1
|
Kuchinad K, Park JR, Han D, Saha S, Moore R, Beach MC. Which clinician responses to emotion are associated with more positive patient experiences of communication? PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 124:108241. [PMID: 38537316 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify communication strategies that may improve clinician-patient interactions, we assessed the association between clinician response to emotion and patient ratings of communication. METHODS From a cohort of 1817 clinician-patient encounters, we designed a retrospective case-control study by identifying 69 patients who rated their interpersonal care as low-quality and 69 patients who rated their care as high-quality. We used the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES) to identify patient emotional expressions and clinician responses. Using mixed-effects logistic regression, we evaluated the association between clinician responses to patients' emotions and patient ratings of their interpersonal care. RESULTS In adjusted analyses, explicit responses that reduced space for further emotional communication were associated with high ratings of care (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.25, 2.99); non-explicit responses providing additional space were associated with low ratings (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.82). In terms of specific response types, neutral/passive responses were associated with low ratings (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.90), whereas giving information/advice was associated with high ratings (OR, 95% 1.91 CI 1.17-3.1). CONCLUSIONS Patients may prefer responses to their expressed emotions that demonstrate clinician engagement, with or without expressions of empathy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These findings may inform educational interventions to improve clinician-patient communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamini Kuchinad
- Department of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jenny Rose Park
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Dingfen Han
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Somnath Saha
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Richard Moore
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Mary Catherine Beach
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States; Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States; Center for Health Equity, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fan J, Li S, Qiang Y, Duan Z, Wu A, Wang R. Barriers and Stimulus in Shared Decision Making Among Aesthetic Dermatologists in China: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2024; 17:1153-1164. [PMID: 38800355 PMCID: PMC11119500 DOI: 10.2147/ccid.s457802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative process involving both healthcare providers and patients in making medical decisions, which gains increasing prominence in healthcare practice. But evidence on the level of SDM in medical practice and barriers as well as stimulus during the SDM implementation among aesthetic dermatologists is limited in China. Methods From July to August 2023, 1938 dermatologists were recruited online in China. Data were collected through an electronic questionnaire covering: (1) demographic features; (2) SDM questionnaire physician version (SDM-Q-Doc); and (3) stimulus and barriers in SDM implementation. Logistic regression was applied to explore factors associated with SDM practice, barriers, and stimulus of SDM implementation, respectively. Results The 1938 dermatologists included 1329 females (68.6%), with an average age of 35 years. The total SDM score ranged from 0 to 45, with a median value of 40 (IQR: 35-44), and the median stimulus score and barriers scores were 28 (IQR: 24-32) and 19 (IQR: 13-26), respectively. The prevalence of good SDM was 27.2%, logistic regression indicated that female dermatologists (odds ratio, OR=1.21, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.96-1.51), and dermatologists with more years of aesthetic practice had a higher proportion of good SDM practice (OR was 1.44 for 5-9 years, 1.58 for 10-15 years and 1.77 for over 15 years). Moreover, female dermatologists and dermatologists with higher education level and serviced in private settings had lower barrier scores; female dermatologists and dermatologists with more years of aesthetic practice had higher stimulus scores. Conclusion Chinese aesthetic dermatologists appear to implement SDM at an active level, with more stimulus and less barriers in SDM implementation. The integration of SDM into clinical practice among dermatologists is beneficial both for patients and dermatologists. Moreover, SDM practice should be strongly promoted and enhanced during medical aesthetics, especially among male dermatologists, dermatologists with less working experience, and those who work at public institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Fan
- Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Skin Diseases Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, University of Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shiyuan Li
- School of Public Health, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan Qiang
- Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Skin Diseases Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhen Duan
- School of Public Health, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Albert Wu
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, University of Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ruiping Wang
- Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Skin Diseases Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, University of Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
