Trends in oral corticosteroids use in severe asthma: a 14-year population-based study

Complications related to oral corticosteroid use in asthma patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Asthma patients requiring oral corticosteroids (OCS) are at increased risk of adverse effects. Research focusing on asthma patients adhering to guideline-directed therapy remains limited. This study evaluates the adverse effects of corticosteroids in asthma patients treated with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) who required additional OCS due to inadequate disease control.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of asthma patients from Taiwan's asthma pay-for-performance program, who had used high-dose ICS for at least 90 days, categorizing them based on OCS use. In the short-term period (3 months), patients were classified into a control group (no OCS) and an OCS group (≥450 mg OCS within 90 days). In the long-term period (6 months), the OCS group consisted of patients receiving ≥ 900 mg OCS within 180 days.

RESULTS

A total of 173,835 patients were enrolled for analysis. We assessed the risks of osteoporosis, diabetes, hypertension, infections, cardiovascular diseases, mental health disorders, and ocular conditions. Both short- and long-term OCS users exhibited significantly higher risks of these adverse outcomes compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the substantial health risks associated with OCS. Clinicians should carefully consider alternative strategies to minimize harm while ensuring effective disease control.

The Impact of Eliminating Out-of-Pocket Payments on Asthma Medication Use

Rationale: High costs of controller therapies may be a barrier to guideline-recommended asthma treatment. Objectives: We determined whether eliminating out-of-pocket (OOP) payments among low-income patients with asthma impacted controller medication use. Methods: We applied a controlled interrupted time series design to administrative claims data in British Columbia, Canada from 2017 to 2020. Cases were individuals with an annual household income <$13,750 in whom copays were eliminated in January 2019; there was no change in public coverage for the control group with annual income >$45,000. We evaluated trends in asthma medication costs, use, the ratio of inhaled corticosteroid-containing medications to all asthma medications, excessive use of short-acting β-agonists (more than one canister per month), and the proportion of days covered by controller therapies. Results: There were 12,940 cases (62% female; mean age, 30.3 yr; standard deviation [SD], 14.9) and 71,331 controls (55% female; mean age, 31.3 yr; SD, 16.3). Removal of OOP payments increased monthly mean medication costs by $3.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], $0.08 to $6.56, 2020 Canadian dollars), days' supply of controller medications by 1.50 days (95% CI, 0.61 to 2.40 d), and the ratio of inhaled corticosteroid-containing medications to total medications by 4.20% (95% CI, 0.73% to 7.66%) compared with the control group. The policy had no effect on the proportion of days covered by controller therapies (0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.04), but nonsignificantly decreased the percentage of patients with excessive short-acting β-agonist use (-6.37%; 95% CI, -12.90% to 0.16%). Conclusions: Removal of OOP payments increased the dispensation of controller therapies, suggesting cost-related nonadherence could impair optimal asthma management.

Clinical remission and control in severe asthma: agreements and disagreements

Over the last two decades, we have witnessed great advancements in our understanding of the immunological pathways of asthma, leading to the development of targeted therapies, such as biologic drugs, that have radically and definitively changed the clinical outcomes of severe asthma. Despite the numerous therapeutic options available, ~4-10% of all people with asthma have severe or uncontrolled asthma, associated with an increased risk of developing chronic oral corticosteroid use, fixed airflow limitation, exacerbations, hospitalization and, finally, increased healthcare costs. The new concept of disease modification in asthma comes from the evolution of asthma management, which encompasses phenotyping patients with different inflammatory endotypes characterizing the disease, followed by the advent of more effective therapies capable of targeting the proximal factors of airway inflammation. This treat-to-target approach aims to achieve remission of the disease. Because the novel treatment paradigm for severe asthma with the advent of biologic therapies is no longer clinical control but rather clinical remission - a step closer to the concept of cure - a deeper and more accurate understanding of the critical causal mechanisms and endotypes of asthma is necessary to achieve the goal of clinical remission, which has the potential to generate real life-changing benefits for patients. This review aims to frame the evolution of the debated concept of clinical remission and provide clinicians with insights that may be helpful in achieving remission in the greatest number of patients.

