p = 0.001). Both MIPO and IMN are excellent treatments for distal tibia fractures. MIPO is effective in reducing the incidence of complications as well as shortening the time of wound healing time but increases the risk of wound infection. In clinical practice, surgeons can make individual choices based on the patient's wishes and proficiency in both techniques.

Medullary cavity application of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss in tibial intramedullary nailing procedures-a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Studies have shown an average postoperative hidden blood loss (HBL) of 473.29 ml and an average Hb loss of 16.71 g/l after intramedullary nailing. Reducing HBL has become a primary consideration for orthopaedic surgeons.

METHODS

Patients with only tibial stem fractures who visited the study clinic between December 2019 and February 2022 were randomized into two groups using a computer-generated form. Two grams of tranexamic acid (TXA) (20 ml) or 20 ml of saline was injected into the medullary cavity before implantation of the intramedullary nail. On the morning of the surgery, as well as on days one, three and five after surgery, routine blood tests and analyses of CRP and interleukin-6 were completed. The primary outcomes were total blood loss (TBL), HBL, and blood transfusion, in which the TBL and HBL were calculated according to the Gross equation and the Nadler equation. Three months after surgery, the incidence of wound complications and thrombotic events, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, was recorded.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients (47 in the TXA group and 50 in the NS group) were analyzed; the TBL (252.10 ± 10.05 ml) and HBL (202.67 ± 11.86 ml) in the TXA group were significantly lower than the TBL (417.03 ± 14.60 ml) and HBL (373.85 ± 23.70 ml) in the NS group (p < 0.05). At the three month postoperative follow-up, two patients (4.25%) in the TXA group and three patients (6.00%) in the NS group developed deep vein thrombosis, with no significant difference in the incidence of thrombotic complications (p = 0.944). No postoperative deaths or wound complications occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of intravenous and topical TXA reduces blood loss after intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures without increasing the incidence of thrombotic events.

Intramedullary Nail Fixation by Suprapatellar and Infrapatellar Approaches for Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures

Objective

To compare the functional and alignment outcomes of intramedullary nail fixation using suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches in treating distal tibial fractures.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 132 patients with distal tibial fractures (87 men, 45 women) ranging in age from 20 to 66 years were treated with intramedullary nails using the suprapatellar (69 patients) or infrapatellar (63 patients) approach. The radiographic alignment outcomes and ankle function were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine which variety influenced ankle functional scores and whether the suprapatellar approach intervention demonstrated a protective effect.

Results

The mean follow‐up time was 14.22 ± 2.31 months. The mean sagittal section angle of the fracture in the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approach groups was 3.20° ± 1.20° and 5.31° ± 1.23°, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean coronal section angle was 3.51° ± 0.89° and 5.42° ± 1.05°, respectively (P < 0.001). Three patients (4.3%) in the suprapatellar approach group and 15 patients (23.8%) in the infrapatellar approach group had poor fracture reduction (P < 0.001). The mean hind foot functional score and ankle pain score were 95.91 ± 4.70 and 35.91 ± 4.70 points, respectively, in the suprapatellar approach group and 85.20 ± 5.61 and 25.20 ± 5.61 points, respectively, in the infrapatellar approach group (P < 0.001 for both). In the comparison of ankle function, the multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that the odds ratio in the suprapatellar approach group was about 7 times that in the infrapatellar approach group (odds ratio, 7.574; 95% confidence interval, 2.148–28.740; P = 0.002). Of the variants measured, the statistically significant risk factors for poor ankle function were AO type A3 (P = 0.016) and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.006). Sex and the operation interval were not statistically significant risk factors for poor ankle function.

Conclusion

Intramedullary nailing using the suprapatellar approach facilitates simple fracture reduction, excellent postoperative fracture alignment, and few complications, giving it obvious advantages over the conventional infrapatellar approach. Additionally, the suprapatellar approach is a prognostic factor associated with postoperative ankle joint function.

Suprapatellar intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures in pregnancy. A report of two cases

Background

Treatment of closed tibial shaft fractures in the 3^rd trimester of pregnancy is controversial. Since there are few case reports published in literature, there is no consensus on the appropriate management of these fractures. This case report proposes intramedullary nailing throught the suprapatellar approach for the treatment of tibial shaft fracture in pregnant women, never described before in literature.

Case presentation

We report 2 cases of a tibial diaphyseal fracture treated by intramedullary nailing in women at the 3^rd trimester of pregnancy.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment of tibial shaft fracture of pregnant women in the 3^rd trimester of pregnancy with intramedullary nailing seems to be safe. The use of the specific suprapatellar approach helps in the intra-operative management of the pregnant patients.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Nailing Techniques for Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients who underwent intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation for tibial shaft fractures using an infrapatellar (IP) or the newer suprapatellar (SP) approach. Secondary outcomes included fluoroscopic radiation exposure, operative time, and radiographic outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search of the databases Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Study Selection.

