Ovarian endometrioma increases the embryo aneuploid rate: an analysis of 7092 biopsied blastocysts from fertile monogenetic disease carriers

Infertility following trisomic pregnancies: A nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To study whether gynecologic or reproductive disorders show association with trisomic conceptions.

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study utilized the Registry of Congenital Malformations to identify women who had a trisomic pregnancy (n = 5784), either with trisomy 13 (T13; n = 351), trisomy 18 (T18; n = 1065) or trisomy 21 (T21; n = 4369) from 1987 to 2018. We used the Finnish Maternity cohort to match the cases to population controls (n = 34 422) on the age, residence, and timing of pregnancy. These data were cross-linked to the ICD-10 diagnoses of the national Care Registry for Health Care data on specialized health care in Finland during 1996 to 2019. Both inflammatory (ICD-10 diagnoses: N70-N77) and noninflammatory disorders of the genital tract (N80-N98) were studied. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated for associations between diagnoses and trisomic conceptions.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of female infertility (N97) at any time was associated with trisomic conceptions (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08-1.32). In the subgroup analysis, this association was found for T18 (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03-1.61) and T21 (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.32), but not for T13 (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.75-1.72). When restricting the timing of the diagnosis of female infertility, an elevated OR was found only after the index pregnancy (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.56-2.09). These increased odds for infertility after trisomic conceptions were observed both in women <35 years (T18 OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.21-3.00; T21 OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.31-2.14) and in women ≥35 years (T18 OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.40-3.33; T21 OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.47-2.39), but not after T13 conceptions.

CONCLUSION

Our observational data suggest a link between trisomic conceptions and subsequent diagnoses of infertility but do not demonstrate causality. These data implicate that partially similar mechanisms might predispose to trisomy and infertility, regardless of maternal age.

Oocyte Quality in Women with Endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition that affects approximately 10% of women of reproductive age globally. It is associated with significant morbidity due to symptoms such as pelvic pain and infertility. Current knowledge suggests that endometriosis impacts oocyte quality, a critical factor for successful fertilization and pregnancy. Despite extensive research, the exact mechanisms remain unclear, and further updates are necessary to optimize treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to summarize current evidence regarding the impact of endometriosis on oocyte quality and its subsequent effects on fertility outcomes, particularly in the context of in vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed using the terms "endometriosis AND oocyte quality," "endometriosis AND infertility, and "endometriosis AND IVF." The review included studies published up to July 2024.

OUTCOME

The review findings indicate that endometriosis may be associated with decreased oocyte quality, characterized by impaired morphological features and molecular abnormalities. These defects potentially lead to lower fertilization rates, impaired embryo development, and reduced pregnancy outcomes. However, some studies suggest that with controlled factors such as age and ovarian reserve, IVF outcomes may be comparable to those without endometriosis.

CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK

For clinicians and scientists working in medically assisted reproduction, understanding the impact of endometriosis on oocyte quality is crucial for improving fertility treatment outcomes. Advances in assisted reproductive technologies and personalized treatment approaches may mitigate these adverse effects. The potential for using artificial intelligence to assess oocyte quality presents a promising avenue for future research, as currently there is no direct and objective measure to assess this parameter.

Beyond the surface: Does stage I-II endometriosis impact fertility? Exploring the challenges of mild disease

Endometriosis is one of the most common gynecologic conditions that women face throughout their lives. Despite advances in technology, diagnosis and treatment of this relapsing and remitting condition is still challenging for many women. This review focuses on literature pertaining to minimal/mild (stage I/II) endometriosis and its impact on fertility. The effectiveness of medical interventions to improve infertility and obstetric outcomes in both natural and assisted reproductive technologies cycles remains debated. The recent ESHRE guidelines suggests that operative laparoscopy could be considered for rASRM stage I/II endometriosis as it improves ongoing pregnancy rates.

Indirect markers of oocyte quality in patients with ovarian endometriosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of ovarian endometriomas (OMA) on indirect markers of oocyte quality in patients undergoing IVF, compared with women without anatomical or functional ovarian abnormalities. The search spanned original randomized controlled trials, case-control studies and cohort studies published in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the ClinicalTrials.gov database up to October 2023. Thirty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis, showing no significant differences in fertilization (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.30), blastulation (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.14) and cancellation (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.44) rates. However, patients with OMA exhibited significantly lower numbers of total and mature (metaphase II) oocytes retrieved (mean difference -1.59, 95% CI -2.25 to -0.94; mean difference -1.86, 95% CI -2.46 to -1.26, respectively), and lower numbers of top-quality embryos (mean difference -0.49, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.06). The Ovarian Sensitivity Index was similar between the groups (mean difference -1.55, 95% CI -3.27 to 0.18). The lack of data published to date prevented meta-analysis on euploidy rate. In conclusion, although the presence of OMA could decrease the oocyte yield in patients undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, it does not appear to have an adverse impact on oocyte quality.

Reproductive outcomes of single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with endometriosis after preimplantation genetic testing

PURPOSE

The reproductive outcomes of patients with endometriosis who are infertile have attracted recent attention. We aimed to explore whether endometriosis affects endometrial receptivity by observing pregnancy outcomes following a euploid blastocyst frozen embryo transfer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of patients with endometriosis from the reproductive hospital affiliated to Shandong University between January 2015 and December 2021. Control groups were matched using the 1:3 propensity score. The live birth, clinical pregnancy, biochemical pregnancy, clinical abortion, premature birth, and aneuploid rates were compared between the control group and endometriosis group.

RESULTS

A total of 625 patients who underwent preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) prior to embryo implantation were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in the live birth, clinical pregnancy, biochemical pregnancy, clinical abortion, and premature birth rates between the two groups. The aneuploidy rate of blastocysts obtained from the endometriosis group was higher than that of the control group (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy outcomes using frozen embryos after PGT in patients with endometriosis did not differ from those in other women experiencing infertility. However, endometriosis may affect the quality of oocytes, resulting in a higher rate of aneuploidy.

Endometriosis and IVF treatment outcomes: unpacking the process

Advanced endometriosis is associated with a reduction of IVF success. Surgical damage to the ovarian reserve following the excision of endometriomas has been claimed as a critical factor in the explanation of this detrimental effect. However, it is generally inferred that other mechanisms might also hamper IVF success in affected women. They include diminished responsiveness to ovarian stimulation, altered steroidogenesis, a decline in oocyte quality, reduced fertilization and embryo development, and impaired implantation. To navigate these limitations, we scrutinized available literature for studies specifically designed to address distinct phases of the IVF process. Utmost consideration was given to intra-patient ovarian response comparisons in women with unilateral endometriomas and to studies applying a meticulous matching to control confounders. The following observations have been drawn: 1) endometriosis has a negligible impact on ovarian response. A slight reduction in stimulation response can only be observed for endometriomas larger than 4 cm. Follicular steroidogenesis is unaffected; 2) oocyte quality is not hampered. Fertilization rates are similar, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is not justified. Embryonic development is uncompromised, with no increase in aneuploidy rate; 3) endometrial receptivity is either unaffected or only slightly impacted. In conclusion, our study suggests that, aside from the well-known negative effect on ovarian reserve from excisional endometrioma surgeries, endometriosis does not significantly affect IVF outcomes.