Antidiabetic treatment patterns and specialty care utilization among patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease

The prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, and obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the description of concurrent treatments: A two-center retrospective cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia

Background

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and obesity are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Nonetheless, their prevalence among patients with T2DM in Saudi Arabia (SA) remains unknown. As current guidelines recommend, these comorbidities require adding certain antidiabetic agents with cardiorenal benefits. However, the prescribers' adherence to these recommendations remains unclear.

Methods

A two-center retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted including adult patients (≥18 years) with T2DM admitted to hospital or seen at outpatient clinics between January and December 2020. Patients were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of ASCVD. Patients with no prior ASCVD history were further classified based on the 10-year ASCVD risk estimation. Endpoints of interest included the prevalence of ASCVD, HF, CKD, and obesity in patients with T2DM. We also evaluated the characteristics of the utilized antidiabetic agents, statin, and aspirin therapies..

Results

Of the 1,218 included patients with T2DM, the majority were female (57.0 %), and aged 45-64 years (53.0 %) with a mean age of 59.3 ± 13.1 years. Hypertension and dyslipidemia were the most prevalent comorbidities (67.7 % and 69.0 %, respectively). Among all patients, 18.6 % had an established ASCVD and the prevalence of HF, CKD, and obesity were 5.1 %, 8.7 %, and 58.3 %, respectively. The most common types of ASCVD witnessed were revascularization (42.3 %), myocardial infarction (36.6 %), and stroke (33.9 %); with an increased prevalence of ASCVD as the age increases (52.8 % at age ≥ 65 years). In the non-ASCVD group, the 10-year ASCVD risk was intermediate or high in 62.7 % of these patients. The rates of utilization of guidelines-recommended therapies were 83.6 % for metformin, 9.4 % for GLP-1 RA, 10.8 % for SGLT2i, 35.2 % for aspirin alone or in combination with clopidogrel, and 79.7 % for statin therapy.

Conclusions

ASCVD, HF, CKD, and obesity are common complications in patients with T2DM in SA, with low overall utilization of the recommended guidelines-recommended medical therapies. Multimodal strategies should be utilized to assess T2DM and its complications, and to improve prescribers' adherence to guidelines-recommended therapies.

Applying the ABCs of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention to the 2023 AHA/ACC Multisociety Chronic Coronary Disease Guidelines

The 2023 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Multisociety Guideline for the Management of Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease provides updated recommendations for the management of chronic coronary disease. The term "chronic coronary disease" reflects the lifelong nature of the disease and diverse disease etiologies that come under the chronic coronary disease umbrella, beyond the presence of epicardial coronary stenosis, which require targeted lifestyle recommendations, serial optimization of medications, and involvement of multiple care team members. In this review, we highlight several areas where a collaborative approach between cardiologists, primary care clinicians, and internists is essential to optimize the care of patients with chronic coronary disease.

Pharmacist impact on evidence-based prescribing of diabetes medications in patients with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Including pharmacists on care teams of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been shown to promote guideline-based prescribing and improve glycemic control, lowering risks of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Evidence is lacking regarding whether including pharmacists on the care team is associated with the prescribing of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) recommended for use in patients with T2D and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between having a pharmacist on the primary care team of patients with T2D and ASCVD and being prescribed a guideline-recommended GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of patients with T2D and ASCVD seen by primary care providers at an academic medical center between June 2019 and May 2020 was completed. Patients with prescriptions for GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i with evidence of cardiovascular benefit were identified and compared between those with pharmacist care vs usual care using multivariable log-binominal regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1,497 included patients, 1,283 (85.7%) were in the usual care group (mean age 68.9 years, hemoglobin A1c 7.6%) and 214 (14.3%) in the pharmacist care group (mean age 64.5 years, A1c 9.0%). Of the pharmacist care group, 50.5% were prescribed a GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i with cardiovascular benefit vs 17.9% in the usual care group (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses controlling for A1c and other potential confounders, those in the pharmacist care group were 2.15 times as likely to have been prescribed a GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i than those in the usual care group (adjusted risk ratio 2.15, 95% CI = 1.83-2.52; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide preliminary evidence that integrating pharmacists into patient care teams is associated with increased prescribing of guideline-recommended treatment with GLP-1 RA and SGLT-2i in patients with T2D and ASCVD, yet there is room for improvement in prescribing these agents to patients with T2D and ASCVD.

The Impact of Web-Based Continuing Medical Education Using Patient Simulation on Real-World Treatment Selection in Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Case-Control Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite guidelines recommending the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in certain patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), they are not being prescribed for many of these patients. Web-based continuing medical education (CME) patient simulations have been used to identify clinicians' practice gaps and improve clinical decision-making as measured within a simulation, but the impact of this format on real-world treatment has not been researched.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a simulation-based CME intervention on real-world use of GLP-1 RAs by endocrinologists and primary care physicians.

