Baskin L, Cao M, Li Y, Baker L, Cooper C, Cunha G. Is it possible to separate the testicular and ovarian components of an ovotestis?
J Pediatr Urol 2025:S1477-5131(25)00181-0. [PMID:
40413144 DOI:
10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.04.009]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2025] [Revised: 03/27/2025] [Accepted: 04/03/2025] [Indexed: 05/27/2025]
Abstract
The presence of an ovotestis is a rare etiology of differences of sex development. Histologically, ovotestis come in two forms: 1) Mixed or 2) Bipolar.
OBJECTIVE
We hypothesize that it is surgically impossible to cleanly separate and preserve either the testicular or ovarian component of an ovotestis.
STUDY DESIGN
Twenty human gonads with a previous diagnosis of ovotestis were re-sectioned in entirety and re-stained with markers for testicular (SOX9, TSPY, SALL4, DDX4, cP450, AR, α-actin) and ovarian tissue (FOXL2, SALL4, DDX4). Histologic sections were photographed at low power to confirm the presence of the entire cross section of the ovotestis. High power was used to confirm an ovotestis based on the presence of both seminiferous cords (testis) and follicles (ovary).
RESULTS
Six of twenty ovotestis did not meet our criterion for the diagnosis of ovotestis lacking the histologic evidence of both testicular and ovarian tissue (lacking ovarian follicles). The remaining 13 patients in which 14 separate specimens were evaluated, contained ovotestis defined by the presence of both seminiferous cords and ovarian follicles. Seven of these specimens had low power confirmational histologic images that included the entire ovotestis and could be completely evaluated for a potential surgical plane of separation. The other seven specimens were consistent with an ovotestis biopsy without complete borders. For the seven specimens that included the entire ovotestis, 6 of the 7 had ovotesticular cords and 3 had the presence of ovotesticular follicles.
DISCUSSION
None of the seven complete specimens had a clear surgical plane where testicular or ovarian components could be isolated cleanly. Often the ovarian component was composed of a thin layer of follicles, surrounded the testicular component with an in-between, mixed layer of both seminiferous cords and follicles. The remaining seven ovotestis biopsy specimens also did not have a clear plane for surgically isolating either the testicular or ovarian compartment.
CONCLUSION
Based on the histologic evaluation of the entire ovotestis as well as ovotestis biopsy specimens it does not appear possible to surgically separate the testicular and ovarian component. We have reservations with the concept in both mixed and bipolar ovotestis that it is possible to surgically preserve either the ovarian or testicular component without leaving incongruent tissue. The clinical implications of leaving gonadal tissue inconsistent with the patient's gender identity remains unknown.
Collapse