"There is no one who helps you with it": experiences of people with long COVID regarding medical care, therapeutic measures, and barriers in the German healthcare system: results of a qualitative study with four focus groups

All-cause healthcare resource utilization and costs among community-managed adults with long-COVID in France, 2020-2023

BACKGROUND

The clinical and economic burden of long COVID is poorly understood. We aim to assess all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in the primary care setting among adults with long COVID in France.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the electronic healthcare records (EHRs) of confirmed and/or probable COVID-19 patients from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) data between March 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. Long COVID was identified per World Health Organization (WHO) definition as suggestive symptoms present ≥3 months following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients' characteristics, HCRU, direct healthcare and indirect costs (National Health Insurance-based prices) were summarized. Costs between patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who developed long COVID, patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who did not develop long COVID (COVID only), and contemporaneous controls without SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared (Non-COVID).

RESULTS

Long COVID developed among 30,122 (11.6%) adults; mean (SD) age was 50 (17) years, 63.6% were female and 27.5% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index score >2. During the post-infection follow-up (mean = 13 months), 97.3% of patients had general practitioner consultations (GP) and 62.4% had nursing care. Costs were highest during the first post-diagnosis year with per patient per year costs of €2,443 (total cost of €52 million), including costs for GP (€208) and specialist (€170) consultations, outpatient procedures (€413), retail pharmacy use (€595), biological testing (€147), and medical device usage (€172). Patients with long COVID had additional costs of €163 and €176 when compared to patients in the COVID only and Non-COVID cohorts, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Since the THIN database is generated from GP EHRs, there is the possibility of measurement/documentation errors and missing values which could compromise the validity and accuracy of certain results.

CONCLUSION

Long COVID was associated with non-negligible HCRU, direct and indirect costs to the French healthcare system. These findings reinforce the importance of optimizing long-term resource allocation for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Improvement in quality of life and cognitive function in Post-COVID syndrome after online occupational therapy: Results from a randomized controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) poses enormous clinical challenges. Occupational therapy (OT) is recommended in PCS, but structural validation of this concept is pending.

METHODS

In an unblinded randomized pilot study (clinical trial # DRKS0026007), feasibility and effects of online OT in PCS were tested. Probands received structured online OT over 12 weeks either via interactive online treatment sessions (interactive group) or prerecorded videos (video group). 50% of probands received no online OT (control group). At week 0, 12, and 24, we analyzed study experience, health-related quality of life, cognitive functions. impairment in performance, and social participation.

RESULTS

N = 158 probands (mean age 38 yrs., 86% female) were included into the analyses. The study experience was described as positive or very positive in 83.3% of probands in the interactive versus 48.1% of probands in the video group (p = 0.001). After 12 weeks, all groups displayed significant improvement in concentration, memory, and performance of daily tasks. After 24 weeks, significant improvement in concentration and memory were observed in control- and video-probands, and social participation had improved after video-OT. However, only probands in the interactive online OT group showed improvement of all measured endpoints including concentration, memory, quality of life, and social participation.

CONCLUSION

We show that online OT is feasible, and that interactive online OT is a promising treatment strategy for affected patients. We present exploratory data on its efficacy and describe variables that can be employed for further investigations in confirmatory trials.

[How do people with long COVID cope with their symptoms and everyday limitations? A qualitative study with four focus groups]

BACKGROUND

The heterogenous and fluctuating intensity of long COVID symptoms poses a challenge to both patients and healthcare providers due to a lack of causal treatment options. The aim of supportive therapies is to help individuals cope with symptoms in daily life and maintain functionality. This study aims to identify coping strategies employed by those affected by long COVID and their perceived benefits.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted with four focus groups comprising 23 adult patients suffering from long COVID. The recorded and transcribed group discussions were analyzed using content-structuring content analysis according to Kuckartz. The results were then systematically analyzed, interpreted, and put in a theoretical context.

