The need for patient-centred clinical research in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Effects of Systemic Enzyme Supplements on Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis-A Pilot Study

Current FDA-approved antifibrotic treatments for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis slow down disease progression but have little impact on symptoms or quality of life in patients. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of systemic enzymes in relieving symptoms associated with PF and improving quality of life.

METHODS

an open-label, prospective study on subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of PF was conducted as proof-of-concept. The subjects (n = 13) received the oral systemic enzyme supplements Serracor-NK and Serra Rx for 12 weeks and completed Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) questionnaires. The effect of this regimen was examined by comparing the end-of-treatment questionnaire scores with baseline values.

RESULTS

significant improvement was seen in 61.5% of subjects, as assessed by the WHO well-being index; an improvement in scores was seen in 84.6% of the subjects, as assessed by the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, with 38.4% of the subjects showing minimal clinically important difference; the supplementation was found to be efficacious in 69.2%, 84.6%, 69.2% and 61.5% of the subjects, as assessed by the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire total, symptom, activity, and impact scores, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serracor-NK and Serra Rx improve symptoms, as well as mental and physical wellbeing and HRQL in patients with PF.

Nurse-Led Palliative Care Clinical Trial Improves Knowledge and Preparedness in Caregivers of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Rationale: Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and their caregivers experience stress, symptom burden, poor quality of life, and inadequate preparedness for end-of-life (EOL) care planning as the disease progresses. The hypothesis for this study was that the early introduction of palliative care in the course of IPF would improve knowledge and preparation for EOL, patient-reported outcomes, and advance care planning in patients with IPF and their caregivers. Objectives: We sought to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a nurse-led early palliative care intervention entitled "A Program of SUPPORT" (Symptom management, Understanding the disease, Pulmonary rehabilitation, Palliative care, Oxygen therapy, Research participation, and Transplantation) in patients with IPF and their caregivers. Methods: Patients with IPF (diagnosed in the year previous to their initial center visit) from the University of Pittsburgh Dorothy P. and Richard P. Simmons Center for Interstitial Lung Disease at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-together with their caregivers-were randomized to receive the intervention "A Program of SUPPORT" or usual care. This included a total of three research visits aligned with their clinic visit over a period of 6 to 8 months. We measured feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of this intervention. Results: A total of 136 patient/caregiver dyads were eligible, and a total of 76 dyads were enrolled and participated. Participants were predominately White males >65 years old. Thirteen percent did not have an identified caregiver. Feasibility was limited; 56% of eligible dyads were enrolled. Eligible dyads (24%) were interested in participating but too fatigued to stay after their clinic visit. There was high attrition (20% of participants died before the study was completed). "A Program of SUPPORT" was acceptable to participants. Efficacy demonstrated a significant improvement in caregiver's knowledge, disease preparedness, and confidence in caring for the patient as well as an improvement in knowledge and advance care planning completion in patient participants. Conclusions: Patients with IPF and their caregivers have unmet needs regarding knowledge of their disease, self-management strategies, and preparedness for EOL planning. This nurse-led intervention demonstrated acceptability and efficacy in knowledge and advance care planning completion in patients and in knowledge, disease preparedness, and confidence in caregivers. Future research should identify additional strategies, including telemedicine resources to reach additional patients and their caregivers earlier in their disease course. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02929017).

Validation of a derived version of the IPF-specific Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire

Background

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is impaired in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). HRQL is often measured using the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) despite the development of an IPF-specific version (SGRQ-I). Using data from a real-world cohort of patients with IPF, we aimed to transform SGRQ into a derived version of SGRQ-I, SGRQ-I_der, to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of SGRQ-I_der and to compare SGRQ-I_der to SGRQ-I.

