1
|
Bélanger-Gravel A, Lavoie KL, Desroches S, Barnett TA, Paquette MC, Therrien F, Gauvin L. To use or not to use behavioural science evidence in designing health promotion interventions: Identification of targets for capacity building. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH = REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE 2025; 116:146-155. [PMID: 39461926 PMCID: PMC11870712 DOI: 10.17269/s41997-024-00948-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The behavioural sciences provide useful evidence to design effective health promotion interventions, but evidence is infrequently integrated in practice. This study examined associations between theoretical domains framework (TDF) constructs and public health practitioners' use of behavioural science evidence to plan public health actions. METHODS Using a cross-sectional design, a convenience sample of 160 practitioners were recruited from public health agencies across Canada. Respondents completed an online questionnaire assessing TDF constructs and the use of behavioural science theory and approaches (i.e., evidence) in their practice. Logistic regression analyses allowed for identification of factors associated with evidence use and intentions. All analyses were adjusted for sex, years of experience, and type of public health agency. RESULTS Greater skills (ORadj = 4.1, 95%CI 1.3, 13.5) and stronger intentions/aligned goals (ORadj = 9.2, 95%CI 2.3, 36.1) were associated with greater use of behavioural science evidence to plan public health actions. Greater perceived capacity to overcome widespread absence of use of behavioural science evidence in their organization (ORadj = 7.2, 95%CI 1.7, 30.3) was also associated with greater use. More knowledge (ORadj = 8.6, 95%CI 1.9, 39.1) and stronger beliefs about consequences (ORadj = 4.0, 95%CI 1.1, 14.7) were significantly associated with stronger intentions/aligned goals. CONCLUSION Findings show that more knowledge, positive attitudes, and stronger perceived competence are associated with greater likelihood of using behavioural science evidence to plan interventions. The use of behavioural science evidence will also require strengthening the norm pertaining to this professional practice in public health organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Bélanger-Gravel
- Department of Information and Communication, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
- Centre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS-INAF), Québec, Québec, Canada.
- Research Centre of the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Québec, Québec, Canada.
| | - Kim L Lavoie
- Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Montréal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sophie Desroches
- Centre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS-INAF), Québec, Québec, Canada
- School of Nutrition, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Tracie A Barnett
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | - Lise Gauvin
- School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kienast-von Einem C, Panter J, Ogilvie D, Reid A. Exploring residential relocation- differences between newcomers and settled residents in health, travel behaviour and neighbourhood perceptions. Health Place 2024; 87:103254. [PMID: 38701677 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
This study explores whether people who have recently moved to an area differ from longer-term residents in their health, travel behaviour, and perceptions of the environment. Using a large, representative sample from the UKHLS, Newcomers demonstrate significantly lower mental and physical health, reduced car commuting, and a higher likelihood of liking their neighbourhood. Area deprivation, urbanicity, household income, and age emerge as influential moderators with i.e. Newcomers in affluent areas experiencing lower physical health than Settled Residents, and rural Newcomers expressing less neighbourhood satisfaction. Our findings highlight that Newcomers' perceptions of their environment diverge and environmental influences vary among population segments, potentially impacting related health behaviours such as active travel. Furthermore, residential relocation introduces Newcomers with distinct characteristics into areas, affecting the context in which potential population health interventions aiming to influence health behaviours operate. This necessitates a deeper understanding of what influences reactions to the environment as well as ongoing adaptation of environmental interventions to respond to changing contexts within the same location over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Kienast-von Einem
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom; Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, United Kingdom.
| | - Jenna Panter
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - David Ogilvie
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
| | - Alice Reid
- Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Examining family and community nurses' core competencies in continuing education programs offered in primary health care settings: An integrative literature review. Nurse Educ Pract 2023; 67:103561. [PMID: 36738528 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
AIM To identify gaps in existing family and community nurse (FCN) continuing education programs and to investigate whether FCN core competencies are covered in continuing education programs offered in primary health care settings. BACKGROUND In global pandemics such as COVID-19, there is an urgent need for staff development using transformative learning and help registered nurses build up their competencies and form a new professional identity as family and community nurses (FCNs). Therefore, FCN education programs become of high importance to enhance nurses' core competencies through continuing education. METHODS An integrative review of the literature was conducted applying the Whittemore and Knafl methodological strategy for studies published between 2015- June 2021. RESULTS FCN core competencies, including the "decision-making process, navigation as care coordinator and patient advocate and promoting individual and family health to support the quality of nursing care," were poorly covered in the FCN programs. Specifically, e-health played a very limited role in FCN continuing education, while ethics, managing change, managing disparity and diversity and leadership skills, did not emerge at all. CONCLUSION The identified gaps can be incorporated into future FCN continuing education programs and may help improve nurses' competence and health care delivery and support new integrated models of care, namely, person-centered and community-based models.