Family Physicians' Awareness of the Burden of Oral Corticosteroids in Asthma Patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify when family physicians decide to prescribe oral corticosteroids (OCS) to treat asthma, to establish the factors affecting their decision, and how familiar family physicians are with the side effects of OCS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among physicians that are members of the Slovenian Family Medicine Society.

RESULTS

The study included 122 family physicians from all 12 Slovenian regions. The great majority (86.9%) reported they had previously prescribed OCS to asthma patients. The largest share of these (45.1%) tended to prescribe a limited number of tablets, although many (42.6%) also prescribed the entire pack. Regarding the adverse effects associated with OCS, the physicians listed a range of potential problems, highlighting hyperglycemia and exacerbated diabetes, the impact on bone density, a suppressed immune system and increased risk of infection as the most common.

CONCLUSION

In the future, it is vital to improve family physicians' awareness of when OCS may be prescribed to treat severe asthma, and to define the clinical pathway for severe asthma, which should also involve interdisciplinary collaboration.

Real-world association between systemic corticosteroid exposure and complications in US patients with severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Systemic corticosteroid (SCS) use remains widespread among patients with severe asthma, despite associated complications.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the association between cumulative SCS exposure and SCS-related complications in severe asthma.

METHODS

This retrospective, longitudinal study used claims data from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database (GSK ID: 214469). Eligible patients (≥ 12 years old) had an asthma diagnosis and were divided into two cohorts: SCS use and non/burst-SCS use. Patients in the SCS use cohort had a claim for a daily prednisone-equivalent dose ≥ 5 mg SCS following ≥ 6 months of continuous SCS use; those in the non/burst-SCS cohort had no evidence of continuous SCS use and had a non-SCS controller/rescue medication initiation claim. For each cohort, the date of the qualifying claim was the index date. SCS users were further stratified by SCS use during each quarter of follow-up: low (≤ 6 mg/day), medium (> 6-12 mg/day), high (> 12 mg/day), and continuous high (≥ 20 mg/day for 90 days). SCS-related complications were evaluated in the quarter following SCS exposure. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) of experiencing SCS-related complications during follow-up in each of the SCS use groups versus the non/burst SCS cohort were calculated using generalized estimating equations models.

RESULTS

SCS and non/burst-SCS use cohorts included 7473 and 89,281 patients (mean follow-up: 24.6 and 24.2 months), respectively. Compared with the non/burst-SCS use cohort, medium, high, and continuous high SCS use was associated with greater odds of any SCS-related complication (adjusted OR [95% confidence interval]: 1.30 [1.21, 1.39], 1.49 [1.35, 1.64] and 1.63 [1.40, 1.89], respectively) including increased acute gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and immune system-related complications, and chronic cardiovascular, metabolic/endocrine, central nervous system, bone-/muscle-related, ophthalmologic, and hematologic/oncologic complications. Low-dose SCS use was also associated with significantly increased odds of acute gastrointestinal and immune system-related complications, and chronic bone-/muscle-related and hematologic/oncologic complications versus the non/burst-SCS use cohort.

CONCLUSION

SCS use, even at low doses, is associated with increased risk of SCS-related complications among patients with severe asthma.

Impact of income-based public drug coverage deductibles on adherence to asthma medications

BACKGROUND

Cost-related nonadherence to medications can be a barrier to asthma management.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the impact of public drug plan deductibles on adherence to asthma medications.