Methods

Based on results from SGRQ, SGRQ-I_der was derived applying the algorithm used to develop SGRQ-I. Of the 50 items in SGRQ, 34 items were retained in SGRQ-I_der. Response options for seven items were collapsed and minor adjustments were made to the weights of two items after correspondence with the developers of SGRQ-I. Cross-sectional validation, responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were assessed by comparison to other HRQL instruments, pulmonary function tests and 6-min walk test performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Furthermore, the association between SGRQ-I_der scores and mortality was examined.

Results

A total of 150 IPF patients participated and 124 completed follow-up at 12 months. SGRQ-I_der performed comparably to SGRQ-I with a high concurrent validity, good test–retest reliability and high known-groups validity. SGRQ-I_der was responsive to change in HRQL and physiological anchors. MCID of SGRQ-I_der for improvement and deterioration was 3.5 and 5.7, respectively. SGRQ-I_der scores were associated with mortality in both univariate (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.42–2.34 per 20-point increase) and multivariate analyses (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.20–2.05 per 20-point increase).

Conclusions

The SGRQ-I_der is a valid, reliable and responsive HRQL instrument in patients with IPF and has psychometric properties comparable to SGRQ-I. Thus, SGRQ results can reliably be transformed into the SGRQ-I_der. The MCID estimates were calculated for improvement and deterioration separately. Increasing SGRQ-I_der score was associated with increased mortality.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01853-2.

Clinical Trials for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and the Role of Health Systems

We are in the midst of transformative innovation in health care delivery and clinical trials in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Health systems are uniquely positioned at the crossroad of these shifting paradigms, equipped with the resources to expand the research pipeline in IPF through visionary leadership and targeted investments. The authors hope that by prioritizing development of health information technology, supporting a broader range of clinical trial designs, and cultivating broad stakeholder engagement, health systems will generate data to address knowledge-evidence-practice gaps in IPF. This will continue to improve the ability to deliver high-quality, safe, and effective care.

Patient-centered Outcomes Research in Interstitial Lung Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Background: In the past two decades, many advances have been made to our understanding of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the way we approach its treatment. Despite this, many questions remain unanswered, particularly those related to how the disease and its therapies impact outcomes that are most important to patients. There is currently a lack of guidance on how to best define and incorporate these patient-centered outcomes in ILD research. Objectives: To summarize the current state of patient-centered outcomes research in ILD, identify gaps in knowledge and research, and highlight opportunities and methods for future patient-centered research agendas in ILD. Methods: An international interdisciplinary group of experts was assembled. The group identified top patient-centered outcomes in ILD, reviewed available literature for each outcome, highlighted important discoveries and knowledge gaps, and formulated research recommendations. Results: The committee identified seven themes around patient-centered outcomes as the focus of the statement. After a review of the literature and expert committee discussion, we developed 28 research recommendations. Conclusions: Patient-centered outcomes are key to ascertaining whether and how ILD and interventions used to treat it affect the way patients feel and function in their daily lives. Ample opportunities exist to conduct additional work dedicated to elevating and incorporating patient-centered outcomes in ILD research.

Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in interstitial lung disease: where to go from here?

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), tools to assess patient self-report of health status, are now increasingly used in research, care and policymaking. While there are two well-developed disease-specific PROMs for interstitial lung diseases (ILD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), many unmet and urgent needs remain. In December 2019, 64 international ILD experts convened in Erice, Italy to deliberate on many topics, including PROMs in ILD. This review summarises the history of PROMs in ILD, shortcomings of the existing tools, challenges of development, validation and implementation of their use in clinical trials, and the discussion held during the meeting. Development of disease-specific PROMs for ILD including IPF with robust methodology and validation in concordance with guidance from regulatory authorities have increased user confidence in PROMs. Minimal clinically important difference for bidirectional changes may need to be developed. Cross-cultural validation and linguistic adaptations are necessary in addition to robust psychometric properties for effective PROM use in multinational clinical trials. PROM burden of use should be reduced through appropriate use of digital technologies and computerised adaptive testing. Active patient engagement in all stages from development, testing, choosing and implementation of PROMs can help improve probability of success and further growth.