METHODS

Two evaluation phases of the CME simulation were conducted: phase I, the CME simulation phase, was a paired, pre-post study of 435 physician learners in the United States; and phase II, the real-world phase, was a retrospective, matched case-control study of 157 of the 435 physicians who had claims data available for the study period.

RESULTS

Phase I CME results showed a 29 percentage point increase in correct decisions from pre- to postfeedback (178/435, 40.9% to 304/435, 69.9%; P<.001) in selecting treatment that addresses both glycemic control and cardiovascular event protection. Phase II results showed that 39 of 157 (24.8%) physicians in the intervention group increased use of GLP-1 RAs, compared to 20 of 157 (12.7%) in the comparison group. Being in the intervention group predicted GLP-1 RA use after education (odds ratio 4.49; 95% CI 1.45-13.97; P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A web-based CME simulation focused on secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in a patient with T2D was associated with increased use of evidence-based treatment selection in the real world.

Telemedicine for diabetes management during COVID-19: what we have learnt, what and how to implement

The past two decades have witnessed telemedicine becoming a crucial part of health care as a method to facilitate doctor-patient interaction. Due to technological developments and the incremental acquisition of experience in its use, telemedicine's advantages and cost-effectiveness has led to it being recognised as specifically relevant to diabetology. However, the pandemic created new challenges for healthcare systems and the rate of development of digital services started to grow exponentially. It was soon discovered that COVID-19-infected patients with diabetes had an increased risk of both mortality and debilitating sequelae. In addition, it was observed that this higher risk could be attenuated primarily by maintaining optimal control of the patient's glucose metabolism. As opportunities for actual physical doctor-patient visits became restricted, telemedicine provided the most convenient opportunity to communicate with patients and maintain delivery of care. The wide range of experiences of health care provision during the pandemic has led to the development of several excellent strategies regarding the applicability of telemedicine across the whole spectrum of diabetes care. The continuation of these strategies is likely to benefit clinical practice even after the pandemic crisis is over.

Real-World Patterns of Basal Insulin Use with Other Diabetes Medications Among People with Type 2 Diabetes Between 2014 and 2020

INTRODUCTION

Basal insulin's position in the type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment paradigm has undergone significant revisions since the advent of diabetes medications such as glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), which offer cardiorenal protection for people with T2D (PwT2D). This study aimed to characterize the demographic, clinical, and diabetes medication utilization patterns of PwT2D initiating basal insulin between 2014 and 2020 over the time period when these revisions were occurring.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using the IBM^® MarketScan^® databases and included adults with T2D who initiated basal insulin therapy (basal insulin initiators) in 2015, 2017, or 2019. Patient characteristics, medication utilization patterns, and time to add an additional diabetes drug class were compared across years. Characteristics of users of basal insulin-GLP-1RA combination therapy (GLP-1RA-basal insulin dual users) were also compared across years.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2019, initiation of basal insulin therapy remained steady, with 1.6-1.9% of PwT2D starting basal insulin in each year. GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i use increased pre- and post-basal insulin initiation (pre-basal: GLP-1RA, from 14.8% to 25.2%, p < 0.0001; SGLT-2i, from 11.4% to 20.5%, p < 0.0001; post-basal: GLP-1RA, from 16.7% to 30.5%, p < 0.0001; SGLT-2i, from 13.4% to 23.3%, p < 0.0001]). The proportion of PwT2D with underlying cardiovascular and renal diseases did not increase during this period. Among basal insulin initiators without prior GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i, or bolus insulin use, time to adding on these agents decreased, with 14.0-15.6% starting bolus insulin within the first year. Among GLP-1RA-basal insulin dual initiators, the proportion of those with underlying cardiovascular disease was not higher among GLP-1RA first users.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, insulin remained key in the T2D treatment paradigm. A growing proportion of PwT2D utilized GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is before and after initiation of basal insulin therapy. At the same time, there was no increase in the proportion of those initiating basal insulin who had cardiorenal comorbidity profiles for which treatment guidelines have recommended the use of GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2is.

Health Care Provider Prescribing Habits and Barriers to Use of New Type 2 Diabetes Medications: A Single-System Survey Study

This survey study evaluated type 2 diabetes medication prescribing patterns of health care providers in different specialties and of different professional designations or levels of training at an academic health care system and sought to identify factors influencing medication choices and uncover barriers to prescribing glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. High cost and the need for prior authorizations were reported as the main barriers to prescribing drugs in these two classes, along with a lack of experience among some specialists. Greater system support to decrease the administrative burden of prescribing newer medications and greater dialogue among the specialties caring for patients with cardiorenal comorbidities can improve prescribing of these drugs in accordance with clinical practice recommendations.

Patterns of new glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use in patients with type 2 diabetes during 2014-2019 from a US database: prescriber and patient characteristics

Highlights This study demonstrates that initiation of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D), including those with concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), has remained low in the United States between 2014 and 2019, despite clinical evidence supporting their use for cardiovascular risk reduction. These findings add to the existing literature to highlight a gap in adherence to current practice guidelines, which suggests that most patients with T2D and ASCVD in the United States may not be receiving optimal risk‐reducing therapies.

