Reconstruction of massive tibial bone and soft tissue defects by trifocal bone transport combined with soft tissue distraction: experience from 31 cases

Clinical Observations of the Effectiveness of the Masquelet Induced Membrane Technique in the Treatment of Critical Long-Bone Defects of the Lower and Upper Extremities

Background and Objectives: Successful treatment of severe trauma and fractures of the long bones with successful healing and bone union is still a significant challenge for surgeons. Unfortunately, up to 10% of long-bone fractures develop bone healing disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of treating bone defects with different etiologies in the upper and lower extremities using the induced membrane technique. Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated the radiological and clinical outcomes of 45 patients with severe bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique during the period from May 2021 to October 2023. The time to bone defect regeneration, size of the bone defect, and the cost of treatment were evaluated. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale, SF-36, and the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI). Results: The mean follow-up time was 31 months (12-35). There were 20 patients with upper extremity bone defects and 25 with lower extremity bone defects. The mean defect length was 7.9 cm for the upper extremity (3.5-18) and 5.3 cm for the lower extremity (3-11). The mean times to achieve bone union and remodeling were 6.0 months (3-12) and 9 months (3-13) for the upper and lower limbs, respectively. Clinical evaluation at the end of treatment (achieving bone union) showed statistically significant improvements in the DASH, SF-36, and LLFI scales for pre- and postoperative outcomes. There was no statistical significance in the SF-36 clinical scale scores after surgical treatment compared to reconstructive treatment of upper and lower extremity bone defects. Results: The presented reconstructive approach to the treatment of bone defects and healing disorders and extensive analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of the induced membrane technique in a short follow-up period, with a relatively high level of patient comfort and good clinical results in the treatment of severe bone defects with particularly infectious etiologies.

Orthoplastic Reconstruction of Distal Tibia High-Energy Fractures Using a Circular External Fixator-A Systematic Review

Background: Compound fractures of the distal tibia (with or without the middle third) represent a challenge for orthopedic and plastic surgeons because of the scarcity of available soft tissue reconstruction and the important comminution of the fractures that usually appear. Methods: The design of this study is based on the PRISMA guidelines. Databases were searched for articles published and available until the first half of 2023. Articles that presented the evolution of patients treated by combining circular external fixators with reconstructive methods were selected. Results: After searching the literature using keywords, we obtained 3355 articles, out of which 14 articles met all the inclusion criteria, with a total number of participants of 283. The bone loss varied between 0.7 and 18.2 cm, while the soft tissue defect was between 3/3 cm and 16/21 cm. The average period of fixation ranged from 4 to 22.74 months. The most used reconstruction methods were 80 free flaps and 73 pedicled flaps out of 249 interventions. Complete flap loss appeared only in 3/283 patients. Regarding the bone union, the percentage of non-union was low, and in all cases, it was achieved after reintervention. A low rate of major complications was observed. Conclusions: The orthoplastic team is the key to successfully treating the high-energy traumatism of the distal tibia (with or without a middle third). The Ilizarov external fixator can be used as a definitive limb-salvage treatment (secondary to the standard primary methods of fixation) in combination with a flap to cover the defects because it does not damage the pedicle, and it helps stabilize the soft tissues and bones around the flap to lower the complications.

The Efficacy of Modified Ilizarov Distraction-Tension Device on Limb Wound Difficult to Cover with Skin Flaps

INTRODUCTION

Closure of complex limb wounds poses challenges and requires innovative approaches. This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified distraction-tension device using Ilizarov external fixation for wound closure in challenging cases.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 patients with extremity wounds that were difficult to cover with skin flaps between January 2019 and December 2022. Tension-relieving traction was applied using the Ilizarovexternal fixator apparatus, tailored to individual wound characteristics. Three types of wire-pin connections were used in this study. The distraction begins on the third postoperative day, with a speed of 0.5mm/d. Clinical wound healing scores were evaluated at 5 and 30 days postoperatively. Complications were documented following the Paley classification system.

