1
|
Kiger ME, Meyer HS. Ownership of Patient Care: Medical Students' Expectations, Experiences, and Evolutions Across the Core Clerkship Curriculum. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2024:1-13. [PMID: 38857111 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2024.2361913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
Phenomenon: Ownership of patient care is a key element of professional growth and professional identity formation, but its development among medical students is incompletely understood. Specifically, how attitudes surrounding ownership of patient care develop, what experiences are most influential in shaping them, and how educators can best support this growth are not well known. Therefore, we studied the longitudinal progression of ownership definitions and experiences in medical students across their core clerkship curriculum. Approach: We conducted a series of four longitudinal focus groups with the same cohort of medical students across their core clerkship curriculum. Using workplace learning theory as a sensitizing concept, we conducted semi-structured interviews to explore how definitions, experiences, and influencers of ownership developed and evolved. Results were analyzed inductively using thematic analysis. Findings: Fifteen students participated in four focus groups spanning their core clerkship curriculum. We constructed four themes from responses: (1) students' definitions of ownership of patient care evolved to include more central roles for themselves and more defined limitations; (2) student conceptions of patient care ownership became more relational and reciprocal over time as they ascribed a more active role to patients; (3) student assessment fostered ownership as an external motivator when it explicitly addressed ownership, but detracted from ownership if it removed students from patient care; and (4) structural and logistical factors impacted students' ability to display patient care ownership. Insights: Student conceptions of ownership evolved over their core clerkship curriculum to include more patient care responsibility and more meaningful relational connections with patients, including recognizing patients' agency in this relationship. This progression was contingent on interactions with real patients and students being afforded opportunities to play a meaningful role in their care. Rotation structures and assessment processes are key influencers of care ownership that merit further study, as well as the voice of patients themselves in these relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle E Kiger
- Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Holly S Meyer
- Department of Medicine, Center for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lees AF, Beni C, Lee A, Wedgeworth P, Dzara K, Joyner B, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Leu M. Uses of Electronic Health Record Data to Measure the Clinical Learning Environment of Graduate Medical Education Trainees: A Systematic Review. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2023; 98:1326-1336. [PMID: 37267042 PMCID: PMC10615720 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study systematically reviews the uses of electronic health record (EHR) data to measure graduate medical education (GME) trainee competencies. METHOD In January 2022, the authors conducted a systematic review of original research in MEDLINE from database start to December 31, 2021. The authors searched for articles that used the EHR as their data source and in which the individual GME trainee was the unit of observation and/or unit of analysis. The database query was intentionally broad because an initial survey of pertinent articles identified no unifying Medical Subject Heading terms. Articles were coded and clustered by theme and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competency. RESULTS The database search yielded 3,540 articles, of which 86 met the study inclusion criteria. Articles clustered into 16 themes, the largest of which were trainee condition experience (17 articles), work patterns (16 articles), and continuity of care (12 articles). Five of the ACGME core competencies were represented (patient care and procedural skills, practice-based learning and improvement, systems-based practice, medical knowledge, and professionalism). In addition, 25 articles assessed the clinical learning environment. CONCLUSIONS This review identified 86 articles that used EHR data to measure individual GME trainee competencies, spanning 16 themes and 6 competencies and revealing marked between-trainee variation. The authors propose a digital learning cycle framework that arranges sequentially the uses of EHR data within the cycle of clinical experiential learning central to GME. Three technical components necessary to unlock the potential of EHR data to improve GME are described: measures, attribution, and visualization. Partnerships between GME programs and informatics departments will be pivotal in realizing this opportunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fischer Lees
- A. Fischer Lees is a clinical informatics fellow, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Catherine Beni
- C. Beni is a general surgery resident, Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Albert Lee
- A. Lee is a clinical informatics fellow, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Patrick Wedgeworth
- P. Wedgeworth is a clinical informatics fellow, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kristina Dzara
- K. Dzara is assistant dean for educator development, director, Center for Learning and Innovation in Medical Education, and associate professor of medical education, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Byron Joyner
