Conversion from a failed proximal femoral nail anti-rotation to a cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty device: a retrospective review of 198 hips with previous intertrochanteric femur fractures

Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty after Sliding Hip Screw and Cephalomedullary Nail Failures: A Systematic Comparative Review and Meta-analysis

With the exception of revision osteosynthesis, conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) following sliding hip screw (SHS) and cephalomedullary nail (CMN) failure in intertrochanteric fractures (ITF) is the most commonly used treatment option. This review determined the relative risk of medical and orthopedic complications, including periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF), following CTHA in failed SHS and CMN fixation of ITF, as well as the Harris hip score (HHS). Major electronic databases were searched for studies and reports on CTHA after SHS and CMN fixation failures in ITF. To assess the risk of bias, the studies were analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for cohort studies. Three studies pooled 327 cases and 353 cases of CTHA from failed CMN and SHS in ITF. The relative risk of medical and orthopedic complications and PFF in the SHS group as compared to the CMN group was 0.87 [0.39, 1.90], 1.64 [1.18, 2.29], and 1.92 [0.81, 4.56], respectively. The mean difference in HHS was -0.72 [-1.47, 0.02] between failed SHS and CMN groups. The included studies were of retrospective study design with a more than 20% loss of follow-up and a high risk of bias. There is 64% more risk of orthopedic complications with CTHA in SHS failures than CMN failures. There is no difference in relative risk of medical complications and PFF between CTHA in both SHS and CMN failure. After CTHA, the benefits in function are similar in both groups.

Survival outcomes of hybrid total hip replacement following failed proximal femoral nail antirotation: a retrospective study with a median 10-year follow-up

Background

This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of hybrid total hip replacement (THR) in patients aged 50 to 70 years who have experienced failures following proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) procedures. By addressing a significant gap in the current medical literature-characterized by inadequate data and inconsistencies regarding the effectiveness of hybrid THRs in revision settings-this research aims to provide valuable insights into the long-term viability and clinical outcomes of hybrid THR for this demographic.

Methods

In this retrospective observational study, we investigated 185 individuals aged 50 to 70 years who underwent hybrid THRs following PFNA procedures across two specialized Joint Surgery Centers. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate implant longevity, which was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with a particular focus on revision surgeries. Additionally, we aimed to analyze secondary outcomes, including patient-reported experiences quantified by the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) and the Likert pain scale. Furthermore, this study sought to quantify the rates of major orthopedic complications within this patient cohort.

Results

A total of 124 individuals (124 THRs) were assessed, resulting in a median follow-up duration of 10 years (range: 3-15 years). The 10-year survivorship, defined as the rate of survival without revision for any reason, was found to be 87.1% (78.5%-90.1%). Stratified survival analysis by age groups (50-60 years and 60-70 years) revealed that the 50-60-year group had significantly higher survival rates compared to the 60-70-year group (p = 0.00026). Postoperative pain scores averaged 3.0 (95% CI, 2.9-3.1), indicating a significant reduction in pain. Furthermore, patient satisfaction was high, with an average satisfaction score of 3.7 (95% CI, 3.6-3.8). The mean EQ-VAS score was 77.4 (95% CI, 76.4-78.3), reflecting favorable post-surgical health perceptions. Among the 124 patients, 13 experienced a total of 19 implant-related complications, leading to an incidence rate of 10.4% for major orthopedic complications.

Conclusion

Hybrid THR shows durable efficacy in patients aged 50-70 with failed PFNA, achieving high revision-free survival and improved postoperative outcomes. Younger patients (50-60 years) had superior survival, while Staphylococcus/Enterococcus infections worsened prognosis. Non-infected individuals aged 50-60 achieved optimal 10-year survival. Complications like stem loosening were reduced, but cement degradation and infection risks remain challenges. Future efforts should target age-specific protocols and infection mitigation.

