Patients' and relatives' perspectives on best possible care in the context of developing a multidisciplinary center for endometriosis and adenomyosis: findings from a national survey

Experiences of disempowerment amongst endometriosis patients: Toward comprehensive care to address the psychosocial impact of chronic illness

Endometriosis is a devastating chronic condition with significant physical and social implications. This research focused on two questions: 1) how do endometriosis patients experience healthcare in Canada, and 2) how can the healthcare encounter effectively address the psychosocial burden of disease that patients bear? This study examines the psychosocial implications of endometriosis diagnosis and treatment. Data was obtained through semi-structured interviews with nine people diagnosed with endometriosis. Interview questions centering patient perceptions of care were thematically analyzed utilizing reflexive thematic analysis. Analyzing participant narratives and drawing upon Kleinman's concepts of illness experiences and slow medicine, this article underlines the urgency of moving toward a deeper ethics of care for endometriosis patients, wherein the patient is understood and advocated for within the Canadian healthcare system. Drawing upon participant experiences, the present research calls for the widespread availability of a comprehensive healthcare model for the treatment of endometriosis.

Informational support for women with endometriosis: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Ten per cent of women of reproductive age suffer from endometriosis, a painful and incurable disease that leaves women with severe implications for their health and overall well-being. Due to the absence of a cure and the limited effectiveness of available treatments, acquiring accurate information is paramount for women to successfully navigate both their daily lives and the complexities of the healthcare system. This scoping review aimed to map the current literature on women with endometriosis information needs, their information seeking behaviour, and the format and scope of current information resources available.

METHODS

The scoping review was conducted using the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR statement. The final search was conducted in August 2024, through the databases Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, and WebofScience. Studies on information resources on endometriosis and information seeking behaviour as well as information needs of women with endometriosis were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

The majority of the 25 included studies focused on information resources, specifically webpages and social media sites. While few studies analysed information seeking behaviour and information needs, the evidence shows women's high interest in a broad spectrum of information topics. Across all studies, the internet was the most important access point for information.

CONCLUSION

Addressing the absence of systematic analyses on the information seeking behaviour and needs of women with endometriosis is crucial for future research. This step is essential for the development of customised information resources that cater specifically to the diverse needs of women affected by endometriosis.

Women's experiences of living with adenomyosis and perceptions of the diagnostic journey: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Uterine adenomyosis is a common gynaecological disease that can be debilitating. It is poorly understood and may be overlooked in clinical settings. A research gap exists as there are currently no published scoping reviews on perceptions and experiences early in the illness course. As part of a professional doctorate thesis, the aim of this review is to systematically retrieve and describe available literature, exploring the impact of living with adenomyosis and perceptions of the diagnostic journey.

DESIGN

A scoping review is conducted using JBI methodology.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, JBI and PROSPERO databases, EThOS online and Google. Searches were made from database inception to July 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

The characteristics of the evidence sourced were deliberately broad. Studies exploring the experiences and perceptions of women diagnosed with adenomyosis were considered.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Titles and abstracts were initially screened. Subsequently, eligibility was clarified through methods section inspection, and the remaining studies were read in depth. A manual hand-search of references of selected studies was conducted. Prespecified data were extracted, charted and categorised into themes.

RESULTS

Six eligible studies were found, with themes describing impact and burdens, as well as several categories of unsupported needs. No studies specifically focused on perceptions of the diagnostic journey, but some eligible studies made minor reference to this and are included.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the profound impact of adenomyosis and is the first to explore the lived experiences and the diagnostic journey. Understanding the burdens of disease in terms of perceptions and lived experience in combination with the experiences of diagnostic interactions is vital to improving diagnostic pathways. Education with improved multidisciplinary collaboration and further qualitative and case study research will be crucial to achieve this goal.

REGISTRATION

A priori protocol was registered (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2UDYN) and published (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075316).