PROMs are essential tools for research and care in ILD and IPF. They report patient perceptions of the impact of disease and its treatments on whole-person wellbeing and can guide research to make care more patient-centred.https://bit.ly/3s7Y0a8

Establishing content-validity of a disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument for patients with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Background

Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (CHP) is caused by an immune mediated response in the lung tissue after exposure to an inhaled environmental antigenic stimulant. We previously documented the ways in which CHP impacts patients’ lives and have now developed a disease-specific instrument, the CHP-HRQOL instrument, to measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The objective of this study was to assess content validity for the CHP-HRQOL.

Methods

Cognitive interviews were conducted among adults with CHP. The instrument was revised and refined between each round of interviews. Feedback was obtained on the instructions, items, response options, and recall period. Items where participants had difficulty with comprehension, wording, or misinterpretation were marked by the interviewer and participant feedback was reviewed to make revisions, add or delete items when appropriate. Readability statistics were calculated using Flesch-Kincaid grade level and reading ease scores.

Results

Ten participants were interviewed over three rounds, with revisions made to the questionnaire in an iterative process. In the initial 39 item instrument, we identified 7 items where two or more participants reported difficulty. Participants preferred a four-week recall period (compared to a two-week recall period) and response options with a 5-point response scale. The final version of the CHP-HRQOL includes 40 items with a median reading level between 6th and 7th grade.

Conclusion

The CHP-HRQOL instrument demonstrated high content validity and is ready for psychometric testing in further validation studies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-020-00282-x.

Health-related quality of life of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is one of the most common forms of interstitial lung disease presenting in persons 50 years and older. Through a comprehensive review of available studies, we aimed to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people living with IPF and the instruments used in this assessment.Searches were conducted up to May, 2020. Quality appraisal and data extraction were performed using pre-designed forms. Narrative synthesis approach was used to report results of the systematic review and a random effects model was used for the meta-analysis. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed, and a trim and fill method was used to assess publication bias.The review included 134 studies. The most used instruments to measure HRQoL were St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Short Form 36 (SF36) and EuroQoL (EQ5D). Standardised mean scores (95% confidence interval) for these instruments were as follows: SGRQ total score: 44.72 (42.21-47.22); SF36 physical component score (PCS): 37.00 (34.74-39.26) SF36 mental component score (MCS): 50.18 (48.41-51.95); King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire total score: 58.38 (55.26-61.51); and EQ5D utility: 0.73 (0.68-0.79). Analysis of standardised means for both SGRQ and SF36 demonstrated worse scores in physical health domains as compared to mental health domains.This systematic review confirms that IPF negatively affected HRQoL, mostly impacting the physical health domains. This study also demonstrated that a diverse number of instruments are used to evaluate HRQoL. In view of this diversity, a standardised approach to measurement of HRQoL for IPF is important to ensure that comparisons made are reliable.

What Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Caregivers Want: Filling the Gaps With Patient Reported Outcomes and Experience Measures

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a progressive disease, with a high mortality within the first 3-5 years from diagnosis and a poor quality of life mainly because of the burden of symptoms, such as dyspnea and cough, occurring usually many months before the diagnosis. Although available antifibrotic therapies slow down disease progression, they have no impact on quality of life. Moreover, health care around idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients is often "disease-centered" and relies on clinical surrogate outcomes that are poorly related to patients' quality of life and disease experience. Therefore, patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have several unmet needs in all domains of health that they wish to see recognized and addressed in the context of the treatment of their disease and its complications. In this review, we summarize the care pathway from the patients' perspective, identifying current gaps in care, education, support, and communication among patients with IPF, their caregivers, and care teams during the patient journey. The role of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), PRO measures (PROMs), and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in their care is discussed, as well as the need of disease-specific PROs, PROMs, and PREMs.