- B. Joyner is vice dean for graduate medical education and a designated institutional official, Graduate Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
- P. Tarczy-Hornoch is professor and chair, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, and professor, Department of Pediatrics (Neonatology), University of Washington School of Medicine, and adjunct professor, Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael Leu
- M. Leu is professor and director, Clinical Informatics Fellowship, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, and professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Penner JC, Hauer KE, Julian KA, Sheu L. How preceptors develop trust in continuity clinic residents and how trust influences supervision: A qualitative study. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 11:73-79. [PMID: 34914028 PMCID: PMC8941004 DOI: 10.1007/s40037-021-00694-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To advance in their clinical roles, residents must earn supervisors' trust. Research on supervisor trust in the inpatient setting has identified learner, supervisor, relationship, context, and task factors that influence trust. However, trust in the continuity clinic setting, where resident roles, relationships, and context differ, is not well understood. We aimed to explore how preceptors in the continuity clinic setting develop trust in internal medicine residents and how trust influences supervision. METHODS In this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with faculty preceptors from two continuity clinic sites in an internal medicine residency program at an urban academic medical center in the United States from August 2018-June 2020. We analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis with sensitizing concepts related to the theoretical framework of the five factors of trust. RESULTS Sixteen preceptors participated. We identified four key drivers of trust and supervision in the continuity clinic setting: 1) longitudinal resident-preceptor-patient relationships, 2) direct observations of continuity clinic skills, 3) resident attitude towards their primary care physician role, and 4) challenging context and task factors influencing supervision. Preceptors shared challenges to determining trust stemming from incomplete knowledge about patients and limited opportunities to directly observe and supervise between-visit care. DISCUSSION The continuity clinic setting offers unique supports and challenges to trust development and trust-supervision alignment. Maximizing resident-preceptor-patient continuity, promoting direct observation, and improving preceptor supervision of residents' provision of between-visit care may improve resident continuity clinic learning and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Penner
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| | - Karen E Hauer
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Katherine A Julian
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Leslie Sheu
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kiger ME, Bautista E, Bertagnoli TM, Hammond CE, Meyer HS, Varpio L, Dong T. Defragmenting the Day: The Effect of Full-Day Continuity Clinics on Continuity of Care and Perceptions of Clinic. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2021; 33:546-553. [PMID: 33792437 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1879652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM Traditional half-day continuity clinics within primary care residency programs require residents to split time between their assigned clinical rotation and continuity clinic, which can have detrimental effects on resident experiences and patient care within continuity clinics. Most previous efforts to separate inpatient and outpatient obligations have employed block scheduling models, which entail significant rearrangements to clinical rotations, team structures, and didactic education and have yielded mixed effects on continuity of care. A full-day continuity clinic schedule within a traditional, non-block rotation framework holds potential to de-conflict resident schedules without the logistical rearrangements required to adopt block scheduling models, but no literature has described the effect of such full-day continuity clinics on continuity of care or resident experiences within continuity clinic. INTERVENTION A pediatric residency program implemented full-day continuity clinics within a traditional rotation framework. We examined the change in continuity for physician (PHY) measure in the six months prior to versus the six months following the switch, as well as changes in how often residents saw clinic patients in follow-up and personally followed up clinic laboratory and radiology results, which we term episodic follow-up. Resident and attending perceptions of full-day continuity clinics were measured using a survey administered 5-7 months after the switch. CONTEXT The switch to full-day continuity clinics occurred in January 2018 within the Wright State University/Wright-Patterson Medical Center Pediatric Residency Program. The program has 46 residents who are assigned to one of two continuity clinic sites, each of which implemented the full-day continuity clinics simultaneously. OUTCOME The PHY for residents at one clinic decreased slightly from 18.0% to 13.6% (p<.001) with full-day continuity clinics but was unchanged at another clinic [60.6% vs 59.5%, p=.86]. Measures of episodic follow-up were unchanged. Residents (32/46 = 77% responding) and attendings (6/8 = 75% responding) indicated full-day continuity clinics improved residents' balance of inpatient and outpatient obligations, preparation for clinic, continuity relationships with patients, and clinic satisfaction. LESSONS LEARNED Full-day continuity clinics within a traditional rotation framework had mixed effects on continuity of care but improved residents' experiences within clinic. This model offers a viable alternative to block scheduling models for primary care residency programs wishing to defragment resident schedules. UNLABELLED Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2021.1879652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle E Kiger
