Semaglutide reduces cardiovascular events regardless of metformin use: a post hoc subgroup analysis of SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6

The Role of Mitophagy in Cardiac Metabolic Remodeling of Heart Failure: Insights of Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Prospects

Heart failure (HF) treatment remains one of the major challenges in cardiovascular disease management, and its pathogenesis requires further exploration. Cardiac metabolic remodeling is of great significance as a key pathological process in the progression of HF. The complex alterations of metabolic substrates and associated enzymes in mitochondria create a vicious cycle in HF. These changes lead to increased reactive oxygen species, altered mitochondrial Ca2+ handling, and the accumulation of fatty acids, contributing to impaired mitochondrial function. In this context, mitophagy plays a significant role in clearing damaged mitochondria, thereby maintaining mitochondrial function and preserving cardiac function by modulating metabolic remodeling in HF. This article aims to explore the role of mitophagy in cardiac metabolic remodeling in HF, especially in obesity cardiomyopathy, diabetic cardiomyopathy, and excessive afterload-induced heart failure, thoroughly analyze its molecular mechanisms, and review the therapeutic strategies and prospects based on the regulation of mitophagy.

Comparative efficacy of GLP-1 RAs/SGLT-2 inhibitors in reducing cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes according to baseline use of metformin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose transporters 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are recommended along with metformin for the potential cardiovascular benefits among type 2 diabetes. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether the effects of SGLT-2i or GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular outcomes are consistent with and without baseline metformin use.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials with SGLT-2i or GLP-1 RAs as interventions of type 2 diabetes patients up to June, 2024. The main outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or cardiovascular death. Both random-effects model and fixed model were adopted to estimate pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

A total of 81,738 patients (median age: 62-66 years, 53.7-71.5% men, median follow-up: 1.3-5.4 years) from 11 studies (7 studies of SGLT-2i and 4 of GLP-1 RAs) were included in the study. The metformin-naive portions ranged from 28.90% to 81.98%. Among patients using metformin at baseline, SGLT-2i or GLP-1 RAs reduced MACE risk (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99, P = 0.02). In metformin-naive patients, similar reductions were observed (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95, P = 0.01). No statistically significant interaction was found between metformin users and non-users for any outcome (all P values for interaction > 0.05), indicating consistent cardiovascular benefits regardless of baseline metformin therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT-2i and GLP-1 RAs have the effects of cardiovascular benefits for T2DM patients regardless of baseline metformin use.

Narrative review of data supporting alternate first-line therapies over metformin in type 2 diabetes

Purpose

Metformin has been the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus as monotherapy or concomitantly with other glucose-lowering therapies due to its efficacy, safety, and affordability. Recent studies on the cardioprotective and renoprotective benefits of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have influenced guidelines on diabetes management to consider these newer agents as alternative first-line therapies. This paper explores the literature supporting the use of these newer medications alone as a first-line agent in place of metformin.

Methods

A review of citations from the most recent guidelines along with a literature search via PubMed was completed to review (1) what, historically, made metformin first-line (2) if newer agents' benefits remain when used without metformin (3) how newer agents compare against metformin when used without it.

Results

Evaluation of the historical literature was completed to summarize the key findings that support metformin as a first-line therapy agent. Additionally, an assessment of the literature reveals that the benefits of these two newer classes are independent of concomitant metformin therapy. Finally, studies have demonstrated that these newer agents can be either non-inferior or sometimes superior to metformin when used as monotherapy.

Conclusion

GLP-1 RA and SGLT-2i can be considered as first line monotherapies for select patients with high cardiovascular risks, renal disease, or weight loss requirements. However, pharmacoeconomic considerations along with lesser long-term safety outcomes should limit these agents' use in certain patients as the management of diabetes continues to transition towards shared-decision making.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01406-6.