Are we there yet? Increasing use of cardioprotective antihyperglycemic agents in patients with T2D and CVD or CV risk in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To report on the use of antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs) by age (i.e. <65, ≥65 years) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) or cardiovascular risk (CV risk) factors in the United States.

METHODS

Patients with T2D and CVD (CVD cohort) or T2D and an additional CV risk factor without pre-existing CVD (CV risk cohort) were identified from 2015 to 2019 in a claims database. Patients were followed from their first observed CVD diagnosis or CV risk factor for each year they were continuously enrolled or until occurrence of a CVD diagnosis (CV risk cohort only). Classes of AHAs received were reported by year, cohort, and age group.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2019, the percentage of patients <65 years on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) increased (CVD: 9-17%, CV risk: 9-17%) and was approximately twice that of those ≥65 years (CVD: 4-8%, CV risk: 4-8%); the percentage of patients <65 years on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors increased (CVD: 11-16%, CV risk: 11-17%) and was approximately triple that of those ≥65 years (CVD: 3-6%, CV risk: 4-7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of GLP-1 RAs and SGLT2 inhibitors increased during the study period; however, most patients did not receive these medications. Patients aged ≥65 years were particularly disadvantaged.

The prescribing pattern of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patient with type two diabetes mellitus: A two-center retrospective cross-sectional study

Background

The use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains limited, especially in those with other compelling indications. Thus, this study aimed to describe the prescribing patterns of GLP-1-RA and SGLT2i in patients with T2DM and to determine the factors that affect the prescribing of these medications.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed the electronic health records of adult patients diagnosed with T2DM who received care between January and December 2020. The patients were classified according to their compelling indications into "patients who are more likely" to benefit from SGLT2i or GLP-1 RA and "patients who are less likely" to benefit from them. They were then further categorized depending on whether these medications were prescribed.

Results

A total of 1,220 patients were included; most were female (56.9%). SGLT2i or GLP-1 RA were preferably prescribed in only 19% of the patients for reasons including BMI ≥ 27 kg/m² (85.6%), uncontrolled T2DM (68.5%), high risk for ASCVD (23.9%), or established ASCVD (14%). The remaining 81.0% were underprescribed these agents. Patients at an older age or with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack had higher odds of being underprescribed (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03 and OR 2.86; 95% CI: 1.33-6.15), respectively.

Conclusion

The results concur with those of previous studies highlighting the underutilization of GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i in patients with T2DM but also with compelling indications. To optimize the use of GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i for their additional benefits, prescribers need to assess the benefits of using these agents in patients who would likely benefit from them, regardless of DM control.

Synchronous Health Care Delivery for the Optimization of Cardiovascular and Renal Care in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current care model of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its complications appears to be "asynchronous" with patient care divided by specialty. This model is associated with low use of guideline-directed medical therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of integrated care models has been well described in the management of patients with T2D; this usually includes an endocrinologist coupled with a nutritionist and nurse. However, physician-based care models are largely "asynchronous," whereby the patient requires multiple different siloed specialties to manage their health care. To date, there has been limited exploration of synchronous care delivery, i.e., whereby multi-comorbid patients with T2D are seen simultaneously by health care providers from endocrinology, cardiology, and nephrology to optimize use of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT). Given the rising complexity of patients with T2D, further research is needed on the role of synchronous health care delivery in optimizing the use of GDMT and improving patient outcomes.

National Trends in Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists by Cardiologists and Other Specialties, 2015 to 2020

Background

Sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) mitigate cardiovascular risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes, but most eligible patients do not receive them. We characterized temporal trends in SGLT2i and GLP‐1RA use by cardiologists compared with other groups of clinicians.

Methods and Results

We conducted a descriptive analysis of serial, cross‐sectional data derived from IQVIA’s National Prescription Audit, a comprehensive audit capturing ≈90% of US retail prescription dispensing and projected to population‐level data, to estimate monthly SGLT2is and GLP‐1RAs dispensed from January 2015 to December 2020, stratified by prescriber specialty and molecule. We also used the American Medical Association’s Physician Masterfile to calculate average annual SGLT2is and GLP‐1RAs dispensed per physician. Between January 2015 and December 2020, a total of 63.2 million SGLT2i and 63.4 million GLP‐1RA prescriptions were dispensed in the United States. Monthly prescriptions from cardiologists increased 12‐fold for SGLT2is (from 2228 to 25 815) and 4‐fold for GLP‐1RAs (from 1927 to 6981). Nonetheless, cardiologists represented only 1.5% of SGLT2i prescriptions and 0.4% of GLP‐1RA prescriptions in 2020, while total use was predominated by primary care physicians/internists (57% of 2020 SGLT2is and 52% of GLP‐1RAs). Endocrinologists led in terms of prescriptions dispensed per physician in 2020 (272 SGLT2is and 405 GLP‐1RAs). Cardiologists, but not noncardiologists, increasingly used SGLT2is over GLP‐1RAs, with accelerated uptake of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin coinciding with their landmark cardiovascular outcomes trials and subsequent US Food and Drug Administration label expansions.