- School of Public Health, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ziegler E, Klein J, Kofahl C. Patient experiences and needs in cancer care- results from a nationwide cross-sectional study in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:572. [PMID: 38698426 PMCID: PMC11067160 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10951-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-centredness has become a central quality indicator for oncology care. Elements include shared decision-making, patient navigation and integration of psychosocial care, which impact patient-reported and clinical outcomes. Despite efforts to promote patient-centred care in Germany in recent decades, implementation remains fragmented. Further, research on patient experiences with cancer care and its determinants is limited. Therefore, this study examines which patient- and facility-specific factors are associated with patient-centred quality care delivery. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,121 cancer patients in acute treatment, rehabilitation, and aftercare for different cancer entities across Germany. A participatory developed questionnaire was used. Outcome measures were the quality of physician-patient interaction and provision of psychosocial care during acute care. Predictors comprised patient-specific characteristics and treatment facility-specific factors. Multiple linear regression and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed. In addition, a content analysis of open-ended comments on the patients' overall cancer care needs was applied. RESULTS Multiple linear regression analysis showed recent diagnosis (β=-0.12, p = < 0.001), being male (β=-0.11, p = 0.003), and having a preference for passive decision-making (β=-0.10, p = 0.001) to be significantly associated with higher interaction quality, but not age, education and health insurance type. An overall low impact of patient characteristics on interaction quality was revealed (adj. R2 = 0.03). Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated the availability of central contact persons (OR = 3.10, p < 0.001) followed by recent diagnosis (p < 0.001), having breast cancer (p < 0.001) and being female (OR = 1.68, p < 0.05) to significantly predict offering psycho-oncological counselling to patients in acute care facilities. The availability of peer support visiting services (OR = 7.17, p < 0.001) and central contact persons (OR = 1.87, p < 0.001) in the care facility, breast cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001) and a higher level of education (p < 0.05) significantly increased the odds of patients receiving information about peer support in the treatment facility. Despite relatively satisfactory quality of physician-patient interactions in cancer care (M = 3.5 (± 1.1)), many patients expressed that better patient-centred communication and coordinated, comprehensive cancer care are needed. CONCLUSION The findings reflect effective developments and improvements in cancer care and suggest that patients' social characteristics are less decisive for delivering patient-centred quality care than systemic factors surrounding the care facilities. They can serve to inform oncology care in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elâ Ziegler
- Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Jens Klein
- Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christopher Kofahl
- Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sutton L, Labriola M, Bognanno T, Moneer S, Ghith J, Rodriguez G, Moore L, Evuarherhe O, Morgans AK. Patient engagement in designing and publishing research in prostate cancer: a scoping review. Future Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38573132 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer have the unique ability of being able to offer valuable insights into how cancer therapeutics may impact the overall patient experience and improve clinical outcomes. Patient engagement could therefore contribute to tailoring treatment strategies and research design according to patient needs. This study evaluated patient engagement in prostate cancer research by identifying patient input in the prostate cancer literature. We performed a keyword cluster analysis of articles from multiple databases and congresses in which patients provided input on disease management or were involved in study design, manuscript authorship or presentation of results (patient voice). In total, 112 studies were included. Patients were involved in the design of 11 studies and were credited as authors in four studies. This review suggests a lack of meaningful patient involvement in prostate cancer research and publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Shelby Moneer
- ZERO - The End of Prostate Cancer, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akakura K, Uemura H, Kawakami S, Yokomizo A, Nakamura M, Nishimura K, Komori T, Ledesma DA. Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients' experience with Radium-223 treatment in Japan. Future Oncol 2024; 20:781-798. [PMID: 38275149 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: We aimed to determine Japanese metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients' Ra-223 treatment experience. Patients & methods: Patients answered the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ domains: Satisfaction with Therapy [SWT], Expectations of Therapy [ET], Feelings about Side Effects [FSE]), the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) and the FACT-Bone Pain (FACT-BP) Questionnaire at baseline, during (vists 3 and 5) and after treatment (end of observation; EOO). Results: Data from 72 patients were included. Baseline median CTSQ scores SWT: 66.1 (IQR19.7), ET: 75.0 (IQR45), and FSE 68.8 (IQR 34.4) were unchanged during vists 3 and 5, but the SWT (-3.57 [IQR17.9]) and ET (-5.0 [IQR30]) decreased while FSE was unchanged (0.0 [IQR31.25]) at EOO. The median MAX-PC (18.0 [IQR 49]) score was unchanged (0.0, IQR 6) while the median FACT BP (54.0 [IQR13]) score decreased by -1.0 (IQR 8) at EOO. Conclusion: Japanese metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients' experience is stable during Ra-223 treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Satoru Kawakami
- Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fefferman A, Beaulieu-Jones BR, Shewmaker G, Zhang T, Sachs T, Merrill A, Ko NY, Cassidy MR. Association of Race, Ethnicity, Insurance, and Language and Rate of Breast-Conserving Therapy Among Women With Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer at an Urban, Safety-Net Hospital. J Surg Res 2023; 291:403-413. [PMID: 37517348 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast-conserving therapy (BCT), specifically breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant radiation, provides an equivalent alternative to mastectomy for eligible patients. However, previous studies have shown that BCT is underused in the United States, particularly among marginalized demographic groups. In this study, we examine the association between race, ethnicity, insurance, and language and rate of BCS among patients treated at an academic, safety-net hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 520 women with nonmetastatic breast cancer diagnosed and treated at an academic, safety-net hospital (2009-2014). We assessed eligibility for BCT and then differences in the rate of BCT among eligible patients by race, ethnicity, insurance, and language. Reasons for not undergoing BCT were documented. RESULTS Median age was 60 y; 55.9% were non-White, 31.9% were non-English-speaking, 15.6% were Hispanic, and 47.4% were Medicaid/uninsured. Three hundred seventy one (86.3%) underwent BCS; within this group, 324 (87.3%) completed adjuvant radiation. Among patients undergoing mastectomy, 30 patients (36.7%) were eligible for BCT; within this group, reasons for mastectomy included patient preference (n = 28) and to avoid possible re-excision or adjuvant radiation in patients with significant comorbidities (n = 2). Eligibility for BCT varied by ethnicity (Hispanic [100%], Non-Hispanic [92%], P = 0.02), but not race, language, or insurance. Among eligible patients, rate of BCS varied by age (<50 y [84.9%], ≥50 y [92.9%], P = 0.01) and ethnicity (Hispanic [98.5%], Non-Hispanic [91.3%], P = 0.04), but not race, language, or insurance. CONCLUSIONS At our safety-net hospital, the rate of BCS among eligible patients did not vary by race, language, or insurance. Excluding two highly comorbid patients, all patients who underwent mastectomy despite being eligible for BCT were counseled regarding BCS and expressed a preference for mastectomy. Further research is needed to understand the value of BCT in the treatment of breast cancer, to ensure informed decision-making, address potential misconceptions regarding BCT, and advance equitable care for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Fefferman
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brendin R Beaulieu-Jones
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Tina Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Teviah Sachs
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrea Merrill
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Section of Hematology & Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Naomi Y Ko
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Section of Hematology & Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael R Cassidy
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Belmiro AA, Guilhem D. Quality of life assessment of patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy. Int J Palliat Nurs 2023; 29:476-485. [PMID: 37862157 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2023.29.10.476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative chemotherapy uses systemic antineoplastic agents to treat an incurable malignancy. The results of cancer treatment need to be measured in terms of what physical and psychological limitations it brings to the patient. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate and establish the impact of the disease and its treatment on the patient's quality of life. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the quality of life of cancer patients undergoing palliative antineoplastic chemotherapy. METHOD A cross-sectional study with quali-quantitative unfolding. Three research instruments were applied: sociodemographic and clinical data; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30); interview script with predefined open questions. RESULTS The quality of life of the participants was considered good. Fatigue and financial difficulty were the main factors that interfered in daily activities. Three analytical categories emerged from the content analysis of the interviews: communication between the health team and the patient; patient's perception of their health/disease; concerns vs prospects. CONCLUSION The evaluation of quality of life for people who are at the end of life needs to balance technological and therapeutic advances, alongside aspects such as the perspective of these patients and the context of their lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dirce Guilhem
- Professor, Nursing Department, University of Brasilia, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Büdenbender B, Köther AK, Kriegmair MC, Grüne B, Michel MS, Alpers GW. Getting specific: participation preference in urooncological decision-making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:114. [PMID: 37407999 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02201-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making is the gold standard for good clinical practice, and thus, psychometric instruments have been established to assess patients' generic preference for participation (e.g., the Autonomy Preference Index, API). However, patients' preferences may vary depending on the specific disease and with respect to the specific decision context. With a modified preference index (API-Uro), we assessed patients' specific participation preference in preference-sensitive decisions pertaining to urological cancer treatments and compared this with their generic participation preference. METHODS In Study 1, we recruited (N = 469) urological outpatients (43.1% urooncological) at a large university hospital. Participation preference was assessed with generic measures (API and API case vignettes) and with the disease-specific API-Uro (urooncological case vignettes describing medical decisions of variable difficulty). A polychoric exploratory factor analysis was used to establish factorial validity and reduce items. In Study 2, we collected data from N = 204 bladder cancer patients in a multicenter study to validate the factorial structure with confirmatory factor analysis. Differences between the participation preference for different decision contexts were analyzed. RESULTS Study 1: Scores on the specific urooncological case vignettes (API-Uro) correlated with the generic measure (r = .44) but also provided incremental information. Among the disease-specific vignettes of the API-Uro, there were two factors with good internal consistency (α ≥ .8): treatment versus diagnostic decisions. Patients desired more participation for treatment decisions (77.8%) than for diagnostic decisions (22%), χ2(1) = 245.1, p ≤ .001. Study 2: Replicated the correlation of the API-Uro with the API (r = .39) and its factorial structure (SRMR = .08; CFI = .974). Bladder cancer patients also desired more participation for treatment decisions (57.4%) than for diagnostic decisions (13.3%), χ²(1) =84, p ≤ .001. CONCLUSIONS The desire to participate varies between treatment versus diagnostic decisions among urological patients. This underscores the importance of assessing participation preference for specific contexts. Overall, the new API-Uro has good psychometric properties and is well suited to assess patients' preferences. In routine care, measures of participation preference for specific decision contexts may provide incremental, allowing clinicians to better address their patients' individual needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Büdenbender
