Association between serum insulin levels and heart failure-related parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure treated with canagliflozin: a post-hoc analysis of the randomized CANDLE trial

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

A manual search was conducted in 3 prestigious English databases, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science, for studies published within the last decade, from July 2014 to July 2024. The extracted literature was synthesized to analyze the efficacy outcomes, survival prognostic indicators, and safety profiles of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with HF and T2DM. The Cochrane bias risk assessment scale was used as a tool to evaluate the quality of the literature, and Review Manager 5.4 software was used to create the bias risk chart. Data analysis and merging were completed with the help of Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.0 statistical software.

RESULTS

Twelve studies encompassing 9509 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that compared to the control group, the SGLT-2 inhibitor-treated group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index [mean difference (MD) = -7.25, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] (-9.83, -4.67)], brain natriuretic peptide levels [MD = -36.96, 95% CI (-63.51, -10.41)], and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [MD = -519.27, 95% CI (-660.77, -377.78)]. Furthermore, the SGLT-2 inhibitor-treated group exhibited significantly higher increases in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores [MD = 3.32, 95% CI (3.30, 3.34)], indicating improved quality of life. Additionally, the incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the SGLT-2 inhibitor-treated group compared to the control group [OR = 0.78, 95% CI (0.69, 0.88)]. The pooled results of the meta-analysis indicated that SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization by 23%, the risk of cardiovascular death by 19%, and the risk of all-cause mortality by 9%.

CONCLUSION

SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy significantly reduced the risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization for HF in patients with HF and T2DM. Additionally, SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly improve cardiac function, decrease the incidence of adverse events, and enhance the quality of life in these patients.

Development of a core outcome set for cardiovascular diabetology: a methodological framework

Background

Cardiovascular diabetology is an emergent field focusing on all aspects of diabetes/cardiovascular interrelationship and metabolic syndrome. High-quality evidence needs to be provided to determine the efficacy and safety of interventions in cardiovascular diabetology. The heterogeneity of outcomes among trials limits the comparison of results, and some outcomes are not always meaningful to end-users. The cardiovascular diabetology core outcome set (COS) study aims to develop a COS of interventions for cardiovascular diabetology. In this paper, we introduce the methodological framework for developing the COS.

Methods

The COS development will include the following steps: (a) establish the COS groups of stakeholders, including international steering committee, Delphi survey group, and consensus meeting group; (b) systematic reviews of outcomes used in trials of cardiovascular diabetology; (c) semistructured interview of stakeholders for outcomes of cardiovascular diabetology; (d) generate a list of candidate outcomes and determine the original outcome pool; (e) Delphi survey with stakeholders of cardiovascular diabetology to select potential core outcomes; and (f) review and endorse the cardiovascular diabetology COS by expert consensus meeting.

Conclusions

This current study reports the methodological framework to develop a COS in cardiovascular diabetology and will provide evidence for the future development of COS in cardiovascular diabetology.