Validation of the AJCC prognostic stage for HER2-positive breast cancer in the ShortHER trial

A standing platform for cancer drug development using ctDNA-based evidence of recurrence

The time required to conduct clinical trials limits the rate at which we can evaluate and deliver new treatment options to patients with cancer. New approaches to increase trial efficiency while maintaining rigor would benefit patients, especially in oncology, in which adjuvant trials hold promise for intercepting metastatic disease, but typically require large numbers of patients and many years to complete. We envision a standing platform - an infrastructure to support ongoing identification and trial enrolment of patients with cancer with early molecular evidence of disease (MED) after curative-intent therapy for early-stage cancer, based on the presence of circulating tumour DNA. MED strongly predicts subsequent recurrence, with the vast majority of patients showing radiographic evidence of disease within 18 months. Such a platform would allow efficient testing of many treatments, from small exploratory studies to larger pivotal trials. Trials enrolling patients with MED but without radiographic evidence of disease have the potential to advance drug evaluation because they can be smaller (given high probability of recurrence) and faster (given short time to recurrence) than conventional adjuvant trials. Circulating tumour DNA may also provide a valuable early biomarker of treatment effect, which would allow small signal-finding trials. In this Perspective, we discuss how such a platform could be established.

Risk of Recurrence in Patients with HER2+ Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Literature Analysis of Patient and Disease Characteristics

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression occurs in 15% to 20% of patients with early-stage breast cancers (EBCs). Without HER2-targeted therapy, 30% to 50% of patients relapse within 10 years, many developing incurable metastatic disease. This literature review was designed to identify and validate patient- and disease-related factors associated with recurrence in patients with HER2+ EBC. Peer-reviewed primary research articles and congress abstracts were identified by searching MEDLINE. Articles published in English from 2019 to 2022 were included to identify contemporary treatment options. Results were analyzed for the relationship between risk factors and surrogates of HER2+ EBC recurrence to determine how identified risk factors affected HER2+ EBC recurrence. Sixty-one articles and 65 abstracts that assessed age at diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), tumor size at diagnosis, hormone receptor (HR) status, pathologic complete response (pCR) status, and biomarkers were analyzed. We confirmed the results of previously published reviews reporting residual cancer burden >0, non-pCR, and fewer tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as risk factors of recurrence. HR status remained an important risk factor for recurrence, with HER2+/HR+ disease more likely to recur. Two or more positive lymph nodes, higher BMI, larger primary tumor size, and low Ki67 were more commonly associated with HER2+ EBC recurrence. The identification of patient and disease factors frequently associated with HER2+ EBC recurrence in the literature provides insight into potential recurrence risk factors. Further investigation into the risk factors identified in this review could lead to improved treatments for patients at high risk for HER2+ EBC recurrence.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

The comparison of the anatomic stage and pathological prognostic stage according to the AJCC 8th edition for the prognosis in Japanese breast cancer patients: data from a single institution

Background

The TNM system, which reflects the anatomical extent of disease, was used for stage definition. In the recently published AJCC 8th edition, the new staging system of the clinical and pathological prognostic stage, which incorporates biological factors, is introduced.

Patients and methods

A total of 2622 patients with primary breast cancer at stage I–III were included in this study. The anatomic stage (aStage) and the pathological prognostic stage (ppStage) for each case were determined according to the definition of the AJCC 8th edition, and the influence of these stages on the prognosis was compared.

Results

The stage distributions of aStage and ppStage were as follows: aStage, stage IA (54.8%), IB (1.1%), IIA (26.1%), IIB (9.2%), IIIA (5.6%), IIIB (0.1%), and IIIC (3.1%); and ppStage, stage IA (66.6%), IB (13.1%), IIA (11.1%), IIB (3.2%), IIIA (3.3%), IIIB (1.4%), and IIIC (1.2%). Compared with the aStage, the ppStage stayed the same in 1710 patients (65.2%), was downstaged in 778 patients (29.7%), and was upstaged in 134 patients. The pathological tumor size (pT2) and lymph node metastasis (pN1) were associated with downstaging, and histological grade 3 was associated with upstaging. ER positivity, PgR positivity, and HER2-positivity were significantly associated with downstaging, and the TN subtype was associated with upstaging. Both the aStage and ppStage were significantly associated with the prognosis; however, the Kaplan–Meier curves for the relapse-free survival (RFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival were better stratified by the ppStage.

Conclusion

The ppStage reflects the prognosis of patients with early breast cancer more accurately than the aStage.