RESULTS

Participants utilized healthcare resources but developed their own strategies for dealing with long COVID because of their dissatisfaction with medical care. These strategies included energy and resource management, physical activity, enhancing health literacy, changing mindset and lifestyle, infection prevention, using medical aids, and dietary changes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that people with long COVID employ a variety of strategies to cope with impairments in everyday life. According to the interviewees, integrating these approaches into the treatment of long COVID can help to reduce the burden of symptoms on those affected, restore their everyday functionality, and improve their self-efficacy and quality of life. Established concepts like "pacing" or "shared-decision making" can serve as a starting point for developing individualized coping strategies and treatment concepts together with patients.

Care for people living with HIV in specialized care: an analysis in light of programmatic vulnerability

Understand and analyze care experiences of people living with HIV (PLH) in specialized services, identifying facilitators and access barriers. Evaluative study, qualitative, carrying out 45 interviews with PLH, whose care is centered on specialty polyclinics. For thematic analysis, the framework of programmatic vulnerability was used in two dimensions: access to health services and comprehensiveness of care. Most participants were not linked to primary health care, although they were virally suppressed. Medical consultations, laboratory tests, individual preventive and educational actions were concentrated in the polyclinics. The referral for health care was assigned to the infectologist, without the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, although there was access to specialists via the internal referral flow at the polyclinics. Follow-up other health conditions was partial, due to the disarticulation between the points of care, depended on the use of private services. Although PLH found support for biomedical and relational demands in Polyclinics, the challenge of guaranteeing of integrated care remained. A model of shared care, co-responsibility, non-hierarchical, user-oriented, is suggested, with changes in the modus operandi of health care networks.

Patient-provider relationships and long COVID: A cross-sectional survey about impact on quality of life

BACKGROUND

In the United States (U.S.), it is estimated that 17.6 % of adults have experienced Long COVID, a condition where symptoms newly develop and linger after initial COVID-19 infection. Long COVID is associated with significantly reduced quality of life (QoL), and patient-provider relationships have been shown to influence QoL for patients in general.

OBJECTIVE

The objective for this study was to better understand the role of patient-provider relationships in shaping QoL among U.S. adults with Long COVID.

METHODS

This study carried out an online survey among U.S. adult with Long COVID (N = 792).

RESULTS

Respondents with at least a bachelor's degree reported higher QoL, and older respondents were more likely to report lower QoL; trust in providers was a significant predictor of higher QoL, while dismissal of Long COVID symptoms was associated with lower QoL (all p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare providers should be aware of the importance of trust in the relationship with their Long COVID patients and the impact this may have on patients' QoL. Researchers and policy makers should include an increasing focus on training for providers who treat patients with Long COVID in order to strengthen patient-provider relationships.

Self-reported Health Service Utilization and Barriers to Care Among US Adults with a History of Post COVID-19 Condition

BACKGROUND

Millions of US adults continue to experience symptoms of post COVID-19 condition (PCC). More data on health service utilization patterns and barriers to care in this population are needed to understand how to care for people with PCC.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate health service utilization and barriers to medical care among individuals with a history of PCC compared with other US adults.

DESIGN

Data were analyzed from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of the US population.

PARTICIPANTS

US adults.

MAIN MEASURES

Health service utilization and the presence of financial and nonfinancial barriers to care in the preceding 12 months.

