The effect of neuropalliative care on quality of life and satisfaction with quality of care in patients with progressive neurological disease and their family caregivers: an interventional control study

"More Areas of Grey": Ambiguities in Neuropalliative Care

Neuropalliative care as a clinical speciality aims to address the unique end-of-life needs and concerns of patients with neurologic disease. Although literature has outlined clinical hurdles, a more nuanced understanding of how neuropalliative care was experienced, conceptualized, and enacted could provide context and depth to better outline practice and research priorities. This article presents findings from an ethnographic study of neuropalliative care conducted in a university-affiliated, tertiary care neurological hospital in Canada with a dedicated neuropalliative consultation service. Specifically, this article examines how clinical hurdles outlined in the neuropalliative literature were experienced and addressed by multiple stakeholders, including patients, families, and clinicians. These clinical hurdles include locating the scope of neuropalliative care, ascertaining the impact of prognostic uncertainty and poor recognition of the dying patient, and navigating the tensions between curative and palliative philosophies. In the discussion, the implications of these clinical hurdles are addressed, concluding with reflections on the role of ethnography, palliative care in the context of functional changes, and broadening approaches to uncertainty.

Neurologists' Attitudes and Perceptions on Palliative Care: A Qualitative Study

Background and Objectives

Despite significant advances in the treatment of neurologic disorders, many conditions require complex care planning and advanced care planning. Neurologists are in a unique position because they are integral in providing patient centered care, understanding neurologic disease and illness trajectory, and how disease can affect patients' sense of self and values. Currently, little is known about neurologists' perceptions and challenges in care planning and palliative care for their patients.

Methods

Neurologists from one Canadian academic institution participated in a 30-minute semistructured interview from November 2022 to April 2023. Interviews were conducted until saturation was reached and confirmed. Interviews occurred online through a secure platform or in-person and were recorded. Data were analyzed using a constant comparative method using constructivist grounded theory. Member checking was conducted post interview.

Results

Ten neurologists participated across a broad spectrum of neurology experience and subspecialties. We developed a detailed theory of understanding neurologists' attitudes and perceptions of palliative care. When neurologists delay or fail to initiate care planning discussions or palliative care, it results from a complex interplay between patient, physician, and resource accessibility factors. Certain contextual factors, such as a first visit or follow-up, inpatient vs outpatient setting, clinic culture, and the type of clinic practice, are factors that can influence these conversations. As a result, physicians may fail to use available resources, or they may involve other care providers or refer to subspecialty neurologic clinics. However, this delay can still lead to patient and provider harm. Opportunities to improve care exist with continuing education opportunities for trainees and staff, collaboration with palliative care specialists, and health systems support, such as increasing public awareness to address misconceptions about palliative care and resource availability.

Discussion

Our findings identify that failure or delay to initiate care planning and palliative care by neurologists results from a complex interplay between local culture, experience, context, practice type, and patient factors. Opportunities to improve care include increasing educational opportunities, building integrated and collaborative practices, and dedicated health systems support.

Impact of Spiritual Support Interventions on the Quality of Life of Patients Who Receive Palliative Care: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Palliative care focuses on the prevention of worsening health, improving the quality of the patient's life, and the relief of suffering, and therefore has a considerable impact on both the patient suffering from a life-threatening or potentially life-threatening illness and on their family. Spirituality, as the dimension of human life involving the search for meaning, purpose, and transcendence, and connection with oneself, others, and the sacred, could be essential in supporting these patients. The aim of this study was to synthesise the scientific evidence describing the interventions and/or activities undertaken to meet the spiritual needs of the palliative patient.

METHODS

A literature search was carried out across the following databases: PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science. The PRISMA statement was used to guide this review.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles were included. The thematic categories included spiritual needs at the end of life, the influence of music and dance as palliative care, care for family caregivers, and the comparison between counselling and dignity therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions in the biopsychosocial-spiritual spheres impact on the patient's peace of mind and promote the acceptance of a "good death". Healthcare personnel play an essential role in the way their patients prepare for the moment of death, and the meaning and values they convey help them to accompany and welcome patients. Last but not least, universities can play a crucial role by training nurses to integrate spiritual interventions such as music and dance, or by considering the family as a unit of care. The systematic review protocol was registered in the Prospective International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under protocol number CRD42023490852.

Primary and Specialist Palliative Care in Neurosurgery: A Narrative Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Glioblastoma and Stroke

OBJECTIVE

Due to the increased demand for palliative care (PC) in recent years, a model has been proposed to divide PC into primary PC and specialist PC. This article aimed to delineate the indications for primary and specialist PC within 2 common neurosurgical conditions-glioblastoma (GBM) and stroke.

