Clarifying learning experiences in student-run clinics: a qualitative study

Student and educator experiences of a student-led clinic in general practice

Giving students more responsibility for patients during medical school may help prepare them for their transition to clinical practice. Student-led clinics (SLCs) could facilitate this. Within SLCs, students take the lead role in delivering patient care, with support and supervision from clinicians. A general practice SLC was established in Dundee, Scotland, with four final-year medical students and one general practitioner (GP) involved in each clinic. Our qualitative case study aimed to explore students' and educators' (GPs') experiences and perceptions of this SLC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 students and three educators, and 18 hrs of observation were conducted over six clinics. Interview transcripts and fieldnotes were integrated and thematically analysed, revealing five main themes. Overall, students' and educators' experiences and perceptions were positive. Students thrived in their lead role in patient care, gaining a sense of empowerment and developing confidence in their abilities. Both students and educators felt comfortable with students having this level of responsibility due to students' seniority and the supervision provided by educators. Teaching in the SLC involved individual discussions and group debriefs. Students developed a sense of belonging as a result of their positive relationships with peers and educators and the environment of the Student Hub. Challenges arose when the clinic ran behind schedule due to unexpectedly complex patients or lengthy individual discussions. Our findings suggest that giving students responsibility for real patients is beneficial and feasible when adequate support is provided and that it is possible for one GP to supervise multiple students successfully.

Student perspectives on student-led family medicine clinics in Qatar: a descriptive qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Student-led clinic is an educational-professional training environment where students are leading the care of patients under the supervision of licensed health care professionals. This study aims to explore medical students' experiences in leading family medicine clinics in Qatar.

METHODS

The study used a qualitative descriptive method. To collect the data, the researchers have used semi-structured interviews. To recruit students, a convenience sampling strategy was used by sending a call to participate to all students who completed the rotation and met the inclusion criteria. An inductive thematic analysis was employed to data analysis.

RESULTS

Ten students participated in the study. Data analysis revealed six themes. These are: Student led clinic as transitional and transformative stage, Challenges faced by students, coping strategies, protective factors, implications of the experience and students' reflections for future rotations. The study revealed that students experienced a mixture of anxiety and excitement during the transition to leading clinics. Challenges included patient-related challenges such as language barriers, challenges related to personal skills such as time and knowledge, and institutional challenges that included limited supervisor availability and balancing academic responsibilities with clinic duties. Coping strategies included continuous knowledge revision, seeking advice from colleagues, and employing creative tools to overcome language barriers.

CONCLUSION

Leading family medicine clinics has an impact on students such as enhancing their time management, diagnostic abilities, communication skills, and confidence. Support from supervisors, team members, patients, and colleagues play a crucial role in students' experiences. This transitional experience supports the shift from self-perception as students perceiving themselves as physicians.

Influence of simulation and clinical settings on peripheral vein cannulation skill learning in nursing education: A qualitative study

Background

Peripheral vein cannulation is a complex yet common practical skill. Learning to insert a peripheral vein cannula is fundamental in nursing education; however, the most beneficial pedagogical approaches are yet to be elucidated.

Objective

To explore and impart a deeper understanding of the learning conditions in nursing education for developing competency in peripheral vein cannulation.

Design

Qualitative, explorative. and comparative research design.

Settings

Two nursing educational settings in southern Norway: an academic setting for simulation-based peripheral vein cannulation skill learning, followed by a hospital setting that provided a 9 week clinical placement period.

Participants

Nine student nurses in the second year of a bachelor's programme in nursing.

Methods

Focus group interviews, individual interviews, and ad hoc conversations with the student nurses on their experiences during and after the process of developing competency in peripheral vein cannulation. Thematic analysis was used to identify categories and common themes.

Results

Eight major themes were identified: 'Anatomical and physiological conditions related to the training modalities', 'Realism in training', 'Sequences in peripheral vein cannulation training', 'Different training modalities affording varied learning opportunities', 'Professional nursing assessments', 'Patients' and peers' emotional reactions', 'Student nurses' own emotional reactions', and 'Significance of the relationship between the student nurse and patient'.

Conclusions

Simulation-based peripheral vein cannulation practice was an important starting point for the students' skill learning. However, the students experienced the complexity of the skill only in the clinical setting because it offered several learning opportunities. Nonetheless, our findings indicate a need to further review peripheral vein cannulation skill learning, especially patient contributing factors, to enhance the transfer of learning from the simulation setting to the clinical setting.

