1
|
Kulkarni AJ, Thiagarajan AB, Skolarus TA, Krein SL, Ellimoottil C. Attitudes and barriers toward video visits in surgical care: Insights from a nationwide survey among surgeons. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00198-3. [PMID: 38734503 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons rapidly adopted video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, video visit use among surgeons has significantly declined, pointing to the need to better understand current attitudes and barriers to their use in surgical care. METHODS From August 2022 to March 2023, a nationwide survey was conducted among practicing surgeons in 6 specialties. The survey included multiple-choice and free-response questions based on an implementation determinants framework, covering demographics, provider, patient, and organizational factors. RESULTS A total of 170 surgeons responded (24% response rate). Overall, 67% of surgeons said their practice lacked motivation for video visit implementation. Additionally, 69% disagreed with using video visits as the sole means for preoperative surgical consultation, even with relevant medical history, labs, and imaging. Nearly 43% cited the need for a physical examination, whereas 58% of surgeons said video visits carried a greater malpractice risk than in-person visits. Other barriers included technological limitations, billing, and care quality concerns. Nevertheless, 41% agreed that video visits could improve outcomes for some patients, and 60% expressed openness to using video visits exclusively for postoperative consultations in uncomplicated surgeries. CONCLUSION Surgeons recognize the potential benefits of video visits for certain patients. However, perceived barriers include the need for a physical examination, technological limitations, care quality concerns, and malpractice risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin J Kulkarni
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Anagha B Thiagarajan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCSF, San Francisco, CA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ted A Skolarus
- Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Sarah L Krein
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Healthcare System, MI
| | - Chad Ellimoottil
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI. https://twitter.com/chadellimoottil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peng W, Huang Q, Mao B. Evaluating variations in the barriers to colorectal cancer screening associated with telehealth use in rural U.S. Pacific Northwest. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:635-645. [PMID: 38001334 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01819-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) remain consistently high in rural populations. Telehealth can improve screening uptake by overcoming individual and environmental disadvantages in rural communities. The present study aimed to characterize varying barriers to CRC screening between rural individuals with and without experience in using telehealth. METHOD The cross-sectional study surveyed 250 adults aged 45-75 residing in rural U.S. states of Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington from June to September 2022. The associations between CRC screening and four sets of individual and environmental factors specific to rural populations (i.e., demographic characteristics, accessibility, patient-provider factors, and psychological factors) were assessed among respondents with and without past telehealth adoption. RESULT Respondents with past telehealth use were more likely to screen if they were married, had a better health status, had experienced discrimination in health care, and had perceived susceptibility, screening efficacy, and cancer fear, but less likely to screen when they worried about privacy or had feelings of embarrassment, pain, and discomfort. Among respondents without past telehealth use, the odds of CRC screening decreased with busy schedules, travel burden, discrimination in health care, and lower perceived needs. CONCLUSION Rural individuals with and without previous telehealth experience face different barriers to CRC screening. The finding suggests the potential efficacy of telehealth in mitigating critical barriers to CRC screening associated with social, health care, and built environments of rural communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Peng
- Edward R. Murrow College of Communication, Washington State University, Murrow Hall 211, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
| | - Qian Huang
- Department of Communication, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA
| | - Bingjing Mao
- TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neal SM, Greenberg MJ. Identifying policy alternatives to enable the virtual establishment of a veterinarian-client-patient relationship. J Feline Med Surg 2024; 26:1098612X231224167. [PMID: 38478919 PMCID: PMC10983609 DOI: 10.1177/1098612x231224167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This research seeks to identify an existing policy stream around the establishment of a veterinarian-client-patient relationship (VCPR) through telemedicine to provide evidence of, and advance policy alternatives for, states and countries looking to allow this practice responsibly. This is seen as an important step for access to veterinary care, particularly for cats. METHODS The multiple streams policy framework requires identification of a centering event, problem stream, policy stream and politics stream in order to have the necessary conditions for policy change to occur. This research identifies that policy stream through thematic content analysis. State-level policies from across the entire USA that address the virtual establishment of a physician-patient relationship were analyzed to provide themes that could be applied to similar policies in veterinary medicine. RESULTS Ten key themes were identified and further organized into four high-order concepts through the thematic content analysis. Detailed accounting of the specific policy alternatives is provided in the supplementary materials. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The themes and concepts presented provide evidence of a robust policy stream. This content analysis, and the supporting supplementary details, provide many options to guide states in the development of sound policies for the virtual establishment of a VCPR by drawing from the more matured field of human medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue M Neal
- Department of Political Science, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, USA