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, L 15-17, 68131, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anja K Köther
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, L 15-17, 68131, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian C Kriegmair
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Britta Grüne
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maurice S Michel
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georg W Alpers
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, L 15-17, 68131, Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hack V, Josfeld L, Hübner J, Keinki C, Büntzel J. Decision-making by cancer patients and the role of a counselling facility for complementary and alternative medicine: a cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:2903-2913. [PMID: 35819526 PMCID: PMC10314849 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04178-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this cohort study was to gain insight on influencing factors on the decision-making process in conventional medicine compared to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). METHODS A standardized questionnaire was distributed among cancer patients who attended the counselling facility for CAM of a German university hospital in 2020. RESULTS Fifty patients (30.3%) returned the questionnaire. After counselling on CAM, most patients made a decision in CAM but also in conventional medicine. Thus, the focus on informed decision-making during counselling on CAM had a strong effect on the decision-making process in conventional medicine. Patients reporting good support also reported making decisions together with physicians and relatives. Moreover, after counselling on CAM, patients reported being more satisfied with their decision in both settings afterwards. CONCLUSION Information on CAM which focuses on informed decision-making, supports patient's ability to understand and weigh risks and benefits of treatments, supports shared decision-making and enables patients to transfer these competences also to decisions on conventional medicine. So counselling on CAM may further decision-making competences in cancer patients. This encourages patients to engage in shared decision-making and increases patient's satisfaction with decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Hack
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
- , Christeserstraße, 98547, Kühndorf, Germany.
| | - Lena Josfeld
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Jutta Hübner
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Christian Keinki
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Jens Büntzel
- Klinik für HNO-Erkrankungen, Südharzklinikum, Nordhausen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Raffetin A, Chahour A, Schemoul J, Paoletti G, He Z, Baux E, Patrat-Delon S, Nguala S, Caraux-Paz P, Puppo C, Arias P, Madec Y, Gallien S, Rivière J. Acceptance of diagnosis and management satisfaction of patients with "suspected Lyme borreliosis" after 12 months in a multidisciplinary reference center: a prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2023; 23:380. [PMID: 37280565 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08352-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Because patients with a "suspicion of Lyme borreliosis (LB)" may experience medical wandering and difficult care paths, often due to misinformation, multidisciplinary care centers were started all over Europe a few years ago. The aim of our study was to prospectively identify the factors associated with the acceptance of diagnosis and management satisfaction of patients, and to assess the concordance of the medical health assessment between physicians and patients 12 months after their management at our multidisciplinary center. METHODS We included all adults who were admitted to the Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region (TBD-RC) (2017-2020). A telephone satisfaction survey was conducted 12 months after their first consultation. It consisted of 5 domains and 13 items rated between 0 (lowest) and 10 (highest grade): (1)Reception; (2)Care and quality of management; (3)Information/explanations given to the patients; (4)Current medical condition and acceptance of the final diagnosis; (5)Overall appreciation. Factors associated with diagnosis acceptance and management satisfaction at 12 months were identified using logistic regression models. The concordance of the health status as assessed by doctors and patients was calculated using a Cohen's kappa test. RESULTS Of the 569 patients who consulted, 349 (61.3%) answered the questionnaire. Overall appreciation had a median rating of 9 [8;10] and 280/349 (80.2%) accepted their diagnoses. Patients who were "very satisfied" with their care paths at TBD-RC (OR = 4.64;CI95%[1.52-14.16]) had higher odds of diagnosis acceptance. Well-delivered information was strongly associated with better satisfaction with the management (OR = 23.39;CI95%[3.52-155.54]). The concordance between patients and physicians to assess their health status 12 months after their management at TBD-RC was almost perfect in the groups of those with confirmed and possible LB (κ = 0.99), and moderate in the group with other diagnoses (κ = 0.43). CONCLUSION Patients seemed to approve of this multidisciplinary care organization for suspected LB. It helped them to accept their final diagnoses and enabled a high level of satisfaction with the information given by the doctors, confirming the importance of shared medical decisions, which may help to reduce health misinformation. This type of structure may be useful for any disease with a complex and controversial diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Raffetin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region, General Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France.
- EpiMAI Research Unity, Laboratory of Animal Health, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Anses-National Veterinaty School of Alfort, Maison-Alfort, France.