Tweetable abstract

Clinical setting-based peripheral vein cannulation practice is vital for student nurses' skill learning because of the skill's complexity.

Impact of student-run clinic participation on empathy and interprofessional skills development in medical and pharmacy students

Background

Students participating in student-run clinics (SRCs) have opportunities to develop and practice beneficial skill sets, including empathy and interprofessional collaboration.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess whether participation in an underserved SRC impacts the development of empathy and interprofessional skills in pharmacy and medical students.

Methods

This study assessed empathy and interprofessional skills development through a self-assessment survey. The survey included the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to assess empathy, the Attitudes Towards Health Care Teams/Team Skills Scale (ATHCTS/TSS) to assess interprofessional team dynamics, and a free-text response section. Participants were grouped based on whether they participated in the SRC (intervention group) or did not participate in the SRC (control group). A subgroup analysis was performed based on the participants' discipline (medicine vs. pharmacy). To compare differences in IRI, ATHCTS, and TSS scores between study groups, independent samples t-tests were performed. A thematic analysis was used for qualitative data.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups in IRI, ATHCTS, or TSS scores. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in scores of student pharmacists or medical students. For both disciplines, the thematic analysis revealed the most common positive themes identified were "real-world patient interaction and care," "impact on practice/career development." Alternatively, it revealed the highest reported negative themes identified as "time management and operational difficulties" and "concerns about the quality of/access to care".

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that involvement in an SRC neither improves nor hinders a learner's development of empathy and interprofessional team skills. Qualitatively, students reported that participation in an SRC benefited their learning and helped develop their skills, like empathy and team dynamics, in an interprofessional setting. Future research with longitudinal monitoring or alternative assessment tools is recommended.

Patient-centred learning in practice. A mixed methods study of supervision and learning in student clinics

OBJECTIVE

Patient-centred learning (PCL) allows medical students to practice a patient-centred approach; however, didactic characteristics of PCL have yet to be fully elucidated. Clinical placements structured as a student clinic (SC) enable authentic student-patient learning relations through enhanced student responsibility and can serve as examples of PCL. We explored the didactic characteristics of supervision and learning in SCs to provide recommendations for PCL-oriented medical education.

METHODS

Triangulation mixed methods study based on qualitative data collected from in-depth interviews with clinical teachers and quantitative data collected from student evaluations of supervision and learning in the SCs.

RESULTS

Supervision and learning in SCs were characterized by 1) a focus on student-patient compatibility and patient needs and resources, which indicated PCL, 2) person-centred explorative supervision to adjust challenges to students' needs and resources, and 3) support of student autonomy to take responsibility for patient treatment.

CONCLUSION

PCL was facilitated by clinical teachers through a dual person-centred didactic approach combined with autonomy-supportive didactic practice. This enabled the integration of patients' and students' needs and resources in clinical teaching.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Clinical teachers can stimulate student-patient learning relations by selecting patients, exploring students' needs and resources, and supporting student autonomy through reflective practice and backup.

Opportunities and challenges for a standardized curriculum in a student-run clinic network

PURPOSE

Student-run clinics (SRCs) are prevalent in medical schools. Although these are popular among students and provide ample learning opportunities, these opportunities are not well-characterized. SRCs are poised to support medical schools' ability to meet accreditation standards and student growth and learning, particularly in areas missing from traditional curricula, such as social determinants of health, interprofessional education and inequities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At the Crimson Care Collaborative (CCC), a network of 7 Harvard Medical School affiliated student-faculty practices in the greater Boston area, we sought to understand what learning opportunities and challenges exist and if a standardized curriculum could improve learning and result in less duplication of teaching efforts. We conducted semi-structured individual interviews of student and faculty leaders and conducted a thematic analysis of the data.

RESULTS

Four key themes emerged: (1) Standardization provides opportunities and challenges, (2) Embrace the unique learning opportunities of each clinic, (3) Educational coaches enhance learning opportunities and increase efficiency, (4) Reflection is a useful tool for improvement & learning.

DISCUSSION

Our results demonstrate a benefit to both a standardized curriculum for all SRC sites focused on broad clinical, skill-based training and site-specific teaching focusing on the unique clinical needs of each student-run clinic.