KEY RESULTS

There were 24,905 individuals included in the analysis, representing approximately 230 million US adults. The weighted prevalence of those with a history of PCC was 6.9% (95%CI, 6.5-7.3). Compared to other US adults, participants with a history of PCC were more likely to have had an urgent care visit (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.52 [95%CI, 1.34-1.72]), emergency room visit (aOR 1.94 [95%CI 1.71-2.21]), hospitalization (aOR 1.48 [95%CI, 1.24-1.77]), rehabilitation services (aOR 1.35 [95%CI, 1.14-1.60]), home care (aOR 1.55 [95%CI, 1.66-2.26]), mental health counseling (aOR 1.39 [95%CI, 1.17-1.65]), and complementary and integrative medicine services (aOR 1.29 [95%CI, 1.13-1.49]). Furthermore, respondents with a history of PCC were more likely to report at least one financial barrier to care (aOR 1.71 [95%CI, 1.48-1.97]) and at least one nonfinancial barrier (aOR 1.77 [95%CI, 1.56-2.00]). A greater proportion of participants with a history of PCC reported a financial barrier and nonfinancial barrier than adults with most other chronic conditions captured by NHIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with a history of PCC were more likely to use a variety of health services and report barriers to medical care. Health systems should consider developing accessible, multidisciplinary care pathways for this population.

Living with Long COVID: A Narrative Study

This qualitative narrative study describes the stories of persons with Long COVID. Four individuals participated in semi-structured interviews with photo elicitation. Thematic analysis yielded six themes: symptom complexity, deep emotional impact, changes to daily life, not being believed, navigating healthcare alone, and positive influence of social support illustrating that persons with Long COVID experience major changes in their bodies, routines, and relationships. The results can inform occupational therapy services by encouraging occupational therapy practitioners to pursue updated Long COVID-specific continuing education and address the functional limitations, role competencies, support systems, and life priorities of these clients.

Long-Term Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Compared to Relatives with SARS-CoV-2 Infection without Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients without SARS-CoV-2: Results of a Retrospective Case-Control Study

Introduction

Long-term sequelae following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection appear to be common in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs).

Methods

We examined the frequency and characteristics of post-COVID-symptoms in patients with IBD (IBD-COVID), comparing them to two control cohorts: infected household members of the IBD-COVID patients without IBD (CONT-COVID) and IBD patients without SARS-COV-2 infection (IBD-no-COVID). A questionnaire for the retrospective documentation of possible post-COVID-19 symptoms was distributed to patients and controls from eight referral centers.

Results

The 319 IBD-COVID, 108 CONT-COVID, and the 221 IBD-no-COVID patients were similar in terms of sex, age, and comorbidities. The occurrence and duration of fatigue in the IBD-COVID cohort correlated with IBD activity. Other complaints such as reduced cognitive performance (p < 0.05) and sleeping disorders (p < 0.05) were even more common in IBD-COVID patients. Persistent hematochezia (p < 0.001), abdominal pain (p < 0.005), diarrhea (p < 0.0001), and anal problems (p < 0.01) were more often in the IBD-COVID patients than in the CONT-COVID cohort. Furthermore, typical IBD-associated symptoms persist for a longer period after an infection. Frequency of post-COVID complaints is higher in IBD patients compared to controls. After infection, the number of outpatient consultations increased in IBD-COVID patients (7.8% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.008).

Conclusion

Fatigue, cognitive impairment, and sleep disturbances are more prevalent among IBD-COVID than CONT-COVID patients. Furthermore, typical IBD-associated symptoms persist for a longer period after an infection. Frequency of post-COVID complaints is higher in IBD patients compared to controls. Tight control of IBD activity could be a suitable tool to avoid post-COVID problems.

Care for post-COVID-19 condition in Germany from the perspectives of patients, informal caregivers and general practitioners: Study protocol for a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

A large number of individuals suffer from post-COVID-19 condition (PCC), characterised by persistent symptoms following a SARS-CoV-2 infection with an impact on daily personal and professional activities. This study aims at examining which (health) care services are used by PCC patients in the German federal state of Lower Saxony, and how these patients manage their condition. The perspectives of patients, informal caregivers and general practitioners (GPs) will be considered.

