The first magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) in the world - lessons learned and how the identified complications helped to develop the implant in the past decade: case report

Autofusion in growing rod surgery for early onset scoliosis; what do we know so far?

The evolving landscape of early onset scoliosis management has shifted from the traditional paradigm of early definitive spinal fusion towards modern growth-friendly implants, particularly Growing Rods (GR). Despite the initial classification of GR treatment as a fusionless procedure, the phenomenon of autofusion has emerged as a critical consideration in understanding its outcomes. Studies have demonstrated the presence of autofusion since the early 1980s. The consequences of autofusion are extensive, impacting curve correction, diminishing trunk growth rate, and contributing to the "law of diminishing returns" in growing rod surgery. The literature suggests that autofusion may complicate definitive fusion surgery, leading to prolonged and intricate procedures involving multiple osteotomies. Additionally, it poses challenges in identifying anatomical landmarks during surgery, potentially increasing the risk of complications and revisions. While autofusion poses challenges to achieving optimal outcomes in growing rod treatment, it cannot be considered a standalone replacement for definitive fusion. Recent advances aim to limit autofusion and enhance treatment outcomes. In this review, we will delve into the existing literature on autofusion, examining studies that have documented its presence, probable causes, pathophysiology, potential implications for long-term patient outcomes, and possible new implants and techniques that decrease its incidence.

Less-Invasive Approach to Early-Onset Scoliosis—Surgical Technique for Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) Based on Treatment of 2-Year-Old Child with Severe Scoliosis

Background: Spinal deformities in children can be caused by various etiologies, such as congenital, syndromic, neuromuscular, or idiopathic. Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is diagnosed before the age of ten years, and when the curvature continues to progress and exceeds a Cobb angle of 60–65 degrees, surgical treatment should be considered. Initial minimally invasive surgery and the implantation of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) allows for the noninvasive distraction of the spine, growing, and avoids multiple operations associated with the classic distractions of standard growing rods. Case presentation: A 2-year-old girl was admitted to our clinic with rapidly progressive thoracic scoliosis. The major curve of the thoracic spine Cobb angle was 122° at 30 months. No congenital deformities were detected. The surgical technique was the less-invasive percutaneous and subfascial implantation of MCGRs, without long incisions on the back and the non-invasive ambulatory lengthening of her spine over the next 4 years. Conclusions: MCGR is a safe procedure for EOS patients. It is extremely effective at correcting spinal deformity; controlling the growth and curvature of the spine as the child develops during growth; reducing the number of hospitalizations and anesthesia; and minimizing the physical and mental burden of young patients, parents, and their families.

Quantitative assessments of image intensifier distortion induced by weak (Sub-Gauss) magnetic fields during fluoroscopically-guided procedures

BACKGROUND

Fluoroscopically-guided procedures at our hospital have been aborted due to sigmoidal distortion (S-distortion) when an image intensifier (II) system is used in a surgical environment distant from any apparent sources of strong magnetic fields, such as a nearby magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Clearly, current clinical practice fails to account for the impact of ambient weak magnetic fields and/or other contributing factors on S-distortion induction.

PURPOSE

This study attempts to quantitatively assess the threshold level of magnetic field, along with other potential factors, that can induce intolerable S-distortion during image-intensified fluoroscopically-guided procedures. We will also discover the origins of such level of magnetic field in typical surgical facilities and provide our practical mitigation strategies accordingly.

METHODS

Ten surgical facilities and their accessory equipment (e.g., surgical tables) were screened using an AC/DC gaussmeter for the distribution and magnitude of magnetic field (magnetic flux density). A 'hot spot' of magnetic field was identified to further investigate the induction of S-distortion by scanning a titanium rod phantom using a GE OEC 9900 Elite II system placed at increasing distance from the 'hot spot' corresponding to decreasing magnetic field experienced by the II. The measurements were compared to that on a 'cold spot', and a GE flat panel detector (FPD) fluoroscopy was used as the negative control. Rod phantoms made of various magnetic susceptible materials (titanium, steel, aluminium, and copper) were scanned to explore the potential effects of implant material on S-distortion. An upper extremity anthropomorphic phantom was imaged on various surgical tables to mimic clinical sceneries. The GE II model and Siemens ARCADIS Orbic II model were compared to evaluate if S-distortion induction varied among different II models. Two metrics, angle of rotation (θ) and deviation/length ratio, were used to quantify the degree of S-distortion. Three designs of external magnetic shielding were evaluated for mitigating S-distortion.

RESULTS

We identified static magnetic fields up to 2500 µT and 70 µT on the floor and at 1-meter height, respectively, in random locations of surgical facilities. A large variation of magnetic field (64 ± 20 µT) was detected on the surface of surgical tables, with background magnetic fields of ∼35 µT. Quantitative assessments demonstrated that even weak magnetic fields at sub-Gauss level (<100 µT) could induce noticeable distortion artifacts, deemed unacceptable (θ > 4°). S-distortion was independent of the implant material being imaged but dependent on the II model - the threshold magnetic fields (4° distortion induction) were as low as 47 µT and 94 µT for the GE and Siemens II models. Mitigation possibilities of S-distortion include relocating the II to an area with subthreshold magnetic fields and shielding the II utilizing cylindrical mu-metal shields with an extension for alleviating the effect of openings.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates that ambient sub-Gauss magnetic fields originating from any possible sources in a surgical environment have to be carefully considered when performing an image-intensified fluoroscopically-guided procedure, because such weak magnetic fields are likely able to induce unacceptable S-distortion artifacts in the acquired X-ray images leading to undesirable surgical outcomes.

