1
|
Yazicioglu O, Ucuncu MK, Guven K. Ingredients in Commercially Available Mouthwashes. Int Dent J 2024; 74:223-241. [PMID: 37709645 PMCID: PMC10988267 DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mouthwashes, a cornerstone of oral and dental hygiene, play a pivotal role in combating the formation of dental plaque, a leading cause of periodontal disease and dental caries. This study aimed to review the composition of mouthwashes found on retail shelves in Turkey and evaluate their prevalence and side effects, if any. METHODS The mouthwashes examined were sourced from the 5 largest chain stores in each district of Istanbul. A comprehensive list of the constituents was meticulously recorded. The research was supported by an extensive compilation of references from scholarly databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. Through rigorous analysis, the relative proportions of mouthwash ingredients and components were determined. RESULTS A total of 45 distinctive variations of mouthwashes, representing 17 prominent brands, were identified. Amongst the 116 ingredients discovered, 70 were evaluated for potential adverse effects and undesirable side effects. The aroma of the mouthwash (n = 45; 100%), as welll as their sodium fluoride (n = 28; 62.22%), sodium saccharin (n = 29; 64.44%), sorbitol (n = 21; 46.6%), and propylene glycol (n = 28; 62.22%) content were the main undesireable features. CONCLUSIONS The limited array of mouthwashes found on store shelves poses a concern for both oral and public health. Furthermore, the intricate composition of these products, consisting of numerous ingredients with the potential for adverse effects, warrants serious attention. Both clinicians and patients should acknowledge the importance and unwarranted side effects of the compnents of the mouthwashes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oktay Yazicioglu
- Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Musa Kazim Ucuncu
- Altinbas University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baus-Domínguez M, Aguilera FR, Vivancos-Cuadras F, Ferra-Domingo L, Torres-Lagares D, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL, Pereira-Riveros T, Vinuesa T, Serrera-Figallo MÁ. Mucoadhesive Pharmacology: Latest Clinical Technology in Antiseptic Gels. Gels 2023; 10:23. [PMID: 38247746 PMCID: PMC10815608 DOI: 10.3390/gels10010023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Chlorhexidine (CHX) is one of the most widely used antiseptics in the oral cavity due to its high antimicrobial potential. However, many authors have stated that the effect of CHX in nonsurgical periodontal therapy is hampered by its rapid elimination from the oral environment. The aim of this study was to determine the antibacterial efficacy of a new compound of chlorhexidine 0.20% + cymenol (CYM) 0.10% on a multispecies biofilm. For this, an in vitro study was designed using a multispecies biofilm model of Streptococcus mutans, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia, and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Quantification of the microbial viability of the biofilm was performed using 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium-chloride (CTC) to calculate the percentage of survival, and the biofilms were observed using a a confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). It was observed that the bactericidal activity of the CHX + cymenol bioadhesive gel was superior to that of the CHX bioadhesive gel, in addition to higher penetrability into the biofilm. Therefore, there was greater elimination of bacterial biofilm with the new compound of chlorhexidine 0.2% plus cymenol 0.1% in a bioadhesive gel form compared to the formulation with only chlorhexidine 0.2% in a bioadhesive gel form.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Baus-Domínguez
- Departamento de Estomatología, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain; (J.-L.G.-P.); (M.-Á.S.-F.)
| | - Felipe-Rodrigo Aguilera
- Unit of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; (F.-R.A.); (T.P.-R.); (T.V.)
- School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
| | | | | | - Daniel Torres-Lagares
- Departamento de Estomatología, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain; (J.-L.G.-P.); (M.-Á.S.-F.)
| | - José-Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez
- Departamento de Estomatología, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain; (J.-L.G.-P.); (M.-Á.S.-F.)
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rociío, Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Tanya Pereira-Riveros
- Unit of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; (F.-R.A.); (T.P.-R.); (T.V.)
| | - Teresa Vinuesa
- Unit of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; (F.-R.A.); (T.P.-R.); (T.V.)
