Challenges for palliative care day services: a focus group study

Age- and gender-based social inequalities in palliative care for cancer patients: a systematic literature review

Objectives

Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide, given its magnitude and growing burden, in addition to the repercussions on health and quality of life. Palliative care can play an important role improving quality of life and it is cost-effective, but some population groups may not benefit from it or benefit less based on age and gender inequalities. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the available evidence on age- and gender-based social inequalities in access to and use of palliative care in cancer patients.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. An exhaustive literature research was performed in Pubmed, CINHAL and Embase until November 2022 and were not restricted by language or date of publication. Eligible studies were observational studies analyzing the access and use of palliative care in cancer patients.

Results

Fifty-three studies were included in the review. Forty-five analyzed age and 44 analyzed gender inequalities in relation to use of and access to palliative care. Our results show that older people receive poorer quality of care, worst symptom control and less preferences for palliative care. In relation to gender, women have a greater preference for the use of palliative care and generally have more access to basic and specialized palliative care services and palliative care facilities.

Conclusion

This review reveals difficulties for older persons and men for access to key elements of palliative care and highlights the need to tackle access barriers for the most vulnerable population groups. Innovative collaborative services based around patient, family and wider community are needed to ensure optimal care.

Public Awareness of Palliative Care: A Nationally Representative Sample of Jordanian Adults

CONTEXT

Internationally, studies suggest that inadequate comprehension of the concept of palliative care and misconceptions about it hinder the effective use of palliative care, especially in developing nations.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the awareness of the adult population in Jordan regarding palliative care.

METHODS

The study used a cross-sectional design and an online self-administered questionnaire survey. The recruitment method was convenience snowball sampling of three thousand nine hundred forty-two Jordanian adults covering 12 governorates. Participants were recruited through social media platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp. The process of gathering data commenced in October -December 2023. Descriptive statistics were computed.

RESULTS

A study of 3942 respondents in Jordan found that 45% have some knowledge of palliative care, with 31% being pretty knowledgeable. Most respondents (89%) strongly agree that patients with incurable illnesses should receive palliative care, with cancer patients showing the highest level of agreement (96%). The most agreed-upon aspect of palliative care is controlling pain and symptoms at home, while the least agreed-upon aspect is providing information on benefits and financial matters. The study also highlighted the link between palliative care and mortality, suggesting the need for increased awareness and education.

CONCLUSION

The demand for palliative care in Jordan is increasing, requiring increased access, a holistic approach, open discussions, and easily accessible information. Challenges include integrating palliative care into non-malignant progressive diseases, ensuring comprehensive end-of-life care, promoting societal receptiveness towards mortality, enhancing information accessibility, and health promotion efforts. The study's results indicate the importance of implementing educational strategies and engaging families and communities in policymaking to change public knowledge and attitudes toward palliative care.

["The total time spent by the general practitioner decreases": The referring physician's view of a palliative day care clinic]

BACKGROUND

Palliative day-care clinics (PDCCs) can complement inpatient and outpatient specialized palliative care. Some studies have shown improvements in the patients'́ symptoms, functional level and psychological well-being, while others have not. This study aimed to document the experience of referring physicians with PDCCs.

METHOD

A postal questionnaire was sent to referring physicians between 11/2020 and 3/2021. The questionnaire included open and closed questions about professional background, symptom control, medical / psychosocial benefits for patients and challenges in the collaboration. Closed, 5-point scaled questions were analyzed descriptively with IBM SPSS Statistics 25®, open questions with a thematic content analysis using MAXQDA 2020®.

RESULTS

Of the 96 referring physicians contacted, 76 questionnaires were returned (79%), 73 of which could be analyzed. Most referring physicians were general practitioners (57%), followed by oncologists (28%). 12% had completed further training in palliative medicine and had been working with patients with palliative care needs for an average of almost 19 years. On average, they had referred 24 patients (range 1-200) to a PDCC. 93% said that inpatient stays were delayed or avoided by PDCCs. 97% were of the opinion that their patients achieved a (great or rather great) benefit from medical treatment, and 96% thought that they benefited (to a great or rather great degree) from psychosocial treatment. 58% said that their own time spent with patients treated at the PDCC had decreased. In addition, a total of 227 open comments on challenges in cooperation, suggestions for optimization, reasons for referring patients and general wishes for PDCCs were analyzed.

DISCUSSION

The high response rate to the questionnaires shows that PDCCs are of great importance to referring physicians. They consider the cooperation with PDCCs to be supportive and helpful for both themselves and their patients.

CONCLUSION

PDCCs make an important contribution to palliative care. Almost all respondents believe that treatment at a PDCC prevents or delays hospitalization.