METHODS

The study will employ a mixed methods design. Patients' perspective will be evaluated through an online survey of: (1) 21,000 adult individuals with a PCC diagnosis (ICD10 U09.9!) in their statutory health insurance claims data in 2022 ("AOK survey") and (2) a self-selected sample of adult individuals with a proven SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2023 and persistent symptoms ("public survey"). Additional data sources will be claims data (n = 27,275) and 25-30 semi-structured interviews. Informal caregivers' perspective will be collected through an online survey and semi-structured interviews. GPs' perspective will be evaluated through four focus groups involving six to eight participants each and an online survey of all registered and practicing GPs in Lower Saxony (approximately 5,000). All survey data will be descriptively analysed. In addition, correlation analyses and multivariable regression analyses will be conducted, for example on factors influencing affected individuals' use of medical services. Interview and focus group data will be subjected to qualitative content analysis. A health economic analysis will be used to determine the costs of PCC to health care payers, patients and society. The project will conclude with an expert workshop to discuss the results and derive recommendations.

DISCUSSION

The results of the study will provide a multidimensional description of the (health) care situation and needs of patients with PCC, and derive recommendations for improving health care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The VePoKaP study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00032846).

[Children and adolescents with post-COVID-19 condition: A qualitative study on the experiences and satisfaction with treatment in a model project in Bavaria (Post-COVID Kids Bavaria)]

BACKGROUND

Against the background of inadequate healthcare provision for children and adolescents with post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS), a model project was initiated in Bavaria (PoCoKiBa: Post-COVID Kids Bavaria), offering specialized diagnostics and care. The aim of this study was to explore and describe the experiences and satisfaction of children and adolescents with PCS, as well as their parents, with the healthcare provided in the model project.

METHODS

From October to December 2022, seven focus group discussions were conducted via video conference or in person with a total of 32 participants (19 children/adolescents, twelve mothers, one father). These represented 28 children and adolescents affected by PCS (aged 7 to 17 years). The focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Study participants talked about their experiences with the care they received within and beyond the model project, continuity of care, communication between doctors and patients, patient information, and the accompanying study. At the sites of the model project, patients found physicians who spent more time with their patients and took them seriously. Following diagnosis, some patients have benefited from recommendations for therapeutic services or everyday behaviours, while others complained about a lack of treatment suggestions or support for dealing with PCS in their everyday life.

DISCUSSION

The experiences of study participants with the medical care of their PCS symptoms within or beyond the model project mirror the well-known challenges of healthcare provision. There is considerable room for improvement in the care of children and adolescents with PCS, particularly in the organization of the complex diagnostic process, which involves several organ systems, and in the provision of targeted information to patients and families affected.

CONCLUSION

The supply of healthcare services, as established and offered in the PoCoKiBa model project, is crucial for families with a child affected by PCS, since it can offer expertise in diagnosis and treatment that is currently not available in routine health care.

German general practitioners' experiences of managing post-COVID-19 syndrome: A qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

The management of the long-term sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, known as post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS), continues to challenge the medical community, largely owing to a significant gap in the understanding of its aetiology, diagnosis and effective treatment.

AIM

To examine general practitioners' (GPs) experiences of caring for patients with PCS and to identify unmet care needs and opportunities for improvement.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This study follows a qualitative design, using in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews with GPs (N = 31) from across Germany.

METHOD

Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

GPs reported that they were often the first point of contact for patients with persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, with symptoms typically resolving within weeks. While ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 is perceived to be more common, the relevance of PCS to GP practices is considerable given its severe impact on patients' functioning, social participation and the substantial time required for patient care. GPs coordinate diagnosis and treatment but face challenges because of the unclear definition of PCS and difficulties in attributing symptoms, resulting in a cautious approach to ICD-10 coding. Interviewees highlight lengthy diagnostic pathways and barriers to accessing specialist care.

CONCLUSION

The findings confirm the high functional limitations and psychosocial burden of PCS on patients, and the central role of GPs in their care. The study suggests a need for further research and health policy measures to support GPs in navigating diagnostic uncertainty, interprofessional communication and the limited evidence on effective treatments.

