A named GP increases self-reported access to health care services

Enabling patient-physician continuity in Swedish primary care: the importance of a named GP. A registry-based observational study

BACKGROUND

Continuity of care is important for patients with chronic conditions. Assigning patients to a named GP may increase continuity.

AIM

To examine whether patients who were registered with a named GP at the onset of their first chronic disease had higher continuity of care at subsequent visits than patients who were only registered at a practice.

DESIGN & SETTING

Registry-based observational study in Skåne County, Sweden. The study population included 66 063 patients registered at the same practice at least 1 year before the onset of their first chronic condition between 2009 and 2015.

METHOD

We compared patients registered with a named GP with patients only registered at a practice over a 4-year follow-up period. The primary outcome was the usual provider of care (UPC) index for all visits and for visits related to the chronic disease. Secondary outcomes were the number of GP, nurse, and out-of-hours visits; emergency department visits; hospital admissions; and mortality. We used linear regression models, adjusted for patient characteristics (using entropy balancing weights) and for practice-level fixed effects, to compare the UPC between those registered with a named GP and those who were not.

RESULTS

Patients with a named GP at onset of their condition had a UPC that was 3-4 percentage points higher than patients who did not have a named GP, but the difference decreased and was not statistically significant after adjusting for patient and practice characteristics. Patients with a named GP made more visits, although not specifically for the chronic condition. There were no statistically significant differences for the other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patient registration with a GP at diagnosis of their first chronic condition does not demonstrate higher continuity of care at subsequent GP visits and is not linked to other relevant outcomes for patients.

Documentation of comorbidities, lifestyle factors, and asthma management during primary care scheduled asthma contacts

Systematically assessing asthma during follow-up contacts is important to accomplish comprehensive treatment. No previous long-term studies exist on how comorbidities, lifestyle factors, and asthma management details are documented in scheduled asthma contacts in primary health care (PHC). We showed comorbidities and lifestyle factors were poorly documented in PHC in this real-life, 12-year, follow-up study. Documented information on rhinitis was found in 8.9% and BMI, overweight, or obesity in ≤1.5% of the 542 scheduled asthma contacts. Of the 145 patients with scheduled asthma contacts, 6.9% had undergone revision of their inhalation technique; 16.6% had documentation of their asthma action plan. Screening of respiratory symptoms was recorded in 79% but nasal symptoms in only 15.5% of contacts. Lifestyle guidance interventions were found in <1% of contacts. These results, based on documented patient data, indicate a need exists to further improve the assessment and guidance of asthma patients in PHC.

A named General Practitioner (GP) is associated with an increase of hospital days in a single predictor analysis: a follow-up of 15 years

BACKGROUND

Continuity of care constitutes the basis of primary health care services and is associated with decreased hospitalization. In Finland, accessibility to primary care and increased use of hospital services are recognized challenges for the health care system.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to determine whether having a named GP is associated with hospital service use.

METHODS

The data are part of the Health and Social Support study (HeSSup) based on a random Finnish working-age population sample. The cohort of the study comprised participants of postal surveys in 1998 (n = 25,898) who returned follow-up questionnaires both in 2003 and 2012 (n = 11,924). Background characteristics were inquired in the questionnaires, and hospitalization was derived from national registries (Hilmo-register).

RESULTS

A named GP was reported both in 2003 and 2012 only by 34.3% of the participants. The association between hospital days and a named GP was linearly rising and statistically significant in a single predictor model. The strongest associations with hospital use were with health-related factors, and the association with a named GP was no longer significant in multinomial analysis.

CONCLUSION

A named GP is associated with an increased use of hospital days, but in a multinomial analysis the association disappeared. Health related factors showed the strongest association with hospital days. From the perspective of the on-going Finnish health and social services reform, continuity of care should be emphasized.