The impact of collagen membranes on 3D gingival fibroblast toroids

Effects of collagen membranes and bone substitute differ in periodontal ligament cell microtissues and monolayers

BACKGROUND

Barrier membranes and bone substitute are major tools of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) after periodontal disease. Integrity of the periodontal ligament plays a key role in periodontal health, but its functionality fails to be fully re-established by GTR after disease or trauma. Microtissue models suggest an in vivo-like model to develop novel GTR approaches due to its three-dimensionality. This study aims to assess the effects of collagen membranes and bone substitute on cell viability, adhesion and gene expression of regenerative and inflammatory biomarkers by periodontal ligament cell (PDLC) microtissues.

METHODS

Human PDLC microtissues and monolayers were cultured on collagen membranes or bone substitute. After 24 hours incubation, metabolic activity, focal adhesion, mRNA and protein production of collagen-type-I (COL1A1), periostin (POSTN), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiogenin (ANG), interleukin (IL)6 and IL8 were measured by resazurin-based toxicity assay, focal adhesion staining, quantitative polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively.

RESULTS

PDLC microtissues and monolayers were viable on collagen membranes and bone substitute, but microtissues were less metabolically active. Dominant staining of actin filaments was found in PDLC microtissues on collagen membranes. COL1A1, POSTN, VEGF, ANG and IL6 were modulated in PDLC microtissues on bone substitute, while there were no significant changes on collagen membranes. PDLC monolayers showed a different character of gene expression changes.

CONCLUSIONS

PDLC microtissues and monolayers react diversely to collagen membranes and bone substitute. Further descriptive and mechanistic tests will be required to clarify the potential of PDLC microtissues as in vivo-like model for GTR.

Current Insight of Collagen Biomatrix for Gingival Recession: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review

Collagen (Col) is a naturally available material and is widely used in the tissue engineering and medical field owing to its high biocompatibility and malleability. Promising results on the use of Col were observed in the periodontal application and many attempts have been carried out to inculcate Col for gingival recession (GR). Col is found to be an excellent provisional bioscaffold for the current treatment in GR. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to scrutinize an overview of the reported Col effect focusing on in vitro, in vivo, and clinical trials in GR application. A comprehensive literature search was performed using EBSCOhost, Science Direct, Springer Link, and Medline & Ovid databases to identify the potential articles on particular topics. The search query was accomplished based on the Boolean operators involving keywords such as (1) collagen OR scaffold OR hybrid scaffold OR biomaterial AND (2) gingiva recession OR tissue regeneration OR dental tissue OR healing mechanism OR gingiva. Only articles published from 2015 onwards were selected for further analysis. This review includes the physicochemical properties of Col scaffold and the outcome for GR. The comprehensive literature search retrieved a total of 3077 articles using the appropriate keywords. However, on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 15 articles were chosen for further review. The results from these articles indicated that Col promoted gingival tissue regeneration for GR healing. Therefore, this systematic review recapitulated that Col enhances regeneration of gingival tissue either through a slow or rapid process with no sign of cytotoxicity or adverse effect.

The response of gingiva monolayer, spheroid, and ex vivo tissue cultures to collagen membranes and bone substitute

Collagen membranes and bone substitute are popular biomaterials in guided tissue regeneration for treatment of traumatized or diseased periodontal tissue. Development of these biomaterials starts in monolayer cell culture, failing to reflect in vivo tissue organization. Spheroid cultures potentially mimic in vivo tissues in structure and functionality. This study aims to compare gingiva cell (GC) monolayers and spheroids to ex vivo gingiva. Human GC monolayers, spheroids and gingiva ex vivo tissues were cultured on plastic surfaces, collagen membranes or bone substitute. Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, immunohistochemistry for KI67 and caspase 3 (CASP3), resazurin-based toxicity assays, quantitative polymerase chain reaction for collagen I (COL1A1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiogenin (ANG), interleukin (IL)6 and IL8 and ELISA for COL1A1, VEGF, ANG, IL6 and IL8 were performed in all cultures. Morphology was different in all culture set-ups. Staining of KI67 was positive in monolayers and staining of CASP3 was positive in spheroids. All culture set-ups were viable. COL1A1 production was modulated in monolayers and ex vivo tissues at mRNA levels, VEGF in monolayers and ex vivo tissues at mRNA levels and in spheroids at protein levels, ANG in spheroids at mRNA levels and in monolayers and spheroids at protein levels, IL6 in monolayers and spheroids at mRNA levels and in spheroids and ex vivo tissues at protein levels and IL8 in monolayers and ex vivo tissues at mRNA levels. Modulations were surface-dependent. In conclusion, each culture model is structurally and functionally different. Neither GC monolayers nor spheroids mimicked gingiva ex vivo tissue in all measured aspects.