Provider perspectives on emergency department initiation of medication assisted treatment for alcohol use disorder

Evaluation of Barriers and Interventions for Emergency Department-Initiated Naltrexone for the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder

BACKGROUND

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) impacts 100 million people globally and frequently leads to emergency department (ED) visits. Although recent studies have shown that starting naltrexone in the ED can effectively reduce drinking behaviors, it remains underutilized.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to identify the barriers clinicians and patients encounter when considering the initiation of naltrexone in the ED, and the interventions that could promote its prescription.

METHODS

Using contextual inquiry, we observed ED operations and conducted open-ended interviews with clinicians, hospital staff, and patients in November 2023 to understand impediments to starting medications for AUD. In March 2024, a mixed-method survey was sent to 160 staff members within the University of Pennsylvania Health System, achieving a 61% response rate. This survey assessed comfort levels with various aspects of AUD treatment and the impact of potential interventions using a 10-point scale.

RESULTS

Findings revealed significant barriers, including the absence of an AUD screening protocol, limited awareness about treatment options among clinicians, and a tendency to defer nonemergent treatments. Patients reported discomfort in ED settings, a lack of familiarity with treatment options, and challenges in accessing follow-up care. Clinicians felt least comfortable prescribing naltrexone and addressing related inquiries. Effective interventions identified included establishing a naltrexone order set for discharging patients and employing substance use navigators to facilitate continuing care.

CONCLUSION

The study finds that the under-treatment of AUD in the ED is a multifaceted issue that underscores the need to provide educational interventions to both patients and clinicians. Additionally, the results emphasize the need to simplify and streamline the process both clinicians and patients.

Physician Follow-Up of Pediatric and Young Adult Emergency Department Visits for Substance Use in Ontario, Canada

PURPOSE

To study the proportion and predictors of outpatient physician follow-up within 60 days of substance-related emergency department (ED) visits for Ontario youth.

METHODS

We examined administrative data on substance-related ED visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among youths aged 10-24 years in Ontario, Canada. Substance-related visits were identified using International Classification of Diseases-10-CA codes. We described demographic characteristics, receipt of mental health services in the year before the ED visit, disposition from the ED, and follow-up services within 60 days of the ED visit.

RESULTS

Between April 1, 2017, and May 31, 2021, 64,236 youth had at least one ED visit for substance use. Visits for alcohol were the most common (49%), followed by cannabis (32.3%). ED visits for all substances were more prevalent during the pandemic than prepandemic, except visits for alcohol. The receipt of follow-up physician care for substance use was low (33.2% prepandemic) but increased during the pandemic (41.7%; adjusted odds ratio 1.34, 95% CI 1.28, 1.39) and varied between substances. Mental health service history in the year before the substance-related ED visit had the strongest association with receipt of follow-up physician care within 60 days (adjusted odds ratio 6.86, 95% CI 6.57, 7.17).

DISCUSSION

Youth frequently do not receive physician follow-ups within two months of the substance-related ED visit, although higher follow-up proportions were seen during the pandemic after the implementation of virtual care. Further research is required to understand why follow-up is low and to examine interventions that can increase connection to care.

Diagnosing Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder

With the lack of distinctive features or diagnostic biomarkers, peripheral neuropathy in patients with excessive alcohol consumption is often misdiagnosed as alcohol-related neuropathy, influenced by underlying implicit and explicit bias against patients with an alcohol use disorder (AUD). Alcohol-related nerve toxicity has been attributed to various underlying mechanisms including altered trophic factor signaling, disrupted protein synthesis, free radical injury from oxidative stress, and nutritional deficiencies. Alcohol-related neuropathy has been most described as mild but painful, predominantly affecting small sensory fibers, without major functional limitations. This phenotype may be indistinguishable from a chronic idiopathic axonal neuropathy; hence, a causal relationship with AUD cannot be established with certainty. Searching for alternative causes is warranted, especially in patients with a more severe or rapidly progressive peripheral neuropathy. At the same time, there is underlying implicit and explicit bias in the medical field against patients with AUDs. Patients often experience devaluation and stigma, which can affect their adherence to medical advice and may lead to social reclusion. Addressing biases in health care workers is crucial to ensure that individuals receive proper care and are not subjected to stigmatization. In this article, we present a comprehensive narrative review of the literature on the clinical presentation and underlying pathomechanisms of alcohol-related peripheral neuropathy, raising awareness of the bias in the medical field against patients with AUD.

Implementation and analysis of a multifaceted intervention for alcohol use disorder from a single academic urban emergency department

BACKGROUND

From 2006 to 2014, alcohol-related visits to the emergency department (ED) increased by 76% in the United States, highlighting the need for improved ED-driven interventions addressing alcohol use disorder (AUD). Naltrexone is an FDA-approved medication for AUD shown to decrease craving and self-administration of alcohol. While oral naltrexone and extended-release naltrexone have been long utilized in primary care and inpatient hospital settings, the use of naltrexone in the ED is limited.