Can general exercise training and pelvic floor muscle training be used as an empowering tool among women with endometriosis? Experiences among women with endometriosis participating in the intervention group of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The potential benefit of exercise in alleviating symptoms of endometriosis is unclear. Still, exercise may be used to empower women and manage disease symptoms. The purpose of this study was to explore how regular supervised group- and individual exercise training, including pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), is experienced among women with endometriosis after participating in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS

Among 41 women randomized to exercise training for four months, ten women were interviewed about their experiences with exercise training after participation in the trial. The weekly group training was led by women's health physiotherapists and included individualized and progressive muscular strength training of large muscle groups and the pelvic floor muscles, in addition to endurance-, flexibility, and relaxation training. An individual training program followed the same principles as the group training and was to be performed 3-5 times per week, depending on the level of intensity. PFMT was recommended daily. The women also received a group pain management course emphasizing exercise training as self-management. Using inductive reflexive thematic analysis, responses to the question "Did participation in the study change your view of exercise as part of the treatment for endometriosis?" were analyzed.

RESULTS

The women brought forward the importance of knowledge about the benefits of exercise to make informed decisions in disease management. Further, the women described how exercise training was perceived as less frightening and manageable when exposed to various intensities, dosages, and types of exercises in a safe and supportive environment. PFMT was especially brought forward as something new and appreciated, and for some of the women, to be performed on days when their bodies could not handle the general exercise training. They also expressed that the supervised exercise brought an extra dimension of belonging through group participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualization and regular supervision seem important to empower women with knowledge about exercise training as self-management and to experience exercise training as safe and non-threatening. Further, creating a sense of belonging through group training may improve social support and build active coping strategies that are essential for disease management of endometriosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05091268 (registered 23.09.2021).

Perceived challenges in treatment decision-making for endometriosis: healthcare professional perspectives

Background

Endometriosis, a systemic chronic inflammatory condition which has no cure, has a high symptom burden that can negatively impact every facet of life. Given the absence of a gold-standard treatment, the best symptom management regimen in endometriosis is heavily reliant on a patient's values and preferences, making shared decision-making (SDM) vital. However, a comprehensive patient decision aid (PtDA) intervention that could facilitate patient decision-making and promote SDM is lacking in endometriosis, and there is little research on the decisional support needs of individuals with this condition. This qualitative study aimed to explore healthcare professional (HP) perspectives of their clients' decisional support needs when choosing treatments to manage endometriosis symptoms, with a view to evaluating the need for a PtDA.

Methods

Australian HPs identified as specialising in endometriosis care (N = 13) were invited to participate in a short interview over the Internet by phone. Questions focussed on perceived facilitators and challenges of decision-making when choosing treatments for endometriosis. Transcribed qualitative data were thematically analysed and verified by multiple coders, using the template approach.

Results

Four themes were identified: (1) Identifying and setting priorities; (2) HPs' lack of time and perceived lack of knowledge; (3) Patient-centred care and SDM, including patient capacity; and (4) Decision-making blinded by hope. This is the first known study to explore HPs' perspectives on patient decision-making challenges in endometriosis.

Discussion

Findings draw attention to the difficulties people with endometriosis experience when assessing and choosing treatments, highlighting the need for a comprehensive PtDA intervention to support this decision-making.

Evidence for the role of multidisciplinary team care in people with pelvic pain and endometriosis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a chronic, inflammatory condition characterised by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. Given the multi-system nature of the disease and the potential for significant negative impact on quality of life, there has been a long-standing recognition of the need for multidisciplinary care for people with endometriosis. However, there is paucity to the data supporting this approach, and much of the evidence is anecdotal.

