1
|
Zhang L, Cui J, Cai M, Li B, Ma G, Wang X, Liu Y, Deng J, Zhang R, Liang H, Yang J. Comparison of short‑term outcomes and 3-year overall survival between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Acta Chir Belg 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38693890 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2024.2348256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the increasing use of robotic gastrectomy (RG) as an alternative to laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in treating gastric cancer, controversy remains over the advantages of RG compared to LG and there is a paucity of studies comparing the two techniques regarding patient survival. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, 675 patients undergoing minimally invasive gastrectomy were recruited from January 2016 to January 2018 (LG: n = 567; RG: n = 108). A one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was applied to minimize the selection bias due to confounding factors, yielding 104 patients in each of the RG and LG groups. After matching, the short-term outcomes and 3-year overall survival were compared in the two groups. RESULTS The PSM cohort analysis showed a similar 3-year overall survival between RG and LG groups (p = .249). Concerning the short-term outcomes, the RG compared to LG resulted in lower blood loss (p = .01), lower postoperative complications (p = .001), lower postoperative pain (p = .016), earlier initiation of soft diet (p = .011), shorter hospital stay (p = .012), but higher hospitalization expenses (p = .001). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that RG may offer advantages in terms of blood loss, surgical complications, recovery time, and pain management compared to LG while maintaining similar overall survival rates. However, RG is associated with higher hospital costs, potentially limiting its wider adoption. Further research, including large, multi-center randomized controlled trials with longer patient follow-up, particularly for advanced gastric cancer, is needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Zhang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Jingli Cui
- Department of General Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, P. R. China
| | - Mingzhi Cai
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Bin Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Gang Ma
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Xuejun Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Yong Liu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Jingyu Deng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Rupeng Zhang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Han Liang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Jilong Yang
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dias AR, Pereira MA, Ramos MFKP, de Oliveira RJ, Yagi OK, Ribeiro U. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A Western propensity score matched analysis. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38630937 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted gastrectomy (RG) has been shown to be safe and feasible in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). However, it is unclear whether RG is equivalent to laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), especially in the Western world. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of RG and LG in GC patients. METHODS We reviewed all gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative gastrectomy by minimally invasive approach in our institution from 2009 to 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to reduce selection bias. DaVinci Si platform was used for RG. RESULTS A total of 156 patients were eligible for inclusion (48 RG and 108 LG). Total gastrectomy was performed in 21.3% and 25% of cases in LG and RG, respectively. The frequency of stage pTNM II/III was 48.1%, and 54.2% in the LG and RG groups (p = 0.488). After PSM, 48 patients were matched in each group. LG and RG had a similar number of dissected lymph nodes (p = 0.759), operative time (p = 0.421), and hospital stay (p = 0.353). Blood loss was lower in the RG group (p = 0.042). The major postoperative complications rate was 16.7% for LG and 6.2% for RG (p = 0.109). The 30-day mortality rate was 2.1% and 0% for LG and RG, respectively (p = 1.0). There was no significant difference between the LG and RG groups for disease-free survival (79.6% vs. 61.2%, respectively; p = 0.155) and overall survival (75.9% vs. 65.7%, respectively; p = 0.422). CONCLUSION RG had similar surgical and long-term outcomes compared to LG, with less blood loss observed in RG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Roncon Dias
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marina A Pereira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcus F K P Ramos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo José de Oliveira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Osmar Kenji Yagi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ulysses Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Loureiro P, Barbosa JP, Vale JF, Barbosa J. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Gastric Cancer Surgery: Short-Term Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 25,521 Patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023; 33:782-800. [PMID: 37204324 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer has the third highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique to perform curative resection surgery. Objective: Compare laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and robotic gastrectomy (RG) regarding short-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the following topics: "Gastrectomy," "Laparoscopic," and "Robotic Surgical Procedures." The included studies compared short-term outcomes between LG and RG. Individual risk of bias was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) scale. Results: There was no significant difference between RG and LG regarding conversion rate, reoperation rate, mortality, overall complications, anastomotic leakage, distal and proximal resection margin distances, and recurrence rate. However, mean blood loss (mean difference [MD] -19.43 mL, P < .00001), length of hospital stay (MD -0.50 days, P = .0007), time to first flatus (MD -0.52 days, P < .00001), time to oral intake (MD -0.17 days, P = .0001), surgical complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III (risk ratio [RR] 0.68, P < .0001), and pancreatic complications (RR 0.51, P = .007) were significantly lower in the RG group. Furthermore, the number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly higher in the RG group. Nevertheless, the RG group showed a significantly higher operation time (MD 41.19 minutes, P < .00001) and cost (MD 3684.27 U.S. Dollars, P < .00001). Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the choice of robotic surgery over laparoscopy concerning relevant surgical complications. However, longer operation time and higher cost remain crucial limitations. Randomized clinical trials are required to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of RG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Loureiro
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - José Pedro Barbosa
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Stomatology, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - José Barbosa
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu Y, Gao G, Liang Y, Li T, Li T. Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery for old rectal cancer patients. Updates Surg 2023:10.1007/s13304-023-01504-9. [PMID: 37233966 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01504-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Robotic surgery is widely utilized for rectal cancer. Older patients are associated with comorbidity and diminished cardiopulmonary reserve, resulting in uncertainty and reluctance to perform robotic surgery in older patients. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in older rectal cancer patients. We collected the data of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and operated at our hospital from May 2015 to January 2021. All patients undergoing robotic surgery were classified into two groups: the old group (≥ 70 years) and young group (< 70 years). Perioperative outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Risk factors related to postoperative complications were also explored. A total of old N = 114 and young N = 324 rectal patients were enrolled in our study. Older patients were prone to exhibit comorbidity than the young and had lower body mass index and higher scores of American Society of Anesthesiologists than the young. No statistical difference was found in operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph nodes retrieved, tumor size, pathological TNM stage, hospital stay after surgery and total hospital cost between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative complications did not show difference between the two groups. On multivariate analyses, male sex and longer operative time could predict postoperative complications, whereas old age was not an independent factor for postoperative complications. After careful preoperative evaluation, robotic surgery is a technically feasible and safe procedure for older rectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaxiong Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
- Department of Graduate School, Medical College of Nanchang University, No. 461 Bayi Avenue, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Gengmei Gao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
- Department of Graduate School, Medical College of Nanchang University, No. 461 Bayi Avenue, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Yahang Liang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
- Department of Graduate School, Medical College of Nanchang University, No. 461 Bayi Avenue, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
- Department of Graduate School, Medical College of Nanchang University, No. 461 Bayi Avenue, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Taiyuan Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun T, Wang Y, Liu Y, Wang Z. Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies and randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg 2022; 22:427. [DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01881-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Da Vinci robotic surgery system, a novel type of surgery, was widespread in surgical field. However, the perioperative outcomes of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) are still controversy, despite several observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) had been reported. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched (PSM) and RCT studies to evaluated the perioperative feasibility and safety of RDG.
Methods
Studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase database, and screened according to the defined limitations. The quality of PSM studies and RCT studies were respectively assessed by ROBINS-I and Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Extracted data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.4.
Results
7 PSM studies and 1 RCT with a total of 2763 patients were included in this analysis. The longer operative time (MD = 31.42, 95% CI [22.88, 39.96], p < 0.00001), less blood loss (MD = − 25.89, 95% CI [− 36.18, − 15.6], p < 0.00001), more retrieved lymph nodes (MD = 3.46, 95% CI [2.94, 3.98], p < 0.00001), shorter time to first flatus (MD = − 0.08, 95% CI [− 0.13, − 0.02], p = 0.006) and liquid intake (MD = − 0.13, 95% CI [− 0.22, − 0.05], p = 0.002) were observed in RDG group compared with LDG group. There are no statistically significant in time to start soft diet, postoperative hospital stays, overall complications, complications Grade I–II, complications Grade ≥ III, anastomotic leakage, bleeding, intra-abdominal bleeding, intraluminal bleeding, ileus, abdominal infection, delayed gastric emptying and wound complications.
Conclusions
RDG showed less blood loss and more retrieved lymph nodes, revealed less time to first flatus and liquid intake after operation. But the operative time was longer in RDG group than in LDG. The incidence rate of postoperative complications was comparable between RDG and LDG.
