A complete cross-over design evaluating canine acceptance of Carprieve® and Rimadyl® carprofen chewable tablets in healthy dogs

Carprofen Attenuates Postoperative Mechanical and Thermal Hypersensitivity after Plantar Incision in Immunodeficient NSG Mice

Immunodeficient NSG mice are reported to be less responsive to buprenorphine analgesia. Here, we used NSG mice to compare the efficacy of the commonly used dose of carprofen (5 mg/kg) with 5 and 10 times that dose (25 and 50 mg/kg) for attenuating postoperative mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity following an incisional pain model. Male and female NSG mice (n = 45) were randomly assigned to one of 4 groups and received daily subcutaneous injections for 3 d: saline (5 mL/kg), 5 mg/kg carprofen (Carp5), 25 mg/kg carprofen (Carp25), and 50 mg/kg carprofen (Carp50). Mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity were assessed 24 h before and at 4, 24, and 48 h after surgery. Plasma carprofen concentrations were measured in a separate group of mice (n = 56) on days 0 (at 2, 4, 12, and 23 h), 1, and 2 after the first, second, and third doses, respectively. Toxicity was assessed through daily fecal occult blood testing (n = 27) as well as gross and histopathologic evaluation (n = 15). Our results indicated that the saline group showed both mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity throughout the study. Carp5 did not attenuate mechanical or thermal hypersensitivity at any time point. Carp25 attenuated mechanical and thermal (except for the 4-h time point) hypersensitivity. Carp50 attenuated only thermal hypersensitivity at 24 h. Fecal occult blood was detected in 1 of 8 Carp25-treated mice at 48 and 72 h. Histopathologic abnormalities (gastric ulceration, ulcerative enteritis, and renal lesions) were observed in some Carp50-treated mice. Plasma carprofen concentrations were dose and time dependent. Our results indicate that Carp25 attenuated postoperative mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity more effectively than Carp5 or Carp50 in NSG mice with incisional pain. Therefore, we recommend providing carprofen at 25 mg/kg SID for incisional pain procedures using immunodeficient NSG mouse.

Florfenicol urinary excretion and its potential for treating canine urinary tract infections

The canine urinary excretion of florfenicol was evaluated to explore its potential for treating urinary tract infections. Nine healthy male intact purpose-bred Beagles and four healthy client-owned dogs each received a single oral dose of florfenicol 20 mg/kg (300 mg/mL parenteral solution) with food. All voluntary urinations were collected for 12 h. Although florfenicol is reportedly bitter tasting, 7/9 Beagles and 4/4 client-owned dogs completely ingested the florfenicol and were enrolled; salivation (n = 1) and headshaking (n = 3) were observed. The last measured urine florfenicol concentrations were variable: Beagles (0.23-3.19 mcg/mL), Pug (3.01 mcg/mL) English Setter (21.29 mcg/mL), Greyhound (32.68 mcg/mL), and Standard Poodle (13.00 mcg/mL). Urine half-life was similar for the Beagles and the Pug, 0.75-1.39 h, whereas the half-life was 1.70-1.82 h for the English Setter, Greyhound, and Standard Poodle. Larger breed dogs exceeded 8 mcg/mL florfenicol (wild-type cutoff) in their urine at 12 h, whereas the Beagles and Pug had <8 mcg/mL; it is unclear if this is an individual, breed, or size difference. These data suggest oral florfenicol may need to be administered q6-12h for canine urinary tract infections, but further data are needed (more enrolled dogs, multiple-dose regimens) before considering clinical trials or breed-specific differences.

The application, value, and impact of outcomes research in animal health and veterinary medicine

Outcomes research is a relatively recent field of study in animal health and veterinary medicine despite being well-established in human medicine. As the field of animal health is broad-ranging in terms of animal species, objectives, research methodologies, design, analysis, values, and outcomes, there is inherent versatility in the application and impact of the discipline of outcomes research to a variety of stakeholders. The major themes of outcomes relevant to the animal health industry have been distilled down to include, but are not limited to, health, production, economics, and marketing. An outcomes research approach considers an element of value along with an outcome of interest, setting it apart from traditional research approaches. Elements of value are determined by the stakeholders' use of products and/or services that meet or exceed functional, emotional, life-changing, and/or societal needs. Stakeholder perception of value depends on many factors such as the purpose of the animal (e.g., companion vs. food production) and the stakeholder's role (e.g., veterinarian, client, pet-owner, producer, consumer, government official, industry representative, policy holder). Key areas of application of outcomes research principles include comparative medicine, veterinary product development, and post-licensure evaluation of veterinary pharmaceuticals and/or biologics. Topics currently trending in human healthcare outcomes research, such as drug pricing, precision medicine, or the use of real-world evidence, offer novel and interesting perspectives for addressing themes common to the animal health sector. An approach that evaluates the benefits of practices and interventions to veterinary patients and society while maximizing outcomes is paramount to combating many current and future scientific challenges where feeding the world, caring for our aging companion animals, and implementing novel technologies in companion animal medicine and in production animal agriculture are at the forefront of our industry goals.