METHODS

We used a quasi-experimental regression discontinuity analysis to determine whether thresholds in deductibles for public drug coverage, determined on the basis of annual household income, decreased medication use among lower-income children and adults with asthma in British Columbia from 2013 to 2018. Using dispensed medication records, we evaluated deductible thresholds at annual household incomes of $15,000 (a deductible increase from 0% to 2% of annual household income), and $30,000 (a deductible increase from 2% to 3% annual household income). We evaluated medication costs, use, the ratio of inhaled corticosteroids-containing controller medications to total medications, excessive use of short-acting β-agonists, and the proportion of days covered by controller therapies. All costs are reported in 2020 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

Overall, 88,935 individuals contributed 443,847 person-years of follow-up (57% of female sex, mean age 31 years). Public drug subsidy decreased by -$41.74 (95% CI, -$28.34 to -$55.13) at the $15,000-deductible threshold, a 28% reduction, and patient costs increased by $48.45 (95% CI, $35.37-$61.53). The $30,000 deductible threshold did not affect public drug costs (P = .31), but patient costs increased by $27.65 (95% CI, $15.22-$40.09), which is an 11% increase. Asthma-related medication use, inhaled corticosteroids-to-total medication ratio, excessive use of short-acting β-agonists, and proportion of days covered by controller therapies were not impacted by deductible thresholds.

CONCLUSION

Income-based deductibles reduced public drug costs with no effect on asthma-related medication use, adherence to controller therapies, or excessive reliever therapy use in lower-income individuals with asthma.

Application of an algorithm to analyze patterns of intermittent oral corticosteroid use in asthma

An algorithm to describe patterns of intermittent oral corticosteroid use in the UK (n = 476,167) found that one-third of patients receiving intermittent oral corticosteroids for asthma only had short gaps (<90 days) between oral corticosteroid prescriptions sometime during follow-up. The increasing frequency pattern was more likely in patients with greater asthma severity and with more short-acting β₂-agonist use at baseline. Our approach may provide a clinically relevant representation of intermittent oral corticosteroid use in asthma.

Systemic corticosteroids in asthma: A call to action from World Allergy Organization and Respiratory Effectiveness Group

Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) are a highly effective treatment for acute exacerbations and long-term symptom control in asthma. Long-term SCS use is highly prevalent across all asthma severities, occurring in over 20% of patients with severe or uncontrolled disease globally. It is now well known that exposure to both long-term and repeated acute courses of SCS is associated with a high risk of serious adverse effects (AEs), such as osteoporosis, and metabolic and cardiovascular complications, especially when prescribed onto a background of other corticosteroids. The aim of this call-to-action article, endorsed by the World Allergy Organization and the Respiratory Effectiveness Group, is to review the accumulating evidence on the burden of SCS on patients with asthma and provide an overview of potential strategies for implementing SCS Stewardship. Primary prevention of exacerbations and improvement of asthma control is a key first step in achieving SCS Stewardship, by optimizing maintenance asthma medications and addressing modifiable risk factors, such as adherence and inhaler technique. Other key elements of SCS Stewardship include increasing appropriate specialist referrals for multidisciplinary review, assessment of biomarkers, and consideration of oral corticosteroid-sparing add-on therapies (eg, biologics). In cases where SCS use is deemed clinically justified, it should be tapered to the lowest possible dose. In addition, patients receiving long-term SCS or frequent acute courses should be closely monitored for emergence of SCS-related AEs. Because of the extensive data available on the costly and burdensome AEs associated with SCS use, as well as the range of treatment options now available, there is a need for healthcare providers (HCPs) to carefully evaluate whether the benefits of SCS outweigh the potential harms, to adopt SCS-sparing and Stewardship strategies, and to consider alternative therapies where possible. Development of a structured and collaborative SCS Stewardship approach is urgently required to protect patients from the potential harm of SCS use.

Characteristics of Oral Corticosteroid Users Among Persons with Asthma on GINA Step 3 Therapy and Above: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portuguese Community Pharmacies

PURPOSE

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are frequently used in asthma management but have an important risk-profile. The aim of the study is to characterize and compare the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, treatment regimen and asthma control between OCS users and non-users among the population of asthma patients (≥18 years) at GINA step 3 and above treated with a fixed combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study in Portuguese community pharmacies. Data was collected via paper-based interview delivered at the pharmacy (sociodemographic characteristics and asthma treatment regimen, namely ICS/LABA and OCS utilization), followed by a telephonic interview collecting smoking history, comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), history of exacerbations and asthma-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in the previous 12 months, as well as asthma control using the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT®).