Key Decision-Making in Post-Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Retrospective Study on Fracture Healing's Impact on Femoral Component Selection

PURPOSE

Following failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures (FIF-ITF), the decision to use a long-stem or standard-stem femoral implant in hip arthroplasty is still debated. This study aimed to explore how the healing status of fractures after FIF-ITF failure affects the choice of femoral stem and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Our retrospective cohort study reviewed 105 cases of patients with FIF-ITF who underwent hip arthroplasty at three tertiary Grade A hospitals between December 2012 and December 2022. We compared the clinical outcomes between patients with healed and unhealed fractures, focusing on the selection of femoral stems in relation to proximal medial support and the healing status of the greater trochanter. The primary outcomes measured were functional results, operative time, blood loss, and incidence of complications. A subgroup analysis was conducted to further evaluate the influence of the proximal medial buttress and greater trochanteric healing on femoral stem selection. Statistical analysis included binary and ordinal logistic regression to identify factors influencing the choice of femoral stems. Additionally, a decision tree model was developed to visually represent and explore the relationship between fracture healing status and the selection of femoral components.

RESULTS

The study included 38 patients with healed fractures and 67 patients with unhealed fractures. Patients in the healed group predominantly chose standard stems and experienced better functional outcomes (p < 0.001, p = 0.002). In contrast, the unhealed group preferred long stems, resulting in longer surgical durations and increased blood loss (p = 0.008, p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that nonunion of the proximal femoral medial buttress was an independent risk factor for long stems (p < 0.0001, OR = 10.402).

CONCLUSION

The selection of femoral prostheses following FIF-ITF is influenced by the fracture healing status, particularly the presence of proximal femoral medial buttress. The decision tree model suggested that long-stem prostheses are more appropriate when there is inadequate fracture healing and the proximal femoral medial buttress is absent.

Hip arthroplasty following failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures: classification decision-making for femoral stem selection and clinical validation

AIMS

Following Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures (FIF-ITF), the choice of treatment remains a clinical challenge. This study introduces a novel classification system to guide the selection of femoral prostheses in hip arthroplasty (HA) and validates its clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Retrospectively, we analyzed 108 cases from three university-affiliated hospitals between December 2012 and February 2023 involving patients who underwent hip arthroplasty due to Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures (FIF-ITF). Patients were classified into three categories based on fracture healing, proximal femoral support, and the severity of femoral cortical defects, with subtypes identified. Surgical outcomes and complication rates were compared between the Classification-based Decision Group and the Non-classification Decision Group.

RESULTS

The Classification-based Decision Group did not differ significantly from the Non-classification Decision Group in operation time, blood loss, or the use of cemented stems. However, the classification system markedly reduced the risk of periprosthetic fractures intraoperatively from 22.5 to 4.4% and postoperatively from 10 to 1.4%. The Classification-based Decision Group also demonstrated higher postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores.

CONCLUSION

The proposed classification system serves as an innovative clinical tool for femoral prosthesis selection in hip arthroplasty post-FIF-ITF, effectively reducing complications and enhancing hip function in the Classification-based Decision Group, underscoring its significant clinical utility.

Favorable revision-free survivorship of cemented arthroplasty following failed proximal femoral nail antirotation: a case series with a median follow-up of 10 years

BACKGROUND

Given the ever-increasing rate of failure related to proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA), it is expected that an increasing number of PFNA individuals will undergo conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The long-term survivorship of conversion of the initial PFNA to cemented THA is still debated. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the long-term revision-free survivorship of cemented THAs after initial failures of PFNA in geriatric individuals.

METHODS

Consecutive geriatric individuals who underwent secondary cemented THA after initial PFNA fixation from July 2005 to July 2018, were retrospectively identified from three medical centres. The primary outcome was revision-free survivorship estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression with revision for any reason as the endpoint; secondary outcomes were functional outcomes and key THA-related complications. Follow-ups occurred at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and then every 12 months after conversion.

