Multidisciplinary programme for rehabilitation of chronic low back pain - factors predicting successful return to work

THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAMME FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC SPINAL PAIN: OUTCOMES WITH WORK STATUS AS THE PRIMARY FOCUS

Objective

To assess the efficacy of the multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programme for chronic spinal patients as to work status, physical functioning, pain intensity, health-related quality of life and the psychosocial domain.

Design

This is a retrospective, single-centre, observational cohort study.

Subjects/Patients

A total of 209 subjects (mean age 41.5 ± 11.4 years) with chronic spinal pain participated in the rehabilitation programme.

Methods

Evaluations were conducted through standardized questionnaires at baseline and at the end of the rehabilitation programme.

Results

Patients were more likely to be at work. Sick leave and work VAS changed significantly. Patients in blue-collar jobs are less likely to return to work. Pain intensity, physical functioning, health-related quality of life and lumbar and cervical range of motion improved significantly.

Conclusion

The multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programme for chronic spinal patients improved the rate of return to work. In daily clinical practice, attention must be given to reducing mobility issues in daily life in order to get patients back to work. The occupational therapist should give patients with blue-collar jobs sufficient attention early in the programme in order to achieve a higher rate of return to work.

Integrative medicine for musculoskeletal pains - A proposed model based on clinical experience

With an increasing number of chronic diseases and related disabilities, modern medicine is falling short of offering definitive, cost-effective, long-term solutions. As we realize contemporary medicine's limitations and side effects, we are gravitating towards whole-person care. Taking learnings from integrative medicine treatment of musculoskeletal pains, I comprehended that a paradigm shift is needed in thinking about etiopathogenesis and diagnosing disease. Different healing possibilities can be identified in humans if we shift our focus from reductionist science to whole-person care. Each health condition is an outcome of disturbed homeostasis involving multiple body systems. Based on homeostatic balancing principles and clinical experience, five interrelated and interdependent pathways are discussed. Based on these pathways, a working model of integrative medicine is presented. It can act as a template for medical practitioners to start integrative medicine practice for the benefit of patients. To make integrative medicine mainstream, there is a need to standardize care, frame regulations, train and educate the practitioners. At the same, it shall be put to rigorous scientific experimentation, research, and scrutiny.

Propensity-matched Comparison Between Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Impact on patient-perceived Quality of Life

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the burden between chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP) and axial spondyloarthropathy (SpA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Chronic nonspecific LBP and SpA are two debilitating yet different chronic musculoskeletal disorders. To compare their burden, propensity score matching is used to control for potential confounders and match the study subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two prospectively collected cohorts of LBP (n=269) and SpA (n=218) patients were studied. Outcomes included current LBP, 36-item Short Form Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level Questionnaire, and EuroQol Visual Analog Scale. With the inherent differences between the two types of patients, propensity score matching was performed for comparing the two groups. Baseline covariates of age, sex, education level, occupation, smoking, and drinking history were selected for the estimation of propensity scores for each subject with the logistic regression model. Significant independent variables for the outcome of current back pain were included in the multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

A total of 127 matched pairs were identified, with 254 patients. In the matched cohort, more patients with chronic LBP had current back pain (95.3%) as compared with SpA (71.7%). Patients with SpA were younger ( P <0.001), with more males ( P <0.001), and better educated ( P =0.001). There was less current back pain and higher nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use ( P <0.001). Most SpA patients had lower Oswestry Disability Index than LBP patients and with low disease activity. Patients with LBP had worse outcome scores as compared with SpA patients given the same Visual Analog Scale. LBP patients had 8.6 times the odds (95% CI: 3.341-20.671; P <0.001) of experiencing current back pain compared with SpA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The disease activity of SpA patients is well controlled. However, patients with chronic LBP have worse pain severity, disability, and health-related quality of life. This has implications on resource utilization and the necessity of advancing LBP understanding and management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Type I prognostic study.

Personalised rehabilitation to improve return to work in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type II after spinal cord stimulation implantation: a study protocol for a 12-month randomised controlled trial-the OPERA study

BACKGROUND

For patients with therapy-refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome type II (PSPS-T2), spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may serve as an effective minimally invasive treatment. Despite the evidence that SCS can improve return to work (RTW), only 9.5 to 14% of patients implanted with SCS are effectively capable of returning to work. Thus, it seems that current post-operative interventions are not effective for achieving RTW after SCS implantation in clinical practice. The current objective is to examine whether a personalised biopsychosocial rehabilitation programme specifically targeting RTW alters the work ability in PSPS-T2 patients after SCS implantation compared to usual care.

METHODS

A two-arm, parallel-group multicentre randomised controlled trial will be conducted including 112 patients who will be randomised (1:1) to either (a) a personalised biopsychosocial RTW rehabilitation programme of 14 weeks or (b) a usual care arm, both with a follow-up period until 12 months after the intervention. The primary outcome is work ability. The secondary outcomes are work status and participation, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, physical activity and functional disability, functional capacities, sleep quality, kinesiophobia, self-management, anxiety, depression and healthcare expenditure.

DISCUSSION

Within the OPERA project, we propose a multidisciplinary personalised biopsychosocial rehabilitation programme specifically targeting RTW for patients implanted with SCS, to tackle the high socio-economic burden of patients that are not re-entering the labour market. The awareness is growing that the burden of PSPS-T2 on our society is expected to increase over time due to the annual increase of spinal surgeries. However, innovative and methodologically rigorous trials exploring the potential to decrease the socio-economic burden when patients initiate a trajectory with SCS are essentially lacking.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05269212. Registered on 7 March 2022.

Impact of Active Physiotherapy Rehabilitation on Pain and Global and Functional Improvement 1-2 Months after Lumbar Disk Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Lumbar disc surgery is a common procedure for patients with lower back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation. This study aims to evaluate the impact of active physiotherapeutic rehabilitation on global/functional improvement and subjective pain score reduction among patients 1–2 months following lumbar disc surgery. The outcomes of this study are to assess the impact of active physiotherapeutic rehabilitation on functional improvement and subjective improvement in pain behavior post active rehabilitation. The outcomes are measured as pain assessed using the visual analog scale, global measurement of improvement, back pain functional status, and return to work. Methods: Databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed (10 June 1996, 2022), Web of Science (10 June 1997, 2022), Scopus (15 March, 10 June 2004, 2022), CINAHL Plus (10 June 1961, 2022), and Cochrane (10 June 1993, 2022) were reviewed without any language restrictions. All studies were systematically screened; however, only randomized controlled trials were eligible against the inclusion/exclusion criteria. All statistical tests were conducted in Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4. The quality of studies was appraised using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach and the risk-of-bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Results: Fifteen articles were identified, enrolling a total of 2188 patients, where the majority of active rehabilitation interventions continued for 3 months. All these interventions began 1–2 months postoperatively, and quantitative findings were presented as mean scores. The subjective pain scores were significantly lower in the interventional group, with a mean difference (MD) of −7.01 (p = 0.004). The pain disability score was considerably lower in the interventional group, with an MD of −3.94 (p = 0.002). Global improvement was higher in the interventional group (OR = 1.94, p = 0.0001). Conclusions: This study presents significant improvement in all parameters concerning pain and functionality. Postoperative rehabilitation requires optimization concerning timing, duration, intensity, and associated components to benefit patients post lumbar disc surgery.