Conclusions

While use of SGLT2is and GLP‐1RAs by cardiologists in the United States increased substantially over a 6‐year period, cardiologists still account for a very small proportion of all use, contributing to marked undertreatment of individuals with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk.

Use of Lipid-, Blood Pressure-, and Glucose-Lowering Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

IMPORTANCE

Based on contemporary estimates in the US, evidence-based therapies for cardiovascular risk reduction are generally underused among patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the use of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive therapies in a broad US population with diabetes and ASCVD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter cohort study used health system-level aggregated data within the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, including 12 health systems. Participants included patients with diabetes and established ASCVD (ie, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral artery disease) between January 1 and December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from September 2020 until January 2021.

EXPOSURES

One or more health care encounters in 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient characteristics by prescription of any of the following key evidence-based therapies: high-intensity statin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA).

RESULTS

The overall cohort included 324 706 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 68.1 (12.2) years and 144 169 (44.4%) women and 180 537 (55.6%) men. A total of 59 124 patients (18.2% ) were Black, and 41 470 patients (12.8%) were Latinx. Among 205 885 patients with specialized visit data from the prior year, 17 971 patients (8.7%) visited an endocrinologist, 54 330 patients (26.4%) visited a cardiologist, and 154 078 patients (74.8%) visited a primary care physician. Overall, 190 277 patients (58.6%) were prescribed a statin, but only 88 426 patients (26.8%) were prescribed a high-intensity statin; 147 762 patients (45.5%) were prescribed an ACEI or ARB, 12 724 patients (3.9%) were prescribed a GLP-1RA, and 8989 patients (2.8%) were prescribed an SGLT2I. Overall, 14 918 patients (4.6%) were prescribed all 3 classes of therapies, and 138 173 patients (42.6%) were prescribed none. Patients who were prescribed a high-intensity statin were more likely to be men (59.9% [95% CI, 59.6%-60.3%] of patients vs 55.6% [95% CI, 55.4%-55.8%] of patients), have coronary atherosclerotic disease (79.9% [95% CI, 79.7%-80.2%] of patients vs 73.0% [95% CI, 72.8%-73.3%] of patients) and more likely to have seen a cardiologist (40.0% [95% CI, 39.6%-40.4%] of patients vs 26.4% [95% CI, 26.2%-26.6%] of patients).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this large cohort of US patients with diabetes and ASCVD, fewer than 1 in 20 patients were prescribed all 3 evidence-based therapies, defined as a high-intensity statin, either an ACEI or ARB, and either an SGLT2I and/or a GLP-1RA. These findings suggest that multifaceted interventions are needed to overcome barriers to the implementation of evidence-based therapies and facilitate their optimal use.

Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Inequities in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Patients With Diabetes in the US

Importance

Randomized clinical trials have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) cause significant weight loss and reduce cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Black patients have a disproportionate burden of obesity and cardiovascular disease and have a higher rate of cardiovascular-related mortality. Racial and ethnic disparities in health outcomes are largely attributable to the pervasiveness of structural racism, and patients who are marginalized by racism have less access to novel therapeutics.

Objectives

To evaluate GLP-1 RA uptake among a commercially insured population of patients with T2D; identify associations of race, ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status with GLP-1 RA use; and specifically examine its use among the subgroup of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) because of the known benefit of GLP-1 RA use for this population.

Design Setting and Participants

This was a retrospective cohort analysis using data from OptumInsight Clinformatics Data Mart of commercially insured adult patients with T2D (with or without ASCVD) in the US. Data from October 1, 2015, to June 31, 2019, were included, and the analyses were performed in July 2020. We estimated multivariable logistic regression models to identify the association of race, ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status with GLP-1 RA use.

Main Outcome and Measure

A prescription for a GLP-1 RA.

Results

Of the 1 180 260 patients with T2D (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-76] years; 50.3% female; 57.7% White), 90 934 (7.7%) were treated with GLP-1 RA during the study period. From 2015 to 2019, the percentage of T2D patients treated with an GLP-1 RA increased from 3.2% to 10.7%. Among patients with T2D and ASCVD, use also increased but remained low (2.8%-9.4%). In multivariable analyses, lower rates of GLP-1 RA use were found among Asian (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.56-0.62), Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.81; 95% CI, 0.79-0.83), and Hispanic (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93) patients with T2D. Female sex (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.20-1.24) and higher zip code-linked median household incomes (>$100 000 [OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11-1.16] and $50 000-$99 999 [OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.09] vs <$50 000) were associated with higher GLP-1 RA use. These results were similar to those found among patients with ASCVD.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of US patients with T2D, GLP-1 RA use increased, but remained low overall for treatment of T2D, particularly among patients with ASCVD who are likely to derive the most benefit. Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients and those with low income were less likely to receive treatment with a GLP-1 RA. Strategies to lower barriers to GLP-1 RA use, such as lower cost, are needed to prevent the widening of well-documented inequities in cardiovascular disease outcomes in the US.