RESULTS

In total, 186 consecutive patients (186 hips) were available for study inclusion. The median follow-up was 120.7 months (60-180 months) in the cohort. Kaplan-Meier survivorship with revision for any reason as the end point showed that the 10-year revision-free survival rate was 0.852 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.771-0.890). Good functional outcomes were seen, and the HHS decreased markedly over the 24th month to the final follow-up interval from 92.2 to 75.1 (each p < 0.05). The overall rate of key THA-related complications was 16.1% (30/186).

CONCLUSION

Cemented THA executed following initial PFNA failure may yield satisfactory revision-free survival and, at least for the initial 10 years after conversion, good functional outcomes and a 16.1% complication rate of key THA-related complications, which supports the trend towards increased use of cemented THA.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Cemented or Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty for Failed Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Following Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical outcomes of cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty (CTHA or UTHA) following prior failed proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) fixation in patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures (IFFs).

Materials and methods

Data from 244 patients with IFFs who experienced a conversion of PFNA to CTHA (n = 120) or to UTHA (n = 124) due to screw cut-out, mal/nonunion, or osteonecrosis during 2008-2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up occurred 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter. The primary outcome was the incidence of orthopedic complications; the secondary outcome was the Harris hip score (HHS).

Results

The median follow-up was 60 months (range, 50-67 months). The incidences of orthopedic complications were 10% in the PFNA to CTHA group and 19.3% in the PFNA to UTHA group (P = .040). Significant differences were also observed regarding the incidence of prosthesis revision (1.7% for PFNA to CTHA vs 7.2% for PFNA to UTHA, P = .036). From the three years after conversion surgery to the final follow-up, significant differences were detected in HHS between groups (each P < .05). At the final follow-up, a statistically significant difference was detected in the HHS (79.54±18.85 for PFNA to CTHA vs. 75.26±18.27 for PFNA to UTHA, P = .014).

Conclusion

The results of the study may demonstrate a significant statistical advantage with respect to the orthopedic complication rate and HHS in favor of CTHA compared to UTHA in patients with failed PFNA.

Long-term survival of hybrid total hip replacement for prior failed proximal femoral nail antirotation: a retrospective study with a median 10-year follow-up

Background

Hybrid total hip replacement (THR) is commonly used in the management of proximal femur fractures in elderly individuals. However, in the context of the revision, the literature on hybrid THR is limited, and differences in the long-term survival outcomes reported in the literature are obvious. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival of hybrid THR for failed proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in elderly individuals aged ≥ 75 years.

Methods

An observational cohort of 227 consecutive individuals aged ≥ 75 years who experienced hybrid THRs following prior primary PFNAs was retrospectively identified from the Joint Surgery Centre, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Implant survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The primary end point was the implant survivorship calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method with revision for any reason as the end point; secondary end points were the function score measured using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the incidence of main orthopaedic complications.

Results

In total, 118 individuals (118 THRs) were assessed as available. The median follow-up was 10 (3–11) years. The 10-year survivorship with revision for any reason as the endpoint was 0.914 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.843–0.960). The most common indication for revision was aseptic loosening (70.0%), followed by periprosthetic fracture (30.0%). At the final follow-up, the median functional score was 83.6 (79.0–94.0). Among the 118 patients included in this study, 16 experienced 26 implant-related complications. The overall incidence of key orthopaedic complications was 13.5% (16/118).

Conclusion

For patients aged ≥ 75 years old with prior failed PFNAs, hybrid THR may yield satisfactory long-term survival, with good functional outcomes and a low rate of key orthopaedic complications.

