Meanings of abortion in context: accounts of abortion in the lives of women diagnosed with breast cancer

The emotional responses of women when terminating a pregnancy for medical reasons: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

In most countries of the world the only basis for considering a termination of pregnancy is for medical reasons. Depending on the circumstances and determinants of each case, the emotional responses to this event vary greatly. The aim of this study is to map the emotional responses of women when their pregnancy is terminated for medical reasons.

METHODS

A scoping review was carried out. This covered all types of qualitative and quantitative studies published in English or Spanish since 2014 which included first-person accounts of women's emotional responses when they had a termination. A bibliographic search was made of four databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Pubmed) along with an additional manual search and backward and forward citation chaining of the studies included. The data were reported in narrative form and the results grouped according to the descriptive characteristics of the study and the emotions involved.

FINDINGS

The review process resulted in the inclusion of thirty-four studies. nineteen of these followed a qualitative approach and fifteen used quantitative methodology, with six of them being intervention studies. The emotions found ranged from anxiety and depression to guilt and thankfulness, so various authors stressed the need to improve training for health professionals to provide information, advice and support to the women during the entire process of the termination of pregnancy for medical reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

The available studies cannot be compared given the variety of designs. The predominant emotions underlying the termination for medical reasons were stress, anxiety and depression. Future research should be carried out using samples of participants covering all causes of termination for medical reasons in a particular context so that an intervention can be designed to help lessen the impact of the process on women's mental health.

Cancer during pregnancy: A qualitative study of healthcare experiences of Australian women

OBJECTIVES

To identify features enhancing the quality of healthcare experiences for women with gestational cancer, and explore the impact of the heterogeneous Australian healthcare system on those experiences.

METHODS

Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with women diagnosed with any cancer during pregnancy in the last five years. Recruitment occurred during 2018-2019 via social media and professional, clinical and community networks. Questions related to women's experiences of their healthcare, wellbeing and psychosocial needs. Interviews were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Study participants (n = 23) received treatment in the private sector (n = 10), public sector (n = 8), or both (n = 5). Five interview themes were found: Control over healthcare; Trust in clinicians, hospitals and systems; Coordination of care; An uncommon diagnosis; Holistic, future-oriented care. Women were most likely to have had a positive healthcare experience when (a)care was well-coordinated and adjusted to meet their unique needs/challenges, and (b)women perceived their care went beyond their immediate medical needs and encompassed future psychosocial wellbeing, including preparation for postpartum challenges.

CONCLUSION

Existing 'usual care' in the public and/or private sector for both the pregnancy and the cancer is insufficient to meet these women's needs. Prioritising psychological wellbeing including psychosocial needs, and communication and planning around fertility and postnatal challenges are essential for this population.

Psychological aspects of gestational cancer: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Gestational cancer is defined as any type of cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or within 12 months of delivery. To date, existing studies on the psychological aspects of this type of cancer have not been evaluated for methodological quality. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the psychological aspects of gestational cancer.

METHODS

Five journal databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed articles reporting upon the psychological aspects of women with gestational cancer. Studies published from journal inception to December 2019 were included, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The Mixed-Method Appraisal Bias Tool was used, to assess the methodological quality of the studies. A narrative description was developed for the psychological outcomes reported in quantitative studies. Qualitative data was synthesized using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Five papers were eligible for inclusion (two qualitative and three quantitative studies). Factors that contributed to women's psychological distress during gestational cancer included disease characteristics, sociodemographic factors, the baby's health, pregnancy-related factors and cognitive emotion regulation. Four main themes emerged from the qualitative studies; concerns about the baby's health, lost opportunities, "not fitting in," and healthcare decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that (a) women with gestational cancer experience psychological distress that is associated with concerns about their babies' health, and (b) their healthcare experiences are affected by communication within multidisciplinary care teams.

Drivers of advanced stage at breast cancer diagnosis in the multicountry African breast cancer - disparities in outcomes (ABC-DO) study

Breast cancer (BC) survival rates in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are low in part due to advanced stage at diagnosis. As one component of a study of the entire journey of SSA women with BC, we aimed to identify shared and setting-specific drivers of advanced stage BC. Women newly diagnosed in the multicountry African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes (ABC-DO) study completed a baseline interview and their stage information was extracted from medical records. Ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for advanced stage (I, II, III, IV) in relation to individual woman-level, referral and biological factors. A total of 1795 women were included from Nigeria, Uganda, Zambia, and the multiracial populations of Namibia and South Africa, 1091 of whom (61%) were stage III/IV. Stage was lower in women with greater BC knowledge (OR 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.85) per point on a 6 point scale). More advanced stage was associated with being black (4.00 (2.79, 5.74)), having attended Collapse

Key Words

• breast cancer
• stage at diagnosis
• sub-Saharan Africa
• survival

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Africa
• Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis
• Breast Neoplasms/pathology
• Female
• Health Services Accessibility
• Humans
• Logistic Models
• Middle Aged
• Neoplasm Staging/methods
• Odds Ratio
• Population Groups
• Prospective Studies
• Referral and Consultation

Collapse

Grants

• 001 World Health Organization
• R01 CA192627 NCI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Fiona McKenzie Section of Environment and RadiationInternational Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
Annelle Zietsman Windhoek Central HospitalWindhoekNamibia
Moses Galukande Makerere UniversityKampalaUganda
Angelica Anele Federal Medical CentreOwerriNigeria
Charles Adisa Abia State University Teaching HospitalAbaNigeria
Groesbeck Parham University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
Leeya Pinder University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
Herbert Cubasch University of the Witwatersrand, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic HospitalJohannesburgSouth Africa
Maureen Joffe University of the Witwatersrand, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic HospitalJohannesburgSouth Africa
Frederick Kidaaga Namibian Institute of PathologyWindhoekNamibia
Robert Lukande Makerere UniversityKampalaUganda
Awa U. Offiah Abia State University Teaching HospitalAbaNigeria
Ralph O. Egejuru Federal Medical CentreOwerriNigeria
Aaron Shibemba University Teaching HospitalLusakaZambia
Joachim Schuz Section of Environment and RadiationInternational Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
Benjamin O. Anderson Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
Isabel dos Santos Silva Department of Non‐Communicable Disease EpidemiologyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineLondonUK
Valerie McCormack Section of Environment and RadiationInternational Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance

Collapse