Serum surfactant protein D as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 trial in Japan

The role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment follow-up of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive lung disease of unknown cause with a poor prognosis. The aim of our study is to determine the role of Krebs von den Lungen-6(KL-6),Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7, Surfactant protein A (SP-A), Surfactant protein D(SP-D), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and periostin in the diagnosis of IPF and in the response monitoring of patients treated.

METHOD

47 IPF patients, 27 non-IPF interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients and 21 healthy individuals were included in the study. Demographic data, pulmonary function test- Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (PFT-DLCO) measurements, High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings of the patients were recorded, and serum samples were taken.

RESULTS

While periostin and SP-A levels were not significantly different between IPF and non-IPF ILD, they were significantly higher in both IPF and non-IPF ILD compared to healthy control group (p=0.002,p=0.006 for periostin and p=0.002,p<0.001 for SP-A, respectively).By receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the cut-off point for periostin to distinguish IPF is >594.5 pg/ml (sensitivity 72%, specificity 76%), while the cut-off point for SP-A is found >6.62 ng/ml (sensitivity 87.2%,specificity 57.1%). In the combined ROC analysis based on SP-A=6.62 ng/ml and periostin >634.6 pg/ml values, sensitivity was found to be 85% and specificity was 57%.Considering the correlation of forced expiratory volume in the first second  (FEV1)(%), forced vital capacity (FVC)(%), restriction and diffusion severities with biomarker levels in the 6th month of IPF patients treated, a correlation was detected between MMP-7 levels and restriction severities (p=0.020), between KL-6 levels and restriction and diffusion severities (p=0.002), and between SP-A levels and FVC(%)(p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

It is thought that biomarkers SP-A and periostin may contribute significantly to the diagnosis of patients with IPF, and SP-A, MMP-7 and KL-6 levels may contribute significantly to treatment follow-up.

Pirfenidone and nintedanib attenuate pulmonary fibrosis in mice by inhibiting the expression of JAK2

Background

Pirfenidone and nintedanib were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). These two drugs can slow the progression of the disease, but the specific mechanisms are not fully understood. In the current study, bleomycin (BLM) induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice was accompanied by high p-JAK2 expression in lung tissue, mainly in the nucleus. The expression of p-JAK2 significantly decreased after intragastric administration of pirfenidone and nintedanib. p-JAK2 is reportedly expressed mainly in the cytoplasm and exerts its effect by activating downstream p-STAT3 in the nucleus.

Methods

In vivo experiments, pulmonary fibrosis was induced in mice with BLM and then treated with pirfenidone and nintedanib. The levels of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β1), SP-A, SP-D and KL-6 in serum were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Pathological staining was performed to assess lung fibrosis in mice, Western blot was performed to detect the expression levels of relevant proteins, and immunofluorescence was performed to observe the fluorescence expression of p-JAK2. In cellular experiments, MLE12 was stimulated with TGF-β1 and intervened with TGF-β1 receptor inhibitor and si-JAK2, pirfenidone and nintedanib, respectively, and the related protein expression levels were detected by Western blot.

Results

In both in vivo and in vitro experiments, pirfenidone and nintedanib were found to attenuate the expression of lung fibrosis markers by inhibiting the expression of JAK2, which may reduce the entry of p-JAK2 into the nucleus by downregulating JAK2 phosphorylation through inhibition of the TGF-β receptor. In contrast, inhibition of JAK2 expression greatly reduced the expression of TGF-β receptor and α-smooth muscles actin (a myofibroblast activation marker).

Conclusions

In both in vivo and in vitro experiments, the present study demonstrated that TGF-β1 promotes JAK2 phosphorylation through a non-classical pathway, and conversely, inhibition of JAK2 expression affects the TGF-β1 signalling pathway. Therefore, we speculate that TGF-β1 and JAK2 signaling pathways interact with each other and participate in fibrosis.

