Towards OPtimal TIming and Method for promoting sUstained adherence to lifestyle and body weight recommendations in postMenopausal breast cancer survivors (the OPTIMUM-study): protocol for a longitudinal mixed-method study

A look into the cancer continuum for the development of a physical activity intervention: qualitative investigation of the physical activity experiences and preferences of female cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Clinical guidelines recommend cancer survivors (i.e., people with a cancer diagnosis) engage in regular physical activity (PA) during and post treatment, yet most do not. Additionally, PA promotion for cancer survivors has primarily focused on post treatment, calling for an understanding of PA promotion during treatment. This study explores the PA experiences and preferences of both in-treatment and post-treatment breast and gynecologic cancer survivors (BGCS) to inform the design of a PA intervention.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with postmenopausal women aged ≥ 50 years, diagnosed with breast or gynecological cancer (stages 1-3), who were undergoing, or recently completed (12 to 24 months) chemotherapy and/or primary treatment. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to explore themes.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 26; Mage: 63.9 years) had a breast (92.3%) and gynecologic (7.7%) cancer diagnosis and 46.2% (n = 12) were in treatment whereas 53.8% (n = 14) were post treatment. BGCS experienced several side effects of cancer treatment and both groups felt PA was an important goal. In-treatment BGCS focused on managing side effects (e.g., fatigue) and recognized energy fluctuated around treatments, making those periods less ideal for PA. In-treatment BGCS strongly endorsed a flexible, at-home intervention. Post-treatment BGCS emphasized recovery and relapse prevention, also favoring at-home, flexible interventions but showing greater interest towards support groups to aid with their recovery journey. Preferred activities included walking, dancing, and muscle-strengthening.

CONCLUSION

Findings highlight the unique challenges postmenopausal BGCS face in participating in PA, especially in-treatment, emphasizing the importance of a tailored PA intervention.

Physiological and environmental factors affecting cancer risk and prognosis in obesity

Obesity results from a chronic excessive accumulation of adipose tissue due to a long-term imbalance between energy intake and expenditure. Available epidemiological and clinical data strongly support the links between obesity and certain cancers. Emerging clinical and experimental findings have improved our understanding of the roles of key players in obesity-associated carcinogenesis such as age, sex (menopause), genetic and epigenetic factors, gut microbiota and metabolic factors, body shape trajectory over life, dietary habits, and general lifestyle. It is now widely accepted that the cancer-obesity relationship depends on the site of cancer, the systemic inflammatory status, and micro environmental parameters such as levels of inflammation and oxidative stress in transforming tissues. We hereby review recent advances in our understanding of cancer risk and prognosis in obesity with respect to these players. We highlight how the lack of their consideration contributed to the controversy over the link between obesity and cancer in early epidemiological studies. Finally, the lessons and challenges of interventions for weight loss and better cancer prognosis, and the mechanisms of weight gain in survivors are also discussed.

Course of objectively measured physical activity and sleep in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A 1-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

As physical inactivity and poor sleep quality may impose additional risk for cancer recurrence and overall mortality in postmenopausal breast cancer (PMBC) survivors, it is important to gain insight into the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on their physical activity (PA) and sleep level.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the course of their physical activity (PA) and sleep throughout governmental measures against COVID-19 during 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

PMBC survivors (n = 96) wore an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT for seven consecutive days at 12 and 18 months after diagnosis and additional measurements were taken after onset of the second (partial) COVID-19 lockdown. Longitudinal data was categorized into four timepoints: before onset of COVID-19 (T1), during the initial lockdown (T2), in between initial and second lockdown (T3), and during the second lockdown (T4). General linear mixed effects models assessed differences in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day, total minutes of PA per day, average acceleration, intensity gradient, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration over time.

RESULTS

Levels of MVPA per day before COVID-19 were low (Median = 20.9 min/day (IQR = 10.8;36.2)), and time spent physically active was most often in light intensity, which remained stable throughout the pandemic. Sleep duration (Median = 442.8 min/night (IQR = 418.3;478.0)) and efficiency (85.9% (IQR = 79.6;88.4)) was sufficient before COVID-19 and showed stability over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Low levels of PA with mostly light intensity, and adequate sleep efficiency and duration were observed before COVID in PMBC survivors. This was not further affected by COVID-19 governmental measures.

Co-designed weight management intervention for women recovering from oestrogen-receptor positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Weight gain is commonly observed during and after breast cancer treatment and is associated with poorer survival outcomes, particularly in women with oestrogen receptor-positive (ER +) disease. The aim of this study was to co-design (with patients) a programme of tailored, personalised support (intervention), including high-quality support materials, to help female breast cancer patients (BCPs) with ER + disease to develop the skills and confidence needed for sustainable weight loss.  METHODS: ER + BCPs were recruited from two UK National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. The selection criteria included (i) recent experience of breast cancer treatment (within 36 months of completing primary treatment); (ii) participation in a recent focus group study investigating weight management perceptions and experiences; (iii) willingness to share experiences and contribute to discussions on the support structures needed for sustainable dietary and physical activity behaviour change. Co-design workshops included presentations and interactive activities and were facilitated by an experienced co-design researcher (HH), assisted by other members of the research team (KP, SW and JS).

RESULTS

Two groups of BCPs from the North of England (N = 4) and South Yorkshire (N = 5) participated in a two-stage co-design process. The stage 1 and stage 2 co-design workshops were held two weeks apart and took place between Jan-March 2019, with each workshop being approximately 2 h in duration. Guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel, a theoretically-informed weight management intervention was developed on the basis of co-designed strategies to overcome physical and emotional barriers to dietary and physical activity behaviour change. BCPs were instrumental in designing all key features of the intervention, in terms of Capability (e.g., evidence-based information, peer-support and shared experiences), Opportunity (e.g., flexible approach to weight management based on core principles) and Motivation (e.g., appropriate use of goal-setting and high-quality resources, including motivational factsheets) for behaviour change.

CONCLUSION

This co-design approach enabled the development of a theoretically-informed intervention with a content, structure and delivery model that has the potential to address the weight management challenges faced by BCPs diagnosed with ER + disease. Future research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention for eliciting clinically-important and sustainable weight loss in this population.