Barriers and facilitators of healthcare access for long COVID-19 patients in a universal healthcare system: qualitative evidence from Austria

BACKGROUND

Long COVID-19 challenges health and social systems globally. International research finds major inequalities in prevalence and healthcare utilization as patients describe difficulties with accessing health care. In order to improve long-term outcomes it is vital to understand any underlying access barriers, for which relevant evidence on long COVID-19 is thus far lacking in a universal healthcare system like Austria. This study aims to comprehensively identify access barriers and facilitators faced by long COVID-19 patients in Austria and explore potential socioeconomic and demographic drivers in health and social care access.

METHODS

Applying an exploratory qualitative approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 experts including medical professionals and senior health officials as well as focus groups with 18 patients with confirmed long COVID-19 diagnosis reflecting varying participant characteristics (age, gender, urbanicity, occupation, education, insurance status) (July-Nov 2023). Data were analysed following a thematic framework approach, drawing on a comprehensive 'access to health care' model.

RESULTS

Based on expert and patient experiences, several access barriers and facilitators emerged along all dimensions of the model. Main themes included scepticism and stigma by medical professionals, difficulties in finding knowledgeable doctors, limited specialist capacities in the ambulatory care sector, long waiting times for specialist care, and limited statutory health insurance coverage of treatments resulting in high out-of-pocket payments. Patients experienced constant self-organization of their patient pathway as stressful, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary care and centralized coordination. Facilitators included supportive social environments, telemedicine, and informal information provided by a nationwide patient-led support group. Differences in patient experiences emerged, among others, as women and younger patients faced gender- and age-based stigmatization. Complementary health insurance reduced the financial strain, however, did not ease capacity constraints, which were particularly challenging for those living in rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicate a call for action to improve the long COVID-19 situation in Austria by empowering both providers and patients via increased information offerings, strengthened interdisciplinary treatment structures and telemedicine offerings as well as research funding. Our insights on potentially relevant socioeconomic and demographic drivers in access barriers lay the necessary foundation for future quantitative inequality research.

A Journey Through Grief: Experiences of Loss Among Patients With Long COVID

Long COVID is a growing health concern with data continuing to emerge about the psychosocial consequences of this new chronic condition. We aimed to improve understanding of the experiences of patients with Long COVID, focusing on emotional impacts arising from experiences of loss and grief caused by persistent physical symptoms and changes in lifestyle and social support. Patients (n = 21) were recruited August to September 2022 from a post-COVID recovery clinic to participate in semistructured interviews. We found that Long COVID patients (1) reported experiencing loss across multiple domains including loss of physical health, mental health, social support and connections, roles in their families, and self-identities, and (2) described experiences of grief that mirrored the 5 stages of grief in the Kubler-Ross model: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and for some, acceptance. Our findings highlight the importance of evaluating the experiences of loss and grief among Long COVID patients as well as support systems for this patient population. Providers may be encouraged to incorporate mental health and bereavement support resources to address critical needs of Long COVID patients.

"The dream is that there's one place you go": a qualitative study of women's experiences seeking care from Long COVID clinics in the USA

BACKGROUND

Seeking and obtaining effective health care for Long COVID remains a challenge in the USA. Women have particularly been impacted, as they are both at higher risk of developing Long COVID and of facing gendered barriers to having symptoms acknowledged. Long COVID clinics, which provide multidisciplinary and coordinated care, have emerged as a potential solution. To date, however, there has been little examination of U.S. patient experiences with Long COVID clinics and how patients may or may not have come to access care at a Long COVID clinic.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 U.S. women aged 18 or older who had experienced Long COVID symptoms for at least 3 months, who had not been hospitalized for acute COVID-19, and who had seen at least one medical provider about their symptoms. Participants were asked about experiences seeking medical care for Long COVID. Long COVID clinic-related responses were analyzed using qualitative framework analysis to identify key themes in experiences with Long COVID clinics.

