1
|
Stiel S, Brütt AL, Stahmeyer JT, Bockelmann AWE, Schleef T, Völkel A, Hoffmann F. Implementation, barriers, and recommendations for further development of advance care planning for the last phase of life in nursing homes in Germany (Gut-Leben): protocol for a mixed-methods study. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:27. [PMID: 36964521 PMCID: PMC10036959 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01147-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nursing home entry often marks the transition into the end-of-life. In 2018, Germany legally introduced reimbursement for advance care planning (ACP according to § 132 g SGB V) in nursing homes that applied for ACP approval to improve end-of-life care. The Gut-Leben project aims to evaluate the implementation and barriers of ACP in nursing homes in Germany, with a special focus on the federal state of Lower Saxony, and provide practical recommendations for further development of end-of-life care. METHODS This mixed-methods study spreads across five work packages (WP) over a three-year period. WP 1 will explore the approval process, implementation, and barriers to ACP in nursing homes. Data will be collected through a national postal survey in a random sample of n = 600. WP 2 will explore whether documented ACP reports are applicable as a data source for research (expecting up to 500 available ACP reports). In WP 3a and 3b, data on the ACP process will be collected in n = 15 approved nursing homes in Lower Saxony over a 12-months period. For WP 3a and WP 3b, data on ACP conversations (n = 600) and on end-of-life care paths (n = 300) will be collected by facilitators and nurses of the respective nursing homes. In WP 4, residents' characteristics upon entry and changes in these characteristics over the length of stay are analyzed, utilizing claims data from the AOK Lower Saxony (expected sample of about 100,000 people entering nursing homes over a 10-years period). WP 5 connects, interprets, and reflects on the findings from WP 1-4 through focus groups and individual interviews with facilitators, nursing staff, residents, relatives, and care providers. Within a participatory approach, a practice advisory board will be set up existing of personal of nursing homes and will be closely involved in the whole research process. DISCUSSION In summary, the Gut-Leben project provides insight into the implementation and barriers of ACP in nursing homes according to German legislation for the first time, including practitioners' and residents' perspectives. Insights will help the further development of ACP in Germany through practical recommendations based on quantitative and qualitative data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Stiel
- Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Anna Levke Brütt
- Junior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Jona T Stahmeyer
- Health Services Research Unit, AOK Niedersachsen, Hannover, Germany
| | - Anne W E Bockelmann
- Division of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Schleef
- Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Anna Völkel
- Junior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Falk Hoffmann
- Division of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fassmer AM, Allers K, Helbach J, Zuidema S, Freitag M, Zieschang T, Hoffmann F. Hospitalization of German and Dutch Nursing Home Residents Depend on Different Long-Term Care Structures: A Systematic Review on Periods of Increased Vulnerability. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2023; 24:609-618.e6. [PMID: 36898411 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate proportions of hospitalized nursing home residents during periods of increased vulnerability, ie, the first 6 months after institutionalization and the last 6 months before death, and comparing the figures between Germany and the Netherlands. DESIGN Systematic review, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022312506). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Newly admitted or deceased residents. METHODS We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception through May 3, 2022. We included all observational studies that reported the proportions of all-cause hospitalizations among German or Dutch nursing home residents during these defined vulnerable periods. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's tool. We assessed study and resident characteristics and outcome information and descriptively reported them separately for both countries. RESULTS We screened 1856 records for eligibility and included 9 studies published in 14 articles (Germany: 8; Netherlands: 6). One study for each country investigated the first 6 months after institutionalization. A total of 10.2% of the Dutch and 42.0% of the German nursing home residents were hospitalized during this time. Overall, 7 studies reported on in-hospital deaths, with proportions ranging from 28.9% to 29.5% for Germany and from 1.0% to 16.3% for the Netherlands. Proportions for hospitalization in the last 30 days of life ranged from 8.0% to 15.7% (Netherlands: n = 2) and from 48.6% to 58.0% (Germany: n = 3). Only German studies assessed the differences by age and sex. Although hospitalizations were less common at older ages, they were more frequent in male residents. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS During the observed periods, the proportion of nursing homes residents being hospitalized differed greatly between Germany and the Netherlands. The higher figures for Germany can probably be explained by differences in the long-term care systems. There is a lack of research, especially for the first months after institutionalization, and future studies should examine the care processes of nursing home residents following acute events in more detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Fassmer