Targeting Progression in Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Overview of Underlying Mechanisms, Molecular Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Intervention

Interstitial lung diseases comprise a heterogenous range of diffuse lung disorders, potentially resulting in pulmonary fibrosis. While idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has been recognized as the paradigm of a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease, other conditions with a progressive fibrosing phenotype characterized by a significant deterioration of the lung function may lead to a burden of significant symptoms, a reduced quality of life, and increased mortality, despite treatment. There is now evidence indicating that some common underlying biological mechanisms can be shared among different chronic fibrosing disorders; therefore, different biomarkers for disease-activity monitoring and prognostic assessment are under evaluation. Thus, understanding the common pathways that induce the progression of pulmonary fibrosis, comprehending the diversity of these diseases, and identifying new molecular markers and potential therapeutic targets remain highly crucial assignments. The purpose of this review is to examine the main pathological mechanisms regulating the progression of fibrosis in interstitial lung diseases and to provide an overview of potential biomarker and therapeutic options for patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

Association of the lung immune prognostic index with the survival of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), a simple index calculated from the blood lactate dehydrogenase level and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, is thought to be associated with host immune status. However, the utility of LIPI in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) is unknown.

METHODS

In this multicentre, retrospective, observational study, an association between LIPI and the survival of patients with IIPs was evaluated.

RESULTS

Exploratory and validation cohorts consisting of 460 and 414 patients with IIPs, respectively, were included (159 and 159 patients had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF], and 301 and 255 had non-IPF, respectively). In the exploratory cohort, patients with IPF and a low LIPI had significantly better survival than those with a high LIPI (median of 5.6 years vs. 3.9 years, p = 0.016). The predictive ability of LIPI for the survival of patients with IPF was validated in the validation cohort (median of 8.5 years vs. 4.4 years, p = 0.003). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, LIPI was selected as an independent predictive factor for the survival of IPF patients. There was no significant association between LIPI and survival of non-IPF patients in the exploratory and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The LIPI was a predictive factor for the survival of patients with IPF and could aid the management of IPF.

Predictive biomarkers of disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic interstitial disease that cannot be cured, and treatment options for IPF are very limited. Early diagnosis, close monitoring of disease progression, and timely treatment are therefore the best options for patients due to the irreversibility of IPF. Effective markers help doctors judge the development and prognosis of disease. Recent research on traditional biomarkers (KL-6, SP-D, MMP-7, TIMPs, CCL18) has provided novel ideas for predicting disease progression and prognosis. Some emerging biomarkers (HE4, GDF15, PRDX4, inflammatory cells, G-CSF) also provide more possibilities for disease prediction. In addition to markers in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), some improvements related to the GAP model and chest HRCT also show good predictive ability for disease prognosis.

Exploring the Role of Biomarkers Associated with Alveolar Damage and Dysfunction in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis-A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is one of the most aggressive forms of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), marked by an ongoing, chronic fibrotic process within the lung tissue. IPF leads to an irreversible deterioration of lung function, ultimately resulting in an increased mortality rate. Therefore, the focus has shifted towards the biomarkers that might contribute to the early diagnosis, risk assessment, prognosis, and tracking of the treatment progress, including those associated with epithelial injury.

METHODS

We conducted this review through a systematic search of the relevant literature using established databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Selected articles were assessed, with data extracted and synthesized to provide an overview of the current understanding of the existing biomarkers for IPF.

RESULTS

Signs of epithelial cell damage hold promise as relevant biomarkers for IPF, consequently offering valuable support in its clinical care. Their global and standardized utilization remains limited due to a lack of comprehensive information of their implications in IPF.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing the aggressive nature of IPF among interstitial lung diseases and its profound impact on lung function and mortality, the exploration of biomarkers becomes pivotal for early diagnosis, risk assessment, prognostic evaluation, and therapy monitoring.

Precision medicine advances in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a highly heterogeneous, unpredictable and ultimately lethal chronic lung disease. Over the last decade, two anti-fibrotic agents have been shown to slow disease progression, however, both drugs are administered uniformly with minimal consideration of disease severity and inter-individual molecular, genetic, and genomic differences. Advances in biological understanding of disease endotyping and the emergence of precision medicine have shown that "a one-size-fits-all approach" to the management of chronic lung diseases is no longer appropriate. While precision medicine approaches have revolutionized the management of other diseases such as lung cancer and asthma, the implementation of precision medicine in IPF clinical practice remains an unmet need despite several reports demonstrating a large number of diagnostic, prognostic and theragnostic biomarker candidates in IPF. This review article aims to summarize our current knowledge of precision medicine in IPF and highlight barriers to translate these research findings into clinical practice.