STUDY SELECTION

Level I to III studies in which patients over the age of 18 years with acute tibial shaft fractures who underwent tibial IMN fixation using an IP or SP approach for fracture fixation were assessed for inclusion. Studies with a minimum of 10 patients in each cohort that reported on postoperative patient-reported outcomes with at least 6 months of follow-up were included for analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Twelve studies that reported PROMs and compared IP and SP intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures were analyzed. This included 654 patients who underwent IP IMN fixation and 542 patients who underwent SP IMN fixation. A random-effects model for unadjusted/crude study estimates were pooled using inverse variance (IV) weighting for continuous variable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This review found a significant improvement in PROM for patients with tibial shaft fractures when the SP IMN technique was used. In addition, there was a significant decrease in intraoperative fluoroscopy time consistent with other radiographic findings demonstrating improved start point accuracy and reduction with SP IMN fixation of tibial shaft fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Multiplanar fracture reducer versus manual traction in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary nails

OBJECT

The purpose of this study was to propose a new traction device, a multiplanar fracture reducer (MFR), for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary nails (IMN). The efficiencies of the multiplanar fracture reducer and manual traction (MT) in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures with IMN were compared.

METHODS

From January 2019 to January 2020, a total of 79 patients were enrolled in this study, among whom 38 were treated with MFR while 41 were treated with MT. Their demographics and fracture characteristics, surgical data, and prognostic data between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The mean number of intra-operative fluoroscopies in the MFR group was less than that in the MT group (19.4 vs 21.2, p < 0.001); surgical procedures involving open reduction were more in the MT group than in MFR group (0 vs 5, p = 0.026); there were less assistants in the MFR group than in the MT group (1 vs 1.9, p < 0.001), while the average Lysholm Knee Function Score and knee flexion were 92.7 ± 2.0 and 128.8 ± 1.4 in the MFR group, and 91.9 ± 2.1 and 127.5 ± 1.8 in the MT group, respectively. Both LKFS and knee flexion in the MFR group were significantly better than those in the MT group (p = 0.032 and p < 0.001). The remaining data between the two groups were comparable.

CONCLUSION

MFR is a safe and effective device for the minimal invasive treatment of tibial shaft fractures fixed with IMN.

Comparison between functionality and quality of reduction between suprapatellar vs infrapatellar approaches in the treatment of diaphyseal and distal tibial fractures

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary nailing is the most frequent procedure used for the treatment of tibial fractures that do not involve the articular surfaces. The goal of this study is to analyse the clinical outcomes, time of surgery and use of fluoroscopy in patients with midshaft and distal tibial fractures treated with suprapatellar and infrapatellar nailing and compare the results between these different groups.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted, and patients were selected between the period of March 2018 and October 2019. The following variables were studied: age, gender, AO classification, time of surgery (minutes), time of fluoroscopy (seconds), quality of reduction in postoperative controls and 1 year follow-up (using the angles MPTA, LDTA, PPTA, ADTA). Functional outcomes were studied at 1 month and 1 year follow-up. The visual analogue scale was used to study and compare the postoperative pain of the patients. The Lysholm Knee Score was used to evaluate the functional outcomes of the patients.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this study. The suprapatellar approach was used in 44 patients and the infrapatellar in 36 patients. The time of surgery (p=0.008) and the mean time of use of fluoroscopy (p <0.001) difference were significant in favour of the suprapatellar approach. In the quality of reduction analysis, we have statistically significant results in the LDTA and ADTA angles. Also, in the evaluation of postoperative pain, significant difference was found in favour of the suprapatellar approach.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study compared the suprapatellar approach and the infrapatellar approach for the treatment of midshaft and distal tibia fractures with intramedullary nailing. The results showed lesser time of surgery and use of fluoroscopy, lower knee pain, and lower rate of malalignment with the suprapatellar approach than with the infrapatellar approach.

Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach for intramedullary nail fixation of tibial shaft fractures: a review of the literature

Semi-extended suprapatellar intramedullary nail fixation of tibial fractures has recently been gaining popularity. Several recent studies and meta-analyses compare the outcomes of the suprapatellar approach with the traditional infrapatellar approach. Despite concerns with intra-articular placement of instruments, studies show the suprapatellar approach to be a safe alternative. Several articles conclude that the suprapatellar approach may be superior to the infrapatellar approach. This review discusses recent findings comparing suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches for nail insertion.

Difference in Pain, Complication Rates, and Clinical Outcomes After Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Nailing for Tibia Fractures? A Systematic Review of 1447 Patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of suprapatellar (SP)-nailing versus infrapatellar (IP)-nailing of tibia fractures in anterior knee pain, complications (retropatellar chondropathy, infection, and malalignment) and physical functioning and quality of life. A clinical question-driven and thorough systematic review of current literature is provided.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies published between 2010 and 2020 relating to SP and IP-nailing of tibia fractures. The study is performed in concordance with PRISMA-guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies eligible for inclusion were randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting on outcomes of interest.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction was performed independently by 2 assessors. Methodological quality and risk of bias was assessed according to the guidelines of the McMaster Critical Appraisal.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Continuous variables are presented as means with SD and dichotomous variables as frequency and percentages. The weighted mean, standardized weighted mean differences, and 95% confidence interval were calculated. A pooled analysis could not be performed because of differences in outcome measures, time-points, and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 1447 patients were analyzed. The weighted incidence of anterior knee pain was 29% after SP-nailing and 39% after IP-nailing, without reported significance. There was a significant lower rate of malalignment after the SP-approach (4% vs. 26%) with small absolute differences in all planes. No substantial differences were observed in retropatellar chondropathy, infection, physical functioning, and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review does not reveal superiority of either technique in any of the respective outcomes of interest. Definitive choice should depend on the surgeon's experience and available resources.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intramedullary tibial nailing using infrapatellar and suprapatellar approaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal tibial fractures has become the gold standard method of fixation with high rates of union and low complication rates reported. The suprapatellar (SP) approach may have many advantages over the traditional infrapatellar (IP) approach. Controversy exists due to potential damage to the patellofemoral joint leading to persistent anterior knee pain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical and procedural outcomes of the SP approach in comparison to the traditional IP approach.