METHODS

This study implemented and analyzed a multifaceted intervention regarding ED naltrexone prescribing at a large safety net, academic, urban hospital. A baseline assessment of preintervention conditions and perspectives on naltrexone prescribing was conducted through a chart review and standardized interviews with ED providers, respectively. The interview results guided design of interventions that addressed identified barriers. These included provider education, prescribing aids, and zero-cost naltrexone tablets supplied by the ED pharmacy to patients upon discharge.

RESULTS

Between September 1, 2019, and August 31, 2020, of 753 unique patients who had a primary diagnosis or chief complaint containing the word "alcohol," only five (0.66%) were prescribed naltrexone. ED providers identified lack of training regarding naltrexone, lack of a prescribing protocol, and limited patient and provider education materials as barriers to prescribing naltrexone. Following the intervention, among 278 eligible patients, 11 oral naltrexone prescriptions were written (3.96%) between April 13, 2021, and August 1, 2021. This represents a sixfold increase over the preintervention period.

CONCLUSIONS

An intervention to increase ED oral naltrexone prescriptions for AUD was successfully implemented, addressing lack of provider education, lack of prescribing resources, and patient barriers to accessing prescribed medications. Longer-term follow-up is needed to assess the efficacy and sustainability of these interventions. Nevertheless, ED clinicians are well positioned to initiate naltrexone prescriptions for patients presenting with AUD.

Patient perspectives on emergency department initiation of medication for alcohol use disorder

OBJECTIVE

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a leading cause of preventable death and is a frequent diagnosis in the emergency department (ED). Treatment in the ED, however, typically focuses on managing the sequelae of AUD, such as acute withdrawal, rather than addressing the underlying addiction. For many patients, these ED encounters are a missed opportunity to connect with medication for AUD. In 2020, our ED created a pathway to offer patients with AUD treatment with naltrexone (NTX) during their ED visit. The aim of this study was to identify what barriers and facilitators patients perceive to NTX initiation in the ED.

METHODS

Adopting the theoretical framework of the behavior change wheel (BCW), we conducted qualitative interviews with patients to elicit their perspectives on ED initiation of NTX. Interviews were coded and analyzed using both inductive and deductive approaches. Themes were categorized according to patients' capabilities, opportunities, and motivations. Barriers were then mapped through the BCW to design interventions that will improve our treatment pathway.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with AUD were interviewed. Facilitators of accepting NTX included having recently experienced sequelae of AUD, rapid management of withdrawal symptoms by the ED provider, having a choice between intramuscular and oral formulations of the medication, and experiencing positive interactions in the ED that destigmatized the patient's AUD. Barriers to accepting treatment included lack of provider knowledge about NTX, dependence on alcohol as self-treatment for psychiatric trauma and physical pain, perceived discriminatory treatment and stigma about AUD, aversion to potential side effects, and lack of access to continued treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of treatment of AUD with NTX in the ED is acceptable to patients and can be facilitated by knowledgeable ED providers who create a destigmatizing environment, effectively manage withdrawal symptoms, and connect patients to providers who will continue treatment.

SAEM GRACE: Anti-craving medications for alcohol use disorder treatment in the emergency department: A systematic review of direct evidence

OBJECTIVES

Alcohol-related concerns commonly present to the emergency department (ED), with a subset of individuals experiencing the symptoms of an alcohol use disorder (AUD). As such, examining the efficacy of pharmacological anti-craving treatment for AUD in the ED is of increasing interest. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the direct evidence assessing the efficacy of providing anti-craving medications for AUD treatment in the ED.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted according to the patient-intervention-control-outcome question: (P) adults (≥18 years old) presenting to the ED with an AUD (including suspected AUD); (I) anti-craving medications (i.e., naltrexone, acamprosate, gabapentin); (C) no prescription or placebo; (O) reduction of repeat ED visits, engagement in addiction services, reductions in heavy drinking days, reductions in any drinking and amount consumed (or abstinence), and in relapse. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and conducted risk of bias assessments for included studies.

RESULTS

From 143 potentially relevant articles, 6 met inclusion criteria: 3 clinical trials, and 3 case studies. The clinical trials identified evaluated oral versus extended-release naltrexone, monthly extended-release naltrexone injections, and disulfiram. Both oral and extended-release naltrexone resulted in decreased alcohol consumption. Monthly extended-release naltrexone injections resulted in significant improvements in drinking and quality of life. Although out of scope, the disulfiram studies identified did not result in an improvement in drinking in comparison to no medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there are few studies directly examining the efficacy of anti-craving medications for AUD in the ED, although the limited evidence that exists is supportive of naltrexone pharmacotherapy, particularly extended-release injection formulation. Additional randomized controlled trials are necessary for substantive direct evidence on anti-craving medication initiation in the ED.

A Roadmap for Modifying Clinician Behavior to Improve the Detection of Cognitive Impairment

A staggering number of individuals live with cognitive decline. Primary care providers are ideally situated to detect the first signs of cognitive decline, but many persons remain undiagnosed. This limits their access to appropriate care. Unfortunately, the timely diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia in primary care is difficult to achieve. There is a great need for interventions to address this problem. This article applies an implementation science framework, the Behavioral Change Wheel, to evaluate the factors that influence detection of cognitive impairment in primary care and proposes candidate interventions for future study.