RESULTS

Traction using modified Ilizarovexternal fixation promoted a significant reduction in wound size. The mean traction period was 11.2 ± 7.3 days, and the mean healing duration was 17.0 ± 3.7 days. The clinical wound healing score improved from 3.7 ± 2.9 at 5 days to 1.7 ± 0.7 at 30 days postoperatively (p < 0.05). Complications were minimal, with no significant obstacles or sequelae observed. Direct closure healing was achieved in 21 cases, skin graft healing in 13 cases, and suture healing in 9 cases. No recurrences were reported. Using Paley's classified complications, there were 17 problems, 9 obstacles, and 0 sequelae.

CONCLUSION

The Ilizarov tension-relieving traction shows promise in facilitating wound closure that is challenging to manage with skin flaps. The modified three types of pin-skin connection configuration could satisfy various types of wound closure.

Management strategies for Docking Site refractures: a comparative analysis of 19 patient cases

AIMS

This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of intramedullary nailing (IMN), percutaneous external plate fixation (PEPF), and re-applied external fixation (REF) in the treatment of refracture at the consolidated docking site following the removal of external fixation in patients with tibial defects who had previously undergone the Ilizarov bone transport technique.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on patients who received IMN, PEPF, or REF for refracture at the consolidated docking site subsequent to the removal of external fixation. A collection of data was made regarding the following parameters: age, gender, defect size, treatment methods, external fixation time (EFT), external fixation index (EFI), time of refracture (TOR) subsequent to fixation removal, and docking reunion time (DRT). Bone and functional outcomes were evaluated by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The study included 14 males and 5 females with an average age of 38.1 ± 8.9 years (range, 26 to 55 years). Etiologies included post-traumatic osteomyelitis in 11 cases and post-traumatic bone loss in 8 cases. The median bone defect was 5.11 ± 0.87 cm (range, 3.8 to 6.8 cm). Following docking site refracture, 6 cases were treated with IMN, 8 with PEPF, and 5 with REF. All patients achieved both satisfactory bone union and functional outcomes, and there was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data or postoperative outcomes among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

IMN, PEPF, and REF were all demonstrated favorable postoperative bone and functional outcomes, suggesting their reliability as treatment options for managing docking site refracture following external fixation removal.

Masquelet combined with free-flap technique versus the Ilizarov bone transport technique for severe composite tibial and soft-tissue defects

BACKGROUND

The treatment of bone and soft-tissue defects after open fractures remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Masquelet technique combined with the free-flap technique (MFFT) versus the Ilizarov bone transport technique (IBTT) for the treatment of severe composite tibial and soft-tissue defects.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the data of 65 patients with tibial and soft-tissue defects and Gustilo type IIIB/C open fractures treated at our hospital between April 2015 and December 2021. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment method: group A (n = 35) was treated with the MFFT and internal fixation, and group B (n = 30) was treated with the IBTT.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 28 months (range 13-133 months). Complete union of both soft-tissue and bone defects was achieved in all cases. The mean bone-union times were 6 months (range 3-12 months) in group A and 11 months (range 6-23 month) in group B, with a significant difference between the two groups (Z = -4.11, P = 0.001). The mean hospital stay was 28 days (range 14-67 d) in group A which was significantly longer than the mean stay of 18 days (range 10-43 d) in group B (Z = -2.608, P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the infection rate between group A (17.1 %) and group B (26.7%) (χ2 = 0.867, P = 0.352). The Total Physical Health Scores were 81.51 ± 6.86 (range 67-90) in group A and 75.83±16.14 (range 44-98) in group B, with no significant difference between the two groups (t = 1.894, P = 0.063). The Total Mental Health Scores were significantly higher in group A (90.49 ± 6.37; range 78-98) than in group B (84.70 ± 13.72; range 60-98) (t = 2.232, P = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Compared with IBTT, MFFT is a better choice of treatment for open tibial and soft-tissue defects with Gustilo IIIB/C fractures. IBTT is the preferred option when the tibial bone defect is large or if the surgeon's expertise in microsurgery is limited.