- Division of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
| | - Katharina Allers
- Division of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany
| | - Jasmin Helbach
- Division of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany
| | - Sytse Zuidema
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Freitag
- Division of General Practice, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany
| | - Tania Zieschang
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany
| | - Falk Hoffmann
- Division of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Malhotra C, Chaudhry I, Shafiq M, Malhotra R. Three distinct symptom profiles among older adults with severe dementia: A latent class analysis. Palliat Support Care 2023:1-8. [PMID: 36785870 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951523000068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Older adults with severe dementia experience multiple symptoms at the end of life. This study aimed to delineate distinct symptom profiles of older adults with severe dementia and to assess their association with older adults' and caregiver characteristics and 1-year mortality among older adults. METHODS We used baseline data from a cohort of 215 primary informal caregivers of older adults with severe dementia in Singapore. We identified 10 indicators representing physical, emotional, and functional symptoms, and responsive behaviors, and conducted latent class analysis. We assessed the association between delineated older adults' symptom profiles and their use of potentially burdensome health-care interventions in the past 4 months; older adults' 1-year mortality; and caregiver outcomes. RESULTS We delineated 3 profiles of older adults - primarily responsive behaviors (Class 1; 33%); physical and emotional symptoms with responsive behaviors (Class 2; 20%); and high functional deficits with loss of speech and eye contact (Class 3; 47%). Classes 2 and 3 older adults were more likely to have received a potentially burdensome intervention for symptoms in the past 4 months and have a greater hazard for 1-year mortality. Compared to Class 1, caregivers of Class 2 older adults were more likely to experience adverse caregiver outcomes, that is, higher distress, impact on schedule and health, anticipatory grief, and coping and lower satisfaction with care received (p<0.01 for all). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS The 3 delineated profiles of older adults can be used to plan or optimize care plans to effectively manage symptoms of older adults and improve their caregivers' outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Isha Chaudhry
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mahham Shafiq
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rahul Malhotra
- Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Searle B, Barker RO, Stow D, Spiers GF, Pearson F, Hanratty B. Which interventions are effective at decreasing or increasing emergency department attendances or hospital admissions from long-term care facilities? A systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e064914. [PMID: 36731926 PMCID: PMC9896242 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE UK long-term care facility residents account for 185 000 emergency hospital admissions each year. Avoidance of unnecessary hospital transfers benefits residents, reduces demand on the healthcare systems but is difficult to implement. We synthesised evidence on interventions that influence unplanned hospital admissions or attendances by long-term care facility residents. METHODS This is a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched from 2012 to 2022, building on a review published in 2013. We included randomised controlled trials that evaluated interventions that influence (decrease or increase) acute hospital admissions or attendances of long-term care facility residents. Risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed using Cochrane Risk Of Bias-2 and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS Forty-three randomised studies were included in this review. A narrative synthesis was conducted and the weight of evidence described with vote counting. Advance care planning and goals of care setting appear to be effective at reducing hospitalisations from long-term care facilities. Other effective interventions, in order of increasing risk of bias, were: nurse practitioner/specialist input, palliative care intervention, influenza vaccination and enhancing access to intravenous therapies in long-term care facilities. CONCLUSIONS Factors that affect hospitalisation and emergency department attendances of long-term care facility residents are complex. This review supports the already established use of advance care planning and influenza vaccination to reduce unscheduled hospital attendances. It is likely that more than one intervention will be needed to impact on healthcare usage across the long-term care facility population. The findings of this review are useful to identify effective interventions that can be combined, as well as highlighting interventions that either need evaluation or are not effective at decreasing healthcare usage. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020169604.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Searle
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Robert O Barker
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Daniel Stow
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Gemma F Spiers