Challenges in the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) requires the careful exclusion of secondary causes of interstitial lung disease (ILD), and the collaboration among different specialists is considered paramount to establish a diagnosis with high diagnostic confidence. The multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) has assumed an increasing importance over the years in the different phases of the IPF diagnostic work-up.

AREAS COVERED

The role of MDD in the diagnosis and management of IPF will be described. Practical insights will be provided into how and when to perform MDD based on the available scientific evidence. Current limitations and future perspectives will be discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

In the absence of high diagnostic confidence, agreement between different specialists during MDD is recognized as a surrogate indicator of diagnostic accuracy. Often, despite a lengthy evaluation, the diagnosis remains unclassifiable in a significant percentage of patients. MDD therefore appears to be pivotal in attaining an accurate diagnosis of ILDs. The discussion among different specialists can also include other specialists, such as rheumatologists and thoracic surgeons, in addition to the core group of pulmonologists, radiologists, and pathologists. Such discussions can allow greater diagnostic accuracy and have important effects on management, pharmacologic therapies, and prognosis.

A Systematic Review of the Prognostic Significance of the Body Mass Index in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

The identification of novel prognostic biomarkers might enhance individualized management strategies in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although several patient characteristics are currently used to predict outcomes, the prognostic significance of the body mass index (BMI), a surrogate measure of excess fat mass, has not been specifically investigated until recently. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, from inception to July 2022, for studies investigating associations between the BMI and clinical endpoints in IPF. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the risk of bias. The PRISMA 2020 statement on the reporting of systematic reviews was followed. Thirty-six studies were identified (9958 IPF patients, low risk of bias in 20), of which 26 were published over the last five years. Significant associations between lower BMI values and adverse outcomes were reported in 10 out of 21 studies on mortality, four out of six studies on disease progression or hospitalization, and two out of three studies on nintedanib tolerability. In contrast, 10 out of 11 studies did not report any significant association between the BMI and disease exacerbation. Our systematic review suggests that the BMI might be useful to predict mortality, disease progression, hospitalization, and treatment-related toxicity in IPF (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022353363).

Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected millions worldwide with a high mortality rate due to a lack of definitive treatment. Despite having a wide range of clinical features, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has emerged as the primary cause of mortality in these patients. Risk factors and comorbidities like advanced age with limited lung function, pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity have increased the risk for severe COVID-19 infection. Rise in inflammatory markers like transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and expression of matrix metalloproteinase 1 and 7 (MMP-1, MMP-7), along with collagen deposition at the site of lung injury, results in extensive lung scarring and fibrosis. Anti-fibrotic drugs, such as Pirfenidone and Nintedanib, have emerged as potential treatment options for post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis. A lung transplant might be the only life-saving treatment. Despite the current advances in the management of COVID-19, there is still a considerable knowledge gap in the management of long-term sequelae in such patients, especially concerning pulmonary fibrosis. Follow up on the current clinical trials and research to test the efficacy of various anti-inflammatory drugs is needed to prevent long-term sequelae early mortality in these patients.

Blood Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels predict treatment response to antifibrotic therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Antifibrotic therapy can slow disease progression (DP) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the prognostic biomarkers for DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy have not been identified. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) for DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy.

METHODS

The clinical data of 188 patients with IPF who initiated antifibrotic therapy at three tertiary hospitals was retrospectively analyzed. DP was defined as a relative decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ 10%, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide ≥ 15%, acute exacerbation, or deaths during 6 months after antifibrotic therapy.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 68.9 years, 77.7% were male, and DP occurred in 43 patients (22.9%) during follow-up (median, 7.6 months; interquartile range, 6.2-9.8 months). There was no difference in baseline KL-6 levels between the DP and no-DP groups; however, among patients with high baseline KL-6 levels (≥ 500 U/mL), changes in KL-6 levels over 1 month were higher in the DP group than those in the non-DP group, and higher relative changes in KL-6 over 1 month were independently associated with DP (odds ratio, 1.043; 95% confidence interval 1.005-1.084) in the multivariable logistic analysis adjusted for age and FVC. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the 1-month change in KL-6 was also useful for predicting DP (area under the curve = 0.707; P < 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the relative change in KL-6 over 1 month might be useful for predicting DP in patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy when baseline KL6 is high.

