1
|
Costa G, Garbarino GM, Lepre L, Liotta G, Mazzoni G, Gabrieli A, Costa A, Podda M, Sganga G, Fransvea P. Laparoscopic Treatment of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Interrupted Stitches Repair versus Knotless Barbed Suture. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1242. [PMID: 38592114 PMCID: PMC10931710 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Peptic ulcers result from imbalanced acid production, and in recent decades, proton pump inhibitors have proven effective in treating them. However, perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) continue to occur with a persistent high mortality rate when not managed properly. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach have been widely acknowledged. Nevertheless, concerning certain technical aspects of this method, such as the best gastrorrhaphy technique, the consensus remains elusive. Consequently, the choice tends to rely on individual surgical experiences. Our study aimed to compare interrupted stitches versus running barbed suture for laparoscopic PPU repair. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study utilizing propensity score matching analysis on patients who underwent laparoscopic PPU repair. Patients were categorised into two groups: Interrupted Stitches Suture (IStiS) and Knotless Suture (KnotS). We then compared the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients in both groups. Results: A total of 265 patients underwent laparoscopic PPU repair: 198 patients with interrupted stitches technique and 67 with barbed knotless suture. Following propensity score matching, each group (IStiS and KnotS) comprised 56 patients. The analysis revealed that operative time did not differ between groups: 87.9 ± 39.7 vs. 92.8 ± 42.6 min (p = 0.537). Postoperative morbidity (24.0% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.331) and Clavien-Dindo III (10.7% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.489) were more frequently observed in the KnotS group, without any significant difference. In contrast, we found a slightly higher mortality rate in the IStiS group (10.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.742). Concerning leaks, no differences emerged between groups (3.6% vs. 5.4%, p = 1.000). Conclusions: Laparoscopic PPU repair with knotless barbed sutures is a non-inferior alternative to interrupted stitches repair. Nevertheless, further research such as randomised trials, with a standardised treatment protocol according to ulcer size, are required to identify the best gastrorraphy technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Costa
- Surgery Center, Colorectal Surgery Research Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy;
| | | | - Luca Lepre
- General and Emergency Surgery Unit, Santo Spirito in Sassia Hospital, ASL Roma 1, 00193 Rome, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Liotta
- General and Emergency Surgery Unit, Palestrina Hospital, ASL Roma 6, 00036 Palestrina, Italy
| | - Gianluca Mazzoni
- General Surgery Unit, G.B. Grassi Hospital, ASL Roma 3, 00122 Rome, Italy
| | - Alice Gabrieli
- Department of General Surgery, Cattinara University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34148 Trieste, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Costa
- UniCamillus School of Medicine, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00135 Rome, Italy (P.F.)
| | - Pietro Fransvea
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00135 Rome, Italy (P.F.)
| |
Collapse
|