Advances in the Application of Bone Transport Techniques in the Treatment of Bone Nonunion and Bone Defects

Bone nonunion and bone defects frequently occur following high-energy open injuries or debridement surgeries, presenting complex challenges to treatment and significantly affecting patients' quality of life. At present, there are three primary treatment options available for addressing bone nonunion and bone defects: vascularized bone grafts, the Masquelet technique, and the Ilizarov technique. The Ilizarov technique, also known as distraction osteogenesis, is widely favored by orthopedic surgeons because of several advantages, including minimal soft tissue requirements, low infection risk, and short consolidation time. However, in recent years, the application of the Masquelet technique has resulted in novel treatment methods for managing post-traumatic bone infections when bone defects are present. Although these new techniques do not constitute a panacea, they continue to be the most commonly employed options for treating complex large bone nonunion and bone defects. This review evaluates the currently available research on the Ilizarov and Masquelet bone transport techniques applied at various anatomical sites. Additionally, it explores treatment durations and associated complications to establish a theoretical foundation that can guide clinical treatment decisions and surgical procedures for the management of bone nonunion and bone defects.

Artificial Deformity Creation as a Method for Limb Salvage for Patients with Massive Tibial and Soft Tissue Defects: A Report of 26 Cases

Soft tissue and bone defects that occur consequence of high-energy trauma are serious and challenging problems. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to show that the artificial deformity creation (ADCr) method allows the closure of soft-tissue defects, avoids amputation, and can facilitate the reconstruction of bone defects and restore limb length.

Patients and methods

Twenty-six adult patients (age range 20-81 years) with soft tissue defects of the lower limb were treated at the Riga East University Hospital from 2018 to 2021. All patients were treated using the ADCr method which is the technique of establishing an interim deformity for resolving tissue loss. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) and application of methods of ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria were used for the evaluation of bone healing and lower extremity function.

Results

Complete union was achieved in all cases. The functional evaluation showed that most patients could achieve excellent and good results and return to activities of daily living. The functional result was poor in one case of a multi-fragmentary distal tibial articular fracture for which an ankle fusion was performed. Final union in this case was achieved with some residual deformity.

Conclusion

The method of ADCr is an effective surgical technique in cases of severe tibial injuries with concomitant loss of bone and soft tissues. This method could be used in cases when either a plastic or microsurgeon is not available or for instances when closing the defect with a flap is either impossible or contraindicated. Excellent and good functional results are possible without severe complications.

How to cite this article

Plotnikovs K, Kamenska J, Movcans J, et al. Artificial Deformity Creation as a Method for Limb Salvage for Patients with Massive Tibial and Soft Tissue Defects: A Report of 26 Cases. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(3):133-139.

Acute shortening and angulation for complex open fractures: an updated perspective

Reestablishing an intact, healthy soft tissue envelope is a critical step in managing lower extremity injuries, particularly high-grade open tibia fractures. Acute shortening and angulation can be used independently or together to address complex soft tissue injuries, particularly when bone loss is present. These techniques facilitate management of difficult wounds and can be combined with local soft tissue rearrangement or pedicled flaps as needed, avoiding the need for free tissue transfer. After angular deformity correction, adjacent bone loss can be addressed with bone grafting or distraction histogenesis. This article discusses the indications for, surgical technique for, and limitations of acute shortening and angulation for management of open lower extremity fractures.

Tetrafocal (three osteotomies) and pentafocal (four osteotomies) bone transport using Ilizarov technique in the treatment of distal tibial defect-preliminary outcomes of 12 cases and a description of the surgical technique

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the preliminary outcomes of tetrafocal (three osteotomies) and pentafocal (four osteotomies) bone transport using Ilizarov technique for the treatment of distal tibial defect and describe the surgical technique.

METHODS

A total of 12 eligible patients with distal tibial defect > 6 cm caused by direct trauma or posttraumatic osteomyelitis who were admitted to our institution from January 2017 to January 2019 were treated by tetrafocal or pentafocal bone transport using Ilizarov technique. Detailed demographic data, including age, sex, etiology, defect size, number of osteotomies (three or four), external fixation time (EFT) and external fixation index (EFI), were collected, and the bone and functional outcomes were evaluated by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system. Complications during the surgery and the follow-up period were recorded and evaluated by the Paley classification at a minimum follow-up of two years after removal of the fixator.

