1
|
Shetty Y, Kamat S, Tripathi R, Parmar U, Jhaj R, Banerjee A, Balakrishnan S, Trivedi N, Chauhan J, Chugh PK, Tripathi CD, Badyal DK, Solomon L, Kaushal S, Gupta K, Jayanthi M, Jeevitha G, Chatterjee S, Samanta K, Desai C, Shah S, Medhi B, Joshi R, Prakash A, Gupta P, Roy A, Chandy S, Ranjalkar J, Bright HR, Dikshit H, Mishra H, Roy SS, Kshirsagar N. Evaluation of prescriptions from tertiary care hospitals across India for deviations from treatment guidelines & their potential consequences. Indian J Med Res 2024; 159:130-141. [PMID: 38528817 PMCID: PMC11050754 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2309_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES Irrational prescribing practices have major consequences on patient safety and also increase the economic burden. Real-life examples of impact of irrational prescription have potential to improve prescribing practices. In this context, the present study aimed to capture and evaluate the prevalence of deviations from treatment guidelines in the prescriptions, potential consequence/s of the deviations and corrective actions recommended by clinicians. METHODS It was a cross-sectional observational study conducted in the outpatient departments of tertiary care hospitals in India wherein the 13 Indian Council of Medical Research Rational Use of Medicines Centres are located. Prescriptions not compliant with the standard treatment guidelines and incomplete prescriptions with respect to formulation, dose, duration and frequency were labelled as 'prescriptions having deviations'. A deviation that could result in a drug interaction, lack of response, increased cost, preventable adverse drug reaction (ADR) and/or antimicrobial resistance was labelled as an 'unacceptable deviation'. RESULTS Against all the prescriptions assessed, about one tenth of them (475/4838; 9.8%) had unacceptable deviations. However, in 2667/4838 (55.1%) prescriptions, the clinicians had adhered to the treatment guidelines. Two thousand one hundred and seventy-one prescriptions had deviations, of which 475 (21.9%) had unacceptable deviations with pantoprazole (n=54), rabeprazole+domperidone (n=35) and oral enzyme preparations (n=24) as the most frequently prescribed drugs and upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and hypertension as most common diseases with unacceptable deviations. The potential consequences of deviations were increase in cost (n=301), ADRs (n=254), drug interactions (n=81), lack of therapeutic response (n=77) and antimicrobial resistance (n=72). Major corrective actions proposed for consideration were issuance of an administrative order (n=196) and conducting online training programme (n=108). INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS The overall prevalence of deviations found was 45 per cent of which unacceptable deviations was estimated to be 9.8 per cent. To minimize the deviations, clinicians recommended online training on rational prescribing and administrative directives as potential interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yashashri Shetty
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth GSMC & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sandhya Kamat
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth GSMC & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Raakhi Tripathi
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth GSMC & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Urwashi Parmar
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth GSMC & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ratinder Jhaj
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Aditya Banerjee
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | | | - Niyati Trivedi
- Department of Pharmacology, Medical College, Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India
| | - Janki Chauhan
- RUM Centre, Medical College, Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India
| | - Preeta Kaur Chugh
- Department of Pharmacology, VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - C. D. Tripathi
- Department of Pharamocology, The Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Dinesh Kumar Badyal
- Department of Pharmacology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Lydia Solomon
- Department of Pharmacology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Sandeep Kaushal
- Department of General Medicine, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Kanchan Gupta
- Department of General Medicine, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - M. Jayanthi
- Department of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
| | - G. Jeevitha
- Department of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
| | - Suparna Chatterjee
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Kalyan Samanta
- Department of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Chetna Desai
- Department of Pharmacology, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Samidh Shah
- Department of Pharmacology, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Bikash Medhi
- Department of Pharmacology, Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Rupa Joshi
- Department of Pharmacology, Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Ajay Prakash
- Department of Pharmacology, Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Pooja Gupta
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Atanu Roy
- RUM Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sujith Chandy
- Departments of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Jaya Ranjalkar
- Departments of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Heber Rew Bright
- Departments of Pharmacy, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Harihar Dikshit
- Department of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Science, Patna, Bihar, India
| | - Hitesh Mishra
- Department of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Science, Patna, Bihar, India
| | - Sukalyan Saha Roy
- Department of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Science, Patna, Bihar, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ravinetto R, Henriquez R, Srinivas PN, Bradley H, Coetzee R, Ochoa TJ, Semuto Ngabonziza JC, Mazarati JB, Van Damme W, van de Pas R, Vandaele N, Torreele E. Shaping the future of global access to safe, effective, appropriate and quality health products. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 9:e014425. [PMID: 38195155 PMCID: PMC10807033 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella Ravinetto