The impact of palliative care on quality of life, anxiety, and depression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomized controlled pilot study

Background

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal disease that results in poor quality of life due to progressive respiratory symptoms, anxiety, and depression. Palliative care improves quality of life and survival in other progressive diseases. No randomized controlled trials have investigated the impact of palliative care on quality of life, anxiety, or depression in IPF.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, controlled, pilot study to assess the feasibility of measuring the effect of a palliative care clinic referral on quality of life, anxiety, and depression in IPF. Patients were randomized to usual care (UC) or usual care + palliative care (UC + PC) with routine pulmonary follow up at 3 and 6 months. The UC + PC group received a minimum of one PC clinic visit. Primary outcome was change from baseline in quality of life, anxiety, and depression as measured by the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Index (HADS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at 6 months.

Results

Twenty-two patients were randomized between September 2017 through July 2018; 11 to UC and 11 to UC + PC. There was no difference in the change in SGRQ score at 3 months or 6 months, however, the symptom score trended towards a significant worsening for UC + PC at both 3 and 6 months (mean change at 3 months for UC and UC + PC was − 7.8 and + 10.7, respectively, p = 0.066; mean change at 6 months for UC and UC + PC was − 6.0 and + 4.6, respectively, p = 0.055). There was no difference in the change in HADS anxiety or depression scores. There was a significant transient worsening in PHQ-9 scores for UC + PC at 3 months (UC: -1.6, UC + PC: + 0.9, p = 0.008); this effect did not persist at 6 months.

Conclusion

This pilot study demonstrated that a randomized controlled trial of palliative care in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients is feasible. Receiving palliative care did not lead to improved quality of life, anxiety, or depression compared to usual care after 6 months. Patients in the UC + PC group trended towards worsening symptoms and a small but statistically significant transient worsening in depression. These findings should be interpreted with caution, and need to be evaluated in adequately powered clinical trials. NCT03981406, June 10, 2019, retrospectively registered.

King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire: responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference

Health status is increasingly used in clinical practice to quantify symptom burden and as a clinical trial end-point in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (KBILD) questionnaire is a brief, validated 15-item, disease-specific, health-related quality of life questionnaire that is increasingly used in clinical trials, but little data exist regarding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Using pulmonary rehabilitation as a model, we aimed to determine the responsiveness of KBILD and provide estimates of the MCID.KBILD scores, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) scores, Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnoea score and incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) distance were measured in 209 patients with ILD (105 with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)) before and after an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Changes with intervention and Cohen's effect size were calculated. Anchor-based (linear regression and receiver operating characteristic plots) or distribution-based approaches (0.5 sd and standard error of measurement) were used to estimate the MCID of KBILD domain and total scores.KBILD, CRQ, MRC Dyspnoea and ISWT improved with intervention, and the effect sizes of KBILD domain and total scores ranged from 0.28 to 0.38. Using anchor-based estimates, the MCID estimates for KBILD-Psychological, KBILD-Breathlessness and activities, and KBILD-Total were 5.4, 4.4 and 3.9 points, respectively. Using distribution-based methods, the MCID estimate for KBILD-Chest symptoms was 9.8 points. The MCID estimates for KBILD in IPF patients were similar.In patients with ILD and IPF, KBILD is responsive to intervention with an estimated MCID of 3.9 points for the total score.

Psychometric properties and minimal important differences of SF-36 in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Background

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare disease with a median survival of 3–5 years after diagnosis with limited treatment options. The aim of this study is to assess the psychometric characteristics of the Short Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) in IPF and to provide disease specific minimally important differences (MID).

Methods

Data source was the European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg). The psychometric properties of the SF-36 version 2 were evaluated based on objective clinical measures as well as subjective perception. We analysed acceptance, feasibility, discrimination ability, construct and criterion validity, responsiveness and test-retest-reliability. MIDs were estimated via distribution and anchor-based approaches.