An inter-professional student-run medication review programme. Reducing adverse drug reactions in a memory outpatient clinic: a controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

We investigated if the addition of an inter-professional student-led medication review team (ISP-team) to standard care can increase the number of detected ADRs and reduce the number of ADRs 3 months after an outpatient visit.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this controlled clinical trial, patients were allocated to standard care (control group) or standard care plus the ISP team (intervention group). The ISP team consisted of medical and pharmacy students and student nurse practitioners. The team performed a structured medication review and adjusted medication to reduce the number of ADRs. Three months after the outpatient visit, a clinical pharmacologist who was blinded for allocation performed a follow-up telephone interview to determine whether patients experienced ADRs.

RESULTS

During the outpatient clinic visit, significantly more (p < 0.001) ADRs were detected in the intervention group (n = 48) than in the control group (n = 10). In both groups, 60-63% of all detected ADRs were managed. Three months after the outpatient visit, significantly fewer (predominantly mild and moderately severe) ADRs related to benzodiazepine derivatives and antihypertensive causing dizziness were detected in the patients of the intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

An ISP team in addition to standard care increases the detection and management of ADRs in elderly patients resulting in fewer mild and moderately severe ADRs.

'Making room for student autonomy' - an ethnographic study of student participation in clinical work

Participation in clinical work is important for medical students' professional development. However, students often report that they experience a passive observer role, and further research on contextual factors that influence student participation is needed. The theory of practice architectures contributes a new perspective to this challenge by elucidating how cultural-discursive, material-economic, and social-political arrangements enable and constrain student participation in clinical work. The aim of this study was to explore how practice architectures in clinical learning environments enable and constrain medical students' participation. The study was designed as an ethnographic field study in three student clinics: 106 h of observation. Analysis comprised ethnographic analysis followed by application of the theory of practice architectures. The ethnographic analysis resulted in six themes: setting the scene, when to call for help, my room - my patient, getting in a routine, I know something you don't, and my work is needed. Applying the theory of practice architectures showed that material-economic arrangements, such as control of the consultation room and essential artefacts, were crucial to student participation and position in the clinical workplace. Furthermore, co-production of a student mandate to independently perform certain parts of a consultation enabled a co-productive student position in the hierarchy of care-producers. The findings offer a conceptually generalisable model for the study of material and social dimensions of clinical learning environments. Although not all clinical learning environments may wish to or have the resources to implement a student clinic, the findings offer insights into general issues about the arrangements of student participation relevant to most clinical teaching contexts.

An Interprofessional Student-Run Medication Review Program: The Clinical STOPP/START-Based Outcomes of a Controlled Clinical Trial in a Geriatric Outpatient Clinic

As the population ages, more people will have comorbid disorders and polypharmacy. Medication should be reviewed regularly in order to avoid adverse drug reactions and medication-related hospital visits, but this is often not done. As part of our student-run clinic project, we investigated whether an interprofessional student-run medication review program (ISP) added to standard care at a geriatric outpatient clinic leads to better prescribing. In this controlled clinical trial, patients visiting a memory outpatient clinic were allocated to standard care (control group) or standard care plus the ISP team (intervention group). The medications of all patients were reviewed by a review panel ("gold standard"), resident, and in the intervention arm also by an ISP team consisting of a group of students from the medicine and pharmacy faculties and students from the higher education school of nursing for advanced nursing practice. For both groups, the number of STOPP/START-based medication changes mentioned in general practitioner (GP) correspondence and the implementation of these changes about 6 weeks after the outpatient visit were investigated. The data of 216 patients were analyzed (control group = 100, intervention group = 116). More recommendations for STOPP/START-based medication changes were made in the GP correspondence in the intervention group than in the control group (43% vs. 24%, P = < 0.001). After 6 weeks, a significantly higher proportion of these changes were implemented in the intervention group (19% vs. 9%, P = 0.001). The ISP team, in addition to standard care, is an effective intervention for optimizing pharmacotherapy and medication safety in a geriatric outpatient clinic.