Comparison of Differences in Complications and Revision After Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty from Plating vs. Nailing vs. Hemiarthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA)after previous hip surgery increases the procedure complexity and complication rate. We investigated the complication rates following conversion to total hip arthroplasty from three hip surgeries, namely plate fixation of the intertrochanteric fracture, nailing of the trochanteric fracture, and hemiarthroplasty of the hip.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted using the PearlDiver database (www.pearldiverinc.com, Colorado Springs) and identified all patients undergoing THA between 2010 and 2019. Among this group, we included all patients who had received one of the three procedures , hip hemiarthroplasty (CPT 27125), fixation of the intertrochanteric fracture with plates and screws (CPT 27444), or fixation of hip fracture with nail (CPT 27445) within two years of THA. We analyzed complications in these patients and compared it to the complication rate in primary THA patients. The complications analyzed were 30-day transfusion risk, 90-day surgical site infection (SSI) risk, 90-day periprosthetic fracture risk, 1-year dislocation risk, and 2-, 5-, and 10-year revision risk.

RESULTS

A total of 118,209 patients underwent THA between 2010 and 2019. A total of 9,173, 48,326, and 31,632 patients underwent fixation with plates and screws , nailing and hemiarthroplasty respectively. We identified 71, 42, and 160 patients with hemiarthroplasty, plates & screws, and nailing, respectively, within two years of THA. 117,936 primary THA patients were used as a comparison group. The nailing group had the highest rate of transfusion risk (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.32, 4.13, P<0.05).Furthermore, the hemiarthroplasty group had highest rate of SSI risk (OR=9.25, 95% CI=4.86, 17.63, P<0.05) and highest revision risk at 2 years (OR=10.532, 95% CI= 6.09, 18.19, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Conversion of hemiarthroplasty to THA was associated with a higher risk of infection and revision. Hence, surgeons considering primary hip hemiarthroplasty for severely comminuted intertrochanteric fracture should exercise caution, especially for active elderly patients.

Conversion of failed internal fixation in proximal femur fractures using calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Reoperations for secondary osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, or hardware failure following failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) or femoral neck fracture (FNF) are common. An effective salvage treatment often involves complete removal of the hardware followed by total hip arthroplasty (THA). Almost no data are available regarding conversion to short-stem THA. This study aimed to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes, potential complications, and the survival rate of short-stem THA following revision surgery.

METHODS

We investigated 27 patients who underwent conversion THA using a calcar-guided short stem. Patient-reported outcome measurements were obtained, including the Harris hip score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, as well as pain and satisfaction on the visual analogue scale. Radiological follow-up was also performed.

RESULTS

We identified 18 (66.7%) patients diagnosed with FNF and 9 (33.3%) patients with ITF. Clinical and radiological outcomes were satisfactory at the last follow-up (30.56 ± 11.62 months). One patient required early revision surgery due to dislocation and greater trochanter fracture. At the last follow-up, none of the short stems required revision. No other major complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Given the low rate of complications and 100% survival, our findings indicate that short stems for conversion THA due to failed internal fixation may be considered an option in a properly selected patient population. However, it should not be considered a standard procedure and should only be performed by experienced surgeons.

Implant survival of cemented arthroplasty following failed fixation of proximal femoral fractures in patients aged 30-60 years: a retrospective study with a median follow-up of 10 years

Background

Given the unremitting growth in the volume of failed fixations of proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) in recent years, it is predictable that total hip replacements (THRs) will be the preferred surgical procedure. The long-term survival of cemented THR (CTHR) revisions remains controversial in patients aged 30–60 years. The goal of this retrospective review was to evaluate the 10-year survival of CTHRs following prior failed primary fixations of PFFs in patients aged 30–60 years.

Methods

We retrospectively identified CTHR revisions implemented at four medical centres during 2008–2017 for a failed primary fixation of PFFs in consecutive patients aged 30–60 years. The primary endpoint was implant survival calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); secondary endpoints included functional scores assessed by Harris hip scores (HHS) and main revision-related orthopaedic complications. Follow-up was executed at 1, 2, 3, and 8 years following revision and then at 1-year intervals until the revision, death, or study deadline, whichever occurred first.