METHODS

A systematic review and bibliometric analysis was conducted to better appreciate the practice trends in PC utilization for GBM and stroke patients using several databases.

RESULTS

There were 70 studies on PC for GBM, the majority of which related to patient preference (22 [31%]). During 1999-2022, there was significant growth in publications per year on this topic at a rate of approximately 0.3 publications per year (P < 0.01). There were 44 studies on PC for stroke, the majority of which related to communication strategies (14 [32%]). During 1999-2022, there was no significant growth in stroke publications per year (P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the progressively disabling neurological course of GBM, we suggest that a specialty PC team be used in conjunction with the neurosurgical team early in the disease trajectory while patients are still able to communicate their preferences, goals, and values. In contrast, short-term and long-term stages of management of stroke have differing implications for PC needs, with the short-term stage necessitating adept, time-sensitive communication between the patient, family, and care teams. Thus, we propose that primary PC should be included as a core competency in neurosurgery training, among other stroke specialists.

Neuropalliative care for progressive neurological diseases: A scoping review on models of care and priorities for future research

BACKGROUND

Neuropalliative care is a newly-defined subspeciality bringing specific aspects of fields of neurology and palliative care together to better meet the complex care needs of people with progressive neurological diseases. Examining these needs would help provide guidance about developing relevant models of care and identify gaps in research knowledge.

AIM

To identify current models and approaches to neuropalliative care for people with progressive neurological diseases and the priorities for future research work.

DESIGN

A scoping literature review following the methods described by the Joanna Briggs Institute.

DATA SOURCES

An electronic search of the literature was undertaken from six sources including MEDLINE (Ovid), EMCARE, PsycINFO and CINAHL covering the years January 2011 to September 2021.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were found examining neuropalliative care from the perspectives of 4795 PND patients, 774 informal carers and 138 health professionals. All studies held themes of integrative care, with most studies employing outpatient models of multidisciplinary care. Topics discussed included: overcoming local system-issues, providing education for professionals, patients and carers, early referral and capturing outcome measures for quality-assurance and future research work.

CONCLUSIONS

Most models of neuropalliative care described in the international literature are predominantly outpatient, multidisciplinary and integrative. Clinicians typically utilise existing neurology and palliative care infrastructure to provide care. More high-quality research and outcome tools are needed to guide the design of evidence-based palliative care for people with progressive neurological diseases.

The current state of neuropalliative care in developing countries. Where are we now?

The need for improved palliative care in developing countries is great. Of 58 million people who die every year, 45 million die in developing countries. An estimated 60% (27 million) of these people in poor nations would benefit from palliative care, and this number is growing as chronic diseases such as cancer rise rapidly. Yet a combination of highly restrictive policies on opioid prescription and a lack of awareness within the medical profession conspire to deprive patients of palliative care. Human rights advocates argue that this neglect is a breach of human rights that is tantamount to torture. This editorial explores the neuropalliative approach and addresses the current state of neuropalliative care in developing countries.

Effects of Palliative Care for Progressive Neurologic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association of palliative care for progressive neurologic diseases with patient- and caregiver-centered outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies, including pilot studies.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Adults with progressive neurologic diseases (dementia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, motor neuron disease, multiple system atrophy, and progressive supranuclear palsy) and their caregivers.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL PLUS, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PubMed were searched from inception to September 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tools. Narrative synthesis was conducted. Patient quality of life (QoL), symptom burden, caregiver burden, and satisfaction with care were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Fifteen trials provided data on 3431 patients (mean age, 73.9 years). Compared with usual care, palliative care was statistically significantly associated with lower symptom burden [standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.34 (95% Cl, -0.59 to -0.09)] and higher caregiver satisfaction [SMD, 0.41 (95% Cl, 0.12 to 0.71)] and patient satisfaction [SMD, 0.43 (95% Cl, -0.01 to 0.87)]. However, the associations were not significant after excluding studies with high risk of bias. Insignificant associations of palliative care with caregiver burden [SMD, -0.09 (95% Cl, -0.21 to 0.03)] and patient QoL [SMD, 0.19 (95% Cl, -0.07 to 0.44)] were observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Palliative care is likely to improve symptom burden and satisfaction with care among patients with progressive neurologic diseases and their caregivers, while its effects on QoL and caregiver burden remains inconclusive. Specific intervention components including interdisciplinary team, palliative care physicians, home visits, and spiritual care appeared to be associated with increased effects on improving palliative outcomes. More rigorous designed studies are warranted to examine the effects of neuropalliative care, effective intervention components, optimal timing, and symptom triggers of palliative care referrals.