- DYNAMIC Research Unity, UPEC-Anses, Créteil, France.
| | - Amal Chahour
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region, General Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Julien Schemoul
- Department of Rheumatology, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region, General Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Giulia Paoletti
- Department of Psychiatry, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region, General Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Zhuoruo He
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region, General Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
- Department of Public Health, University of Paris Saclay, Saclay, France
| | - Elisabeth Baux
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of the Eastern Region, Brabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Solène Patrat-Delon
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of the Western Region, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Steve Nguala
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region, General Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Pauline Caraux-Paz
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region, General Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Costanza Puppo
- Department of Psychology, Lumière University Lyon II, UMR 1296, Lyon, France
| | - Pauline Arias
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region, General Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Yoann Madec
- Epidemiology of Emerging Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Sébastien Gallien
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tick-Borne Diseases Reference Center of Paris and the Northern Region, General Hospital of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
- DYNAMIC Research Unity, UPEC-Anses, Créteil, France
- Department of Infectious Diseases, UH Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Julie Rivière
- EpiMAI Research Unity, Laboratory of Animal Health, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Anses-National Veterinaty School of Alfort, Maison-Alfort, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van der Waal MS, Seghers N, Welsing PMJ, van Huis LH, Emmelot-Vonk MH, Hamaker ME. A meta-analysis on the role older adults with cancer favour in treatment decision making. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101383. [PMID: 36243627 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the complex setting of oncological treatment decision making, balancing professional guidance while respecting patient involvement can be a challenge. We set out to assess the role adults with cancer favour in treatment decision making (TDM), including differences across age groups and change over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and Embase, for studies on role preference of (older) adults with cancer in oncological treatment decision making. A meta-analysis was conducted based on Control Preference Scale (CPS) data, a questionnaire on patient role preference in TDM. RESULTS This meta-analysis includes 33 studies reporting CPS data comprising 17,197 adults with cancer. Mean age was 60.6 years old for studies that specified age (24 studies, 6155 patients). During the last decade, patients' role preference shifted towards significantly more active involvement in TDM (p = 0.006). No age-dependent subgroup differences have been identified; both younger and older adults, defined as, respectively, below and above 65 years old, favour active involvement in treatment decision making. DISCUSSION Over time, adults with cancer have shifted towards more active role preference in treatment decision making. In current cancer care, a large majority prefers taking an active role, irrespective of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike S van der Waal
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nelleke Seghers
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht/Zeist/Doorn, the Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Julius Center Research Program Methodology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lieke H van Huis
- Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht/Zeist/Doorn, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marije E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht/Zeist/Doorn, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hirata I, Hanaoka S, Rokutanda R, Funakoshi R, Hayashi H. Shared decision-making practices and patient values in pharmacist outpatient care for rheumatic disease: A multiple correspondence analysis. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY & PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES : A PUBLICATION OF THE CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, SOCIETE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES PHARMACEUTIQUES 2023; 26:11135. [PMID: 36942300 PMCID: PMC9990622 DOI: 10.3389/jpps.2023.11135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the value-to-value relationships, relationship between values and patient background, continuation rate of treatment after shared decision-making (SDM), and disease status in order to clarify the values involved in drug therapy decisions for patients with rheumatic disease. Methods: We investigated patient values (efficacy of drug therapy [effectiveness], safety, economics, daily life, and other) and the continuance rate and disease status of treatment after 6 months in 94 patients with rheumatic disease aged ≥18 years who made decisions with pharmacists and physicians in the pharmacy outpatient clinic between September 2019 and April 2021. Multiple correspondence and K-means cluster analyses were performed to show the relationship between values and basic patient information. Results: Among the selected patients, 87% and 47% selected effectiveness for multiple selections and single selection, respectively. Effectiveness was at the center of the graph; three clusters containing other values were placed around it. History of allergy or side effects caused by biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors were in the safety cluster. The non-usage history of biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors was in the economic cluster. Conclusion: Effectiveness was the most important factor for patients with rheumatic disease; the values that patients consider important may shift from effectiveness to other values based on each patient's subjective experience with the treatment and/or the stage of life in which they were treated. It is important to positively link patient values and information about the treatment plan in shared decision-making while establishing rapport with the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikkou Hirata
- Department of Pharmacy, Kameda General Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Hanaoka
- Department of Clinical Pharmacotherapy, School of Pharmacy, Nihon University, Chiba, Japan
- *Correspondence: Shunsuke Hanaoka,
| | - Ryo Rokutanda
