Moderate-intensity statin therapy seems ineffective in primary cardiovascular prevention in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated by nephropathy. A multicenter prospective 8 years follow up study

The association between statin use and diabetic nephropathy in US adults: data from NHANES 2005 - 2018

Background

A serious consequence of diabetes is diabetic nephropathy (DN), which is commonly treated by statins. Studies evaluating the effects of statin medication have yielded inconsistent results regarding the potential association with diabetic nephropathy. To manage diabetic nephropathy's onset and improve the quality of life of patients, it is imperative to gain a comprehensive understanding of its contributing factors.

Data and methods

Our study was conducted using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) as well as weighted multivariate logistic regression models to determine the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for diabetic nephropathy. We conducted stratified analyses to examine the impact of statins and the duration of their usage on diabetic nephropathy in different subgroups. A nomogram model and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were also developed to predict DN risk.

Results

Statin use significantly increased the incidence of DN (OR=1.405, 95%CI (1.199,1.647), p<0.001). Individuals who used statins for 5 to 7 years were more likely to develop diabetic nephropathy (OR=1.472, 95%CI (1.057,2.048), p=0.022) compared to those who used statins for 1-3 years (OR=1.334, 95%CI (1.058,1.682), p=0.015) or <1 year (OR=1.266, 95%CI (1.054,1.522), p = 0.012). Simvastatin has a greater incidence of diabetic nephropathy (OR=1.448, 95%CI(1.177, 1.78), P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Taking statins long-term increases the risk of DN. Statin use is associated with an increased risk of DN. Caution should be exercised when prescribing atorvastatin and simvastatin for long-term statin therapy.

Intensified Multifactorial Intervention in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

In the management of diabetes mellitus, one of the most important goals is to prevent its micro- and macrovascular complications, and to that end, multifactorial intervention is widely recommended. Intensified multifactorial intervention with pharmacotherapy for associated risk factors, alongside lifestyle modification, was first shown to be efficacious in patients with microalbuminuria (Steno-2 study), then in those with less advanced microvascular complications (the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment In People with Screen Detected Diabetes in Primary Care [ADDITION]-Europe and the Japan Diabetes Optimal Treatment study for 3 major risk factors of cardiovascular diseases [J-DOIT3]), and in those with advanced microvascular complications (the Nephropathy In Diabetes-Type 2 [NID-2] study and Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan [DNETT-Japan]). Thus far, multifactorial intervention led to a reduction in cardiovascular and renal events, albeit not necessarily significant. It should be noted that not only baseline characteristics but also the control status of the risk factors and event rates during intervention among the patients widely varied from one trial to the next. Further evidence is needed for the efficacy of multifactorial intervention in a longer duration and in younger or elderly patients. Moreover, now that new classes of antidiabetic drugs are available, it should be addressed whether strict and safe glycemic control, alongside control of other risk factors, could lead to further risk reductions in micro- and macrovascular complications, thereby decreasing all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The number of risk factors not at target is associated with cardiovascular risk in a type 2 diabetic population with albuminuria in primary cardiovascular prevention. Post-hoc analysis of the NID-2 trial

Background

Nephropathy in Diabetes type 2 (NID-2) study is an open-label cluster randomized clinical trial that demonstrated that multifactorial intensive treatment reduces Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs) and overall mortality versus standard of care in type 2 diabetic subjects with albuminuria and no history of cardiovascular disease. Aim of the present post-hoc analysis of NID- 2 study is to evaluate whether the number of risk factors on target associates with patient outcomes.

Methods

Intervention phase lasted four years and subsequent follow up for survival lasted 10 years. To the aim of this post-hoc analysis, the whole population has been divided into 3 risk groups: 0–1 risk factor (absent/low); 2–3 risk factors (intermediate); 4 risk factors (high). Primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non-fatal MACEs, the secondary endpoint was all-cause death at the end of the follow-up phase.

Results

Absent/low risk group included 166 patients (52.4%), intermediate risk group 128 (40.4%) and high-risk group 23 (7.3%). Cox model showed a significant higher risk of MACE and death in the high-risk group after adjustment for confounding variables, including treatment arm (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.04–3.52, P = 0.038 and 1.96, 95%CI 1.02–3.8, P = 0,045, respectively, vs absent/low risk group).

Conclusions

This post-hoc analysis of the NID-2 trial indicates that the increase in the number of risk factors at target correlates with better cardiovascular-free survival in patients with type 2 diabetes at high CV risk.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00535925. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00535925

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-022-01674-7.