- Wright-Patterson Medical Center, Pediatric Residency Program, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA
- Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Erica Bautista
- Pediatrics, Dayton Children's Hospital, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA
| | - Thomas M Bertagnoli
- Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Lakenheath Air Base, Brandon, UK
| | - Caitlin E Hammond
- Wright-Patterson Medical Center, Pediatric Residency Program, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA
- Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Holly S Meyer
- Center for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Lara Varpio
- Center for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ting Dong
- Center for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kiger ME, Meyer HS, Varpio L. "It is you, me on the team together, and my child": Attending, resident, and patient family perspectives on patient ownership. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 10:101-109. [PMID: 33263864 PMCID: PMC7952476 DOI: 10.1007/s40037-020-00635-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient ownership is an important element of physicians' professional responsibility, but important gaps remain in our understanding of this concept. We sought to develop a theory of patient ownership by studying it in continuity clinics from the perspective of residents, attending physicians, and patients. METHODS Using constructivist grounded theory, we conducted 27 semi-structured interviews of attending physicians, residents, and patient families within two pediatric continuity clinics to examine definitions, expectations, and experiences of patient ownership from March-August 2019. We constructed themes using constant comparative analysis and developed a theory describing patient ownership that takes into account a diversity of perspectives. RESULTS Patient ownership was described as a bi-directional, relational commitment between patient/family and physician that includes affective and behavioral components. The experience of patient ownership was promoted by continuity of care and constrained by logistical and other systems-based factors. The physician was seen as part of a medical care team that included clinic staff and patient families. Physicians adjusted expectations surrounding patient ownership for residents based on scheduling limitations. DISCUSSION Our theory of patient ownership portrays the patient/family as an active participant in the patient-physician relationship, rather than a passive recipient of care. While specific expectations and tasks will vary based on the practice setting, our findings reframe the way in which patient ownership can be viewed and studied in the future by attending to a diversity of perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle E Kiger
- Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Wright-Patterson Medical Center, Dayton, OH, USA.
| | - Holly S Meyer
- Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lara Varpio
- Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Krawiec C, Myers AK. Voluntary assignments during the pediatric clerkship to enhance the clinical experiences of medical students in the United States. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2020; 17:17. [PMID: 32455511 PMCID: PMC7338279 DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pediatric clerkships that utilize off-campus clinical sites ensure clinical comparability by requiring completion of patient-focused tasks. Some tasks may not be attainable (especially off-campus); thus, they are not assigned. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of providing a voluntary assignment list to third-year medical students in their pediatric clerkship. METHODS This is a retrospective single-center cross-sectional analysis of voluntary assignment completion during the 2019–2020 academic year. Third-year medical students were provided a voluntary assignment list (observe a procedure, use an interpreter phone to obtain a pediatric history, ask a preceptor to critique a clinical note, and follow-up on a patient after the rotation ends). Descriptive statistics were used to assess the timing and distribution of voluntary assignment completion. RESULTS In total, 132 subjects (77 on the main campus, 55 off-campus) were included. Eighteen (13.6%) main-campus and 16 (12.1%) off-campus students completed at least 1 voluntary assignment. The following voluntary assignments were completed: observe a procedure (15, 11.4%), use an interpreter phone (26, 19.7%), ask a preceptor to critique a clinical note (12, 9.1%), and follow-up on a patient after the rotation ends (7, 5.3%). Off-campus students completed the assignments more often (29.1%) than on-campus students (23.4%) CONCLUSION Our clerkship values specific patient-focused tasks that may enhance student development, but are not attainable at all clinical sites. When provided a voluntary assignment list, 34 out of 132 students (25.8%) completed them. Clerkships that utilize off-campus sites should consider this approach to optimize the pediatric educational experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conrad Krawiec
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Abigail Kate Myers