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Fiona Pearson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lemoyne SEE, Van Bogaert P, Calle P, Wouters K, Deblick D, Herbots H, Monsieurs K. Transferring nursing home residents to emergency departments by emergency physician-staffed emergency medical services: missed opportunities to avoid inappropriate care? Acta Clin Belg 2023; 78:3-10. [PMID: 35234573 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2022.2042644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The decision to transfer a nursing home (NH) resident to an emergency department (ED) is multifactorial and challenging but many of the emergency physician-staffed emergency medical service (EP-EMS) interventions and ED transfers are probably inappropriate. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study in three EP-EMSs in Belgium over a period of three years. We registered indicators that are potentially associated with inappropriate transfers: patient characteristics, availability of written do not resuscitate (DNR) orders or treatment restrictions, involvement of a general practitioner (GP) and availability of transfer notes. We also explored the association between age, the Charlson Comordity Index (CCI), polypharmacy, dementia, and the availability of DNR documents. RESULTS We registered 308 EP-EMS interventions in NH residents. In 98% the caller was a health-care professional. In 75% there was no GP present and 40% had no transfer note. Thirty-two percentage of the patients had dementia, 45% had more than two comorbidities and 68% took five medications or more. In 6% cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed. DNR orders were available in 25%. Eighty-eight percentage of the NH residents were transferred to the ED. Forty-four percent had a CCI >5. In patients of ≥90 years, with a CCI >5, with dementia and with polypharmacy, DNR orders were not available in 81%, 67%%,and 69%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Improved EMS dispatch centre-NH caller interaction, more involvement of GP's, higher availability of DNR orders and better communication between GPs/NHs and EP-EMS could prevent inappropriate interventions, futile prehospital aactions,and ED transfers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E E Lemoyne
- Emergency Department, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Peter Van Bogaert
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Paul Calle
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kristien Wouters
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.,Clinical Trial Center (CTC), CRC Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Dennis Deblick
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Hanne Herbots
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Kg Monsieurs
- Emergency Department, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Inacio MC, Jorissen RN, Wesselingh S, Sluggett JK, Whitehead C, Maddison J, Forward J, Bourke A, Harvey G, Crotty M. Predictors of hospitalisations and emergency department presentations shortly after entering a residential aged care facility in Australia: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e057247. [PMID: 34789497 PMCID: PMC8601069 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To: (1) examine the 90-day incidence of unplanned hospitalisation and emergency department (ED) presentations after residential aged care facility (RACF) entry, (2) examine individual-related, facility-related, medication-related, system-related and healthcare-related predictors of these outcomes and (3) create individual risk profiles. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using the Registry of Senior Australians. Fine-Gray models estimated subdistribution HRs and 95% CIs. Harrell's C-index assessed risk models' predictive ability. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Individuals aged ≥65 years old entering a RACF as permanent residents in three Australian states between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2016 (N=116 192 individuals in 1967 RACFs). PREDICTORS EXAMINED Individual-related, facility-related, medication-related, system and healthcare-related predictors ascertained at assessments or within 90 days, 6 months or 1 year prior to RACF entry. OUTCOME MEASURES 90-day unplanned hospitalisation and ED presentation post-RACF entry. RESULTS The cohort median age was 85 years old (IQR 80-89), 62% (N=71 861) were women, and 50.5% (N=58 714) had dementia. The 90-day incidence of unplanned hospitalisations was 18.0% (N=20 919) and 22.6% (N=26 242) had ED presentations. There were 34 predictors of unplanned hospitalisations and 34 predictors of ED presentations identified, 27 common to both outcomes and 7 were unique to each. The hospitalisation and ED presentation models out-of-sample Harrell's C-index was 0.664 (95% CI 0.657 to 0.672) and 0.655 (95% CI 0.648 to 0.662), respectively. Some common predictors of high risk of unplanned hospitalisation and ED presentations included: being a man, age, delirium history, higher activity of daily living, behavioural and complex care needs, as well as history, number and recency of healthcare use (including hospital, general practitioners attendances), experience of a high sedative load and several medications. CONCLUSIONS Within 90 days of RACF entry, 18.0% of individuals had unplanned hospitalisations and 22.6% had ED presentations. Several predictors, including modifiable factors, were identified at the time of care entry. This is an actionable period for targeting individuals at risk of hospitalisations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Inacio
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Robert N Jorissen
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Steve Wesselingh