A Narrative Review of Problems in Learning and Practicing Palliative Care in Neurology Clinics in Japan and Proposed Solutions

As the understanding of the role of palliative care in neurology increases, there is the need to ensure that these developments include not only care at home and in hospitals but also in clinics. There are no reports on palliative care from neurology clinics in Japan, and this paper considers the problems and proposed solutions for improving palliative care provided at neurology clinics in Japan. In Japan, physicians in neurology clinics are extremely busy both during and after office hours with medical treatment and the preparation of various documents and are unable to conduct case conferences. Moreover, the education system for palliative care, especially for lifelong education, is not sufficient, and multidisciplinary cooperation is difficult due to the lack of specialists and their scattered locations. To improve the care provided for patients and their families, general palliative care should be included in the health insurance system with incentives and recognition, and mandatory lifelong education should be established so that all neurologists can provide palliative care. These proposals may be appropriate for other countries as palliative care in neurology is established.

The involvement of palliative care with neurology – a comparison of UK, Switzerland and Italy

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain the involvement of palliative care with neurology services in the care of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in the United Kingdom, Italy and Switzerland, in particular the collaboration with and referral from neurology, the involvement in multidisciplinary team care and in the respiratory support of ALS patients.

METHODS

In 2019, two online surveys were undertaken of palliative care specialists, using specialist groups of the European Academy of Neurology, European Association of Palliative Care and the Association of Palliative Medicine for Great Britain and Ireland.

RESULTS

The respondents were specialist palliative care professionals, predominantly senior doctors, involved in the care of people with ALS. As the numbers of respondents from many countries were in single figures the analysis was restricted to the United Kingdom, Italy and Switzerland. The time of involvement varied, with early involvement commonest in the UK. Barriers to referral included neurologists not referring and financial issues, particularly in Switzerland. The reluctance of patients and families to see palliative care services was reported as less than 20% in all countries. Respondents were often involved in the care of people receiving noninvasive ventilation (NIV), in all countries. and with tracheostomy ventilation (TV), particularly in Italy.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care services are often involved in the care of people with ALS, but the extent and timing of involvement varies. The use of clinical guidelines and education on palliative care for neurology services may encourage collaboration, for the benefit of people with ALS and their families.

Neuropalliative care for the neurosurgeon: a primer

Many neurosurgical conditions are incurable, leading to disability or severe symptoms, poor quality of life, and distress for patients and families. The field of neuropalliative care (NPC) addresses the palliative care (PC) needs of individuals living with neurological conditions. Neurosurgeons play an important role within multidisciplinary NPC teams because of their understanding of the natural history of and treatment strategies for neurosurgical conditions, longitudinal patient-physician relationships, and responsibility for neurosurgical emergencies. Moreover, patients with neurosurgical conditions have unique PC needs given the trajectories of neurosurgical diseases, the realities of prognostication, psychosocial factors, communication strategies, and human behavior. PC improves outcomes among neurosurgical patients. Despite the importance of NPC, neurosurgeons often lack formal training in PC skills, which include identifying patients who require PC, assessing a patient's understanding and preferences regarding illness, educating patients, building trust, managing symptoms, addressing family and caregiver needs, discussing end-of-life care, and recognizing when to refer patients to specialists. The future of NPC involves increasing awareness of the approach's importance, delineating priorities for neurosurgeons with regard to NPC, increasing emphasis on PC skills during training and practice, expanding research efforts, and adjusting reimbursement structures to incentivize the provision of NPC by neurosurgeons.

Triggers for Referral to Specialized Palliative Care in Advanced Neurologic and Neurosurgical Conditions: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives

To systematically review the literature for the most suitable trigger criteria for referral to specialist palliative care services in life-limiting and life-threatening neurologic and neurosurgical conditions.

Methods

Literature searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE (1990-December 2020). To be included, studies must have trigger/referral criteria clearly outlined, a ≥75% nononcology neurosciences population, and consensus or guidelines documents regarding palliative neurosciences or trigger/referral criteria. We excluded studies that had an oncologic or non-neurosciences population as the main focus of study, trigger and referral criteria not clearly outlined, and no primary or duplicative data. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD4202013579), and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The American Academy of Neurology Clinical Practice Guidelines Process Manual was used to assess for risk of bias.

Results

Our search identified 1,748 publications, of which 22 articles met the eligibility criteria. Studies were considered in 2 main groups: (A) studies designed specifically to identify trigger criteria for referral to specialized neuropalliative care services (n = 9) and (B) studies that retrospectively reported the reason for referral to specialized palliative care or reflected a consensus statement among people with advanced neurologic illness (n = 13). Overall, the results suggest that several published referral triggers for specialized neuropalliative care are based on expert consensus. However, there is a growing body of literature providing evidence-based condition-specific triggers for multiple sclerosis, parkinsonism, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and dementia.

