Metacarpal shaft fixation: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plating, lag screws, and headless compression screws

Biomechanical analysis of plate versus K-wire fixation for metacarpal shaft fractures with wedge-shaped bone defects

BACKGROUND

Metacarpal shaft fracture is a common type of hand fracture. Numerous studies have explored fixing transverse fractures in the midshaft of the metacarpal bone. However, this section of the metacarpal bone is often susceptible to high-energy injury, resulting in comminuted fracture or bone loss. In such cases, wedge-shaped bone defects can develop in the metacarpal shaft, increasing the difficulty of performing fracture fixation. Notably, the research on this type of fracture fixation is limited. This study compared the abilities of four fixation methods to fix metacarpal shaft fractures with wedge-shaped bone defects.

METHODS

In total, 28 artificial metacarpal bones were used. To create wedge-shaped bone defects, an electric saw was used to create metacarpal shaft fractures at the midshaft of each bone. The artificial metacarpal bones were then divided into four groups for fixation. The bones in the first group were fixed with a dorsal locked plate (DP group), those in the second group were fixed with a volar locked plate (VP group), and those in the third group were fixed by combining dorsal and volar locked plates (DP + VP group), and those in the fourth group were fixed with two K-wires (2 K group). Cantilever bending tests were conducted using a material testing machine to measure yielding force and stiffness. The four groups' fixation capabilities were then assessed through analysis of variance and Tukey's test.

RESULTS

The DP + VP group (164.1±44.0 N) achieved a significantly higher yielding force relative to the 2 K group (50.7 ± 8.9 N); the DP group (13.6 ± 3.0 N) and VP group (12.3 ± 1.0 N) did not differ significantly in terms of yielding force, with both achieving lower yielding forces relative to the DP + VP group and 2 K group. The DP + VP group (19.8±6.3 N/mm) achieved the highest level of stiffness, and the other three groups did not differ significantly in terms of stiffness (2 K group, 5.4 ± 1.1 N/mm; DP group, 4.0 ± 0.9 N/mm; VP group, 3.9 ± 1.9 N/mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The fixation method involving the combined use of dorsal and volar locked plates (DP + VP group) resulted in optimal outcomes with respect to fixing metacarpal shaft fractures with volar wedge bone defects.

Metacarpal Shortening with Intramedullary Screw Fixation: A Cadaveric Study

Background  Intramedullary screw fixation is a commonly used technique for the management of metacarpal fractures. However, compression across the fracture site can lead to unintentional shortening of the metacarpal. Questions/Purposes  Our aim was to evaluate the risk of overshortening with differing intramedullary device designs for fixation of metacarpals. Methods  The small finger metacarpal of nine fresh-frozen cadavers were included. A metacarpal neck fracture was simulated with a 5-mm osteotomy. Three different intramedullary screw designs were compared. Each screw was placed in a retrograde fashion into the intramedullary canal and the amount of shortening measured. Screws were reversed and the number of reverse turns with the screwdriver needed to release overshortening were measured. Results  The average shortening at the osteotomy site was 2.5 mm. The mean shortening was 80%, 58%, and 12% for the partially threaded screw, fully threaded screw, and threaded nail, respectively. The mean differences of the distance shortened were statistically significant for the threaded nail compared with the partially and fully threaded screws. The partially threaded screw had the most shortening, while the threaded nail provided the least amount of shortening. When the screws were reversed, the screws did not disengage until the screw was fully removed from the osteotomy site. Conclusion  The fully threaded nail demonstrates less shortening and possibly minimizes overshortening of fractures compared with partially threaded and fully threaded screw designs. Overshortening cannot be corrected by unscrewing the screw unless completely removed from the distal fragment. Clinical Relevance  Orthopaedic surgeons may select intermedullary screws based on the design that is suited for the particular metacarpal fracture pattern.

Outcomes Following Fully Threaded Intramedullary Nailing of Metacarpal Fractures

Purpose

Intramedullary screw fixation has emerged as a popular approach for the treatment of displaced metacarpal fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the functional and radiographic outcomes of a newly designed, headless noncompressive fully threaded intramedullary nail (TIMN) for the treatment of metacarpal fractures.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who were treated with the INnate TIMN (ExsoMed) at a single academic institution with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Patient-reported functional outcomes included Quick Disabilities for the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires, return to work and physical activity time, and overall satisfaction. Radiographs were retrospectively reviewed to determine radiographic union, change in angulation, and metacarpal shortening.