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Janet K Sluggett
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Craig Whitehead
- Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - John Maddison
- Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - John Forward
- Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alice Bourke
- Central Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gillian Harvey
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leniz J, Yi D, Yorganci E, Williamson LE, Suji T, Cripps R, Higginson IJ, Sleeman KE. Exploring costs, cost components, and associated factors among people with dementia approaching the end of life: A systematic review. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (NEW YORK, N. Y.) 2021; 7:e12198. [PMID: 34541291 PMCID: PMC8438684 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Understanding costs of care for people dying with dementia is essential to guide service development, but information has not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to understand (1) which cost components have been measured in studies reporting the costs of care in people with dementia approaching the end of life, (2) what the costs are and how they change closer to death, and (3) which factors are associated with these costs. METHODS We searched the electronic databases CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, EconLit, and Embase and reference lists of included studies. We included any type of study published between 1999 and 2019, in any language, reporting primary data on costs of health care in individuals with dementia approaching the end of life. Two independent reviewers screened all full-text articles. We used the Evers' Consensus on Health Economic Criteria checklist to appraise the risk of bias of included studies. RESULTS We identified 2843 articles after removing duplicates; 19 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 16 were from the United States. Only two studies measured informal costs including out-of-pocket expenses and informal caregiving. The monthly total direct cost of care rose toward death, from $1787 to $2999 USD in the last 12 months, to $4570 to $11921 USD in the last month of life. Female sex, Black ethnicity, higher educational background, more comorbidities, and greater cognitive impairment were associated with higher costs. DISCUSSION Costs of dementia care rise closer to death. Informal costs of care are high but infrequently included in analyses. Research exploring the costs of care for people with dementia by proximity to death, including informal care costs and from outside the United States, is urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javiera Leniz
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Emel Yorganci
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Lesley E. Williamson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Trisha Suji
- School of Medical EducationFaculty of Life Science and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Rachel Cripps
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Irene J. Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Katherine E. Sleeman
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Veronese N, Barbagallo M. Specific approaches to patients affected by dementia and covid-19 in nursing homes: the role of the geriatrician. Ageing Res Rev 2021; 69:101373. [PMID: 34051375 PMCID: PMC8152235 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is relevant in older people. Attention was given to the nursing homes in which frailer people are usually admitted. In this review, we discuss the approaches for daily problems found in nursing home as geriatricians and potentially new research directions. We start with the problem of the older people affected by dementia and Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia for which also the execution of a simple diagnostic test (such as nasopharyngeal swab) could be problematic. Another important problem is the management of wandering patients for which the re-organization of the spaces and vaccination could be the solutions. The relationship with families is another important problem, also from a medico-legal point of view, that can be faced using video conferencing tools. Moreover, we discussed the importance of stratifying prognosis in older nursing home residents for the best management and therapeutically approach, including palliative care, also using telemedicine and the inclusion of prognostic tools in daily clinical practice. Finally, we approached the therapeutical issues in older people that suggests the necessity of future research for finding older-friendly medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Veronese
- Geriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Mario Barbagallo
- Geriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Janbek J, Frimodt-Møller N, Laursen TM, Waldemar G. Hospital readmissions following infections in dementia: a nationwide and registry-based cohort study. Eur J Neurol 2021; 28:3603-3614. [PMID: 33978303 DOI: 10.1111/ene.14911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to investigate readmission risks following infections in dementia, identify the types of infections behind the risks, and highlight the reasons for readmissions. METHODS Acute inpatient hospital admissions for infections in Danish residents were included from 1 January 2000, or age 65 years. Primary outcomes were 7-day readmissions risk ratios (RRs; risk following infection index admissions of people with dementia relative to those without dementia), risks by infection site, and reasons for readmission. Secondary outcomes were 30- and 90-day readmission risks. Competing risk of death was estimated. RESULTS Seven-day readmission RR was increased in all age groups and was highest in the youngest patients (women RR: 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.53; men RR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.12-1.35). RRs decreased with increasing age and longer follow-up. The most notable common readmissions were for infections and dehydration in dementia. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that there is a substantially increased readmission risk in people with dementia than in those without dementia, particularly within 7 days, and for the youngest in the cohort. Readmission risks were higher for infection index admissions than for admissions for causes other than infection, and readmissions were mostly due to infections. Our findings highlight the burden of infections in people with dementia and call for in-depth investigations of determinants related to readmission risks, to inform public policy and identify avenues for interventions that can decrease or prevent potentially avoidable readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Janbek
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Section 8007, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Niels Frimodt-Møller
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Munk Laursen
- Department of Economics and Business Economics, National Centre for Register-based Research, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, Aarhus V, Denmark
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Section 8007, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cheraghi-Sohi S, Panagioti M, Daker-White G, Giles S, Riste L, Kirk S, Ong BN, Poppleton A, Campbell S, Sanders C. Patient safety in marginalised groups: a narrative scoping review. Int J Equity Health 2020; 19:26. [PMID: 32050976 PMCID: PMC7014732 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-1103-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Marginalised groups (‘populations outside of mainstream society’) experience severe health inequities, as well as increased risk of experiencing patient safety incidents. To date however no review exists to identify, map and analyse the literature in this area in order to understand 1) which marginalised groups have been studied in terms of patient safety research, 2) what the particular patient safety issues are for such groups and 3) what contributes to or is associated with these safety issues arising. Methods Scoping review. Systematic searches were performed across six electronic databases in September 2019. The time frame for searches of the respective databases was from the year 2000 until present day. Results The searches yielded 3346 articles, and 67 articles were included. Patient safety issues were identified for fourteen different marginalised patient groups across all studies, with 69% (n = 46) of the studies focused on four patient groups: ethnic minority groups, frail elderly populations, care home residents and low socio-economic status. Twelve separate patient safety issues were classified. Just over half of the studies focused on three issues represented in the patient safety literature, and in order of frequency were: medication safety, adverse outcomes and near misses. In total, 157 individual contributing or associated factors were identified and mapped to one of seven different factor types from the Framework of Contributory Factors Influencing Clinical Practice within the London Protocol. Patient safety issues were mostly multifactorial in origin including patient factors, health provider factors and health care system factors. Conclusions This review highlights that marginalised patient groups are vulnerable to experiencing a variety patient safety issues and points to a number of gaps. The findings indicate the need for further research to understand the intersectional nature of marginalisation and the multi-dimensional nature of patient safety issues, for groups that have been under-researched, including those with mental health problems, communication and cognitive impairments. Such understanding provides a basis for working collaboratively to co-design training, services and/or interventions designed to remove or at the very least minimise these increased risks. Trial registration Not applicable for a scoping review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,, England. .,Centre for Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, England.
| | - Maria Panagioti
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,, England
| | - Gavin Daker-White
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,, England.,Centre for Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Sally Giles
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,, England.,Centre for Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Lisa Riste
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,, England
| | - Sue Kirk
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,, England
| | - Bie Nio Ong
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,, England.,Keele University, Citylabs, Nelson St, Manchester, M13 9NQ, England
| | - Aaron Poppleton
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,, England
| | - Stephen Campbell
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,, England.,Centre for Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Caroline Sanders
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL,, England.,Centre for Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, England.,NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Citylabs, Nelson St, Manchester, M13 9NQ, England.,Health Innvoation Manchester, Citylabs, Nelson St, Manchester, M13 9NQ, England
| |
Collapse
|