CTRP4 is Associated with Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with type 2 diabetes

Aims/Introduction

To evaluate the correlation of circulating C1q tumor necrosis factor‐related protein 4 (CTRP4) with coronary artery disease (CAD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Methods

A total of 240 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled in our center between January 2020 and December 2020. They were assigned into two groups, including the CAD and non‐CAD groups, based on coronary angiography or computed tomography angiography findings. Serum CTRP4 levels were detected by an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kit. The association of CTRP4 with CAD was determined by logistic regression analysis. The predictive value of CTRP4 for CAD was calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results

Median serum CTRP4 amounts were markedly elevated in the CAD group in comparison with the non‐CAD group (10.37 vs 3.75 ng/mL, P < 0.01). Binary logistic regression showed that CTRP4 was associated with CAD and even the amount of coronary artery lesions (P < 0.05). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was greater for CTRP4 compared with HbA1c or CRP (0.87 vs 0.74, 0.87 vs 0.80, P < 0.01). The area under the curve for CTRP4 and glycated hemoglobin in combination was larger than that obtained for CTRP4 combined with CRP (0.91 vs 0.87, P < 0.01). According to the maximum Youden index criteria, the optimal cut‐off of CTRP4 was 5.42 ng/mL, which yielded a sensitivity of 84.4% and a specificity of 76.7% in predicting CAD in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Conclusions

Serum CTRP4 levels are positively correlated with CAD occurrence and severity. Combining CTRP4 and glycated hemoglobin has a better predictive value for CAD in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

SIRT1 rs10823108 and FOXO1 rs17446614 responsible for genetic susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy

SIRT1 and FOXO1 play an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy (DN). However, the association between genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to type 2 DN (T2DN) has not been explored. In this study, a total of 1066 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (413 without and 653 with DN) were enrolled. The genotypes of three htSNPs (rs3818292, rs4746720, rs10823108) within SIRT1 and two htSNPs (rs2721068, rs17446614) in FOXO1 were determined by PCR-RFLP. HbA1C, LDL, HDL, TC, and TG levels were also examined. SIRT1 rs10823108 AA genotype was significantly associated with a decreased risk of DN (OR = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.38–0.97), while GA genotype (OR = 1.77, 95%CI: 1.33–2.35) and AA genotype (OR = 2.32, 95%CI: 1.25–4.34) of FOXO1 rs17446614 was associated with an increased T2DN risk. The interactions among rs1744 6614, BMI and duration of diabetes (OR: 2.63, 95%CI: 1.23–4.31) were also observed. Subsequent haplotype analysis revealed that two haplotype defined by AC (OR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.15–1.94) and AT (OR: 1.79, 95%CI: 1.06–2.80) within FOXO1 gene may increase the risk of T2DN. In conclusion, genetic variant rs10823108 in SIRT1 and variant rs17446614 in FoxO1 may contribute to the risk of DN in T2DM patients.

Effects of background statin therapy on glycemic response and cardiovascular events following initiation of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a large UK cohort study

Aim

Statins may increase the risk of new-onset diabetes and adversely affect glycaemic control, but their effects on the glycemic response and mortality outcomes following commencement of insulin therapy in patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) are unclear.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 12,725 insulin initiators with T2D using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) UK database. Changes in HbA1c at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months, and the 5-year risk of mortality and (3-point) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), were compared between prior users (n = 10,682) and non-users (n = 2043) of statin therapy who were newly commenced on insulin treatment. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios of the different outcomes.

Results

Mean age of the cohort was 58.7 ± 14.0 years (51% male) and mean baseline HbA1c was 8.7 ± 1.8%. A greater initial reduction in HbA1c was observed following insulin initiation in the non-users of statins compared with the users, which was significant in the short term (−0.34% vs −0.26% at 6 months; mean diff = −0.09%, p = 0.004) but not in the long term: −0.31% versus −0.35% at 3 years (mean diff = 0.05%, p = 0.344). CV events (3-point MACE) were 878 versus 217 in statin users versus non-users (20.7 vs 30.9 per 1000 person-years; adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 1.36 (95% CI 1.15–1.62; p < 0.0001). In a subgroup analysis of individual statins, HbA1c was higher throughout the study duration with all statins relative to non-users of statin therapy (p < 0.05). The aHRs for 3-point MACE for atorvastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin and pravastatin were 0.82 (95% CI 0.68–0.98), 0.67 (0.55–0.82), 0.56 (0.39–0.81) and 0.78 (0.60–1.01), respectively.

Conclusions

Following initiation of insulin therapy in patients with T2D in routine care, concurrent use of a statin was associated with less good glycaemic control in the short-term but a much lower risk of major adverse CV events.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12933-017-0587-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.