Implementing pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a realist evaluation of different delivery models

Effect of midwife-led pelvic floor muscle training on prolapse symptoms and quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse in Ethiopia: A Cluster-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition that can significantly impact a woman's quality of life. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is recommended as a first-line conservative treatment for prolapse, but evidence on its effectiveness from low-resource settings is limited. This study aimed to assess the effect of midwife-led PFMT on prolapse symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among women with mild-to-moderate POP in Ethiopia.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A community-based, parallel-groups, two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in Dale and Wonsho districts of Sidama Region, Ethiopia. Women with symptomatic POP stages I-III were randomized by cluster to receive either midwife-led PFMT plus lifestyle counseling (intervention group) or lifestyle counseling alone (control group). The participants and counselors knew what the women were receiving, but they were not aware of the other group. The outcome assessors, who collected data at the end of intervention, were blinded to the participants' treatment allocation. The primary outcomes were changes in prolapse symptom score (POP-SS) and prolapse quality of life (P-QoL). Mixed-effects generalized linear model was used to determine the effect of PFMT on prolapse symptoms and P-QoL at 99% confidence level. Adjusted β coefficients were used as effect measures. The level of significance was adjusted for multiple comparisons. A total of 187 women were randomized to intervention (n = 86) from four clusters and control (n = 101) arms from another four clusters. At sixth months, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements both in prolapse symptoms and P-QoL. The mean change difference in POP-SS was -4.11 (99% CI [-5.38, -2.83]; p <  0.001). Similarly, the mean change difference was: -8.86 (99% CI [-13.84, -3.89]; p < 0.001) in physical domain of P-QoL; -11.18 (99% CI [-15.03, -7.32]; p < 0.001) in psychological domain of P-QoL, and -9.01 (99% CI [-10.49, -5.54]; p < 0.001) in personal relationship domain of P-QoL. A significantly higher proportion (83.72%) of women in the intervention group perceived their condition as "better" after the intervention as compared to 41.58% in the control group. Women with earlier stages of prolapse (stages I and II) experienced higher benefits compared to those in stage III.

CONCLUSIONS

A midwife-led PFMT combined with lifestyle counseling significantly improves prolapse symptoms and quality of life in mild-to-moderate POP. This strategy can be integrated into the existing maternal and reproductive health programs to address POP in low-income settings where access to trained specialist is limited.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za) database, with the registration number PACTR202302505126575 (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=24311).

Exploring nulliparous women's perceptions of pelvic organ prolapse treatments: A qualitative study for enhancing nursing care in Romania

Background

There remains a significant gap in understanding what nulliparous (NP) women desire in terms of treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) before pregnancy and childbirth.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the perceptions of young NP women without POP regarding various POP treatments and identify their preferred treatment options to enhance quality in nursing practice.

Methods

This study employed a qualitative descriptive design involving thirteen young NP women at the Faculty of Medicine, Ovidius University from Constanța, Romania. Age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, previous surgical interventions, and smoking status were evaluated. Participants underwent a semi-structured interview from January to February 2024, during which their perceptions of different POP treatments were explored. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and were analyzed using content analysis.

Results

The mean age of the NP women without POP was 24.23 years, with 61.53% having a BMI of 30 or greater and 69.23% reporting previous surgical interventions. Four dominant themes emerged: 1) the Internet as a source of information about treatments for POP; 2) insufficient knowledge about POP symptoms; 3) the preference for supervised PFM training; and 4) choosing the surgical treatments by vaginal route, although wishing to preserve the uterus.

Conclusion

The findings indicated that young NP women's perceptions of POP treatments were primarily influenced by online information. The preferred treatment for POP among young NP women was conservative, with a strong emphasis on supervised PFM training. This study provides valuable insights into nursing practice by highlighting NP women's perceptions and preferences for PFM training as a treatment for POP, potentially contributing to delaying the onset of this condition in their lives.

Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in older adults: a best practice implementation project

OBJECTIVES

This project aimed to implement best practices for pelvic floor muscle training to manage urinary incontinence among older women in long-term care in Kerala, India.

INTRODUCTION

Urinary incontinence is a prevalent and distressing condition that affects a significant proportion of older adults and is characterized by involuntary loss of urine, leading to social embarrassment, decreased quality of life, and increased health care costs. It is more prevalent in women and is associated with dementia, limited mobility, and other comorbidities in long-term care. Pelvic floor muscle training is a first-line treatment option for urinary incontinence in older adults, given its potential to improve quality of life and reduce health care costs.

METHODS

This project was based on the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. A baseline audit was conducted to evaluate current practice against best practices. After identifying barriers and implementing strategies, follow-up audits were conducted after 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

The baseline audit showed 0% compliance with all best practices. Barriers such as lack of knowledge and practice of pelvic floor exercises for urinary incontinence among participants and nurses; unknown cognitive status; and health emergencies were identified. Strategies including video-assisted training of pelvic floor muscle exercises, training calendars, and flip charts with instructions. The follow-up audits showed significant improvements in compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

This project reduced urinary incontinence in the participants. Although two of the audit criteria did not reach 100% compliance by the end of 6 months, the stakeholders of the long-term care facility understood the importance of pelvic floor muscle training, which will be beneficial for future residents with urinary incontinence.