- General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kiger ME, Meyer HS, Hammond C, Miller KM, Dickey KJ, Hammond DV, Varpio L. Whose Patient Is This? A Scoping Review of Patient Ownership. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2019; 94:S95-S104. [PMID: 31365409 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000002920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The scope of physicians' responsibility toward patients is becoming increasingly complicated to delimit as interdisciplinary care delivery and degrees of subspecialization increase. Patients can easily be lost across multiple transitions involved in care. Preparing learners to engage in safe and responsible patient care requires that we be clear about parameters of patient ownership. This scoping review (1) explores and synthesizes definitions of patient ownership and (2) describes the factors that influence patient ownership. METHOD Searching PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO, the authors sought out publications of any format (i.e., original research papers, review articles, commentaries, editorials, and author discussions) that (1) addressed patient ownership directly or a closely related concept that explicitly affected patient ownership, (2) included medical care providers (attending/faculty physicians, medical residents, and/or medical students), and (3) were published in English. The authors analyzed findings to construct common themes and categorize findings. RESULTS Of 411 papers screened, 82 met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-three papers defined patient ownership in highly variable ways. Common themes across definitions included responsibility for patient care, personally carrying out patient care tasks, knowledge of patients' medical information, independent decision making, and putting patients' needs above one's own. Factors influencing patient ownership were (1) logistical concerns, (2) personal attributes, and (3) socially or organizationally constructed expectations. CONCLUSIONS A new definition of patient ownership is proposed encompassing findings from the review, while also respecting the shift from individual to a team-based patient care, and without removing the centrality of an individual provider's commitment to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle E Kiger
- M.E. Kiger is assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. H.S. Meyer is assistant professor, Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. C. Hammond is clinical instructor, Department of Pediatrics, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio. K.M. Miller is resident physician, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio. K.J. Dickey is resident physician, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio. D.V. Hammond is pediatrician, Keesler Medical Center, Biloxi, Mississippi. L. Varpio is professor, Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Benton W, Snyder ED, Estrada CA, Bryan TJ. Signed, Sealed, Delivered: Increasing Patient Notification of Test Results in an Internal Medicine Resident Continuity Clinic. South Med J 2019; 112:85-88. [PMID: 30708371 DOI: 10.14423/smj.0000000000000929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Informing patients of their test results is an important patient safety issue, yet many physicians perform dismally in this regard. Residents often face additional barriers to communicating test results to patients. We wanted to determine whether streamlining the notification process, communicating expectations, and having residents audit their performance would increase result notification rates. METHODS We used a quasi-experimental design, and a single-group before-and-after intervention. Our multifold intervention consisted of development and standardization of a notification process in the electronic medical record, an education component, and a self-audit component. During a 15-minute session, we educated residents on the use of the new process. We also restated expectations regarding notifying patients of their results. Residents audited their own charts for a period before the intervention and during a second, postintervention period. An independent review of notification rates took place simultaneously as well as during an additional period several months later. RESULTS In total, 87 residents were eligible for participation. All 87 completed the project, giving a 100% participation rate. Resident-reported laboratory test notification rates increased from 16% to 91%; other test result rates increased from 33% to 84%. The three independent reviews showed laboratory test notification rates increased from 18.5% to 71.7% to 87.1%, and notification of other test results increased from 23.5% to 66.7% to 91.7%. CONCLUSIONS Baseline rates of notification for diagnostic tests results were low, but streamlining the notification process, clearly stating expectations for using it, and using resident self-audit can improve notification rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Benton
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, the Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, and the Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Erin D Snyder
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, the Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, and the Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Carlos A Estrada
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, the Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, and the Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Teresa J Bryan