RESULTS

A total of 347 patients recruited in 98 pharmacies were included in the analysis. Of those, 328 had completed both questionnaires. A quarter of the individuals reported OCS use in the previous 12 months (OCS users), either as add-on therapy (6%) or exacerbation treatment (19%). Patients were mostly females (72%), with an average age of 59.5 years (SD=15.4). OCS users were significantly older and reported more frequently having conjunctivitis (25.9% vs 15.0%), osteoporosis (25.9% vs 13.4%), arthritis (14.6% vs 6.9%), and gastrointestinal disease (16.1% vs 8.1%). OCS users also reported greater urgent HCRU: unscheduled consultations (33.3% vs 9.3%) and emergency department (ED) visits (32.1% vs 12.1%). Both groups presented poor disease control (85.2% of OCS users vs 72.9% of non-OCS users).

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the burden of OCS therapy to asthma patients and the need to improve asthma management, by adopting OCS sparing strategies in this subgroup of patients.

16-year trends in asthma hospital admissions in Canada

BACKGROUND

Asthma hospitalizations declined rapidly in many parts of the world, including Canada, in the 1990s and early 2000s.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the declining trend of asthma hospitalizations persisted in recent years in Canada.

METHODS

Using the Canadian comprehensive nationwide hospitalization data (2002-2017), we identified hospital admissions with the main International Classification of Diseases codes for asthma. We analyzed sex-specific age-standardized trends in annual hospitalization rates among pediatric (< 19 years) and adult (19+ years) patients. We used change-point analysis to evaluate any substantial changes in the trends in the sex-age groups.

RESULTS

There were 254,672 asthma-related hospital admissions (59% pediatric, 50% female) during the study period. Among children, age-adjusted annual rates per 100,000 decreased by 55% in females (152-69) and by 60% in males (270-108) from 2002 to 2017. Among adults, the rates decreased by 59% in both sexes (females: 61-25; males: 27-11). Change-point analysis indicated a substantial plateauing of the annual rate in both pediatric (from -15.3 [females] and -25.8 [males] before 2010 to -0.6 [females] and -0.8 [males] after 2010) and adult (from -5.4 [females] and -2.6 [males] before 2008 to -0.6 [females] and -0.2 [males] after 2008) groups.

CONCLUSION

After a substantial decline in hospital admissions for acute asthma, there has been minimal further decline since 2010 for children and 2008 for adults. In addition to adhering to the contemporary standards of asthma care, novel, disruptive strategies are likely needed to further reduce the burden of asthma.

Oral corticosteroid-sparing effects of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma: evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) have long been a mainstay of treatment for asthma exacerbations and chronic severe asthma. However, it is increasingly recognized that both long-term and short-term OCS use are directly associated with a wide range of serious adverse effects, and as such OCS-sparing treatment alternatives are now widely recommended for patients with severe asthma. While several international guidelines recommend these treatments, guidance on OCS tapering, and which patients are most likely to tolerate OCS reduction and/or discontinuation, is still lacking. Several biologics have demonstrated efficacy in patients with OCS-dependent asthma. One OCS-sparing treatment is the anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody mepolizumab, which is approved for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. In addition to improved exacerbation rates, asthma control, quality of life, and lung function among patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, mepolizumab also has an OCS-sparing effect, which has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies. Both physicians and patients express concerns about the adverse effects of OCS, and additional data from the randomized, controlled SIRIUS trial (NCT01691508) highlight the high level of concern among patients regarding OCS-related burden. In this article, we discuss current guidance on OCS-sparing strategies for patients with severe asthma, provide a summary of the available evidence of the OCS-sparing effect of mepolizumab, and highlight patient and physician perspectives on the use of OCS and OCS-sparing treatments in severe asthma.