'When a patient chooses to die at home, that's what they want… comfort, home': Brilliance in community-based palliative care nursing

INTRODUCTION

To redress the scholarly preoccupation with gaps, issues, and problems in palliative care, this article extends previous findings on what constitutes brilliant palliative care to ask what brilliant nursing practices are supported and promoted.

METHODS

This study involved the methodology of POSH-VRE, which combines positive organisational scholarship in healthcare (POSH) with video-reflexive ethnography (VRE). From August 2015 to May 2017, inclusive, nurses affiliated with a community health service who delivered palliative care, contributed to this study as co-researchers (n = 4) or participants (n = 20). Patients who received palliative care (n = 30) and carers (n = 16) contributed as secondary participants, as they were part of observed instances of palliative care. With a particular focus on the practices and experiences that exceeded expectations and brought joy and delight, the study involved capturing video-recordings of community-based palliative care in situ; reflexively analysing the recordings with the nurses; as well as ethnography to witness, experience, and understand practices and experiences. Data were analysed, teleologically, to clarify what brilliant practices were supported and promoted.

RESULTS

Brilliant community-based palliative care nursing largely involved maintaining normality in patients' and carers' lives. The nurses demonstrated this by masking the clinical aspects of their role, normalising these aspects, and appreciating alternative 'normals'.

CONCLUSION

Redressing the scholarly preoccupation with gaps, issues, and problems in palliative care, this article demonstrates how what is ordinary is extraordinary. Specifically, given the intrusiveness and abnormalising effects of technical clinical interventions, brilliant community-based palliative care can be realised when nurses enact practices that serve to promote a patient or carer to normality.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients and carers contributed to this study as participants, while nurses contributed to this study as co-researchers in the conduct of the study, the analysis and interpretation of the data, and the preparation of the article.

Prevalence and Predictors of Palliative Care Utilization among Hospitalized Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Objective: Research has shown that palliative care improves the quality of life of cancer patients; however, there is no literature on specific factors that predict its use in diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Therefore, the prevalence of palliative care utilization and predictors of palliative care utilization among patients with DLBCL were examined. Methods: Data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) collected between 2016 to 2018 were used for all analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the predictors of palliative care utilization among hospitalized patients with DLBCL. Descriptive analyses were used to explore the overall prevalence of palliative care receipt in this population. Results: Of the 41,789 hospitalizations, 7.1% of patients used palliative care during hospitalization, while 4.8% utilized palliative care and were discharged alive. DLBCL patients aged 70 and older had 1.3 times (95% CI: 1.14-1.41) higher odds of utilizing palliative care compared to those less than 70 years. Relative to Medicare/Medicaid patients, those with other types of insurance were 1.7 times (95% CI: 1.34-2.05) more likely to receive palliative care. Those who were either transferred to a facility/discharged with home health (AOR: 6.23; 95% CI: 5.21-7.44) or died during hospitalization (AOR: 45.17; 95% CI: 36.98-55.17) had higher odds of receiving palliative care when relative to those with a routine hospital discharge. Other associated factors were type of admission, length of stay, chemotherapy receipt, and number of comorbidities. Conclusions: The prevalence of palliative care utilization was low and factors predicting utilization in our population were identified. Our findings highlight the need to increase awareness among medical oncologists on the need to involve the palliative care team early in the management of hospitalized patients with DLBCL.

"My everyday life has returned to normal"- Experiences of patients and relatives with a palliative day care clinic: a qualitative evaluation study

PURPOSE

Palliative day care clinics (PDCCs) complement inpatient and home palliative care and provide access to a range of multi-professional services. However, they are not part of standard care in Germany. Yet, international studies show that PDCCs have a positive impact on e.g. quality of life. To evaluate one of the first PDCCs in Germany (Aschaffenburg-Alzenau (PDCC-AA)) by describing the experiences, satisfaction, challenges, wishes of patients and relatives and possible alternatives to treatment in the PDCC.

METHODS

Qualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews. Data was analyzed using qualitative structuring content analysis according to Kuckartz with deductive a priori categories and inductive subcategories.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients and 38 relatives completed telephone interviews. The majority of patients were diagnosed with a cancer or tumor disease. The following four main themes emerged: (1) alternatives to treatment at the PDCC, (2) symptom relief, (3) sense of security, (4) "everyday life framing" (normality of everyday life). Participants valued the medical treatment (especially for pain), psychosocial support given and having direct access to a range of services (e.g., wound care and pleural drainage), while relatives valued being provided respite services. A sense of security, availability of therapies, and devoted time that healthcare providers spent to explain e.g., treatment options were mentioned most positively, as well as confidence in dealing with the illness. As to whether there was an alternative to treatment in the PDCC, some saw further inpatient stays, the emergency room or care by general practitioners as options (although not preferred). Patients expressed concern that they were not treated and informed according to their needs in other care settings.