RESULTS

There were 9 men and 3 women with an average age of 37.4±7.8 years. The etiology included posttraumatic osteomyelitis in 8 cases and posttraumatic bone loss in 4 cases. The mean bone defect after radical debridement was 7.1±0.6 cm. Tetrafocal bone transport was applied in 9 cases, and pentafocal bone transport was applied in 3 cases. The average EFT and EFI were 5.2±0.8 months and 0.7±0.2 months/cm, respectively. The average time of follow-up after removal of the external fixator was 28.5±3.3 months without recurrence of osteomyelitis. The bone results were good in 7 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 1 case, and the functional results were good in 5 cases, fair in 6 cases, and poor in 1 case. The most common complication was pin tract infection, which occurred in all cases, but there were no major complications, such as nerve or vascular injury.

CONCLUSION

Tetrafocal and pentafocal bone transport using Ilizarov technique could be an alternative treatment option in selected cases with distal tibial defect > 6 cm. It could shorten the distraction period, fasten regeneration, and reduce the associated complications.

Matched comparative study of trifocal bone transport versus induced membrane followed by trifocal bone transport in the treatment of segmental tibial defects caused by posttraumatic osteomyelitis

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and clinical outcomes of trifocal bone transport (TBT) versus induced membrane followed by trifocal bone transport (IM + TBT) in the treatment of tibial defects > 6 cm caused by posttraumatic osteomyelitis.

Methods

A total of 69 eligible patients with tibial defects > 6 cm who were treated between January 2010 and January 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Overall, 18 patients treated by IM + TBT and 18 treated by TBT were matched by propensity score analysis. The mean tibial defect after radical debridement was 6.97 ± 0.76 cm (range, 6.0 to 8.9 cm). The measurements, including demographic data, external fixation index (EFI), external fixation time (EFT), duration of docking union, bone and functional outcomes evaluated by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system, and postoperative complications evaluated by Paley classification during follow-up were recorded.

Results

Age, gender, injury mechanism, affected side, defect size, previous operation time, and follow-up time were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean EFT was 293.8 ± 12.1 days in the TBT group vs. 287.5 ± 15.3 days in the IM + TBT group. The mean EFI was 36.02 ± 2.76 days/cm vs. 34.69 ± 2.83 days/cm, respectively. The mean duration of docking union was 210.7 ± 33.6 days vs. 179.7 ± 22.9 days, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative bone and functional results between the two groups. Delayed union or nonunion and soft tissue incarceration were significantly reduced in the IM + TBT group compared to those in the TBT group.

Conclusion

Both TBT and IM + TBT achieved satisfactory postoperative bone and functional outcomes in patients with segmental tibial defects > 6 cm following posttraumatic osteomyelitis, while IM + TBT had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complication in delayed union or nonunion and soft tissue incarceration, as well as faster docking union.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05501-8.

Evaluation of the efficacy of ipsilateral fibular transfer for reconstruction of large tibial defects in children: a retrospective study

Background

Reconstruction of large tibial defects is often a major challenge in limb salvage. This study aimed to evaluate initial follow-up results of ipsilateral fibula transfer for the treatment of large tibial defects in children.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed between September 2014 and April 2021. Ten children were identified as having large tibial defects. The children underwent ipsilateral fibula transfer. We then evaluated initial healing, tibial length discrepancy, ankle varus/valgus, fibular position, refracture, infection, and function.

Results

Five boys and five girls, with an average age of 7.2 years, were evaluated. The transferred fibula was united in the patients. The mean follow-up period after fibular transposition was 43 months. The patients achieved primary bone union; the mean time to union was 8.4 months (range, 4–18 months). Complications included refracture (30%), infection (40%), tibia malunion (30%), ankle varus (30%), sensory loss of toes (10%), and ankle valgus (10%). No other major complications were observed. All 10 patients were able to perform activities of daily living and return to their normal activities.