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Rodrigo Henriquez
- Maestría de Epidemiología y Salud Colectiva, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Quito, Ecuador
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Hazel Bradley
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Renier Coetzee
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Theresa J Ochoa
- Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Jean Claude Semuto Ngabonziza
- Research, Innovation and Data Science Division, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda
- Department of Clinical Biology, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | | | - Wim Van Damme
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | | | - Nico Vandaele
- Access-To-Medicines Research Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Torreele
- , Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, University College London, London, UK
- Independent Researcher and Advisor, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fulone I, Cadogan C, Barberato-Filho S, Bergamaschi CC, Mazzei LG, Lopes LP, Silva MT, Lopes LC. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of policies regulating drug marketing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 6:CD013780. [PMID: 37288951 PMCID: PMC10250001 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013780.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The costs of developing new treatments and bringing them to the market are substantial. The pharmaceutical industry uses drug promotion to gain a competitive market share, and drive sale volumes and industry profitability. This involves disseminating information about new treatments to relevant targets. However, conflicts of interest can arise when profits are prioritised over patient care and its benefits. Drug promotion regulations are complex interventions that aim to prevent potential harm associated with these activities. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of policies that regulate drug promotion on drug utilisation, coverage or access, healthcare utilisation, patient outcomes, adverse events and costs. SEARCH METHODS We searched Epistemonikos for related reviews and their included studies. To find primary studies we searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, EconLit, Global Index Medicus, Virtual Health Library, INRUD Bibliography, two trial registries and two sources of grey literature. All databases and sources were searched in January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We planned to include studies that assessed policies regulating drug promotion to consumers, healthcare professionals or regulators and third-party payers, or any combination of these groups.In this review we defined policies as laws, rules, guidelines, codes of practice, and financial or administrative orders made by governments, non-government organisations or private insurers. One of the following outcomes had to be reported: drug utilisation, coverage or access, healthcare utilisation, patient health outcomes, any adverse effects (unintended consequences), and costs. The study had to be a randomised or non-randomised trial, an interrupted time series analysis (ITS), a repeated measures (RM) study or a controlled before-after (CBA) study. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently assessed eligibility for inclusion of studies. When consensus was not reached, any disagreements were discussed with a third review author. We planned to use the criteria suggested by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) to assess the risk of bias of included studies. For randomised trials, non-randomised trials, and CBA studies, we planned to estimate relative effects, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). For dichotomous outcomes, we planned to report the risk ratio (RR) when possible and adjusted for baseline differences in the outcome measures. For ITS and RM, we planned to compute changes along two dimensions: change in level and change in slope. We planned to undertake a structured synthesis following EPOC guidance. MAIN RESULTS: The search yielded 4593 citations, and 13 studies were selected for full-text review. No study met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We sought to assess the effects of policies that regulate drug promotion on drug use, coverage or access, use of health services, patient outcomes, adverse events, and costs, however we did not find studies that met the review's inclusion criteria. As pharmaceutical policies that regulate drug promotion have untested effects, their impact, as well as their positive and negative influences, is currently only a matter of opinion, debate, informal or descriptive reporting. There is an urgent need to assess the effects of pharmaceutical policies that regulate drug promotion using well-conducted studies with high methodological rigour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izabela Fulone
- Pharmaceutical Science Graduate Course, University of Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Cathal Cadogan
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | - Luis Phillipe Lopes
- Pharmaceutical Science Graduate Course, University of Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Luciane C Lopes
- Pharmaceutical Science Graduate Course, University of Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gad M, Salem A, Oortwijn W, Hill R, Godman B. Mapping of Current Obstacles for Rationalizing Use of Medicines (CORUM) in Europe: Current Situation and Potential Solutions. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:144. [PMID: 32194401 PMCID: PMC7063972 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction There are increasing concerns regarding the inappropriate use of medicines with expenditure continuing to grow driven by increasing sales in oncology and orphan diseases, enhanced by their emotive nature. As a result, even high income countries are struggling to fund new premium priced medicines. These concerns have resulted in initiatives to better manage the entry of new medicines and enhance the rational use of medicines (RUM). However, there is a need to ascertain the current situation. We sought to address this by developing the Current Obstacles for Rationalizing Use of Medicines in Europe (CORUM) mapping tool to qualitatively investigate the current situation and provide analysis of current views on RUM and interventions among key European payers and their advisers. The findings will be used to provide future guidance. Methodology Descriptive study