Results

The study population included 258 individuals (73.3% male; mean age 67.3 years, SD 10.7). Of them 75.2% (194 individuals) had no missing item. The distribution of several items was skewed, although floor effect was acceptable. Physical component score (PCS) correlated significantly and moderately with several anchors, whereas the correlations of mental component score (MCS) and anchors were only small. The tests showed mainly significant lower HRQL in individuals with long-term oxygen therapy. Analyses in stable individuals did not show significant changes of HRQL except for one dimension and anchor. Individuals with relevant changes of the health status based on the anchors had significant changes in all SF-36 dimensions and summary scales except for the dimension PAIN. PCS and MCS had mean MIDs of five and six, respectively. Mean MIDs of the dimensions ranged from seven to 21.

Conclusion

It seems that the SF-36 is a valid instrument to measure HRQL in IPF and so can be used in RCTs or individual monitoring of disease. Nevertheless, the additional evaluation of longitudinal aspects and MIDs can be recommended to further analyse these factors. Our findings have a great potential impact on the evaluation of IPF patients.

Trial registration

The eurIPFreg and eurIPFbank are listed in https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02951416).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-019-1010-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Patients' perceptions and patient-reported outcomes in progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases

The effects of interstitial lung disease (ILD) create a significant burden on patients, unsettling almost every domain of their lives, disrupting their physical and emotional well-being and impairing their quality of life (QoL). Because many ILDs are incurable, and there are limited reliably-effective, life-prolonging treatment options available, the focus of many therapeutic interventions has been on improving or maintaining how patients with ILD feel and function, and by extension, their QoL. Such patient-centred outcomes are best assessed by patients themselves through tools that capture their perceptions, which inherently incorporate their values and judgements. These patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) can be used to assess an array of constructs affected by a disease or the interventions implemented to treat it. Here, we review the impact of ILD that may present with a progressive-fibrosing phenotype on patients' lives and examine how PROs have been used to measure that impact and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

Mechanisms of exercise limitation in patients with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Small airway and interstitial pulmonary involvements are prominent in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP). However, their roles on exercise limitation and the relationship with functional lung tests have not been studied in detail.

Our aim was to evaluate exercise performance and its determinants in cHP. We evaluated maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing performance in 28 cHP patients (forced vital capacity 57±17% pred) and 18 healthy controls during cycling.

Patients had reduced exercise performance with lower peak oxygen production (16.6 (12.3–19.98) mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹versus 25.1 (16.9–32.0), p=0.003), diminished breathing reserve (% maximal voluntary ventilation) (12 (6.4–34.8)% versus 41 (32.7–50.8)%, p<0.001) and hyperventilation (minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope 37±5 versus 31±4, p<0.001). All patients presented oxygen desaturation and augmented Borg dyspnoea scores (8 (5–10) versus 4 (1–7), p=0.004). The prevalence of dynamic hyperinflation was found in only 18% of patients. When comparing cHP patients with normal and low peak oxygen production (<84% pred, lower limit of normal), the latter exhibited a higher minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope (39±5.0 versus 34±3.6, p=0.004), lower tidal volume (0.84 (0.78–0.90) L versus 1.15 (0.97–1.67) L, p=0.002), and poorer physical functioning score on the Short form-36 health survey. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that reduced lung volumes (forced vital capacity %, total lung capacity % and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon dioxide %) were high predictors of poor exercise capacity.

Reduced exercise capacity was prevalent in patients because of ventilatory limitation and not due to dynamic hyperinflation. Reduced lung volumes were reliable predictors of lower performance during exercise.

Besides significant small airway involvement, reduced exercise capacity is due to ventilatory limitation and not due to dynamic hyperinflation in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitishttp://ow.ly/Ou9230kSBQz

Psychometric properties of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: insights from the INPULSIS trials

Introduction

We evaluated the psychometric properties of the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) using data from the two INPULSIS trials.

Methods

Data from 1061 patients treated with nintedanib or placebo were pooled. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, known-groups validity, responsiveness and responder thresholds were examined.