Autofusion With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: A Case Report

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are an effective alternative to traditional growing rods (TGRs) in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS), with comparable deformity correction despite fewer planned reoperations. This case report presents a unique case of autofusion in a patient with tetraplegic cerebral palsy, thoracic myelomeningocele, and EOS who was treated with dual MCGR instrumentation and underwent serial lengthening procedures for four years. We detail the operative and radiographic findings in a novel case of autofusion encountered after MCGR placement to treat EOS. An eight-year-old female with tetraplegic cerebral palsy causing a 94° right thoracic neuromuscular scoliosis was treated with dual MCGRs; she then underwent serial lengthenings every four months. At 12 years of age, during MCGR explantation and posterior spinal fusion, dense heterotopic autofusion was encountered around the MCGR instrumentation, limiting further deformity correction. The benefits of MCGRs make them an appealing alternative to TGRs for the treatment of EOS. Although the theoretical risk of autofusion in MCGRs is low, recent case reports propose autofusion as a possible reason for MCGRs' failure to lengthen.

Longitudinal comparison of direct medical cost, radiological and health-related quality of life treatment outcomes between traditional growing rods and magnetically controlled growing rods from preoperative to maturity

Background

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have replaced traditional growing rods (TGR) in the past decade, however, a comparison of their direct costs and treatment outcomes based on real longitudinal data is lacking. This study aims to compare the direct cost and treatment outcomes between TGR and MCGR, whilst incorporating complications, reoperations and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) throughout the entire treatment course.

Methods

Patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) who underwent initial growing rod surgery between 2003 and 2016 at a tertiary scoliosis clinic were studied with longitudinal data. Accumulated direct medical costs were calculated based on the unit cost of surgeries of each TGR and MCGR, costs incurred for any rod exchange or remedial surgery for post-operative complication. Treatment outcomes were evaluated via: Patient’s HRQoL using SRS-22r questionnaire, and radiological parameters (including major curve correction, spine length gains, spinal balance) throughout the treatment until maturity.

Results

A total of 27 EOS patients (16 MCGR, 11 TGR) were studied. Total direct cost of index surgery for MCGR was HKD$223,108 versus lower cost of HKD$135,184 for TGR (p < 0.001). At 2–3 years post-index surgery, accumulative total direct medical cost of MCGR and TGR became most comparable (TGR:MCGR ratio = 1.010) and had reached neutrality between the two groups since. Radiological parameters had no intergroup differences at maturity. For HRQoL, TGR group had shown the trend of less pain (domain score mean difference: 0.53, p = 0.024) post-index surgery and better self-appearance (domain score mean difference: 1.08, p = 0.017) before fusion. Higher satisfaction with treatment (domain score mean difference: 0.76, p = 0.029) was demonstrated by TGR patients at fusion/maturity. MCGR had negative (r_s = -0.693) versus TGR’s positive (r_s = 0.989) correlations (p < 0.05) of cost and SRS-22r total scores at 2–3 years post-index surgery.

Conclusions

From index surgery to maturity, TGR demonstrated better satisfaction with treatment by patients and comparable overall HRQoL with MCGR during the treatment course, as MCGR did not show apparent benefit despite less surgeries and cost neutrality between the two groups at 2–3 years post-index surgery.

A biomechanical study on the effect of lengthening magnitude on spine off-loading in magnetically controlled growing rod surgery: Implications on lengthening frequency

Purpose: To assess whether the magnitude of lengthening in magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) surgeries has an immediate or delayed effect on spinal off-loading. Methods: 9 whole porcine spines were instrumented using two standard MCGRs from T9 to L5. Static compression testing using a mechanical testing system (MTS) was performed at three MCGR lengthening stages (0 mm, 2 mm, and 6 mm) in each spine. At each stage, five cycles of compression at 175N with 25 min of relaxation was carried out. Off-loading was derived by comparing the load sustained by the spine with force applied by the MTS to the spine. Micro-CT imaging was subsequently performed. Results: The mean load sustained by the vertebral body before lengthening was 39.69N, and immediately after lengthening was 25.12N and 19.91N at 2 mm and 6 mm lengthening, respectively; decreasing to 10.07N, 8.31N, and 8.17N after 25 minutes of relaxation, at 0 mm, 2 mm, and 6 mm lengthening stages, respectively. There was no significant difference in off-loading between 2 mm and 6 mm lengthening stages, either instantaneously (p = 0.395) or after viscoelastic relaxation (p = 0.958). CT images showed fractures/separations at the level of pedicle screws in six spines and in the vertebral body's growth zone in five spines after 6 mm MCGR lengthening. Conclusion: This study demonstrated MCGRs cause significant off-loading of the spine leading to stress shielding. 6 mm of lengthening caused tissue damage and microfractures in some spines. There was no significant difference in spine off-loading between 2 mm and 6 mm MCGR lengthening, either immediately after lengthening or after viscoelastic relaxation.