CONCLUSIONS

PDCCs may close a gap between inpatient and home palliative care. Participants mentioned that hospital stays can be delayed or even prevented.

'There's something about admitting that you are lonely' - prevalence, impact and solutions to loneliness in terminal illness: An explanatory sequential multi-methods study

BACKGROUND

Loneliness is a prevalent societal issue and can impact on a person's physical and mental health. It is unclear how loneliness impacts on end of life experiences or how such feelings can be alleviated.

AIM

To explore the perceived prevalence, impact and possible solutions to loneliness among people who are terminally ill and their carers in Northern Ireland through the lens of health and social care professionals.

DESIGN

An explanatory multi-method study.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

An online survey (n = 68, response rate 30%) followed by three online focus groups with palliative and end of life care health and social care professionals (n = 14). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Loneliness was perceived by professionals as highly prevalent for people with a terminal illness (92.6%) and their carers (86.8%). Loneliness was considered a taboo subject and impacts on symptoms including pain and breathlessness and overall wellbeing at end of life. Social support was viewed as central towards alleviating feelings of loneliness and promoting connectedness at end of life. Four themes were identified: (1) the stigma of loneliness, (2) COVID-19: The loneliness pandemic (3) impact of loneliness across physical and mental health domains and (4) the power of social networks.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for greater investment for social support initiatives to tackle experiences of loneliness at end of life. These services must be co-produced with people impacted by terminal illness to ensure they meet the needs of this population.

A survey of hospice day services in the United Kingdom & Republic of Ireland : how did hospices offer social support to palliative care patients, pre-pandemic?

INTRODUCTION

Social support is described by patients and other stakeholders to be a valuable component of palliative day care. Less is known about the range of hospice services that have been used in practice that facilitate social support. An online survey aimed to gain an overview of all hospice day services that facilitated social support for adults outside of their own homes.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed via email to people involved in managing hospice day services. Questions were asked on hospice characteristics, including staff and volunteer roles. Respondents were asked to identify services they felt offered social support to patients. Data collection took place between August 2017 and May 2018.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 103 hospices in the UK and ROI (response rate 49.5%). Results provide an overview of hospice day and outpatient services that offer social support to patients. These are: multi-component interventions, activity groups, formal support groups, befriending, and informal social activities. Multi-component interventions, such as palliative day care, were the most commonly reported. Their stated aims tend to focus on clinical aspects, but many survey respondents considered these multicomponent interventions to be the 'most social' service at their hospice. The survey also identified a huge variety of activity groups, as well as formal therapeutic support groups. Informal 'social-only' activities were present, but less common. Over a third of all the services were described as 'drop in'. Most responding hospices did not routinely use patient reported outcome measures in their 'most social' services.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey documents hospice activity in facilitating social support to be diverse and evolving. At the time of data collection, many hospices offered multiple different services by which a patient might obtain social support outside of their own home and in the presence of other patients.

Hospice delivery models and survival differences in the terminally ill: a large cohort study

OBJECTIVE

A common difficulty at the end of life (EOL) is to determine an appropriate service model, such as hospice share care (HSC), hospice inpatient care (HIC) and hospice home care (HHC). This study aimed to recommend the appropriate hospice delivery model based on the physical, psychosocial and spiritual needs of patients referred for hospice care.

METHODS

This cohort study included patients who received only one kind of hospice delivery model between 2006 and 2020. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test, non-parametric analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model that determined the patients' clinical characteristics for a hospice delivery model and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 8874 hospice patients were recruited, of which 7076 (79.7%) were HSC patients, 918 (10.4%) were HIC patients and 880 (9.9%) were HHC patients. There were significant differences in the physical symptoms and demographic, psychosocial and spiritual factors among the three groups (p<0.001). The patients who received the HHC were less to have dyspnoea (18.5%) and dysphagia (28.7%). The HIC patients showed higher severity of symptoms and experienced greater psychosocial distress (73.2%). The HSC is appropriate for noncancer patients . Patients with cancer were associated with less dyspnoea (32.4%) and dysphagia (46.5%). Patients with lung cancer who received the HHC had better survival than those who received other types of hospice care (HR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.86, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides guidance regarding the appropriate hospice service model, based on individualised palliative needs, targeting improvement in EOL care.