Results

In total, 120 patients (120 hips) who met the eligibility criteria were eligible for follow-up. The median follow-up was 10.2 years (range, 8–12 years). Kaplan–Meier survivorship showed that implant survival with revision for any reason as the endpoint was 95% at 5 years (CI: 93–97%), 89% at 8 years (CI: 86–92%), and 86% at 10 years (CI: 83–89%). Patients treated with three hollow screws had better revision-free survival than patients treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA), dynamic hip screw (DHS) or titanium plate plus screws (three p < 0.05). Functional scores were apt to decrease gradually, and at the final follow-up, the mean HHS was 76.9 (range, 67.4–86.4). The overall rate of main revision-related orthopaedic complications was 18.3% (22/120).

Conclusion

CTHR implemented following prior failed primary fixations of PFFs tends to afford an acceptable 10-year survival, along with advantageous HHS and a low rate of main revision-related orthopaedic complications, which may support an inclination to follow the utilisation of CTHRs, especially in revision settings for intracapsular fractures.

Conversion of failed proximal femoral nail antirotation to uncemented or cemented femoral component fixation: a multicentre retrospective study with a median 10-year follow-up

Background

Conversion of a failed proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) to a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming increasingly universal. However, consensus has not been reached regarding which device (uncemented or hybrid THA) to use. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the conversion of failed PFNAs to uncemented versus hybrid THAs in the elderly population.

Methods

Consecutive elderly patients with prior failed PFNAs treated with uncemented or hybrid THA from January 2008 to December 2019 were retrospectively identified from two medical centres. The primary outcome was implant survival after THA revision; secondary outcomes were the functional outcomes assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the incidence of key THA-related complications.

Results

A total of 236 patients (uncemented THA, n = 116; hybrid THA, n = 120) were eligible for this study. Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrated that the 10-year cumulative survival rates were 0.801 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.783–0.852) in the uncemented THA group versus 0.925 (95% CI, 0.861–0.964) in the hybrid THA group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36 [95% CI 0.24–0.56], p = 0.004). From the 72nd month after the revision to the last follow-up, functional outcomes differed considerably between cohorts (each p < 0.05), and the rate of key THA-related complications was comparable between cohorts (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

For elderly patients with prior failed PFNAs who experienced uncemented or hybrid THA, hybrid THA revision may provide a clinically significant improvement over uncemented THA revision with regard to implant survival, functional outcomes, and THA-related complications compared to uncemented THA revision.

Is there a role for cementless primary stem in hip arthroplasty for early or late fixation failures of intertrochanteric fractures?

BACKGROUND

The choice of femur stems during the hip arthroplasty procedures for patients with treatment failure of intertrochanteric fractures (ITF) remains controversial. We aimed to compare the surgical complication and reoperation rates between cementless primary and revision stems in the early (≤3 months) and late (> 3 months) fixation failures of ITF.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cohort study conducted in a single, tertiary referral hospital of Taipei, Taiwan. We included hip arthroplasty procedures for failed ITF using cementless primary or revision stems. There were 40 and 35 patients who had early and late fixation failure of ITF, respectively. The patient demographics, time to fixation failure, surgical complications and medical complications were recorded for analysis.

RESULTS

We included 75 patients that underwent hip arthroplasty procedure for failed ITF using cementless primary (n = 38) or revision (n = 37) stems. The mean age was 79.3 years and 56% of the patients were female. In the early fixation failure group, the complication rate was similar between the primary and revision stems (44% vs. 29%, p = 0.343). However, there was a trend toward a higher reoperation rate (31% vs. 8%, p = 0.061) of using the primary stem, compared with the revision stem. In the late fixation failure group, the rate of complication and reoperation was similar between the two stem types.

CONCLUSION

For early fixation failures of ITFs, we caution against the use of cementless primary stems due to a trend towards an increased risk of reoperations compared to the use of cementless revision stems. However, in late fixation failures of ITFs, there is a role for cementless primary stems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.