Impact of a clinical pharmacist on provider prescribing patterns in a primary care clinic

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have demonstrated beneficial outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. Unfortunately, these agents are still underutilized in primary care practice. A clinical pharmacist was embedded at a primary care clinic to provide diabetes and hypertension management under a collaborative practice agreement with a supervising physician.

OBJECTIVES

This study will evaluate whether the presence of an embedded pharmacist in a primary care clinic affects prescribing patterns of novel, evidence-based diabetes therapies.

METHODS

We abstracted information on SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing patterns from 3 primary care clinics across 2 time periods as a single-center, retrospective cohort study. We used a difference-in-difference analysis to compare prescription rates and assess the impact of embedding the pharmacist into clinical practice. Prescriptions written by the pharmacist were excluded.

RESULTS

Across all 3 clinics, 1309 and 1489 patients were included in the pre-intervention and postintervention periods, respectively. The percentage of patients prescribed either an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 agonist, similar between both groups at baseline, rose to 11.6% in the nonintervention clinics and 15.0% in the intervention clinic. There was a statistically significant increase in SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing in the intervention clinic compared with nonintervention clinics (P = 0.034). This change in prescribing patterns appeared even greater when excluding prescribers who were not present during both pre-intervention and postintervention periods (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a pharmacist is associated with increased SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing within a clinic, even in patients not seen directly by the pharmacist. These results suggest that an on-site clinical pharmacist providing care for patients with diabetes may indirectly influence the prescribing behavior of co-located primary care providers, increasing the adoption of novel noninsulin diabetic medications.

Permission to prescribe: do cardiologists need permission to prescribe diabetes medications that afford cardiovascular benefit?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antihyperglycemic therapies including sodium glucose contransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) have been demonstrated to confer significant cardiovascular benefit and reduce future events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, despite positive data from cardiovascular outcome trials, these therapies remain underutilized in a large proportion of patients who have clinical indications and meet coverage guidelines for their initiation. One of the causes of the observed gap between scientific evidence and clinical cardiology practice is therapeutic hesitancy (otherwise known as therapeutic inertia). The purpose of this review is to discuss the contributors to therapeutic hesitancy in the implementation of these evidence-based therapies and, more importantly, provide pragmatic solutions to address these barriers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated that clinicians may not initiate cardiovascular protective therapies due to a reluctance to overstep perceived interdisciplinary boundaries, concerns about causing harm due to medication side effects, and a sense of unfamiliarity with the optimal choice of therapy amidst a rapidly evolving landscape of T2DM therapies.

SUMMARY

Herein, we describe a multifaceted approach aimed at creating a 'permission to prescribe' culture, developing integrated multidisciplinary models of care, enhancing trainees' experiences in cardiovascular disease prevention, and utilizing technology to motivate change. Taken together, these interventions should increase the implementation of evidence-based therapies and improve the quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes of individuals with T2DM.

Medication Optimization Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Participating in a CGM-Driven Virtual Care Program: Prospective Trial (Preprint)

Background

The Onduo virtual care program for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) includes a mobile app, remote lifestyle coaching, connected devices, and telemedicine consultations with endocrinologists for medication management and prescription of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) devices. In a previously described 4-month prospective study of this program, adults with T2D and baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) ≥8.0% to ≤12.0% experienced a mean HbA_1c decrease of 1.6% with no significant increase in hypoglycemia.

Objective

The objective of this analysis was to evaluate medication optimization and management in the 4-month prospective T2D study.

Methods

Study participants received at least 1 telemedicine consultation with an Onduo endocrinologist for diabetes medication management and used RT-CGM intermittently to guide therapy and dosing. Medication changes were analyzed.

Results

Of 55 participants, 48 (87%) had a medication change consisting of a dose change, addition, or discontinuation. Of these, 15 (31%) participants had a net increase in number of diabetes medication classes from baseline. Mean time to first medication change for these participants was 36 days. The percentage of participants taking a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist increased from 25% (12/48) to 56% (n=27), while the percentages of participants taking a sulfonylurea or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor decreased from 56% (n=27) to 33% (n=16) and 17% (n=8) to 6% (n=3), respectively. Prescriptions of other antidiabetic medication classes including insulin did not change significantly.

Conclusions

The Onduo virtual care program can play an important role in providing timely access to guideline-based diabetes management medications and technologies for people with T2D.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03865381; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03865381

Evaluation of clinical and antidiabetic treatment characteristics of different sub-groups of patients with type 2 diabetes: Data from a Mediterranean population database

AIMS

To describe the characteristics and antidiabetic treatment among type 2 diabetes patients according to the clinical conditions prioritized in the Spanish 2020 RedGDPS (Primary Care Diabetes Study Groups Network) therapeutic algorithm: obesity, older than 75 years, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and heart failure.