Collapse
|
6
|
Rosa F, Schena CA, Laterza V, Quero G, Fiorillo C, Strippoli A, Pozzo C, Papa V, Alfieri S. The Role of Surgery in the Management of Gastric Cancer: State of the Art. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225542. [PMID: 36428634 PMCID: PMC9688256 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery still represents the mainstay of treatment of all stages of gastric cancer (GC). Surgical resections represent potentially curative options in the case of early GC with a low risk of node metastasis. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and indocyanine green fluorescence are novel techniques which may improve the employment of stomach-sparing procedures, ameliorating quality of life without compromising oncological radicality. Nonetheless, the diffusion of these techniques is limited in Western countries. Conversely, radical gastrectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy and multimodal treatment represents a valid option in the case of advanced GC. Differences between Eastern and Western recommendations still exist, and the optimal multimodal strategy is still a matter of investigation. Recent chemotherapy protocols have made surgery available for patients with oligometastatic disease. In this context, intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapy via HIPEC or PIPAC has emerged as an alternative weapon for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. In conclusion, the surgical management of GC is still evolving together with the multimodal strategy. It is mandatory for surgeons to be conscious of the current evolution of the surgical management of GC in the era of multidisciplinary and tailored medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fausto Rosa
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Laterza
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Giuseppe Quero
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorillo
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonia Strippoli
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Carmelo Pozzo
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Papa
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ma S, Li L, Yang C, Liu B, Zhang X, Liao T, Liu S, Jin H, Cai H, Guo T. Advances in the application of robotic surgical systems in gastric cancer: A narrative review. Asian J Surg 2022:S1015-9584(22)01484-1. [PMID: 36334999 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.10.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the common malignant tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, and surgery is currently an important treatment for progressive gastric cancer. With the development of technology, the simultaneous maturation of artificial intelligence (AI), fifth-generation (5G) telecommunication networks and the internet of things (IOT) has brought significant efficacy and new opportunities for the surgical treatment of gastric malignancies. The combination of 5G network and remote surgical robotic system is the future trend of radical gastric cancer surgery, and the "unmanned" treatment mode of fully automated robotic gastric cancer radical surgery will be realized soon.
Collapse
|
8
|
Gong S, Li X, Tian H, Song S, Lu T, Jing W, Huang X, Xu Y, Wang X, Zhao K, Yang K, Guo T. Clinical efficacy and safety of robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:2734-2748. [PMID: 35020057 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08994-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) is a new technique that is rapidly gaining popularity and may help overcome the limitations of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG); however, its safety and therapeutic efficacy remain controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RDG. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies that compared RDG and LDG and were published between the time of database inception and May 2021. We assessed the bias risk of the observational studies using ROBIN-I, and a random effect model was always applied. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 22 studies involving 5386 patients. Compared with LDG, RDG was associated with longer operating time (Mean Difference [MD] = 43.88, 95% CI = 35.17-52.60), less intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 24.84, 95% CI = - 41.26 to - 8.43), a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (MD = 2.41, 95% CI = 0.77-4.05), shorter time to first flatus (MD = - 0.09, 95% CI = - 0.15 to - 0.03), shorter postoperative hospital stay (MD = - 0.68, 95% CI = - 1.27 to - 0.08), and lower incidence of pancreatic fistula (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07-0.79). Mean proximal and distal resection margin distances, time to start liquid and soft diets, and other complications were not significantly different between RDG and LDG groups. However, in the propensity-score-matched meta-analysis, the differences in time to first flatus and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups lost significance. CONCLUSIONS Based on the available evidence, RDG appears feasible and safe, shows better surgical and oncological outcomes than LDG and, comparable postoperative recovery and postoperative complication outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiyi Gong
- Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750000, Ningxia, China.,Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, The Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, 222 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Xiong Li
- Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750000, Ningxia, China.,Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, The Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, 222 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Hongwei Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Department of Clinical Medicine, The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Shaoming Song
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, The Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, 222 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Tingting Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, The Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, 222 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Wutang Jing
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Xianbin Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Department of Clinical Medicine, The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Yongcheng Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Xingqiang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Kaixuan Zhao
- Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750000, Ningxia, China.,Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Kehu Yang
- Institution of Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, The Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China. .,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, 222 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China. .,Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
| | - Tiankang Guo
- Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750000, Ningxia, China. .,Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, 204 West Donggang R.D., Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China. .,Department of Clinical Medicine, The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Feng Q, Ma H, Qiu J, Du Y, Zhang G, Li P, Wen K, Xie M. Comparison of Long-Term and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of PSM and RCT Studies. Front Oncol 2022; 11:759509. [PMID: 35004278 PMCID: PMC8739957 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.759509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of gastric cancer (GC) after robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy (RG versus LG), we carried out a meta-analysis of propensity score matching (PSM) studies and randomized controlled study (RCT) to compare the safety and overall effect of RG to LG for patients with GC. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register were searched based on a defined search strategy to identify eligible PSM and RCT studies before July 2021. Data on perioperative and oncological outcomes were subjected to meta-analysis. Results Overall, we identified 19 PSM studies and 1 RCT of RG versus LG, enrolling a total of 13,446 patients (6,173 and 7,273 patients underwent RG and LG, respectively). The present meta-analysis revealed nonsignificant differences in tumor size, proximal resection margin distance, distal resection margin distance, abdominal bleeding, ileus, anastomosis site leakage, duodenal stump leakage rate, conversion rate, reoperation, overall survival rate, and long-term recurrence-free survival rate between the two groups. Alternatively, comparing RG with LG, RG has a longer operative time (p < 0.00001), less blood loss (p <0.0001), earlier time to first flatus (p = 0.0003), earlier time to oral intake (p = 0.0001), shorter length of stay (p = 0.0001), less major complications (p = 0.0001), lower overall complications (p = 0.0003), more retrieved lymph nodes (P < 0.0001), and more cost (p < 0.00001). Conclusions In terms of oncological adequacy and safety, RG is a feasible and effective treatment strategy for gastric cancer but takes more cost in comparison with LG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingbo Feng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Hexing Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Jie Qiu
- Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Maotai Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Yan Du
- Department of General Surgery, The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Guodong Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China
| | - Kunming Wen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Ming Xie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Effect of Combining Early Chemotherapy with Zhipu Liujunzi Decoction under the Concept of Strengthening and Consolidating Body Resistance for Gastric Cancer Patients and Nursing Strategy. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2021; 2021:2135924. [PMID: 34934408 PMCID: PMC8651398 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2135924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of combining early chemotherapy with Zhipu Liujunzi decoction under the concept of strengthening and consolidating body resistance for gastric cancer patients and nursing strategy. Methods The clinical data of 100 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy in our hospital from July 2019 to July 2020 were selected for the retrospective analysis, and the patients were divided into the control group and experimental group according to different treatment methods, with 50 cases in each group. Early chemotherapy after surgery was given to patients in the control group, and on the basis of the aforesaid treatment and under the concept of strengthening and consolidating body resistance, patients in the experimental group took Zhipu Liujunzi decoction and received the nursing strategy, so as to compare their effective rate, adverse reaction rate (ARR), immune function indicators, KPS scores, and nursing satisfaction scores. Results After treatment, the experimental group obtained significantly higher objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) (P < 0.05), lower carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels (P < 0.001), higher immune parameters levels (P < 0.001), higher KPS scores and lower TCM symptom scores (P < 0.001), lower PSQI scores, SAS scores, and SDS scores (P < 0.001) and higher nursing satisfaction scores (P < 0.001), and lower total accidence rate of toxic side effects (P < 0.05) than the control group. Conclusion Under the concept of strengthening and consolidating body resistance, combining early chemotherapy with Zhipu Liujunzi decoction is a reliable method for improving the immune function and quality of life for gastric cancer patients with higher safety. Such a strategy greatly reduces the tumor marker levels in patients. Further research will be conducive to establishing a better solution for gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ebihara Y, Kurashima Y, Murakami S, Shichinohe T, Hirano S. Short-term outcomes of robotic distal gastrectomy with the "preemptive retropancreatic approach": a propensity score matching analysis. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:825-831. [PMID: 34510380 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01306-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
We report the usefulness of the preemptive retropancreatic approach (PRA) in robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) using multi-jointed forceps. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of RDG with PRA and conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the propensity score matching method. A total of 126 patients [RDG = 55; laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) = 71] were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were matched using the following propensity score covariates: age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, the extent of lymph node dissection, and Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma stage. Surgical results and postoperative outcomes were compared. We identified 28 propensity score-matched pairs. The median operative time and blood loss were comparable (P = 0.272 and P = 0.933, respectively). Regarding postoperative outcomes, the incidence of postoperative complications [Clavien-Dindo classification II (CD ≥ II)] was lower in the RDG group than in the LDG group (P = 0.020). No significant differences in the peak C-reactive protein value and length of hospital stay were observed between the two groups (P = 0.391 and P = 0.057, respectively). In addition, no patients had postoperative pancreas-related complications (≥ CD II) in the RDG group. RDG using PRA seems to be a safe and feasible procedure for gastric cancer because of short-term outcomes and reduction of postoperative complications (especially postoperative pancreas-related complications) as compared to conventional LDG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuma Ebihara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan.
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan.
| | - Yo Kurashima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan
| | - Soichi Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Shichinohe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, North 15 West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan
| |
Collapse
|