Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Thai version of the STarT Back Screening Tool in patients with non-specific low back pain

Reproducibility and content validity of the Slovenian version of the STarT Back Screening Tool for chronicity risk assessment in patients with low back pain

Chronic pain is the most common cause of impaired work ability and thus represents a significant social and economic burden. STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) is the most often used screening tool for rapid identification and classification of patients for their risk of development of chronic low back pain, which is valid and reliable in the original English version and translation into other languages. The aim of the present study was to translate the SBT into Slovenian and to evaluate its content validity and reliability. We translated the SBT from English into Slovenian and back according to the standard protocol. We tested its metric properties on a group of patients with low back pain aged 18 to 65 years. The reliability of the reassessment was calculated using the ICC and specific agreement, while the content validity of the questionnaire was determined using the ceiling and floor effect. Of the 42 patients who participated in the study, 42.9% were at low risk, 33.3% were at moderate risk, and 23.8% were at high risk of developing chronic pain, according to the SBT. The ICC for the entire sample was 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.98). The Slovenian translation of the SBT showed excellent specific agreement between the initial and repeat assessments: 91.4% for the low-risk group, 85.7% for the moderate-risk group, and 95.2% for the high-risk group. In addition, it showed good content validity, as no ceiling or floor effects were detected. The Slovenian translation of the questionnaire is suitable for clinical use.

Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Thai version of the modified STarT Back Screening Tool in individuals with neck pain

BACKGROUND

The modified STarT Back Screening Tool (mSBST) can be used to classify individuals with neck pain (NP) into low, medium, and high risk for chronicity. However, the mSBST-Thai version (mSBST-TH) for NP does not exist.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to adapt the SBST-TH into the mSBST-TH and evaluate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The adaptation process committee included one researcher, one musculoskeletal physical therapist, and one Thai linguistic expert. A total of 261 participants (aged 20-70 years) with NP in Phitsanulok Province were invited to complete the mSBST-TH, visual analogue scale, neck disability index, fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ), pain catastrophizing scale, EuroQol five-dimensions five-levels questionnaire (EQ5D-5L), and EQ5D-5L-visual analogue scale (EQ5D-5L-VAS). Fifty participants completed the mSBST-TH twice, with an interval of 48 hours to perform test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the mSBST-TH total score was 0.73. Factor analysis revealed two components, psychosocial and physical. The intraclass correlation coefficient of test-retest reliability was found to be 0.81 for the total score. Moderate correlations were found between the mSBST-TH and all questionnaires, except for the FABQ-work. The discriminative validity was excellent between the mSBST-TH total score and the EQ5D-5L-VAS. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the mSBST-TH total score were 0.56 and 1.56, respectively. No significant floor and ceiling effects were found.

CONCLUSION

The mSBST-TH was successfully adapted with no ambiguity reported. Furthermore, the mSBST-TH has presented acceptable psychometric evaluation.

Consistencia interna, validez convergente, discriminante y de criterio del Start Back Screening Tool en una muestra colombiana

Introducción. El dolor lumbar (DL) es una causa frecuente de consulta y una de las principales causas de incapacidad laboral permanente. La estratificación del riesgo de discapacidad por DL permite desarrollar intervenciones terapéuticas específicas; sin embargo, dicha estratificación requiere instrumentos válidos y confiables. Objetivo. Determinar la consistencia interna y la validez convergente, discriminante y de criterio del cuestionario Start Back Screening Tool (SBST) en una muestra colombiana. Materiales y métodos. Estudio cuantitativo de validación de pruebas realizado en 68 pacientes adultos con DL que recibieron una intervención fisioterapéutica (10 sesiones) entre 2019 y 2020 en una clínica de Chía, Colombia. Los participantes diligenciaron el SBST, la escala numérica de clasificación del dolor (ENCD) y el cuestionario Roland Morris Disability (RMD) en tres momentos: pre-, post-intervención y luego de 6 semanas de seguimiento (sin tratamiento). La consistencia interna del SBST se determinó mediante los coeficientes Alfa de Cronbach, Omega, λ6 y Greatest lower bound (GLB). En cuanto a la validez de criterio y de constructo, se evaluaron las correlaciones entre el instrumento y la ENCD y el RMD mediante el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson. Finalmente, se realizó un ANOVA de medidas repetidas entre las medias de puntaje del SBST obtenidas en los tres momentos para estimar su validez discriminante. Resultados. La consistencia interna del instrumento, según los diferentes coeficientes, varió entre aceptable y alta (Alfa= 0.634; Omega=0.648; λ6=0.664; GLB = 0.780). Se observaron correlaciones positivas entre el puntaje promedio en el SBST y los puntajes promedio en la ENCD (r=0.257; p=0.035) y la RMD (r=0.475; p<0.0010), así como diferencias significativas entre los puntajes promedio del SBST pre, post-intervención y seguimiento (ANOVA: F=33.722; p <0.001). Conclusión. El SBST es un instrumento válido y confiable para el clasificar el nivel de riesgo de mal pronóstico en pacientes colombianos con DL.