- Veterinary Care Accessibility Project, Rochester, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wyte-Lake T, Cohen DJ, Williams S, Casey D, Chan M, Frank B, Levander XA, Stein D, White KK, Bailey SR. Patients' and Clinicians' Experiences with In-person, Video, and Phone Modalities for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 2024:10.1007/s11606-023-08586-6. [PMID: 38228990 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08586-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic condition that requires regular visits and care continuity. Telehealth implementation has created multiple visit modalities for OUD care. There is limited knowledge of patients' and clinicians' perceptions and experiences related to multi-modality care and when different modalities might be best employed. OBJECTIVE To identify patients' and clinicians' experiences with multiple visit modalities for OUD treatment in primary care. DESIGN Comparative case study, using video- and telephone-based semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS Patients being treated for OUD (n = 19) and clinicians who provided OUD care (n = 15) from two primary care clinics within the same healthcare system. APPROACH Using an inductive approach, interviews were analyzed to identify patients' and clinicians' experiences with receiving/delivering OUD care via different visit modalities. Clinicians' and patients' experiences were compared using a group analytical process. KEY RESULTS Patients and clinicians valued having multiple modalities available for care, with flexibility identified as a key benefit. Patients highlighted the decreased burden of travel and less social anxiety with telehealth visits. Similarly, clinicians reported that telehealth decreased medical intrusion into the lives of patients stable in recovery. Patients and clinicians saw the value of in-person visits when establishing care and for patients needing additional support. In-person visits allowed the ability to conduct urine drug testing, and to foster relationships and trust building, which were more difficult, but not impossible via a telehealth visit. Patients preferred telephone over video visits, as these were more private and more convenient. Clinicians identified benefits of video, including being able to both hear and see the patient, but often deferred to patient preference. CONCLUSIONS Considerations for utilization of visit modalities for OUD care were identified based on patients' needs and preferences, which often changed over the course of treatment. Continued research is needed determine how visit modalities impact patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Wyte-Lake
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Deborah J Cohen
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Shannon Williams
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - David Casey
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Matt Chan
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Brian Frank
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ximena A Levander
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Dan Stein
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Katie Kirkman White
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Steffani R Bailey
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rodler S, Ramacciotti LS, Maas M, Mokhtar D, Hershenhouse J, De Castro Abreu AL, Fuchs G, Stief CG, Gill IS, Cacciamani GE. The Impact of Telemedicine in Reducing the Carbon Footprint in Health Care: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of 68 Million Clinical Consultations. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:873-887. [PMID: 38036339 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Carbon footprint (CF) has emerged as an important factor when assessing health care interventions. OBJECTIVE To investigate the reduction in CF for patients utilizing telemedicine. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried for studies describing telemedicine consultation and reporting on carbon emissions saved and the carbon emissions of telemedicine devices as primary outcomes, and travel distance and time and cost savings and safety as secondary outcomes. Outcomes were tabulated and calculated per consultation. Carbon emissions and travel distances were also calculated for each total study cohort. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and the Oxford level of evidence was determined. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 48 studies met the inclusion criteria, covering 68 465 481 telemedicine consultations and savings of 691 825 tons of CO2 emissions and 3 318 464 047 km of travel distance. Carbon assessment was mostly reported as the estimated distance saved using a conversion factor. Medical specialties used telemedicine to connect specialists with patients at home (n = 25) or at a local center (n = 6). Surgical specialties used telemedicine for virtual preoperative assessment (n = 9), follow-up (n = 4), and general consultation (n = 4). The savings per consultation were 21.9-632.17 min and $1.85-$325. More studies focused on the COVID-19 time frame (n = 33) than before the pandemic (n = 15). The studies are limited by calculations, mostly for the travel distance for carbon savings, and appropriate follow-up to analyze the real impact on travel and appointments. CONCLUSIONS Telemedicine reduces the CF of the health care sector. Expanding the use of telemedicine and educating providers and patients could further decrease CO2 emissions and save both money and time. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed 48 studies on the use of telemedicine. We found that people used their cars less and saved time and money, as well as CO2 emissions, if they used teleconsultations. Some studies only looked at how much CO2 from driving was saved, so there might be more to learn about the benefits of teleconsultations. The use of online doctor appointments is not only good for our planet but also helps patients in saving time and money. This review is registered on the PROSPERO database for systematic reviews (CRD42023456839).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Severin Rodler
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University Hospital of LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marissa Maas
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Mokhtar
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacob Hershenhouse
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andre Luis De Castro Abreu
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gerhard Fuchs
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Inderbir S Gill
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni E Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Artificial Intelligence Center, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|