Serial Measurements of Circulating KL-6, SP-D, MMP-7, CA19-9, CA-125, CCL18, and Periostin in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Receiving Antifibrotic Therapy: An Exploratory Study

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and inevitably fatal disease with a heterogeneous clinical course. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of circulating biomarkers in routine IPF clinical practice. We conducted an exploratory study in a cohort of 28 IPF subjects qualified for anti-fibrotic therapy with up to 24 months serial measurements of seven IPF biomarkers, including those that are well-established, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), surfactant protein D (SP-D), matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP-7), and more recently introduced ones, cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 18 (CCL18), and periostin. Among studied biomarkers, SP-D had the highest diagnostic accuracy to differentiate IPF subjects from controls, followed by MMP-7 and KL-6. At each study timepoint, KL-6 levels correlated inversely with forced vital capacity % predicted (FVC% pred.), and transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide % predicted (T_L,CO% pred.), while SP-D levels correlated inversely with FVC% pred. and T_L,CO% pred. at 24 months of anti-fibrotic therapy. Baseline KL-6 and CA19-9 concentrations were significantly elevated in patients with progressive disease in comparison to patients with stable disease. In addition, in the progressors subgroup CA19-9 concentrations significantly increased over the second year of study follow-up. In patients with progressive disease, we observed a significant inverse correlation between a change in SP-D levels and a change in FVC% pred. in the first year of treatment, whereas in the second year a significant inverse correlation between a change in KL-6 levels and a change in FVC% pred. was noted. Our study findings support the view that both well-established IPF biomarkers, including KL-6, SP-D, and MMP-7, and more recently introduced ones, like CA19-9, have the potential to support clinical practice in IPF.

Molecular Biomarkers in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: State of the Art and Future Directions

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the most lethal form of interstitial pneumonia of unknown cause, is associated with a specific radiological and histopathological pattern (the so-called "usual interstitial pneumonia" pattern) and has a median survival estimated to be between 3 and 5 years after diagnosis. However, evidence shows that IPF has different clinical phenotypes, which are characterized by a variable disease course over time. At present, the natural history of IPF is unpredictable for individual patients, although some genetic factors and circulating biomarkers have been associated with different prognoses. Since in its early stages, IPF may be asymptomatic, leading to a delayed diagnosis. Two drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, have been shown to modify the disease course by slowing down the decline in lung function. It is also known that 5-10% of the IPF patients may be affected by episodes of acute and often fatal decline. The acute worsening of disease is sometimes attributed to identifiable conditions, such as pneumonia or heart failure; but many of these events occur without an identifiable cause. These idiopathic acute worsenings are termed acute exacerbations of IPF. To date, clinical biomarkers, diagnostic, prognostic, and theranostic, are not well characterized. However, they could become useful tools helping facilitate diagnoses, monitoring disease progression and treatment efficacy. The aim of this review is to cover molecular mechanisms underlying IPF and research into new clinical biomarkers, to be utilized in diagnosis and prognosis, even in patients treated with antifibrotic drugs.

Biomarkers in Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease: Optimizing Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Response

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a heterogenous group of diffuse lung disorders that commonly result in irreversible pulmonary fibrosis. While idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the prototypical progressive fibrosing ILD (PF-ILD), a high proportion of patients with other ILD subtypes develop a PF-ILD phenotype. Evidence exists for shared pathobiology leading to progressive fibrosis, suggesting that biomarkers of disease activity may prove informative across the wide spectrum of ILDs. Biomarker investigation to date has identified a number of molecular markers that predict relevant ILD endpoints, including disease presence, prognosis, and/or treatment response. In this review, we provide an overview of potentially informative biomarkers in patients with ILD, including those suggestive of a PF-ILD phenotype. We highlight the recent genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic investigations that identified these biomarkers and discuss the body compartments in which they are found, including the peripheral blood, airway, and lung parenchyma. Finally, we identify critical gaps in knowledge within the field of ILD biomarker research and propose steps to advance the field toward biomarker implementation.