Collapse
|
4
|
Copeland L, Littlecott HJ, Couturiaux D, Hoddinott P, Segrott J, Murphy S, Moore G, Evans RE. Adapting population health interventions for new contexts: qualitative interviews understanding the experiences, practices and challenges of researchers, funders and journal editors. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066451. [PMID: 36288840 PMCID: PMC9615984 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Research on the adaptation of population health interventions for implementation in new contexts is rapidly expanding. This has been accompanied by a recent increase in the number of frameworks and guidance to support adaptation processes. Nevertheless, there remains limited exploration of the real-world experiences of undertaking intervention adaptation, notably the challenges encountered by different groups of stakeholders, and how these are managed. Understanding experiences is imperative in ensuring that guidance to support adaptation has practical utility. This qualitative study examines researcher and stakeholder experiences of funding, conducting and reporting adaptation research. SETTING Adaptation studies. PARTICIPANTS Participants/cases were purposefully sampled to represent a range of adapted interventions, types of evaluations, expertise and countries. Semistructured interviews were conducted with a sample of researchers (n=23), representatives from research funding panels (n=6), journal editors (n=5) and practitioners (n=3). MEASURES A case study research design was used. Data were analysed using the framework approach. Overarching themes were discussed within the study team, with further iterative refinement of subthemes. RESULTS The results generated four central themes. The first three relate to the experience of intervention adaptation (1) involving stakeholders throughout the adaptation process and how to integrate the evidence base with experience; (2) selecting the intervention and negotiating the mismatch between the original and the new context; and (3) the complexity and uncertainty when deciding the re-evaluation process. The final theme (4) reflects on participants' experiences of using adaptation frameworks in practice, considering recommendations for future guidance development and refinement. CONCLUSION This study highlights the range of complexities and challenges experienced in funding, conducting and reporting research on intervention adaptation. Moving forward, guidance can be helpful in systematising processes, provided that it remains responsive to local contexts and encourage innovative practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Copeland
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Hannah J Littlecott
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health (PSPH), Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU, Munchen, Bayern, Germany
| | - Danielle Couturiaux
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Pat Hoddinott
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professional Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Jeremy Segrott
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Simon Murphy
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Graham Moore
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Rhiannon E Evans
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Durand F, Richard L, Beaudet N, Fortin-Pellerin L, Hudon AM, Tremblay MC. Healthcare professionals' longitudinal perceptions of group phenomena as determinants of self-assessed learning in organizational communities of practice. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:75. [PMID: 35114973 PMCID: PMC8815148 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03137-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the importance of continuous learning as a response to the increasing complexity of health care practice, there is a need to better understand what makes communities of practice in health effective at fostering learning. Despite the conceptual stance that communities of practice facilitate individual learning, the scientific literature does not offer much evidence for this. Known factors associated with the effectiveness of communities of practice - such as collaboration, psychological safety within the community, and commitment to the community - have been studied in cross-sectional qualitative designs. However, no studies to date have used a quantitative predictive design. The objective of this study is to assess how members of a community of practice perceive interactions among themselves and determine the extent to which these interactions predict self-assessed learning over time. METHODS Data was collected using validated questionnaires from six communities of practice (N = 83) in four waves of measures over the course of 36 months and was analysed by means of General Estimating Equations. This allowed to build a longitudinal model of the associations between perceptions of collaboration, psychological safety within the community, commitment to the community and self-assessed learning over time. RESULTS Perception of collaboration in the community of practice, a personal sense of psychological safety and a commitment to the community of practice are predictors longitudinally associated with self-assessed learning. CONCLUSIONS In terms of theory, conceptual links can be made between intensity of collaboration and learning over time in the context of a community of practice. Recent work on psychological safety suggests that it is still unclear whether psychological safety acts as a direct enhancer of learning or as a remover of barriers to learning. This study's longitudinal results suggest that psychological safety may enhance how and to what extent professionals feel they learn over time. Commitment towards the community of practice is a strong predictor of learning over time, which hints at differential effects of affective, normative and continuance commitment. Communities of practice can therefore apply these findings by making collaboration, psychological safety, commitment and learning regular reflexive topics of discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Durand
- Montfort Research Chair in Organization of Health Services, Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, 55 Laurier Avenue East, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5 Canada
| | - Lucie Richard
- Faculté des sciences infirmières, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Nicole Beaudet
- Direction de santé publique de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | | | | | - Marie-Claude Tremblay
- Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d’urgence, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kalver EH, McInnes DK, Yakovchenko V, Hyde J, Petrakis BA, Kim B. The CORE (Consensus on Relevant Elements) Approach to Determining Initial Core Components of an Innovation. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2021; 1:752177. [PMID: 36926486 PMCID: PMC10012682 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2021.752177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Identifying an intervention's core components is indispensable to gauging whether an intervention is implemented with fidelity and/or is modified; it is often a multi-stage process, starting with the first stage of identifying an initial set of core components that are gradually refined. This first stage of identifying initial core components has not been thoroughly examined. Without a clear set of steps to follow, interventions may vary in the rigor and thought applied to identifying their initial core components. We devised the CORE (Consensus on Relevant Elements) approach to synthesize opinions of intervention developers/implementers to identify an intervention's initial core components, particularly applicable to innovative interventions. We applied CORE to a peer-based intervention that aids military veterans with post-incarceration community reintegration. Our CORE application involved four intervention developers/implementers and two moderators to facilitate the seven CORE steps. Our CORE application had two iterations, moving through Steps 1 (individual core component suggestions) through 7 (group discussion for consensus), then repeating Steps 4 (consolidation of component definitions) through 7. This resulted in 18 consensus-reached initial core components of the peer-based intervention, down from the 60 that the developers/implementers individually suggested at Step 1. Removed components were deemed to not threaten the intervention's effectiveness even if absent. CORE contributes to filling a critical gap regarding identifying an intervention's initial core components (so that the identified components can be subsequently refined), by providing concrete steps for synthesizing the knowledge of an intervention's developers/implementers. Future research should examine CORE's utility across various interventions and implementation settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily H Kalver
- Department of Psychology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, United States
| | - D Keith McInnes
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Health Administration, Bedford, MA, United States.,Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Vera Yakovchenko
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Health Administration, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - Justeen Hyde
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Health Administration, Bedford, MA, United States.,Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Beth Ann Petrakis
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Health Administration, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - Bo Kim
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Health Administration, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Richard L, Beaudet N, Chiocchio F, Fortin-Pellerin L. [Organizational learning and health promotion: a Quebec project]. SANTE PUBLIQUE 2019; Vol. 31:357-365. [PMID: 31640323 DOI: 10.3917/spub.193.0357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article focuses on health promotion laboratories, a Quebec professional development program offered by the Public Health Department of the Montréal Region to teams of professionals and managers working in health promotion within local public health organizations. The objective is to examine the process of translating the knowledge gained by participants as a result of the program over the longer term within the organization. METHOD This was a qualitative descriptive study. The work was guided by Nonaka’s Organizational Knowledge Creation Model. Data were collected from participants at several types of discussion and development events held in the three months following the end of the pilot project. A thematic content analysis was performed using a grid derived from Nonaka’s model. RESULTS The analysis revealed the presence of both externalization and internalization in two of the sites, as well as a considerable volume of combinations in the four sites studied. In the latter case, the learnings reused over the longer term were similar to those that had been transferred in the short term (e.g. ideas and methods relating to partnership, planning, etc.). CONCLUSION These results are important, in that they confirm the laboratories’ potential to propagate the learnings throughout the organization, beyond the short-term gains made by participants during the laboratories. These learnings could potentially pave the way for new practices.
Collapse
|
8
|
A five-step approach for developing and implementing a Rural Primary Health Care Model for Dementia: a community-academic partnership. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2019; 20:e29. [PMID: 32799988 PMCID: PMC6536750 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423618000968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim This study is aimed at developing a Rural Primary Health Care (PHC) Model for delivering comprehensive PHC for dementia in rural settings and addressing the gap in knowledge about disseminating and implementing evidence-based dementia care in a rural PHC context. Background Limited access to specialists and services in rural areas leads to increased responsibility for dementia diagnosis and management in PHC, yet a gap exists in evidence-based best practices for rural dementia care. Methods Elements of the Rural PHC Model for Dementia were based on seven principles of effective PHC for dementia identified from published research and organized into three domains: team-based care, decision support, and specialist-to-provider support. Since 2013 the researchers have collaborated with a rural PHC team in a community of 1000 people in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan to operationalize these elements in ways that were feasible in the local context. The five-step approach included: building relationships; conducting a problem analysis/needs assessment; identifying core and adaptable elements of a decision support tool embedded in the model and resolving applicability issues; implementing and adapting the intervention with local stakeholders; and sustaining the model while incrementally scaling up. Results Developing and sustaining relationships at regional and PHC team levels was critical. A comprehensive needs assessment identified challenges related to all domains of the Rural PHC Model. An existing decision support tool for dementia diagnosis and management was adapted and embedded in the team’s electronic medical record. Strategies for operationalizing other model elements included integrating team-based care co-ordination into the decision support tool and family-centered case conferences. Research team specialists provided educational sessions on topics identified by the PHC team. This paper provides an example of a community-based process for adapting evidence-based practice principles to a real-world setting.
Collapse
|