Results

Cronbach’s α was 0.93 for SGRQ total score and >0.75 for domain scores. In patients with stable disease based on change in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≤5% predicted or ‘no change’ on Patient’s Global Impression of Change, intraclass correlation coefficients for the SGRQ total score were 0.72 or 0.76, respectively. Moderate to strong correlations were observed between SGRQ total and domain scores and the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire cough domains (−0.34 to −0.65), University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (0.56 to 0.83) and EuroQol 5-Dimensional Quality of Life Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (−0.41 to −0.55); correlations with FVC % predicted were weak (−0.24 to −0.30). Longitudinal correlations between changes in SGRQ total score and these patient-reported outcomes over 52 weeks were moderate. Changes in SGRQ total, impact and activity scores were sensitive to detecting improvement or deterioration in FVC >10% predicted at week 52. Collectively, distribution-based and anchor-based approaches suggested using a change of 4–5 points in SGRQ total score as a starting point for responder analyses.

Conclusions

The psychometric properties of the SGRQ support its use as a measure of health-related quality of life in patients with IPF.

An educational initiative to improve the team-based care of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

A successful initiative to improve best care practice in IPF supported by electronic medical record changes http://ow.ly/ORxi30hBEmy.

Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions

Best supportive care (BSC) is generally defined as all the interventions and the multiprofessional approach aimed to improve and optimise quality of life (QoL) in patients affected by progressive diseases. In this sense, it excludes and might be complementary to other interventions directly targeting the disease. BSC improves survival in patients with different types of cancer. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experience a vast range of symptoms during the natural history of the disease and might have a beneficial effect of BSC interventions. This review highlights the current evidence on interventions targeting QoL and gaps for the clinical assessment of BSC in the treatment of IPF patients. Very few interventions to improve QoL or improve symptom control are currently supported by well-designed studies. Sound methodology is paramount in evaluating BSC in IPF, as well as the use of validated tools to measure QoL and symptom control in this specific group of patients.

New insights on patient-reported outcome measures in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: only PROMises?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In a chronic, progressive and ultimately fatal disease like idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the maintenance of patients' quality of life should be regarded as a major aim of treatment. Although better knowledge and two antifibrotic drugs are now available in IPF, the individual response to treatment and its acceptance remain poorly explored. This review summarizes recent advances in research on patient-reported outcomes and their measures, indispensable instruments to investigate how patients feel and function, and how the disease impacts their lives.

RECENT FINDINGS

In IPF, there is a paucity of specific well-validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The use of generic PROMs in past IPF trials revealed a poor correlation of such questionnaires with established endpoints of treatment response. Several attempts are currently ongoing to develop specific IPF PROMs. The King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease health status questionnaire and the Tool to Assess Quality of Life in IPF are promising questionnaires developed by using institutional recommendations and are currently being validated in large cohorts.

SUMMARY

Well-validated relevant PROMs can be employed for multiple purposes: as outcome measures for daily care or for driving therapeutic decisions, as efficacy endpoints in clinical trials, or as tools to collect useful data for healthcare policy makers in order to improve access and quality of care.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: moving forward

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the prototype of a large and heterogeneous group of pulmonary disorders, mainly chronic and progressive, usually known as interstitial lung disease (ILD). Over the last few decades, IPF has been increasingly recognized as a major unmet medical need in respiratory medicine and has become the focus of intense research activity. This is due to the fact that IPF incidence is increasing worldwide, with rates (and unfortunately prognosis) which are very similar to those of many forms of cancer. Basic and clinical research on IPF has been enormously advancing over the last few decades, culminating in the recent discovery of two safe and effective drugs, now finally made available to patients. For all these reasons, missing a diagnosis of IPF is not acceptable anymore and there is a need for spreading the knowledge about IPF across various specialties of medicine globally. In this context, this article collection in BMC Medicine contributes to the ultimate goal of early identification and better management of patients with ILD, and IPF in particular, worldwide.