- Department of Rheumatology, Kameda General Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Hiroyuki Hayashi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacotherapy, School of Pharmacy, Nihon University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tabernero J, Bowling TE, Rivers J, Chari D, Ghith J, Ferdinand R, Shanahan K, Shore ND. Improving access to oncology publications for advocates and people with cancer. Cancer 2022; 128:3757-3763. [PMID: 36098654 PMCID: PMC9826100 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Journal articles provide reliable and current information about cancer research. This can offer hope to people with cancer and help them make decisions about their care. Here, the authors suggest ways in which different groups may help people with cancer to find, view, and understand articles. For example, journals should make articles free to view if they describe research that could change patient care. Also, clear titles and easy-to-follow summaries or videos may help people to find relevant articles and understand the main findings. It is important to explore ways to best share research with all those whose lives it may affect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep Tabernero
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology, International Oncology Bureau‐Quiron, University of Vic‐Central University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Jamil Rivers
- METAvivor Research & SupportAnnapolisMarylandUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Neal D. Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research CenterMyrtle BeachSouth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kang JH. Influences of decision preferences and health literacy on temporomandibular disorder treatment outcome. BMC Oral Health 2022; 22:385. [PMID: 36064350 PMCID: PMC9446804 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02420-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shared decision-making is defined as the process by which physicians and informed patients make a shared medical decision, taking into account the preferences and values of the patients. It is well known that shared decision-making practices improve both clinicians’ and patients’ satisfaction and lead to better treatment outcomes. The aim of the study was to assess associations between patients’ roles in decision-making, health literacy levels, and treatment outcomes of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Methods In total, 131 participants were enrolled. Participants underwent interview and physical examination at baseline and six months after TMD management. TMD was diagnosed according to Diagnostic Criteria/TMD criteria. Myofascial trigger points were bilaterally evaluated in the two masticatory muscles including the temporalis and masseter muscles. The roles that participants preferred to play or had perceived during decision-making and their health literacy levels were assessed using Control Preferences Scale and Newest Vital Sign, respectively. Results Participants who perceived themselves as occupying active roles in decision-making showed higher health literacy levels than those with passive perceived roles. Participants with appropriate health literacy showed higher perceived participation levels in decision-making than did those with limited health literacy. The extent of subjective symptomatic improvement after six months of treatment showed significant associations with perceived role in decision-making, despite lack of significant relationships between perceived role in decision-making and the extent of improvement of objective parameters. Conclusion Active participation of patients in decision-making improves the satisfaction but limited health literacy constitutes barriers to effective patient engagement during TMD management. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02420-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong-Hyun Kang
- Clinic of Oral Medicine and Orofacial Pain, Institute of Oral Health Science, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nakayama K, Yonekura Y, Danya H, Hagiwara K. Associations between health literacy and information-evaluation and decision-making skills in Japanese adults. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1473. [PMID: 35918675 PMCID: PMC9344668 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13892-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health literacy among Japanese is often low, making it difficult for them to evaluate health information and make informed decisions. However, the health literacy scales applied measure the perceived difficulty of health-related tasks; they do not directly assess the specific skills needed to perform the tasks: the skills to judge the reliability of diverse information using evaluation criteria and implement rational decision-making. Therefore, the study objectives were to investigate the following issues using a nationwide survey in Japan. (1) When obtaining information, to what extent do people apply criteria for evaluating information to confirm its reliability; when making decisions, to what extent do they seek out available options and compare pros and cons based on their own values? (2) How strongly are such skills associated with health literacy and demographic characteristics? (3) What opportunities are available to learn these skills? Methods We conducted an online questionnaire survey using a Japanese Internet research company; 3,914 valid responses were received. The measures comprised health literacy (European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire), five items on information evaluation, four items on decision-making, and items on the availability and location of learning opportunities. We calculated Pearson correlations to explore the association of health literacy with information-evaluation and decision-making skills. Multivariate analyses were also conducted using these factors as dependent variables. Results Fewer than half (30%–50%) of respondents reported always or often evaluating information and engaging in decision-making. Health literacy was significantly and positively correlated with the specific skills of information evaluation and decision-making (r = .26 and .30, respectively) as were multivariate analyses (beta = .15 and .22, respectively). Over 40% of respondents had never learned those skills. The most common resources for learning the skills were the Internet and television; less-used resources were schools and workplaces. Conclusions Both information-evaluation and decision-making skills were associated with health literacy. However, these skills are not sufficiently widespread in Japan because there are few opportunities to acquire them. More research is needed to raise awareness of the importance of such skills for improving health literacy and providing learning opportunities. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13892-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Nakayama
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan.