Results

A total of 49 patients (58 fractures) with a mean age of 36 years (range: 17-75 years) were included. The mean follow-up time was 2.7 years (range: 1.4-4.3 years). Overall, the mean patient satisfaction rating was 4.9 of 5 (range: 3-5). The mean return to work time was 7.2 weeks (range: 0.14-28 weeks), and the mean return to sport or activity was 8.3 weeks (range: 1-28 weeks). Average QuickDASH scores across all patients were 4 (range: 0-56.9). The median radiographic healing time was 6.1 weeks (range: 4.7-15.4 weeks). Mean postoperative shortening in the fifth metacarpal fracture was 3 mm (range: -4.2 to 8 mm) at the initial postoperative visit and 3.6 mm (range: -3.3 to 7.9 mm) at the final radiographic follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed that postoperative shortening was similar, regardless of the fracture pattern. The following four complications were reported: one case of persistent pain and stiffness, one case of carpal tunnel syndrome, one nonunion, and one fractured intramedullary nail.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the TIMN allows for a reliable return to work and physical activity, high patient satisfaction, low complication rate, and minimal shortening at the final radiographic follow-up.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Intramedullary K-wires versus Alternate Techniques for Metacarpal Shaft and Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Intramedullary K-wire (IMKW) fixation is one of the mainstays for surgically treating metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. However, there remains a lack of literature comparing outcomes of the various available surgical repair techniques in all indicated metacarpals. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical advantages and drawbacks of IMKW compared with alternate fracture repair techniques. A comprehensive systematic literature review was performed to identify studies that compared clinical outcomes of IMKW to alternate metacarpal fixation modalities. Outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH/ quick DASH) scores, grip strength, union rate, visual analog scale pain, operative time, and complications. A random-effects model was used to compare IMKW to the pooled effect of other fixation techniques. A total of 10 studies were included in our analysis, comprising 497 metacarpal fractures (220 shafts and 277 necks). IMKW fixation was identified as the control group in all studies. The pooled experimental group included plates, transverse K-wires (TKWs), interfragmentary screws (IFSs), and K-wire cross-pinning (CP). In treating metacarpal shaft fractures, IMKW showed significantly shorter operative time ( p  = 0.04; mean difference = - 13; 95% confidence interval = -26 to -0.64). No significant differences were observed in treating metacarpal neck fractures for disability, grip strength, healing rate, pain, operative time, or complication rate. This systematic review and meta-analysis found no difference in clinical outcomes among various surgical techniques for treating metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. Further high evidence studies are required that investigate the efficacy and safety of IFS, CP, TKW, and intramedullary screws versus IMKW for treating closed, unstable metacarpal fractures.

Intramedullary Metacarpal Fracture Fixation: A Biomechanical Study of Screw Diameter and Comparison With Intramedullary Wire Stabilization

PURPOSE

Interest in intramedullary metacarpal fracture fixation (IMFF) with screws is increasing. However, the optimal screw diameter for fracture fixation is not yet established. In theory, larger screws should be more stable, but there is concern about long-term sequelae of larger metacarpal head defects and extensor mechanism injury created during insertion as well as implant cost. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare different diameter screws for IMFF to a popular and more cost-effective alternative of intramedullary wiring.

METHODS

Thirty-two cadaveric metacarpals were used in a transverse metacarpal shaft fracture model. Treatment groups consisted of IMFF with 3.0 × 60 mm, 3.5 x 60 mm, and 4.5 x 60 mm screws as well as 4 1.1-mm intramedullary wires. Cyclic cantilever bending was performed with the metacarpals mounted at 45° to simulate physiologic loading. Cyclical loading at 10, 20, and 30 N was performed to determine fracture displacement, stiffness, and ultimate force.

RESULTS

At 10, 20, and 30 N of cyclical loading, all screw diameters tested provided similar stability as measured by fracture displacement and were superior to the wire group. However, ultimate force under load to failure testing was similar between the 3.5- and 4.5-mm screws and superior to 3.0-mm screws and wires.

CONCLUSIONS

For IMFF, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.5-mm diameter screws provide adequate stability for early active motion and are superior to wires. When comparing the different screw diameters, 3.5- and 4.5-mm diameter screws offer similar construct stability and strength superior to the 3.0-mm diameter screw. Therefore, to minimize metacarpal head morbidity, smaller screw diameters may be preferable.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study suggests that IMFF with screws is biomechanically superior to wires in cantilever bending strength in the transverse fracture model. However, smaller screws may be sufficient to permit early active motion while minimizing metacarpal head morbidity.