Effective Veterinary Clinical Teaching in a Variety of Teaching Settings

This review explores different modalities for clinical teaching of veterinary learners globally. Effective clinical teaching aims to prepare graduates for a successful career in clinical practice. Unfortunately, there is scant literature concerning clinical teaching in veterinary medicine. Our intent for this review is to stimulate and/or facilitate discussion and/or research in this important area. We discuss the different forms that veterinary clinical teaching can take, depending on their setting, which can be university-based clinical activities, work-based in commercial clinical practices, or in a traditional academic setting with little to no real-time exposure to clients and patients. We suggest that each of these modalities has a place in clinical teaching of veterinary learners at any point in the curriculum but that a mix of these approaches will likely provide an improved experience for the learner. Further, we discuss strategies to improve clinical teaching in these different settings. Potential strategies related to the teaching skills of clinical instructors could include training in delivery of clinical teaching in a variety of learning settings, and instructors’ official recognition, including opportunities for career progression. Potential strategies to improve clinical teaching in different teaching settings would vary with the learning settings. For example, in traditional academic settings, case-based learning with incorporation of simulation models is one proposed strategy. The involvement of learners in ‘teach-others’ is a strategy for both traditional academic and clinical settings. Finally, clearly addressing Day One competencies is required in any clinical teaching setting.

Can Students Create Their Own Educational Escape Room? Lessons Learned from the Opioid Crisis Escape Room

Educational escape rooms (EERs) are live-action, team-based games used to teach content-related and generic knowledge and skills. Instead of students just playing the EER, we believed that giving them the opportunity to create their own EERs would augment the learning effects of this teaching method. We report on the feasibility, evaluation, and lessons learned of our assignment on an opioid epidemic-based EER. This original teaching method appealed to most students, but the workload was evaluated to be too high. Our lessons learned include the need for sufficient (extrinsic) motivation, careful explanation of the assignment, and small group sizes.

Exploring patient experiences in the student outpatient clinic - A contribution to learning

OBJECTIVE

To understand how patients experience participation in student encounters.

METHODS

Qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews with ten cardiac surgery patients who had attended voluntary postoperative consultations in a student outpatient clinic. The interview guide included questions about reasons for and experiences of being part of a teaching situation. Interviews were analysed through inductive thematic analysis where pieces of text in each interview were assigned different codes and condensed into themes.

RESULTS

The patients expressed a duality in their reasons for participating in student consultations: (1) a personal need for assurance (safety) and (2) a wish to help students (altruism). Students were perceived as professional and sometimes insecure. Being part of an educational situation was meaningful to the patients because they did not feel objectified. Knowing that there was a backup supervisor made the patients feel safe even though the supervisor was not present during all parts of the consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients experienced safety, understood their role in all parts of the consultation, and shared a wish to help students learn.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A sequential consultation model alternating between student- and supervisor-driven supervision can balance student autonomy and patient safety. This knowledge could guide future patient-centred medical education in student clinics.

Unintended Consequences? Assessing the Impact of Curricular Change on Medical Student Participation in a Student-Run Free Clinic

INTRODUCTION

In a prior qualitative study of the impact of a new (ACE) medical school curriculum, students and faculty reported decreased participation in the student-run free clinic (SRFC) attributed to more intensive scheduling and more frequent testing compared to the previous (Legacy) curriculum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To verify and understand this perception formed during curriculum reform, we conducted a mixed method study to measure student participation in the SRFC before and after curricular change and assessed student beliefs and motivations about SRFC participation using focus groups.

RESULTS

Overall SRFC participation did not decrease among students in the ACE cohort following curriculum change. Additionally, both Legacy and ACE groups showed lower participation during test weeks, but the decrease was not significantly different between the ACE and Legacy cohorts. Focus groups confirmed the pervasive misbelief that SRFC participation was indeed lower among ACE students and attributed to reduced student discretionary time plus increased preparation time for frequent testing. Focus groups also revealed several "values" about volunteering at the SRFC which should be endorsed and promoted by schools considering curricular change. Participants valued the SRFC for educational items that were most effectively taught in the SRFC, notably social determinants of health, interprofessional practice, and interviewing with medical interpreters. They also valued the SRFC for professional validation, opportunities to apply course content, practice clinical skills, form important professional relationships, and provide community service.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings validate the value of SRFC experience as reported by students and demonstrate that, contrary to misbeliefs, participation was not negatively impacted by curricular reform.