AIM

This systematic review aims to describe recent evidence-based models and patient-centred perspectives of multidisciplinary care for endometriosis, to improve understanding of the role of an integrated, multidisciplinary team in effectively addressing patients' care needs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles published between 1 January 2010 to 7 July 2022.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and pinpointed a multidisciplinary team consisting of gynaecologists, pain specialists, nurses, physiotherapists, psychologists, sex therapists, nutritionists, complementary medicine practitioners, and social workers to be most commonly utilised in holistically managing people with pelvic pain and endometriosis. Furthermore, patient perspectives on care highlighted the need for reliable information, respect and validation of experiences or preferences, discussion of long-term treatment plans and social and emotional supports.

CONCLUSION

The trend for multidisciplinary team care for people with endometriosis is growing. Further consumer-driven clinical studies and outcome evaluations need to be conducted to determine the effect of multidisciplinary care on improvements to quality of life for people living with endometriosis and or pelvic pain.

Women's experiences of the diagnostic journey in uterine adenomyosis: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Uterine adenomyosis is a benign gynaecological disease that causes physical and psychological problems, impacting on relationships. It is poorly understood and consequently may be diagnosed late. This protocol describes the process of conducting a systematic scoping review to retrieve and describe literature examining the daily experience and impact of living with uterine adenomyosis. It will explore the journey to diagnosis (and perceptions of what this process is like); identify the main concepts currently used in the literature and highlight gaps in knowledge for future research in relevant populations.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, the population-concept-context approach is used to form clear review questions. A three-phase search strategy will locate published and unpublished evidence from multiple sources. All articles reporting on the personal experiences of women diagnosed with uterine adenomyosis will be considered. Findings from qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method study designs from all settings will be included, not limited by geography but restricted to English. Documents will be screened by the primary researcher, supported by university supervisors. Search outputs will be presented using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 flow diagram. No formal quality appraisal will be conducted. Review findings will be descriptively collated and reported consistent with the Scoping Review Extension of the PRISMA checklist. Patient and public involvement engagement reflected a positive response for the project that this protocol supports.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As primary data will not be collected, formal ethical approval is not required. Prepared as part of a professional doctorate thesis, the findings of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, support groups and social media networks.

Psychological adaptation in women with endometriosis: current knowledge and future research perspectives

This short report aims to present current knowledge on endometriosis. The daily repercussions of endometriosis and their impact on women's psychological state, the resentment often expressed towards doctors associated with diagnosis delay, influencing both appropriation and adaptation to the disease and driving women mainly to self-manage are discussed. Directions for research and intervention include the need to devise a comprehensive strategy in collaboration with stakeholders and to examine targeted study areas more thoroughly, notably related to work environment management, dietary changes and their consequences or the social representation of endometriosis among physicians, are proposed.

Patients' Perspectives on How to Improve Endometriosis Care: A Large Qualitative Study Within the ComPaRe-Endometriosis e-Cohort

Background: Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition that affects about 10% of women of reproductive age. Despite its prevalence, diagnosis is often delayed, misdiagnosis is common, and treatment options are poor. This study aimed at capturing ideas to improve endometriosis care from the patients' perspectives. Materials and Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from 1,000 adult patients in ComPaRe-Endometriosis (a French prospective e-cohort focused on endometriosis) who answered to the open-ended question: "If you had a magic wand, what would you change about your health care?". The free-text responses were analyzed by qualitative thematic analysis using an inductive approach. Results: Patients had a mean age of 34.1 years (standard deviation = 8.1); 56% and 42% had stage IV disease or deep endometriosis, respectively. They elicited 2,487 ideas to improve the management of endometriosis, which were categorized into 61 areas of improvement, further grouped into 14 themes. The top five areas of improvement were mentioned by >10% of the patients and were to (1) train caregivers to develop their knowledge on the disease, (2) provide better management of daily pain and pain attacks, (3) take patient-reported symptoms seriously, (4) standardize diagnostic processes to improve early detection, and (5) have caregivers listen more to the patients. Conclusions: We identified 61 areas for improvement in endometriosis care. These results reflect patients' expectations in terms of management of their disease and will be useful to design a better global care for endometriosis from the patients' perspectives.