Complications Following Intramedullary Screw Fixation for Metacarpal Fractures: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

There has been a recent increase in the use of intramedullary screws (IMS) for the surgical treatment of metacarpal fractures. While IMS fixation has been shown to produce excellent functional outcomes, postoperative complications have yet to be fully explored in a comprehensive way. This systematic review quantified the incidence, treatment, and results of complications following IMS fixation for metacarpal fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Central, EBSCO, and EMBASE databases. All clinical studies that documented IMS complications following metacarpal fracture fixation were included. Descriptive statistics were analyzed for all available data.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included: 2 randomized trials, 4 cohort studies, 19 case series, and 1 case report. Among the 1,014 fractures studied, 47 complications were reported across all studies (4.6%). Stiffness was the most common, followed by extension lag, loss of reduction, shortening, and complex regional pain syndrome. Other complications included screw fracture, bending, and migration; early-onset arthrosis; infection; tendon adhesion; hypertrophic scar; hematoma; and nickel allergy. Eighteen of the 47 (38%) patients with complications underwent revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications following IMS fixation of metacarpal fractures are relatively uncommon.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

The Addition of a Temporary Intramedullary K-wire to Facilitate Plating for Metacarpal Fractures

Open reduction internal fixation with plate fixation is commonly used in treating metacarpal fractures to facilitate early rehabilitation. However, it is sometimes challenging to maintain a satisfactory 3-dimensional alignment during the plating process. We present a method using a temporary centrally placed intramedullary k-wire to maintain a fundamental stability for reduction of metacarpal fractures. This method facilitates the plating process and simplifies the open reduction internal fixation of the metacarpal fractures.

Intramedullary Headless Screw Fixation for Metacarpal Fractures - Technical Tips

Metacarpal fractures are a common injury in the hand. When surgical intervention is indicated, there are multiple approaches and techniques of fixation. Intramedullary fixation has become an increasingly versatile method of fixation. The limited dissection needed for its insertion, rotational stability provided by the isthmic fit and lack of requisite hardware removal are improvements over conventional K-wire or plate fixation techniques. Multiple outcome studies have confirmed its safety and effectiveness. In this technical note, we provide some tips that can help surgeons considering intramedullary headless screw fixation of metacarpal fractures. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Biomechanical study on fixation methods for horizontal oblique metacarpal shaft fractures

OBJECTIVE

To investigate differences in the effectiveness of two lag screws, a regular bone plate, and locking bone plate fixation in treating horizontal oblique metacarpal shaft fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Horizontal oblique metacarpal shaft fractures were created in 21 artificial metacarpal bones and fixed using one of the three methods: (1) two lag screws, (2) a regular plate, and (3) a locking plate. All the specimens were subjected to the cantilever bending test performed using a material testing machine to enable recording of the force-displacement data of the specimens before failure. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare failure force and stiffness values among the three fixation methods.

RESULTS

The mean failure force of the two lag screw group (78.5 ± 6.6 N, mean + SD) was higher than those of the regular plate group (69.3 ± 17.6 N) and locking plate group (68.2 ± 14.2 N). However, the mean failure force did not significantly differ among the three groups. The mean stiffness value of the two lag screw group (17.8 ± 2.6 N/mm) was lower than those of the regular plate group (20.2 ± 10.5 N/mm) and locking plate group (21.8 ± 3.8 N/mm). However, the mean stiffness value did not significantly differ among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The fixation strength of two lag screw fixation did not significantly differ from that of regular and locking bone plate fixation, as indicated by the measurement of the ability to sustain force and stiffness.

Comparison of the fixation ability between lag screw and bone plate for oblique metacarpal shaft fracture

Background

For oblique metacarpal shaft fracture, if anatomical reduction is achieved through conservative cast immobilization rather than stable fixation, bone malrotation can easily occur, resulting in severe loss in hand prehensile function. However, whether bone plate fixation or only lag screw fixation is more preferable remains unclear. Few studies have evaluated whether screw fixation can provide biomechanical fixation strength similar to bone plate fixation.

Objective

We assessed the difference in fixation strength between fixtation with two lag screws and bone plate for oblique metacarpal shaft fractures.

Materials and methods

We created oblique metacarpal shaft fractures on 21 artificial bones and fixated them using (1) double lag screw (2LS group), (2) regular plate (RP group), or (3) locked plate (LP group). To obtain the force–displacement data, a cantilever bending test was conducted for each specimen through a material testing machine. One-way analysis of variance and a Tukey test were conducted to compare the maximum fracture force and stiffness of the three fixation methods.

Results

The maximum fracture force of the 2LS group (mean + SD: 153.6 ± 26.5 N) was significantly lower than that of the RP (211.6 ± 18.5 N) and LP (227.5 ± 10.0 N) groups (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were discovered between the RP and LP groups. The coefficient of variation for the maximum fracture force of the 2LS group (17.3%) was more than twice as high as that of the RP (8.7%) and LP (4.4%) groups. In addition, the stiffness of the three fixation methods was similar.

Conclusion

Compared with bone plate fixation, double lag screw fixation yielded slightly lower maximum bearable fracture force but similar stiffness. Therefore, this technique could be used for treating oblique metacarpal shaft fractures. However, using double lag screw fixation alone is technically demanding and requires considerable surgical experiences to produce consistent results.