| | - Yuki Yonekura
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| | - Hitomi Danya
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| | - Kanako Hagiwara
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gellerstedt L, Langius-Eklöf A, Kelmendi N, Sundberg K, Craftman ÅG. Men's experiences of receiving a prostate cancer diagnosis after opportunistic screening-A qualitative descriptive secondary analysis. Health Expect 2022; 25:2485-2491. [PMID: 35898187 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is one of the most common types of cancer in men and could occur without symptoms. Screening has been debated but remains controversial and, in most countries, organized population-based screening does not exist. The aim of this study was to describe men's experiences of receiving a prostate cancer diagnosis after opportunistic screening. METHODS This study is a secondary analysis from interviews with 17 men (aged 56-80 years) who had undergone curative treatment for prostate cancer. Data were collected in an urban region of Sweden through interviews conducted face to face or by telephone. An inductive content analysis was used with Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research as a reporting checklist. RESULTS Two main categories were identified. Screening is a lifesaver enclosed by ethical dilemmas reflects how men considered screening as a lifesaving test. Testing was surrounded by injustice and an eagerness to encourage other men to undergo screening. Facing challenges during diagnosis reflects the men's experiences of being in an unknown field yet expected to engage in decision-making concerning appropriate treatment. Receiving the diagnosis rendered mixed emotions about having a cancer disease, that the treatment could cause lifelong symptom distress and the men described being hesitant to talk about their diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight men's opinions about screening and that the lack of routine screening represents injustice. The men considered this as an ethical question of lifesaving justice, while stakeholders may argue that screening could lead to unnecessary suffering and overtreatment. Men do not always talk openly about their diagnosis, linked to the fact that it concerns intimate areas. It is important to balance the information in relation to shared decision-making regarding treatment. Health care professionals have an ethical responsibility to support and coach the patient in their decision. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This study was based on interviews with men who had experienced a diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Gellerstedt
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Langius-Eklöf
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nazmije Kelmendi
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Stockholm County Council, Academic Primary Health Care Center, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kay Sundberg
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Åsa G Craftman
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Nursing Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Koyama T, Nawa N, Itsui Y, Okada E, Fujiwara T. Facilitators and barriers to implementing shared decision making: A cross-sectional study of physicians in Japan. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2546-2556. [PMID: 35184910 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative process in which patients and healthcare providers jointly make a medical decision. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers to self-reported implementation of SDM in Japan, and to explore if there is effect modification by hospital types. METHODS A total of 129 physicians in Japan completed a questionnaire that asked about their perception of SDM based on SDM-Q-Doc and its facilitators and barriers, which corresponded to each construct of the integrated behavioral model (IBM). The association between facilitators and barriers and SDM-Q-doc score was assessed using linear regression analysis. Stratified analysis by hospital types was also performed. RESULTS Significant facilitators included physicians' attitude, injunctive norm, intention and habit. Significant barriers included physicians' unfavorable attitude, lack of self-efficacy, knowledge, salience and experience. Moreover, experiential attitude (concerning patient characteristics), injunctive norm (concerning patient preferences), and physician's habit were significant facilitators for physicians working in university hospitals when compared to those working in municipal hospitals. CONCLUSION The facilitators and barriers to implementing SDM in Japan were identified. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS More opportunities for training on SDM are needed to provide knowledge and skills, which will enhance salience and contribute their habitual practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teruchika Koyama
- Professional Development Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobutoshi Nawa
- Professional Development Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medical Education Research and Development, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Itsui
- Professional Development Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eriko Okada
- Professional Development Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medical Education Research and Development, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Fujiwara
- Department of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hinz A, Zenger M, Schmalbach B, Brähler E, Hofmeister D, Petrowski K. Quality of Life Domains in Breast Cancer Survivors: The Relationship Between Importance and Satisfaction Ratings. Front Psychol 2022; 13:923537. [PMID: 35814141 PMCID: PMC9257209 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Quality of life (QoL) has been the focus of increasing interest in oncology. QoL assessment instruments implicitly assume that each QoL domain has the same meaning for each patient. The objective of this study was to analyze the importance of and the satisfaction with QoL domains and to analyze the relationship between the two. Methods A sample of 308 breast cancer survivors was examined twice with a three-month time interval. The women completed the two QoL questionnaires Questions of Life Satisfaction (FLZ-M), which measures participants' satisfaction with eight QoL domains and the subjective importance of those domains to them, and the EORTC QLQ-C30. A sample of 1,143 women from the general population served as controls. Results Compared with the general population sample, the patients were less satisfied with their health and more satisfied with all other QoL domains. The subjective importance of health was lower in the patients' sample (Effect size: d = 0.38). Satisfaction with health and importance of health were slightly positively correlated (r between 0.05 and 0.08). The effect of QoL domain importance on general QoL was small (beta between −0.05 and 0.11), and interaction effects between domain importance and satisfaction on the prediction of global QoL were negligible. Conclusion In addition to satisfaction with QoL dimensions, the subjective importance of these dimensions is relevant for psychooncological research and treatment. Health is not the only relevant QoL domain in breast cancer survivors, other domains such as finances also deserve health care providers' attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Hinz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- *Correspondence: Andreas Hinz
| | - Markus Zenger
- Department of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bjarne Schmalbach
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Elmar Brähler
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Dirk Hofmeister
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Katja Petrowski
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Influencing factors of lung cancer patients' participation in shared decision-making: a cross-sectional study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 148:3303-3312. [PMID: 35716189 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04105-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate and analyze the level of actual participation and perceived importance of shared decision-making on treatment and care of lung cancer patients, to compare their differences and to explore their influencing factors. METHODS A total of 290 lung cancer patients were collected from oncology and thoracic surgery departments of a comprehensive medical center in Qingdao from October 2018 to December 2019. Participants completed a cross-sectional questionnaire to assess their actual participation and perceived importance in shared decision-making on treatment and care. Descriptive analysis and non-parametric tests were carried out to assess the status quo of patients' shared decision-making on treatment and care. Binary logistic regression analysis with a stepwise back-wards was applied to predict factors that affected patients' participation in shared decision-making. RESULTS The results showed that patients with lung cancer had a low degree of participation in shared decision-making. There were significant differences between actual participation and perceived importance of shared decision-making on treatment and care. Education level, age, gender, income, marital status, personality, the course of the disease (> 6 months), and the pathological TNM staging (III) affected patient's level of participation in shared decision-making. CONCLUSION Actual participation in shared decision-making on the treatment and care of lung cancer patients was low and considered unimportant. We could train oncology nurses to use patient decision aids to help patients and families participate in shared decision-making on patients' value, preferences and needs.