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, the Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, and the Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dziorny AC, Orenstein EW, Lindell RB, Hames NA, Washington N, Desai B. Automatic Detection of Front-Line Clinician Hospital Shifts: A Novel Use of Electronic Health Record Timestamp Data. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10:28-37. [PMID: 30625502 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Excess physician work hours contribute to burnout and medical errors. Self-report of work hours is burdensome and often inaccurate. We aimed to validate a method that automatically determines provider shift duration based on electronic health record (EHR) timestamps across multiple inpatient settings within a single institution. METHODS We developed an algorithm to calculate shift start and end times for inpatient providers based on EHR timestamps. We validated the algorithm based on overlap between calculated shifts and scheduled shifts. We then demonstrated a use case by calculating shifts for pediatric residents on inpatient rotations from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, comparing hours worked and number of shifts by rotation and role. RESULTS We collected 6.3 × 107 EHR timestamps for 144 residents on 771 inpatient rotations, yielding 14,678 EHR-calculated shifts. Validation on a subset of shifts demonstrated 100% shift match and 87.9 ± 0.3% overlap (mean ± standard error [SE]) with scheduled shifts. Senior residents functioning as front-line clinicians worked more hours per 4-week block (mean ± SE: 273.5 ± 1.7) than senior residents in supervisory roles (253 ± 2.3) and junior residents (241 ± 2.5). Junior residents worked more shifts per block (21 ± 0.1) than senior residents (18 ± 0.1). CONCLUSION Automatic calculation of inpatient provider work hours is feasible using EHR timestamps. An algorithm to assess provider work hours demonstrated criterion validity via comparison with scheduled shifts. Differences between junior and senior residents in calculated mean hours worked and number of shifts per 4-week block were also consistent with differences in scheduled shifts and duty-hour restrictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C Dziorny
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Evan W Orenstein
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Robert B Lindell
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Nicole A Hames
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Nicole Washington
- Pediatrics Residency Program, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Bimal Desai
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singman EL, Srikumaran D, Green L, Tian J, McDonnell P. Supervision and autonomy of ophthalmology residents in the outpatient Clinic in the United States: a survey of ACGME-accredited programs. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2017; 17:105. [PMID: 28651531 PMCID: PMC5485577 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0941-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development and demonstration of incremental trainee autonomy is required by the ACGME. However, there is scant published research concerning autonomy of ophthalmology residents in the outpatient clinic setting. This study explored the landscape of resident ophthalmology outpatient clinics in the United States. METHODS A link to an online survey using the QualtricsTM platform was emailed to the program directors of all 115 ACGME-accredited ophthalmology programs in the United States. Survey questions explored whether resident training programs hosted a continuity clinic where residents would see their own patients, and if so, the degree of faculty supervision provided therein. Metrics such as size of the resident program, number of faculty and clinic setting were also recorded. Correlations between the degree of faculty supervision and other metrics were explored. RESULTS The response rate was 94%; 69% of respondents indicated that their trainees hosted continuity clinics. Of those programs, 30% required a faculty member to see each patient treated by a resident, while 42% expected the faculty member to at least discuss (if not see) each patient. All programs expected some degree of faculty interaction based upon circumstances such as the level of training of the resident or complexity of the clinical situation. 67% of programs that tracked the contribution of the clinic to resident surgical caseloads reported that these clinics provided more than half of the resident surgical volumes. More ¾ of resident clinics were located in urban settings. The degree of faculty supervision did not correlate to any of the other metrics evaluated. CONCLUSIONS The majority of ophthalmology resident training programs in the United States host a continuity clinic located in an urban environment where residents follow their own patients. Furthermore, most of these clinics require supervising faculty to review both the patients seen and the medical documentation created by the resident encounters. The different degrees of faculty supervision outlined by this survey might provide a useful guide presuming they can be correlated with validated metrics of educational quality. Finally, this study could provide an adjunctive resource to current international efforts to standardize ophthalmic residency education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric L. Singman
- Wilmer Eye Institute General Eye Services Clinic, @ Johns Hopkins Hospital, Wilmer B-29, 600 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
| | - Divya Srikumaran
- Wilmer Eye Institute General Eye Services Clinic, @ Johns Hopkins Hospital, Wilmer B-29, 600 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
| | - Laura Green
- Ophthalmology Residency Program Director, Lifebridge Health Krieger Eye Institute, 2411 W. Belvedere Ave, Baltimore, MD 21215 USA
| | - Jing Tian
- Biostatistics Consulting Center, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Room 3148, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
| | - Peter McDonnell
- Wilmer Eye Institute, @ Johns Hopkins Hospital, Maumenee 727, 600 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
| |
Collapse
|