METHODS

Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Clinical characteristics, the use of antidiabetic drugs and the KDIGO renal risk categories at 31.12.2016 were retrieved from the SIDIAP (Information System for Research in Primary Care) database (Catalonia, Spain).

RESULTS

From a total of 373,185 type 2 diabetes patients, 37% were older than 75 years, 45% obese, 33% had chronic kidney disease, 23.2% cardiovascular disease and 6.9% heart failure. Insulin was more frequently prescribed in chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease and heart failure whereas Sodium-Glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and Glucagon Like Peptide 1 receptor agonists were scarcely prescribed (2.6% and 1.4%, respectively). Among patients with severe renal failure, contraindicated drugs like metformin (16%) and sulfonylureas (6.1%) were still in use. The 2012 KDIGO renal risk categories distribution was: Low: 60.9%, Moderate: 21.6%, High: 9.8% and Very high: 7.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 80% of our T2DM patients meet one of the five clinical conditions that should be considered for treatment individualization. Importantly, a relevant number of patients with severe renal failure were found to use contraindicated drugs.

Optimizing sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor use in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A collaborative clinical practice statement

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a debilitating disease that is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and societal costs. The past three decades have brought about significant advancements in the pharmacologic management of HFrEF, and a corresponding reduction in morbidity and mortality. However, the progress to improve clinical outcomes in real-world settings has stalled in recent years, largely due to underutilization of guideline directed medical therapies (GDMT). The discovery of significant cardio-renal protection from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has ushered in a new treatment paradigm for HFrEF management with SGLT2i therapy becoming an essential component of GDMT. Our Preventive Cardiology and Heart Failure services have established an innovative, multi-disciplinary, collaborative protocol to optimize management of cardiovascular risk factors and facilitation SGLT2i use in patients with HFrEF. The goal of this collaboration is to enhance utilization and safety of SGLT2i for HFrEF management by circumventing medication access issues, the major obstacle to therapy initiation. Within this protocol, our heart failure providers identify patients for the addition of SGLT2i to a background of heart failure GDMT. The patient is then referred to preventive cardiology where the team performs a comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment, optimizes cardiovascular risk factors, and initiates SGLT2i with an emphasis on medication access, cost minimization, and mitigation of potential side effects. The heart failure team assumes responsibility for modification of heart failure-based therapies, and the preventive team manages diabetes, lipid, and metabolic-based therapies. The patient is followed by both cardiology services in a structured fashion, comparing outcome measures at regular intervals and utilizing our patient registry and bio-repository. This clinical practice statement provides a detailed evidentiary review on the cardiovascular and renal benefits of SGLT2i, outlines the rational for creation of a collaborative protocol, details a structured program that may serve as a template for enhanced heart failure management in other health systems, and addresses challenges encountered and recommendations for use.

Development and Internal Validation of A Prediction Tool To Assist Clinicians Selecting Second-Line Therapy Following Metformin Monotherapy For Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) face increased risk of many long-term adverse outcomes. While managing patients with T2D, clinicians are challenged to stay informed regarding all new therapies and must consider potential risks and benefits resultant to their use. Metformin (MET) is typically prescribed as first-line therapy, but a second line is often needed, given MET can be insufficient for maintaining long-term glycemic control. Our objective was to develop a predictive decision-making tool to help clinicians use an outcome-based approach to select second-line therapies for patients when MET monotherapy is insufficient for glycemic control.

METHODS

Electronic health records of 19 277 adults with T2D on MET monotherapy and ≥3 months of either GLP-1RA, DPP-4i, Insulin, SGLT-2i, SFU, or TZD therapy were reviewed at Cleveland Clinic from patient visits occurring between 2005 and 2019. Separate models were developed to predict likelihood of each main outcome measure (stroke, myocardial infarction, worsening hypertension, renal failure, and death). Discrimination and calibration were assessed with bootstrapping.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time for those without an event was 3.6 years (interquartile range 1.9, 6.3). Model discrimination ability was evaluated by concordance indices (goodness of fit metric with values ranging between 0 and 1: 1 indicates perfect discrimination ability; 0.5 reflects same discrimination ability as chance) demonstrating strong discrimination ability, with concordance index values for outcomes as follows: myocardial infarction (0.786), stroke (0.805), worsening hypertension (0.855), renal failure (0.808), and death (0.827).

CONCLUSION

A decision-making tool has been developed that may afford clinicians a more objective and individualized approach to choosing a second-line therapy to control glycemia for persons with T2D.

