1
|
Odebunmi OO, Wangen M, Waters AR, Ferrari RM, Marciniak MW, Rohweder C, Wheeler SB, Brenner AT, Shah PD. Colorectal cancer screening knowledge among community pharmacists: A national survey. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2025; 65:102130. [PMID: 38796158 PMCID: PMC11584338 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.102130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can reduce CRC morbidity and mortality. Community pharmacies could be a viable option for delivering home-based CRC screening tests such as fecal immunochemical tests (FITs). However, little is known about community pharmacists' knowledge about CRC screening guidelines. OBJECTIVE We assessed community pharmacists' knowledge about CRC screening to identify education and training needs for a pharmacy-based CRC screening program. METHODS Between September 2022 and January 2023, we conducted an online national survey of community pharmacists practicing in the United States. Responders were eligible if they were currently-licensed community pharmacists and currently practiced in the United States. The survey assessed knowledge of national CRC screening guidelines, including recommended starting age, frequency of screening, different screening modalities, and follow-up care. Using multiple linear regression, we evaluated correlates of community pharmacists' level of CRC screening knowledge, defined as the total number of knowledge questions answered correctly from "0" (no questions correct) to "5" (all questions correct). RESULTS A total of 578 eligible community pharmacists completed the survey, with a response rate of 59%. Most community pharmacists correctly answered the question about the next steps following a positive FIT (87%) and the question about where a FIT can be done (84%). A minority of community pharmacists responded correctly to questions about the age to start screening with FIT (34%) and how often a FIT should be repeated (28%). Only 5% of pharmacists answered all knowledge questions correctly. Community pharmacists answered more CRC screening knowledge questions correctly as their years in practice increased. Board-certified community pharmacists answered more CRC screening knowledge questions correctly compared to those who were not board-certified. CONCLUSION To ensure the successful implementation of a pharmacy-based CRC screening program, community pharmacists need to be educated about CRC screening and trained to ensure comprehensive patient counseling and preventive service delivery.
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah PD, Wangen M, Rohweder CL, Waters AR, Odebunmi OO, Marciniak MW, Ferrari RM, Wheeler SB, Brenner AT. Patient Willingness to Use a Pharmacy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Service: A National Survey of U.S. Adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:63-71. [PMID: 37909917 PMCID: PMC10842686 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to understand U.S. adults' willingness to use a pharmacy-based fecal immunochemical test (FIT) distribution service for routine colorectal cancer screening called PharmFIT using Diffusion of Innovation Theory, evaluating patient's appraisals of the program's relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity. METHODS From March to April 2021, we conducted a national online survey of 1,045 U.S. adults ages 45 to 75. We identified correlates of patient willingness to use PharmFIT using structural equation modeling. RESULTS Most respondents (72%) were willing to get a FIT from their pharmacy for their regular colorectal cancer screening. Respondents were more willing to participate in PharmFIT if they perceived higher relative advantage ($\hat{\beta}$= 0.184; confidence interval, CI95%: 0.055-0.325) and perceived higher compatibility ($\hat{\beta}$ = 0.422; CI95%: 0.253-0.599) to get screened in a pharmacy, had longer travel times to their primary health care provider ($\hat{\beta}$ = 0.007; CI95%: 0.004-0.010). Respondents were less willing to participate in PharmFIT if they were 65 years or older ($\hat{\beta}$ = -0.220; CI95%: -0.362 to -0.070). CONCLUSIONS Most U.S. adults would be willing to participate in PharmFIT for their routine colorectal cancer screening. Patient perceptions of the relative advantage and compatibility of PharmFIT were strongly associated with their willingness to use PharmFIT. Pharmacies should account for patient preferences for these two traits of PharmFIT to increase adoption and use. IMPACT Pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening may be a viable public health strategy to significantly increase equitable access to screening for U.S. residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parth D. Shah
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Mary Wangen
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Catherine L. Rohweder
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Austin R. Waters
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
| | - Olufeyisayo O. Odebunmi
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
| | - Macary W. Marciniak
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Renée M. Ferrari
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
| | - Alison T. Brenner
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Waters AR, Meehan K, Atkins DL, Ittes AH, Ferrari RM, Rohweder CL, Wangen M, Ceballos RM, Issaka RB, Reuland DS, Wheeler SB, Brenner AT, Shah PD. How pharmacists would design and implement a community pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program. PREVENTIVE ONCOLOGY & EPIDEMIOLOGY 2024; 2:10.1080/28322134.2024.2332264. [PMID: 38881823 PMCID: PMC11177275 DOI: 10.1080/28322134.2024.2332264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Background Distributing CRC screening through pharmacies, a highly accessible health service, may create opportunities for more equitable access to CRC screening. However, providing CRC screening in a new context introduces a substantial implementation challenge. Methods We conducted 23 semi-structured interviews with community pharmacists practicing in Washington state and North Carolina about distributing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to patients in the pharmacy. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide analysis. Results Pharmacists believed that delivering FITs was highly compatible with their environment, workflow, and scope of practice. While knowledge about FIT eligibility criteria varied, pharmacists felt comfortable screening patients. They identified standardized eligibility criteria, patient-facing educational materials, and continuing education as essential design features. Pharmacists proposed adapting existing pharmacy electronic health record systems for patient reminders/prompts to facilitate FIT completion. While pharmacists felt confident that they could discuss test results with patients, they also expressed a need for stronger communication and care coordination with primary care providers. Discussion When designing a pharmacy-based CRC screening program, pharmacists desired programmatic procedures to fit their current knowledge and context. Findings indicate that if proper attention is given to multi-level factors, FIT delivery can be extended to pharmacies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin R Waters
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
| | - Katherine Meehan
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Dana L Atkins
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Annika H Ittes
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109
| | - Renée M Ferrari
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
| | - Catherine L Rohweder
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Mary Wangen
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Rachel M Ceballos
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Rachel B Issaka
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine. Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Daniel S Reuland
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
| | - Alison T Brenner
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27510, USA
| | - Parth D Shah
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| |
Collapse
|