RESULTS

Of the 30 women, 43.3% (n = 13) had been seen at a Long COVID clinic or by a provider affiliated with a Long COVID clinic and 30.0% (n = 9) had explored or attempted to see a Long COVID clinic but had not been seen at time of interview. Participants expressed five key themes concerning their experiences with seeking care from Long COVID clinics: (1) Access to clinics remains an issue, (2) Clinics are not a one stop shop, (3) Not all clinic providers have sufficient Long COVID knowledge, (4) Clinics can offer validation and care, and (5) Treatment options are critical and urgent.

CONCLUSIONS

While the potential for Long COVID clinics is significant, findings indicate that ongoing barriers to care and challenges related to quality and coordination of care hamper that potential and contribute to distress among women seeking Long COVID care. Since Long COVID clinics are uniquely positioned and framed as being the place to go to manage complex symptoms, it is critical to patient wellbeing that they be properly resourced to provide a level of care that complies with emerging best practices.

Exploring the perceptions and experiences of community rehabilitation for Long COVID from the perspectives of Scottish general practitioners' and people living with Long COVID: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the experience of accessing Long COVID community rehabilitation from the perspectives of people with Long COVID and general practitioners (GPs).

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive study employing one-to-one semistructured virtual interviews analysed using the framework method.

SETTING

Four National Health Service Scotland territorial health boards.

PARTICIPANTS

11 people with Long COVID (1 male, 10 female; aged 40-65 (mean 53) and 13 GPs (5 male, 8 female).

RESULTS

Four key themes were identified: (1) The lived experience of Long COVID, describing the negative impact of Long COVID on participants' health and quality of life; (2) The challenges of an emergent and complex chronic condition, including uncertainties related to diagnosis and management; (3) Systemic challenges for Long COVID service delivery, including lack of clear pathways for access and referral, siloed services, limited resource and a perceived lack of holistic care, and (4) Perceptions and experiences of Long COVID and its management, including rehabilitation. In this theme, a lack of knowledge by GPs and people with Long COVID on the potential role of community rehabilitation for Long COVID was identified. Having prior knowledge of rehabilitation or being a healthcare professional appeared to facilitate access to community rehabilitation. Finally, people with Long COVID who had received rehabilitation had generally found it beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several patient, GP and service-level barriers to accessing community rehabilitation for Long COVID. There is a need for greater understanding by the public, GPs and other potential referrers of the role of community rehabilitation professionals in the management of Long COVID. There is also a need for community rehabilitation services to be well promoted and accessible to the people with Long COVID for whom they may be appropriate. The findings of this study can be used by those (re)designing community rehabilitation services for people with Long COVID.

Insights into early recovery from Long COVID-results from the German DigiHero Cohort

65 million people worldwide are estimated to suffer from long-term symptoms after their SARS-CoV-2 infection (Long COVID). However, there is still little information about the early recovery among those who initially developed Long COVID, i.e. had symptoms 4-12 weeks after infection but no symptoms after 12 weeks. We aimed to identify associated factors with this early recovery. We used data from SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals from the DigiHero study. Participants provided information about their SARS-CoV-2 infections and symptoms at the time of infection, 4-12 weeks, and more than 12 weeks post-infection. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with early recovery from Long COVID and principal component analysis (PCA) to identify groups among symptoms. 5098 participants reported symptoms at 4-12 weeks after their SARS-CoV-2 infection, of which 2441 (48%) reported no symptoms after 12 weeks. Men, younger participants, individuals with mild course of acute infection, individuals infected with the Omicron variant, and individuals who did not seek medical care in the 4-12 week period after infection had a higher chance of early recovery. In the PCA, we identified four distinct symptom groups. Our results indicate differential risk of continuing symptoms among individuals who developed Long COVID. The identified risk factors are similar to those for the development of Long COVID, so people with these characteristics are at higher risk not only for developing Long COVID, but also for longer persistence of symptoms. Those who sought medical help were also more likely to have persistent symptoms.