Hypoglycemic Drugs in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure: A Narrative Review

Over the last few years, given the increase in the incidence and prevalence of both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF), it became crucial to develop guidelines for the optimal preventive and treatment strategies for individuals facing these coexisting conditions. In patients aged over 65, HF hospitalization stands out as the predominant reason for hospital admissions, with their prognosis being associated with the presence or absence of T2DM. Historically, certain classes of glucose-lowering drugs, such as thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone), raised concerns due to an observed increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular (CV)-related mortality. In response to these concerns, regulatory agencies started requiring CV outcome trials for all novel antidiabetic agents [i.e., dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is)] with the aim to assess the CV safety of these drugs beyond glycemic control. This narrative review aims to address the current knowledge about the impact of glucose-lowering agents used in T2DM on HF prevention, prognosis, and outcome.

Advances in the management of type 2 diabetes in adults

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic and progressive cardiometabolic disorder that affects more than 10% of adults worldwide and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, disability, and high costs. Over the past decade, the pattern of management of diabetes has shifted from a predominantly glucose centric approach, focused on lowering levels of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), to a directed complications centric approach, aimed at preventing short term and long term complications of diabetes, and a pathogenesis centric approach, which looks at the underlying metabolic dysfunction of excess adiposity that both causes and complicates the management of diabetes. In this review, we discuss the latest advances in patient centred care for type 2 diabetes, focusing on drug and non-drug approaches to reducing the risks of complications of diabetes in adults. We also discuss the effects of social determinants of health on the management of diabetes, particularly as they affect the treatment of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes.

The Impact of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist on the Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background

Since 2005, the cardioprotective effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have garnered attention. The cardioprotective effect could be an added benefit to the use of GLP-1 RA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at summarizing observational studies that recruited type 2 diabetes individuals with fewer cardiovascular (CV) events before enrolling in the research.

Methods

Systematically, the databases were searched for observational studies reporting compound CV events and deaths in type 2 diabetics without having the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) compared to other glucose-lowering agents. A meta-analysis was carried out using random effects model to estimate the overall hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Five studies were found eligible for the systematic review including a total of 64,452 patients receiving either liraglutide (three studies) or exenatide (two studies).

Results

The pooled HR for major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and extended MACE was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.65 - 0.93, I2 = 68%) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89 - 0.98, I2 = 29%), respectively. The pooled HR for hospitalization due to heart failure (HHF) and occurrence of HF was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77 - 0.91, I2 = 79%) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75 - 0.94, I2 = 95%), respectively. For stroke, GLP-1 RA was associated with a significant risk reduction of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75 - 0.98, I2 = 81%). There was no significant myocardial infarction (MI) risk reduction with GLP-1 RA. As for all-cause mortality, the pooled HR for the occurrence of all-cause mortality was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.88, I2 = 0%). The pooled HR for the occurrence of CV death was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65 - 0.85, I2 = 38%). GLP-1 RA therapy was associated with a significantly low risk of MACE, extended MACE, all-cause mortality, and CV mortality. Except for MACE, the heterogenicity among the studies was low.

Conclusion

We conclude that GLP-1 RA is associated with a low risk of CV events composites and mortality. The findings support the cardioprotective effect of GLP-1 RA.

Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)

The American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes convened a panel to update the previous consensus statements on the management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes in adults, published since 2006 and last updated in 2019. The target audience is the full spectrum of the professional healthcare team providing diabetes care in the USA and Europe. A systematic examination of publications since 2018 informed new recommendations. These include additional focus on social determinants of health, the healthcare system and physical activity behaviours including sleep. There is a greater emphasis on weight management as part of the holistic approach to diabetes management. The results of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes trials involving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, including assessment of subgroups, inform broader recommendations for cardiorenal protection in people with diabetes at high risk of cardiorenal disease. After a summary listing of consensus recommendations, practical tips for implementation are provided.

Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)

The American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes convened a panel to update the previous consensus statements on the management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes in adults, published since 2006 and last updated in 2019. The target audience is the full spectrum of the professional health care team providing diabetes care in the U.S. and Europe. A systematic examination of publications since 2018 informed new recommendations. These include additional focus on social determinants of health, the health care system, and physical activity behaviors, including sleep. There is a greater emphasis on weight management as part of the holistic approach to diabetes management. The results of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes trials involving sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, including assessment of subgroups, inform broader recommendations for cardiorenal protection in people with diabetes at high risk of cardiorenal disease. After a summary listing of consensus recommendations, practical tips for implementation are provided.