Real-world use of cardioprotective glucose-lowering drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: A Danish nationwide cohort study, 2012 to 2019

AIMS

To investigate temporal trends in time to initiation of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 analogues (cardioprotective glucose-lowering drugs [GLDs]) in patients with a new dual diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a cohort study, we identified patients with a new dual diagnosis of T2DM and CVD using linked healthcare data from nationwide registries on drug prescriptions and diagnosis codes. For each calendar year between 2012 and 2018, we examined time to initiation and cumulative user proportions (CUPs) for cardioprotective GLD use 1 and 2 years after the dual diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among all individuals living in Denmark in the period 2012 to 2018, 41 733 patients with a new dual diagnosis of T2DM and CVD were identified (median [interquartile range] age 71 [64-79] years, 61% male, and 57% with CVD as the latest diagnosis). Incidence curve slopes and 1- and 2-year CUPs for cardioprotective GLDs increased during the study period (1-year CUP 4.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-4.5) in 2012 to 14.7, 95% CI 13.7-15.7, in 2018; 2-year CUP 5.5, 95% CI 5.0-6.1, in 2012 to 16.7, 95% CI 15.8-17.7, in 2017). T2DM patients with CVD as the second (latest) diagnosis had higher 1-year CUPs than CVD patients with T2DM as the latest diagnosis: 2012: 7.0 (95% CI 6.2-8.0) versus 1.4 (95% CI 1.0-1.8); 2018: 18.1 (95% CI 16.8-19.6) versus 10.0 (95% CI 8.8-11.3).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T2DM and CVD, the incidence of cardioprotective GLD initiation increased between 2012 and 2018, however, within 2 years of dual diagnosis, it remained low.

Potential unrealized mortality benefit of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transport-2 inhibitors: A report from the Veterans Health Administration Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking program

AIM

To assess the unrealized potential of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or sodium-glucose co-transport-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use to reduce mortality in veterans with type 2 diabetes (T2D), coronary artery disease (CAD), and other characteristics congruent with clinical trial cohorts that established the efficacy of these agents.

METHODS

Veterans with T2D and CAD on angiography in 2014 who were untreated with either a GLP-1RA or a SGLT2i were assessed for key eligibility criteria of the LEADER (GLP-1RA) and EMPA-REG OUTCOME (SGLT2i) trials. Trial hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for all-cause death were applied to deaths observed in veterans through 2018 to estimate the potential benefit of GLP-1RA or SGLT2i use.

RESULTS

Median observation was 4.3 years. Of 15 987 veterans with T2D and CAD, 1186 (7.4%) were excluded for GLP-1RA or SGLT2i treatment, and 1386 lacked glycated haemoglobin measurement. Of the remaining 13 415 patients, 4103 (30.1%) and 5313 (39.6%) fulfilled the key criteria for the LEADER and EMPA-REG OUTCOME trials, respectively. Death occurred in 1009 (24.6%) of LEADER-eligible patients and 1335 (25.1%) of EMPA-REG OUTCOME-eligible patients. Under treatment with liraglutide in LEADER-eligible veterans, a 3.5% (0.7%-6.2%) potential absolute mortality reduction, corresponding to 144 (28-253) fewer deaths (0.88 [0.17-1.56] per 100 person-years), might have been expected. Similarly, under treatment with empagliflozin in EMPA-REG OUTCOME-eligible veterans, a 7.9% (4.5%-10.8%) potential absolute mortality reduction, corresponding to 418 (230-573) fewer deaths (1.98 [1.14-2.72] per 100 person-years), might have been expected.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis indicates unrealized opportunities to reduce mortality in selected veterans with T2D and CAD via increased GLP-1RA and SGLT2i use.

Trends in diabetes-related complications in Hong Kong, 2001-2016: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Nationwide studies on contemporary trends in incidence of diabetes-related complications in Asia are lacking. We describe trends in incident coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, heart failure, hyperglycaemic crisis, and lower-extremity amputation (LEA) in people with diabetes in Hong Kong between 2001 and 2016.

METHODS

The Hong Kong Diabetes Surveillance Database (HKDSD) is a territory-wide diabetes cohort identified from Hong Kong Hospital Authority electronic medical record system. We identified events of CHD, stroke, heart failure and hyperglycaemic crisis using hospital principal diagnosis codes at discharge and that of LEA using inpatient procedure codes. We used Joinpoint regression analysis to describe incidence trends by age and sex.

RESULTS

Between 2001 and 2016, a total of 390,071 men and 380,007 women aged 20 years or older with diabetes were included in the HKDSD. Event rates of CHD, stroke, heart failure, hyperglycaemic crisis and LEA declined by 69.4% (average annual percent change: - 7.6, 95% CI - 10.2, - 5.0), 70.3% (- 8.7, 95% CI - 9.8, - 7.5), 63.6% (- 6.4, 95% CI - 8.0, - 4.7), 59.1% (- 6.6, 95% CI - 12.4, - 0.44), and 67.5% (- 5.8, 95% CI - 7.2, - 4.4), in men and by 77.5% (- 9.9, 95% CI - 11.8, - 7.9), 74.5% (- 9.0, 95% CI - 9.6, - 8.4), 65.8% (- 7.0, 95% CI - 8.0, - 6.0), 81.7% (- 8.5, 95% CI - 10.5, - 6.5), and 72.7% (- 9.1. 95% CI - 12.2, - 5.8) in women, respectively, over a 16-year period in people with diabetes in Hong Kong. Joinpoint analysis identified greater declines in event rates of the five diabetes-related complications in the earlier one-third of study period and slowed down but remained significant until 2016. Event rates decreased for all age groups above 45 years for both sexes. There was no significant change in event rates in the group aged 20-44 years except for decline in hyperglycaemic crisis.