Discussion

There is a growing body of research that outlines evidence-based referral triggers for neuropalliative care. The ambiguity of nomenclature surrounding referral triggers in the current literature and field of neuropalliative care was a limitation to this study. We suggest that condition-specific triggers are likely to be the most effective for identifying the appropriate patients and timing for referral to specialist palliative care. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020135791, crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).

Neuropalliative care: Defining an emerging field

Palliative care is increasingly becoming an established part of medical care, providing the holistic assessment and management of the person at the center of care-physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. This had originally been primarily provided for people with terminal cancers but in the last 50 years, this care has extended to caring for people with issues throughout disease progression and for all diagnoses, including neurologic diseases. Palliative care in fact is now included within guidelines and standards for many neurologic diseases. Palliative care may be delivered as an approach provided by all health and social care professionals; by focused care provided within neurology; and through the involvement of specialist palliative care and neuropalliative care for more complex issues. The education of neurologists and palliative care specialists is essential to enable all to be aware of the issues faced by patients and their families and provide adequate support for patients, families, and healthcare professionals. In this way, the quality of life can be maintained as much as possible and patients are able to die with as little distress as possible, with their families and carers supported.

What palliative care physicians wish neurologists knew

This chapter describes several features of palliative care that we believe can assist neurologists in caring for patients with serious illness. These features include the importance of recognizing suffering, the central of total pain (including physical, emotional, spiritual, and existential aspects), structural features of palliative care such as the distinction been palliative care and hospice, and the concept of primary and specialty palliative care. Structural features of palliative care such as interdisciplinary teamwork, approaches to self-care, and a perspective on prognostic uncertainty are also considered. Throughout this chapter, the focus is on ways in which neurologists can integrate these approaches in caring for patients and their families.

Differences Between Exergaming Rehabilitation and Conventional Physiotherapy on Quality of Life in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative condition with both motor and non-motor symptoms affecting the quality of life (QoL) of older adults. Exergaming rehabilitation allows the interaction of the subject with digital games through the implementation of repetitive functional activities. Conventional physiotherapy uses patient-centered programs that include a variety of active exercises. The aim of this review was to look into the effectiveness of exergaming rehabilitation on the QoL of people with PD and compare it with conventional physiotherapy. Five electronic databases were searched for eligible studies until February 2021. For the statistical analysis, the mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence interval were used to calculate effect sizes between groups. To determine heterogeneity, statistical index I ² was used. A total of 548 participants were included in 14 studies. Exergaming rehabilitation related with improved QoL (p = 0.687, 95% CI: -1.682 to -0.734), balance (p = 0.039, 95% CI: 0.364-13.689), (p = 0.018, 95% CI: 0.446-4.830), and gait (p = 0.005, 95% CI: 0.351-1.924). No significant difference was found between groups regarding the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (p = 0.196, 95% CI: -5.970 to 1.225) and for the Timed Up and Go Test (p = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.446-4.830). Exergames as a rehabilitation method can be used to provide alternative interactive intervention with positive results for QoL in people with PD. Further investigation is needed to assess the effect on mental health in this population group.

Satisfaction of Patients With Severe Multiple Sclerosis and Their Family Members With Palliative Care: Interventional Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with MS should be provided palliative care, which could help them manage symptoms more efficiently and could solve some psychosocial problems. Evaluating the satisfaction with provided care may be one of the factors of the quality of care evaluation.

AIM

The aim of this controlled intervention study was to determine the factors affecting one's satisfaction with care in patients in advanced stages of MS and their caregivers. Furthermore, the aim was to study the difference in the satisfaction of patients and family members with the provided specialized palliative care, as opposed to the standard care.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 103 patients with MS who were randomized to either a palliative care intervention or the control group. Family members of each patient were invited in the study, and 97 caregivers agreed to participe. The patients in the intervention group were provided with neuropalliative care in the form of consultations with a multidisciplinary palliative team. A modified questionnaire, CANHELP Lite, was used to collect data. Patients and family members completed the questionnaire 3 months after the intervention.

RESULTS

The patients and caregivers in the intervention group expressed significantly greater satisfaction in all analyzed areas (p = 0.000-0.002). The provided intervention predicted the satisfaction in the domains of a relationship with the doctor, disease management, and decision-making/communication. Another important predictor of the satisfaction in all domains was the functional state of the patient.

CONCLUSION

Targeted consultations resulted in the greater satisfaction of patients with MS and their caregivers with the provided care.