Medical students as adverse drug event managers, learning about side effects while improving their reporting in clinical practice

Managing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is a challenge, especially because most healthcare professionals are insufficiently trained for this task. Since context-based clinical pharmacovigilance training has proven effective, we assessed the feasibility and effect of a creating a team of Junior-Adverse Drug Event Managers (J-ADEMs). The J-ADEM team consisted of medical students (1st-6th year) tasked with managing and reporting ADRs in hospitalized patients. Feasibility was evaluated using questionnaires. Student competence in reporting ADRs was evaluated using a case-control design and questionnaires before and after J-ADEM program participation. From Augustus 2018 to Augustus 2019, 41 students participated in a J-ADEM team and screened 136 patients and submitted 65 ADRs reports to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Center Lareb. Almost all patients (n = 61) found it important that "their" ADR was reported, and all (n = 62) patients felt they were taken seriously by the J-ADEM team. Although attending physicians agreed that the ADRs should have been reported, they did not do so themselves mainly because of a "lack of knowledge and attitudes" (50%) and "excuses made by healthcare professionals" (49%). J-ADEM team students were significantly more competent than control students in managing ADRs and correctly applying all steps for diagnosing ADRs (control group 38.5% vs. intervention group 83.3%, p < 0.001). The J-ADEM team is a feasible approach for detecting and managing ADRs in hospital. Patients were satisfied with the care provided, physicians were supported in their ADR reporting obligations, and students acquired relevant basic and clinical pharmacovigilance skills and knowledge, making it a win-win-win intervention.

The short- and long-term effects of a course on rational drug use: A comparative study between prefinal- and final-year undergraduate medical students who attended the course in different clinical years

BACKGROUND

Rational pharmacology use and appropriate prescribing are among the key learning outcomes in medical education. Some medical faculties include rational pharmacotherapy course in their education programs at different years of education in Turkey. The aims of this study were to investigate the differences in effect of rational pharmacotherapy course on short- and long-terms by comparing two cohorts who attended the course in different clinical years of medical education by identifying which parameters of prescription items are different among groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This quasi-experimental study was conducted in School of Medicine. Participants consisted of 157 students who attended the course in Grade 4 (n = 110, Group A) and Grade 5 (n = 47, Group B). Students were asked to complete a prescribing task both upon completion of the course and 1 year after. The performance in prescribing was determined by prescription scoring form. Repeated measures ANOVA was employed to test the intervention effect between two periods. McNemar test was employed to measure the change in each item on the prescription. Point-biserial correlations between each item on the prescription and their scores on the test as a whole were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean score of Group A dropped to 59.41 (standard deviation [SD] = 14.06) from 90.43 (SD = 8.90), and the mean score of Group B dropped to 73.37 (SD = 12.56) from 83.91 (SD = 10.03). All the prescription components in the scripts of the Group A students worsened significantly, except the "name of drug," whereas Group B students maintained most of them after 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the long-term retention effect of rational pharmacotherapy course conducted in later years of education is better than the course conducted in earlier years of education, which may be related to the fact that students in later years are more likely to take on responsibility for patient therapy process in clinical education.

Medical students as junior adverse drug event managers facilitating reporting of ADRs

The Junior Adverse Drug Event Manager (J-ADEM) team is a multifaceted intervention focusing on real-life education for medical students that has been shown to assist healthcare professionals in managing and reporting suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb. The aim of this study was to quantify and describe the ADRs reported by the J-ADEM team and to determine the clinical potential of this approach. The J-ADEM team consisted of medical students tasked with managing and reporting ADRs in hospitalized patients. All ADRs screened and reported by J-ADEM team were recorded anonymously, and categorized and analysed descriptively. From August 2018 through January 2020, 209 patients on two wards in an academic hospital were screened for ADR events. The J-ADEM team reported 101 ADRs. Although most ADRs (67%) were first identified by healthcare professionals and then reported by the J-ADEM team, the team also reported an additional 33 not previously identified serious ADRs. In 10% of all reported ADRs, the J-ADEM team helped optimize ADR treatment. The ADR reports were largely well-documented (78%), and ADRs were classified as type A (66%), had a moderate or severe severity (85%) and were predominantly avoidable reactions (69%). This study shows that medical students are able to screen patients for ADRs, can identify previously undetected ADRs and can help optimize ADR management. They significantly increased (by 300%) the number of ADR reports submitted, showing that the J-ADEM team can make a valuable clinical contribution to hospital care.