CONCLUSIONS

The event rates of diabetes-related complications have declined substantially with no evidence of stabilization or increase in Hong Kong up to 2016. Improvements in outcome were observed for all age subgroups but not in young people with diabetes, calling for urgent action to improve quality of care to prevent complications in young people at risk.

Improved long-term cardiovascular outcomes after intensive versus standard screening of diabetic complications: an observational study

Background

Complication screening is recommended for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the optimal screening intensity and schedules are unknown. In this study, we evaluated whether intensive versus standard complication screening affects long-term cardiovascular outcomes.

Methods

In this observational study, we included 368 T2D patients referred for intensive screening provided as a 1-day session of clinical–instrumental evaluation of diabetic complications, followed by dedicated counseling. From a total of 4906 patients, we selected control T2D patients who underwent standard complication screening at different visits, by 2:1 propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was the 4p-MACE, defined as cardiovascular mortality, or non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure. The Cox proportional regression analyses was used to compare outcome occurrence in the two groups, adjusted for residual confounders.

Results

357 patients from the intensive screening group (out of 368) were matched with 683 patients in the standard screening group. Clinical characteristics were well balanced between the two groups, except for a slightly higher prevalence of microangiopathy in the intensive group (56% vs 50%; standardized mean difference 0.11, p = 0.1). Median follow-up was 5.6 years. The adjusted incidence of 4p-MACE was significantly lower in the intensive versus standard screening group (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52–0.95; p = 0.02). All components of the primary endpoint had nominally lower rates in the intensive versus standard screening group, which was particularly significant for heart failure (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.22–0.83; p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Among T2D patients attending a specialist outpatient clinic, intensive complication screening is followed by better long-term cardiovascular outcomes. No significant effect was noted for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and the benefit was mainly driven by a reduced rate of hospitalization for heart failure.

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and antidiabetes treatment characteristics among a large type 2 diabetes population in the United States

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevalence, antidiabetes medication usage and physician specialty encounters among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the United States during 2015.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis.

PATIENTS

Adults with T2DM in a large US administrative claims database. Patients were divided into ASCVD and non-ASCVD groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted for three age groups (18-44, 45-64 and 65+ years).

RESULTS

Of 1 202 596 patients with T2DM, 45.2% had established ASCVD. About 40% of T2DM patients with ASCVD had visited a cardiologist during 2015, compared to 11% in the non-ASCVD group. The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) was low overall (<12%), and even lower in the ASCVD group (<9%). The prevalence of ASCVD was 15%, 36% and 71% in the 18-44, 45-64 and 65+ year age groups, respectively. GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i use was ≤5% in the 65+ subgroup, regardless of ASCVD status.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data showed a high prevalence of ASCVD among T2DM patients, and confirmed, as a baseline assessment, low use of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is in these at-risk patients prior to the 2017 American Diabetes Association guidelines recommending use of agents with proven cardiovascular benefits.

Performance of a computable phenotype for identification of patients with diabetes within PCORnet: The Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network

PURPOSE

PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, represents an innovative system for the conduct of observational and pragmatic studies. We describe the identification and validation of a retrospective cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from four PCORnet sites.

METHODS

We adapted existing computable phenotypes (CP) for the identification of patients with T2DM and evaluated their performance across four PCORnet sites (2012-2016). Patients entered the cohort on the earliest date they met one of three CP categories: (CP1) coded T2DM diagnosis (ICD-9/ICD-10) and an antidiabetic prescription, (CP2) diagnosis and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5%, or (CP3) an antidiabetic prescription and HbA1c ≥6.5%. We required evidence of health care utilization in each of the 2 prior years for each patient, as we also developed an incident T2DM CP to identify the subset of patients without documentation of T2DM in the 365 days before t₀ . Among a systematic sample of patients, we calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) for the T2DM CP and incident-T2DM CP using electronic health record (EHR) review as reference.

RESULTS

The CP identified 50 657 patients with T2DM. The PPV of patients randomly selected for validation was 96.2% (n = 1572; CI:95.1-97.0) and was consistently high across sites. The PPV for the incident-T2DM CP was 5.8% (CI:4.5-7.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The T2DM CP accurately and efficiently identified patients with T2DM across multiple sites that participate in PCORnet, although the incident T2DM CP requires further study. PCORnet is a valuable data source for future epidemiological and comparative effectiveness research among patients with T2DM.