Conclusion

Ipsilateral fibula transfer is a salvage surgery for the treatment of large tibial defects in children with congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia, traumatic nonunion of the tibia, and/or tibial defect after chronic osteomyelitis. However, long-term results still need to be followed up.

Limb reconstruction in a resource-limited environment

INTRODUCTION

Limb salvage and reconstruction are often challenging and even more so in the limited resource setting. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the strategies for addressing the unique obstacles and opportunities of limb reconstructive surgery in resource-limited environments globally.

METHODS

We review (1) the global burden and dimension of the problem, (2) the relevance of orthopedic forums and communication, (3) free and open-access software for deformity analysis and correction, (4) bidirectional learning opportunities, and the value of fellowships and mentoring between resource-rich and resource-limited countries, and (5) how societies like SICOT can help to tackle the problem. Finally, case examples are presented to demonstrate the choice of surgical implants, their availability in regions with limited resources, and how the universal principles of limb reconstruction can be applied, irrespective of resource availability.

RESULTS

Limb reconstruction can often be life-changing surgery with the goals of limb salvage, improved function, and ambulation. The contradiction of relatively few severe limb deformities in high-income countries (HICs) with abundant resources and the considerable burden of limb deformities in resource-limited countries is striking. Free, open access to education and software planning tools are of paramount importance to achieve this goal of limb reconstruction. Bidirectional learning, i.e., knowledge exchange between individual surgeons and societies with limited and abundant resources, can be reached via fellowships and mentoring. The presented cases highlight (1) fixator-assisted wound closure obliviating the need for plastic surgery, (2) open bone transport, and (3) hinged Ilizarov frames for correction of severe deformities. These cases underline that optimal clinical outcome can be achieved with low-cost and readily available implants when the principles of limb reconstruction are skillfully applied.

DISCUSSION

Limb lengthening and reconstruction are based on universally applicable principles. These have to be applied regardless of the planning tool or surgical implant availability to achieve the goals of limb salvage and improved quality of life.

Reconstruction of massive tibial defect caused by osteomyelitis using induced membrane followed by trifocal bone transport technique: a retrospective study and our experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical outcomes of the application of induced membrane followed by trifocal bone transport technique in the treatment of massive tibial defect caused by osteomyelitis.

METHOD

A total of 18 eligible patients with tibial defect > 6 cm caused by osteomyelitis who were admitted to our institution from January 2010 to January 2016 and treated by induced membrane followed by trifocal bone transport technique. There were 12 male and 6 females with an average age of 40.4 years old. A detailed demographic data (age, sex, etiology, previous operation time, defect size and location, interval from Masquelet technique to trifocal bone transport technique, external fixation index (EFI), duration of regenerate consolidation and docking union) were collected, bone and functional outcomes were evaluated by Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system. Complications during and in the period of follow up were recorded and evaluated by Paley classification at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

The etiology include posttraumatic osteomyelitis in 13 cases and primary osteomyelitis in 5 cases. An average of previous operation time was 3.4 times. Mean tibial defect after radical debridement was 6.8 cm. An average interval duration from formation of induced membrane to trifocal bone transport was 4.8 weeks. An average of EFI was 37.1 days/cm, the duration of regenerate consolidation and docking union were 124.7 days and 186.4 days, respectively. An average time of follow-up after removal of external fixator was 28.5 month without recurrence of osteomyelitis. The bony outcome was excellent in 6 cases, good in 8 cases, fair in 3 cases and poor in 1 case, and functional outcome was excellent in 4 cases, good in 10 cases, fair in 2 cases and poor in 2 cases. The most common complication was pin tract infection which occurred in 15 cases and there were no major complications such as nerve or vascular injury.

CONCLUSION

Massive tibial defect caused by osteomyelitis can be successfully treated first stage using induced membrane followed by second stage using trifocal bone transport technique, which is an effective method in terms of radical elimination of osteomyelitis with expected clinical outcomes.