exploring and identifying perceived gaps to achieving optimal RUM. The CORUM tool was based on the WHO 12 key interventions to promote RUM. Results 62 participants took part with most respondents believing their country could improve RUM capacity. This included educational initiatives on the use of clinical guidelines (90%) and the inclusion of problem-based pharmacotherapy in undergraduate curricula and for Continued Professional Development. Key challenges included a lack of regular updates of guidelines, exacerbated by limited funding and a lack of follow-up to monitor adherence to agreed guidelines. RUM could also be enhanced by the development of regional formularies as well as implementing Drug and Therapeutic Committees where these are currently limited. There also needs to be greater co-ordination between RUM and Health Technology Assessment activities, with countries learning from each other. Conclusion There is an urgent need to improve RUM through improved educational and other activities among European countries, with countries learning from each other. This will involve addressing current challenges and we will be following this up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Gad
- Global Health and Development Group, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed Salem
- Real World Evidence Solutions, IQVIA, Zaventem, Belgium
| | - Wija Oortwijn
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ruaraidh Hill
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Brian Godman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.,Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.,Health Economics Centre, University of Liverpool Management School, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Garankuwa, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Holloway KA, Ivanovska V, Manikandan S, Jayanthi M, Mohan A, Forte G, Henry D. Identifying the most effective essential medicines policies for quality use of medicines: A replicability study using three World Health Organisation data-sets. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0228201. [PMID: 32027679 PMCID: PMC7004360 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Poor quality use of medicines (QUM) has adverse outcomes. Governments’ implementation of essential medicines (EM) policies is often suboptimal and there is limited information on which policies are most effective. Methods We analysed data on policy implementation from World Health Organisation (WHO) surveys in 2007 and 2011, and QUM data from surveys during 2006–2012 in developing and transitional countries. We compared QUM scores in countries that did or did not implement specific policies and regressed QUM composite scores on the numbers of policies implemented. We compared the ranking of policies in this and two previous studies, one from the same WHO databases (2003–2007) the other from data obtained during country visits in South-East Asia (2010–2015). The rankings of a common set of 17 policies were correlated and we identified those that were consistently highly ranked. Findings Fifty-three countries had data on both QUM and policy implementation. Forty policies were associated with effect sizes ranging from +13% to -5%. There was positive correlation between the composite QUM indicator and the number of policies reported implemented: (r) = 0.437 (95% CI 0.188 to 0.632). Comparison of policy rankings between the present and previous studies showed positive correlation with the WHO 2003–7 study: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient 0.498 (95% CI 0.022 to 0.789). Across the three studies, five policies were in the top five ranked positions 11 out of a possible 15 times: drugs available free at the point of care; a government QUM unit; undergraduate training of prescribers in standard treatment guidelines, antibiotics not available without prescription and generic substitution in the public sector. Interpretation Certain EM policies are associated with better QUM and impact increases with co-implementation. Analysis across three datasets provides a policy short-list as a minimum investment by countries trying to improve QUM and reduce antimicrobial drug misuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Anne Holloway
- Health and Nutrition, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, England, United Kingdom of Great Britain
- * E-mail:
| | - Verica Ivanovska
- Essential Medicines and Health Products, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Solaiappan Manikandan
- Department of Pharmacology, Jawarhalal Nehru Institute of Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Mathaiyan Jayanthi
- Department of Pharmacology, Jawarhalal Nehru Institute of Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Anbarasan Mohan
- Department of Pharmacology, Government Theni Medical College, Theni, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Gilles Forte
- Essential Medicines and Health Products, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - David Henry
- Institute for Evidence-based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kingori P, Peeters Grietens K, Abimbola S, Ravinetto R. Poor-quality medical products: social and ethical issues in accessing 'quality' in global health. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4:e002151. [PMID: 31803513 PMCID: PMC6882547 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Kingori
- Ethox Centre, Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Oxford, UK
| | - Koen Peeters Grietens
- Public Health Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.,School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Seye Abimbola
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,BMJ Global Health, London, UK
| | - Raffaella Ravinetto
- Public Health Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bloom G, Katsuma Y, Rao KD, Makimoto S, Yin JDC, Leung GM. Next steps towards universal health coverage call for global leadership. BMJ 2019; 365:l2107. [PMID: 31126926 PMCID: PMC6533546 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l2107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Gerald Bloom and colleagues argue that the G20 is uniquely placed to facilitate crucial actions to accelerate progress towards universal health coverage
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yasushi Katsuma
- Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
- Institute for Global Health Policy Research, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Krishna D Rao
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|