| | - María-Ángeles Serrera-Figallo
- Departamento de Estomatología, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain; (J.-L.G.-P.); (M.-Á.S.-F.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Suárez-Rodríguez B, Regueira-Iglesias A, Blanco-Pintos T, Balsa-Castro C, Vila-Blanco N, Carreira MJ, Tomás I. Short-term anti-plaque effect of a cymenol mouthwash analysed using the DenTiUS Deep Plaque software: a randomised clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23:560. [PMID: 37573292 PMCID: PMC10422750 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03256-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of cymenol mouthwashes on levels of dental plaque has not been evaluated thus far. OBJECTIVE To analyse the short-term, in situ, anti-plaque effect of a 0.1% cymenol mouthwash using the DenTiUS Deep Plaque software. METHODS Fifty orally healthy participants were distributed randomly into two groups: 24 received a cymenol mouthwash for eight days (test group A) and 26 a placebo mouthwash for four days and a cymenol mouthwash for a further four days thereafter (test group B). They were instructed not to perform other oral hygiene measures. On days 0, 4, and 8 of the experiment, a rinsing protocol for staining the dental plaque with sodium fluorescein was performed. Three intraoral photographs were taken per subject under ultraviolet light. The 504 images were analysed using the DenTiUS Deep Plaque software, and visible and total plaque indices were calculated (ClinicalTrials ID NCT05521230). RESULTS On day 4, the percentage area of visible plaque was significantly lower in test group A than in test group B (absolute = 35.31 ± 14.93% vs. 46.57 ± 18.92%, p = 0.023; relative = 29.80 ± 13.97% vs. 40.53 ± 18.48%, p = 0.024). In comparison with the placebo, the cymenol mouthwash was found to have reduced the growth rate of the area of visible plaque in the first four days by 26% (absolute) to 28% (relative). On day 8, the percentage areas of both the visible and total plaque were significantly lower in test group A than in test group B (visible absolute = 44.79 ± 15.77% vs. 65.12 ± 16.37%, p < 0.001; visible relative = 39.27 ± 14.33% vs. 59.24 ± 16.90%, p < 0.001; total = 65.17 ± 9.73% vs. 74.52 ± 13.55%, p = 0.007). Accounting for the growth rate with the placebo mouthwash on day 4, the above results imply that the cymenol mouthwash in the last four days of the trial reduced the growth rate of the area of visible plaque (absolute and relative) by 53% (test group A) and 29% (test group B), and of the area of total plaque by 48% (test group A) and 41% (test group B). CONCLUSIONS The 0.1% cymenol mouthwash has a short-term anti-plaque effect in situ, strongly conditioning the rate of plaque growth, even in clinical situations with high levels of dental plaque accumulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Suárez-Rodríguez
- Oral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15782, Spain
| | - A Regueira-Iglesias
- Oral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15782, Spain
| | - T Blanco-Pintos
- Oral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15782, Spain
| | - C Balsa-Castro
- Oral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15782, Spain
- Centro Singular de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Intelixentes and Departamento de Electrónica e Computación, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - N Vila-Blanco
- Centro Singular de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Intelixentes and Departamento de Electrónica e Computación, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - M J Carreira
- Centro Singular de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Intelixentes and Departamento de Electrónica e Computación, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - I Tomás
- Oral Sciences Research Group, Special Needs Unit, Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15782, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ting M, Dahlkemper A, Schwartz JJ, Woodfork M, Suzuki JB. Preprocedural Viral Load Effects of Oral Antiseptics on SARS-CoV-2 in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2023; 11:1694. [PMID: 37371789 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11061694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) There are limited clinical trials to support the effectiveness of mouth rinses when used as a preprocedural rinse against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of antiseptic mouth rinses as a preprocedural rinse in reducing SARS-CoV-2 oral viral load in-vivo. (2) Methods: A literature search was conducted through November 2022 for the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The evaluated outcomes were quantitative changes in viral load and the statistical significance of that change after using antiseptic mouth rinses. (3) Results: 14 randomized controlled trials (RCT) were selected for risk of bias assessment and data extraction. (4) Conclusion: Within the limits of this systematic review, preprocedural mouth rinses may significantly reduce SARS-CoV-2 in the mouth, thus, reducing the viral particles available for airborne dispersion. Preprocedural mouth rinses may be an effective strategy for reducing airborne SARS-CoV-2 dispersion in the environment. Their use may be a preventive strategy to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in selected medical and healthcare facilities, including dental clinics. Potential preprocedural mouth rinses are identified for use as an integral part of safe practice for healthcare protocols. This systematic review was registered with the National Institute for Health Research, international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42022315177.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Ting
- Department of Periodontics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- General Practice Residency, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA
- Think Dental Learning Institute, Paoli, PA 19301, USA
| | - Alex Dahlkemper
- General Practice Residency, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA
| | - Jeremy J Schwartz
- General Practice Residency, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA
| | - Manzel Woodfork
- General Practice Residency, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA
| | - Jon B Suzuki
- Department of Graduate Periodontics, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
- Department of Graduate Prosthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98015, USA
- Department of Graduate Periodontics, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA
| |
Collapse
|