SPANISH ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A211.

The relationship between symptom severity, bother and psychological factors in women with pelvic organ prolapse: A cross-sectional observational study

AIM

The primary aim is to explore the relationship between symptom severity and prolapse bother in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The secondary aim is to determine the association between psychological variables and prolapse bother.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted via online surveys assessing POP bother (visual analog scale for bother), POP symptom severity (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms), and psychological measures of depression and anxiety (Kessler psychological distress scale [K-10]), catastrophizing (modified pain catastrophizing scale [mPCS]), and self-efficacy (modified pain self-efficacy questionnaire [mPSEQ]) in women with self-reported POP. Symptom severity, bother and psychological variables were analyzed using linear regression.

RESULTS

Seventy-six women with a mean (SD) age of 42.8 (14.57) years were included in analysis. A moderate to strong positive linear relationship (R²  = 0.449, p < 0.001) was found between symptom severity and POP bother. Prolapse bother and psychological variables were moderately correlated, where increased K-10 scores (R²  = 0.230, p = 0.001), higher mPCS scores (R²  = 0.460, p < 0.001), and lower mPSEQ scores (R²  = 0.460, p < 0.001) were associated with increased POP bother. Moderate and severe catastrophizing was associated with significantly higher POP bother, with mean POP bother scores of 7.861 ± 0.45 (p < 0.001) and 8.652 ± 0.45 (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A moderate positive relationship between POP bother and symptom severity was found, with greater psychological distress and lower self-efficacy associated with increasing POP bother. Women presenting with POP should be screened for psychological factors to guide management.

Pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: the PROPEL realist evaluation

Background

Pelvic organ prolapse is estimated to affect 41–50% of women aged > 40 years. A multicentre randomised controlled trial of individualised pelvic floor muscle training found that pelvic floor muscle training was effective in reducing symptoms of prolapse, improved quality of life and showed clear potential to be cost-effective. Provision of pelvic floor muscle training for prolapse has continued to vary across the UK, with limited availability of specialist physiotherapists to deliver it.

Objectives

This project aimed to study the implementation and outcomes of different models of delivery to increase the service provision of pelvic floor muscle training, and to follow up treatment outcomes for the original trial participants.

Design

A realist evaluation of pelvic floor muscle training implementation conducted within three full case study sites and two partial case study sites; an observational prospective cohort study comparing patient-reported outcomes pre and post intervention in all five sites; and a long-term follow-up study linking previous trial participants to routine NHS hospital data.

Setting

The setting for the realist evaluation was pelvic floor muscle training service delivery models in three NHS sites. The setting for the patient-reported outcome measures study was pelvic floor muscle training services in five NHS sites.

Methods

Realist evaluation qualitative data were collected at four time points in three case study sites to understand the implementation models, uptake, adherence and impact. Interviews involved service managers/leads, consultants, staff delivering pelvic floor muscle training and women receiving pelvic floor muscle training.

Main outcomes measures

Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months across five sites, including the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score, health-related quality of life (measured using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, questionnaire), prolapse severity (measured using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System), urinary incontinence (measured using International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire – Urinary Incontinence Short Form) and need for further treatment.

Results

A total of 102 women were recruited to the patient-reported outcome measures cohort study (target, n = 120), and 65 women had matched baseline and 6-month Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Scores. The mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score was 10.18 (standard deviation 5.63) at baseline and 6.98 (standard deviation 5.23) at 6 months, representing a statistically significant and clinically meaningful difference. There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes obtained from delivery by specialist physiotherapists and the outcomes obtained from delivery by other health-care professionals (mean change in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score: –3.95 vs. –2.81, respectively). Services delivered using higher-band physiotherapists only were more costly than services delivered using other staff mixes. The effect of the original pelvic floor muscle training intervention, over a post-intervention period of > 10 years, was a reduction in the odds of any treatment during follow-up (odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.99). The realist evaluation revealed stark differences in implementation. The site with a specialist physiotherapy service resisted change because of perceived threats to the specialist role and concerns about care quality. Pelvic floor muscle training delivery by other health-care staff was easier when there was a lack of any existing specialist service; staff had prior training and interest in pelvic health; staff had support, autonomy, time and resources to deliver pelvic floor muscle training as part of their core role; and surrounding services supported a flow of pelvic floor muscle training referrals.

Limitations

The number of available matched pre and post outcomes for women and the lack of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System examinations were limitations of this study.

Conclusions

It is possible to train different staff to effectively deliver pelvic floor muscle training to women. Women’s self-reported outcomes significantly improved across all service models. Training should be adequately tailored to differential skill mix needs.

Future work

Future work should include further implementation of pelvic floor muscle training and should include pre- and post-outcome data collection using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score.

Study registration

This study is registered as Research Registry 4919.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 47. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.