Transformative learning in an interprofessional student-run clinic: a qualitative study

Student-run free clinics are increasingly seen as a way for students in health professions to have early authentic exposures to providing care to marginalized populations, often in the context of interprofessional teams. However, few studies characterize what and how students may learn from volunteering at a student-run free clinic. We aimed to examine shifts in attitude or practice that volunteers report after completing a placement at an interprofessional student-run clinic in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Transcripts from semi-structured reflective focus groups were analyzed in an exploratory thematic manner and from the perspective of transformative learning theory. Volunteers reported attitude shifts toward greater self-awareness of assumptions, recognition of the need for systemic interventions, and seeing themselves as learning and contributing meaningfully in a team even without direct-client contact. Practice shifts emerged of individualizing assessment and treatment of patients as well as increased comfort working in interprofessional teams. Attitude and practice shifts were facilitated by authentic interactions with individuals from marginalized populations, taking a patient-centered approach, and an interprofessional context. Interprofessional student-run free clinics are suited to triggering disorienting dilemmas that set the stage for transformative learning, particularly when volunteers are guided to reflect.

The clinical and educational outcomes of an inter-professional student-led medication review team, a pilot study

Aims

The involvement of an inter-professional healthcare student team in the review of medications used by geriatric patients could not only provide patients with optimized therapy but also provide students with a valuable inter-professional learning experience. We describe and evaluate the clinical and learning outcomes of an inter-professional student-run mediation review program (ISP).

Subject and method

A variable team consisting of students in medicine, pharmacy, master advanced nursing practice, and master physician assistant reviewed the medication lists of patients attending a specialized geriatric outpatient clinic.

Results

During 32 outpatient visits, 188 medications were reviewed. The students identified 14 medication-related problems, of which 4 were not recognized by healthcare professionals. The ISP team advised 95 medication changes, of which 68 (71.6%) were directly implemented. Students evaluated this pilot program positively and considered it educational (median score 4 out of 5) and thought it would contribute to their future inter-professional relationships.

Conclusion

An inter-professional team of healthcare students is an innovative healthcare improvement for (academic) hospitals to increase medication safety. Most formulated advices were directly incorporated in daily practice and could prevent future medication-related harm. The ISP also offers students a first opportunity to work in an inter-professional manner and get insight into the perspectives and qualities of their future colleagues.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02972-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Outpatient learning perspectives at a UK hospital

BACKGROUND

Undergraduate students spend much of their training in the clinical workplace, increasingly in hospital outpatient settings; however, they report that this does not always yield the educational value that they expect. This study investigates ways in which outpatient learning can be enhanced from the perspectives of students and teachers, exploring which approaches may be most appropriate in different circumstances.

METHODS

We conducted 14 semi-structured interviews with medical students from one UK medical school and consultants (specialists) at a single teaching hospital. We explored their experiences and perceptions of clinical teaching and learning in this outpatient setting. Transcripts were analysed through a consensual qualitative research approach. An evaluation of established frameworks for outpatient teaching was conducted and strategies were matched to stakeholder needs.

FINDINGS

A total of 24 core ideas were identified, which were categorised into: individual factors (student, doctor and patient), interpersonal factors, team factors and organisational factors. Teaching strategies that address stakeholder needs included: student-led clinics, case-based discussions, one-minute preceptor, the SNAPPS tool (summarize, narrow differential, analyse, probe preceptor, plan and select issues for self-learning), advanced organisers and supplementing.

DISCUSSION

There is a complex interplay between personal, interpersonal, team and organisational factors that contribute to the effectiveness of the outpatient setting as a learning environment. Strategies at the personal and interpersonal levels are unlikely to be successful or sustained without organisational resourcing and support. Further research is needed to implement and evaluate these suggested strategies.

WHO guide to good prescribing is 25 years old: quo vadis?

INTRODUCTION

Twenty-five years ago, the World Health Organization (WHO) published the Guide to Good Prescribing (GGP), followed by the accompanying Teacher's Guide to Good Prescribing (TGGP). The GGP is based on a normative 6-step model for therapeutic reasoning and prescribing, and provides a six-step guide for students to the process of rational prescribing.

METHOD

We reviewed the need to update both WHO publications by evaluating their use and impact, including new (theoretical) insights and demands. Based on information from literature, Internet, and other (personal) sources, we draw the following conclusions.

RESULTS

1. An update of the GGP and TGGP, both in terms of content and form, is necessary because of the current need for these tools (irrational medicine use and unavailability of medicines), the lack of similar documents, and the lack of connection with recent developments, such as Internet and modern education; 2. The basic (6-step) model of the GGP is effective in terms of rational prescribing in the undergraduate situation and is still consistent with current theories about (context) learning, clinical decision-making, and clinical practice; 3. The dissemination and introduction of the GGP and TGGP in education has been successful so far, but is still not optimal because of lack of support and cooperation.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the evaluation results, a plan for the revision of the GGP and TGGP is presented.