METHOD

In this PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis, five databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and CINAHL were searched from inception until May 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies involving adults with tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation using either the suprapatellar or infrapatellar approach were included. Data extracted included demographics, functional knee scores, fluoroscopy exposure, insertional accuracy and adverse events. The primary outcome was validated functional knee scores. Risk of bias was calculated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2 (RoB 2) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

In total 16 studies were included consisting of 5 RCTs and 11 comparative observational studies. This included 1750 total operations with 810 in the SP group and 940 in the IP group. Meta-analysis was performed on the studies where appropriate data was reported. The SP approach demonstrated superior Lysholm scores (Mean Difference (MD) 5.63 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.81 to 8.44]), reduced fluoroscopy times (MD -38.12 sec [95% CI: -47.96 to -28.28]) and increased entry point accuracy (Standard Mean Difference (SMD) -0.90 [95% CI: -1.22 to -0.59]). No differences in complication rates or blood loss were found.

CONCLUSION

Based on the data presented in this review, intramedullary nailing of the tibia using the SP approach demonstrates superior Lysholm knee scores, greater entry point accuracy and reduced fluoroscopy exposure with equivalent risk of developing complications when compared to the IP approach.

Infrapatellar versus suprapatellar approach for intramedullary nailing of the tibia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is a conventional technique for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. It has been suggested that the suprapatellar (SP) approach holds advantages over the traditional infrapatellar (IP) approach. Current literature lacks adequate data to provide robust clinical recommendations. This meta-analysis aims to determine the efficacy of infrapatellar versus suprapatellar techniques for IMN.

METHODS

An up-to-date literature search of the Embase, Medline, and registry platform databases was performed. The search was conducted using a predesigned search strategy and all eligible literature was critically appraised for methodological quality via the Cochrane's collaboration tool. Fluoroscopy time, operative time, pain score, knee function, deep infection, non-union and secondary operation rates were all considered.

CONCLUSION

A total of twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results of this analysis show that suprapatellar nailing is associated with reduced post-operative pain scores and improved functional outcomes. The data suggest no significant difference in terms of operative times, fluoroscopy times, rates of deep infection, non-union or secondary procedures when compared to infra-patellar techniques. Further studies are required to confirm these findings and assess long-term results.

Lateral position: a friendly surgical position for intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures via infrapatellar approach

BACKGROUND

The conventional infrapatellar approach to intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures adopts the supine high-flexion knee position. However, this has disadvantages including difficulty in obtaining the proximal tibial anteroposterior view during intraoperative fluoroscopy, prolonged duration of fluoroscopy. Accordingly, the present study investigated the utility of the lateral position in the infrapatellar approach to intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.

METHODS

The present study was a retrospective analysis of 112 patients who sustained closed tibial shaft fractures and treated with intramedullary nailing via the infrapatellar approach. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical position: lateral or supine. The demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 54 patients in the lateral and 58 in the supine position groups. The duration of surgery and fluoroscopy was shorter in the lateral group than the supine group (p < 0.05). Blood loss during surgery was lower in the lateral compared with supine position group (p < 0.05). The malunion rate was lower in the lateral position group as compared with the supine position group (p < 0.05); moreover, fewer surgical assistants were needed than in the supine group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in fracture healing time, other complications between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The lateral position was a more convenient choice for intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures via infrapatellar approach.

Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures

Background

This study aimed to analyze and compare the clinical and functional outcomes of distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) using the suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) surgical approaches.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed in 63 patients with distal fractures that were treated with IMN between August 2014 and August 2018. A total of 27 and 36 patients underwent IMN using the SP and IP techniques, respectively. The surgical time, blood loss, closed reduction rate, rate of adjuvant reduction technique, fracture healing time, and complications were reviewed in this study. Anterior knee pain was assessed using the visual analog scale. The Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale were used as clinical measurements.

Results

A total of 63 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, were evaluated. The average surgical time, blood loss, rate of adjuvant reduction technique, closed reduction rate, fracture healing time, and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score were insignificantly different (P > 0.05) between the two groups. However, the SP approach was superior to the IP approach in terms of pain score, AOFAS score, and fracture deformity rate (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

In the treatment of distal tibia fractures, the SP IMN technique is associated with a significantly higher functional outcome, lower knee pain, and lower rate of fracture deformity than the IP IMN technique.