Collapse
|
20
|
Asai A, Okita T, Bito S. Discussions on Present Japanese Psychocultural-Social Tendencies as Obstacles to Clinical Shared Decision-Making in Japan. Asian Bioeth Rev 2022; 14:133-150. [PMID: 35069883 PMCID: PMC8761963 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-021-00201-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
In Japan, where a prominent gap exists in what is considered a patient’s best interest between the medical and patient sides, appropriate decision-making can be difficult to achieve. In Japanese clinical settings, decision-making is considered an act of choice-making from multiple potential options. With many ethical dilemmas still remaining, establishing an appropriate decision-making process is an urgent task in modern Japanese healthcare. This paper examines ethical issues related to shared decision-making (SDM) in clinical settings in modern Japan from the psychocultural-social perspective and discusses the ideal decision-making process in present Japan. Specifically, we discuss how five psychocultural-social tendencies – “surmise (Sontaku),” “self-restraint (Jishuku),” “air (atmosphere or mood, Kuuki),” “peer pressure (or tuning pressure, Docho-Atsuryoku),” and “community (Seken)”—which have often been referred to as characteristics of present-day Japanese people, may affect the ideal practice of SDM in Japanese clinical settings. We conclude that health care professionals must be aware of the possible adverse effects of the above Japanese psychocultural-social tendencies on the implementation of SDM and attempt to promote autonomous decision-making, thereby allowing patients to make treatment choices that sufficiently reflect their individual and personal views of life, experiences, goals, preferences, and values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Asai
- Department of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Taketoshi Okita
- Department of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Seiji Bito
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Xiao L, Peng M, Liu Y, Zhang L. Information, deliberation, and decisional control preferences for participation in medical decision-making and its influencing factors among Chinese cancer patients. Health Expect 2021; 24:1725-1736. [PMID: 34309132 PMCID: PMC8483183 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient‐centred care should strive to respond to the individual patient's needs and preferences when possible. Yet, preferences of cancer patients for participation in different stages of the medical decision‐making process to increase matching of preferred and actual participation of the patients in decision‐making are not well known. Objective This study aimed to determine the level of information, deliberation and decisional control preferences in decision‐making practices among Chinese cancer patients and to explore their association with the sociodemographic and clinical variables of the patients. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted involving a convenience sample of 328 cancer patients from three public hospitals in Guangzhou, China. The Patient Expectation for Participation in Medical Decision‐making Scale (PEPMDS) was used to evaluate information, deliberation and decisional control preferences of the patients. Binary logistic regressions were conducted to determine the association between sociodemographic variables, clinical variables and preferences of the patients. Results Most patients reported a high preference for information (73.2%) and deliberation (73.8%), while a small number (37.2%) reported a high preference for decisional control. Younger patients and patients with higher levels of education were significantly more likely to have a high preference for information, deliberation and decisional control. Patients with low annual family incomes were significantly more likely to have a low preference for decisional control. Conclusion Preferences of patients for involvement in different stages of decision‐making practices could vary. The level of preferences appears to be related to the patient's age, education level, and financial status. Practice Implications Healthcare providers should tailor the participatory approaches of patients considering individual preferences for information, deliberation and decisional control during medical decision‐making. Patient Contribution Patients participated in the survey and filled in the questionnaires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Xiao
- Evidence-based Nursing and Midwifery Practice Center, School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meifang Peng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yawei Liu
- Evidence-based Nursing and Midwifery Practice Center, School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lili Zhang
- Evidence-based Nursing and Midwifery Practice Center, School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|