A deep learning model based on concatenation approach to predict the time to extract a mandibular third molar tooth

Prediction of extraction difficulty for impacted maxillary third molars with deep learning approach

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine if a deep learning (DL) model can predict the surgical difficulty for impacted maxillary third molar tooth using panoramic images before surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The dataset consists of 708 panoramic radiographs of the patients who applied to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic for various reasons. Each maxillary third molar difficulty was scored based on dept (V), angulation (H), relation with maxillary sinus (S), and relation with ramus (R) on panoramic images. The YoloV5x architecture was used to perform automatic segmentation and classification. To prevent re-testing of images, participate in the training, the data set was subdivided as: 80 % training, 10 % validation, and 10 % test group.

RESULTS

Impacted Upper Third Molar Segmentation model showed best success on sensitivity, precision and F1 score with 0,9705, 0,9428 and 0,9565, respectively. S-model had a lesser sensitivity, precision and F1 score than the other models with 0,8974, 0,6194, 0,7329, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that the proposed DL model could be effective for predicting the surgical difficulty of an impacted maxillary third molar tooth using panoramic radiographs and this approach might help as a decision support mechanism for the clinicians in peri‑surgical period.

The diagnostic performance of impacted third molars in the mandible: A review of deep learning on panoramic radiographs

Background

Mandibular third molar is prone to impaction, resulting in its inability to erupt into the oral cavity. The radiographic examination is required to support the odontectomy of impacted teeth. The use of computer-aided diagnosis based on deep learning is emerging in the field of medical and dentistry with the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. This review describes the performance and prospects of deep learning for the detection, classification, and evaluation of third molar-mandibular canal relationships on panoramic radiographs.

Methods

This work was conducted using three databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. Following the literature selection, 49 articles were reviewed, with the 12 main articles discussed in this review.

Results

Several models of deep learning are currently used for segmentation and classification of third molar impaction with or without the combination of other techniques. Deep learning has demonstrated significant diagnostic performance in identifying mandibular impacted third molars (ITM) on panoramic radiographs, with an accuracy range of 78.91% to 90.23%. Meanwhile, the accuracy of deep learning in determining the relationship between ITM and the mandibular canal (MC) ranges from 72.32% to 99%.

Conclusion

Deep learning-based AI with high performance for the detection, classification, and evaluation of the relationship of ITM to the MC using panoramic radiographs has been developed over the past decade. However, deep learning must be improved using large datasets, and the evaluation of diagnostic performance for deep learning models should be aligned with medical diagnostic test protocols. Future studies involving collaboration among oral radiologists, clinicians, and computer scientists are required to identify appropriate AI development models that are accurate, efficient, and applicable to clinical services.

System for automatically assessing the likelihood of inferior alveolar nerve injury

Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury is a severe complication associated with mandibular third molar (MM3) extraction. Consequently, the likelihood of IAN injury must be assessed before performing such an extraction. However, existing deep learning methods for classifying the likelihood of IAN injury that rely on mask images often suffer from limited accuracy and lack of interpretability. In this paper, we propose an automated system based on panoramic radiographs, featuring a novel segmentation model SS-TransUnet and classification algorithm CD-IAN injury class. Our objective was to enhance the precision of segmentation of MM3 and mandibular canal (MC) and classification accuracy of the likelihood of IAN injury, ultimately reducing the occurrence of IAN injuries and providing a certain degree of interpretable foundation for diagnosis. The proposed segmentation model demonstrated a 0.9 % and 2.6 % enhancement in dice coefficient for MM3 and MC, accompanied by a reduction in 95 % Hausdorff distance, reaching 1.619 and 1.886, respectively. Additionally, our classification algorithm achieved an accuracy of 0.846, surpassing deep learning-based models by 3.8 %, confirming the effectiveness of our system.

Mandibular third molar extraction: perceived surgical difficulty in relation to professional training

BACKGROUND

Establishing the level of surgical difficulty pre-operatively is an essential step in ensuring correct treatment planning. This study set out to determine whether the knowledge and experience acquired by dentists who had received different levels of training influenced, firstly, the perceived levels of difficulty of a variety of cases of mandibular third molar (MTM) extraction and, secondly, the perceived difficulty deriving from a series of factors (patient-related factors, anatomical and radiographic factors, operative factors).

METHODS

This cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study took the form of a survey. Using a visual analog scale (VAS), participants evaluated both the perceived difficulty of 30 cases of MTM extraction described by means of digital panoramic radiographs and the perceived difficulty deriving from a series of factors conditioning MTM extraction. The results underwent statistical analysis with SPSS Statistics 28.0 software. Non-parametric tests (Mann Whitney test for independent samples and the Kruskal-Wallis test) were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 389 surveys were available for analysis. Dental practioners with no surgical training saw the intervention as presenting greater difficulty. Professionals with postgraduate training in oral surgery considered patient-related factors more important than operative factors, in contrast to dentists who had not received oral surgery training.

CONCLUSIONS

Dental training has a signficant influence on the perceived difficulty of MTM extraction and also affects opinions about which factors have greater or lesser influence on surgical difficulty.