Tiotropium in asthma: back to the future of anticholinergic treatment

Anti-muscarinic drugs as preventive treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children and adults

Regular physical activity is strongly recommended to prevent chronic respiratory diseases, including asthma. On the other hand, vigorous physical training may trigger airway symptoms and bronchoconstriction. The transient airway narrowing occurring because of exercise is named exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Despite management according to guidelines, a significant proportion of patients experiences uncontrolled EIB, which thus represents a relevant unmet medical need. In particular, although prevention and treatment of EIB are effectively based on the use of beta-2 bronchodilator drugs, high heterogeneity in individual responses has been reported. Furthermore, even though beta-2 adrenergic drugs remain the mainstay of EIB management, occurrence of tolerance and side effects, as well as doping concerns have been reported with their use. In regard to this, inhaled antimuscarinics could represent an alternative or additional effective and safe bronchodilator therapeutic option for achieving optimal EIB control and minimize adverse events. The present systematic review aims to collect and provide the most updated and evidence-based literature findings on the efficacy and safety of short- and long-acting inhaled anti-muscarinic drugs for the preventive treatment of EIB in both children and adults. Take-Home Message: Anti-muscarinic drugs are effective and safe in preventing EIB, despite response variability is reported. Further studies should focus on long-acting molecules, chronic administration and phenotype-driven effects.

Bacterial secretion of histamine within the gut influences immune responses within the lung

BACKGROUND

Histamine is an important immunomodulator influencing both the innate and adaptive immune system. Certain host cells express the histidine decarboxylase enzyme (HDC), which is responsible for catalysing the decarboxylation of histidine to histamine. We and others have shown that bacterial strains can also express HDC and secrete histamine; however, the influence of bacterial-derived histamine on the host immune responses distant to the gut is unclear.

METHODS

The Escherichia coli BL21 (E coli BL21) strain was genetically modified to express the Morganella morganii (M morganii)-derived HDC gene (E coli BL21_HTW). E coli BL21 and E coli BL21_HTW were gavaged to ovalbumin (OVA) sensitized and challenged mice to investigate the effect of bacterial-derived histamine on lung inflammatory responses.

RESULTS

Oral administration of E coli BL21_HTW, which is able to secrete histamine, to wild-type mice reduced lung eosinophilia and suppressed ex vivo OVA-stimulated cytokine secretion from lung cells in the OVA respiratory inflammation mouse model. In histamine receptor 2 (H2R)-deficient mice, administration of histamine-secreting bacteria also reduced inflammatory cell numbers in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). However, the suppressive effect of bacterial-derived histamine on BAL inflammation was lost in HDC-deficient mice. This loss of activity was associated with increased expression of histamine degrading enzymes and reduced histamine receptor expression.

CONCLUSION

Histamine secretion from bacteria within the gut can have immunological consequences at distant mucosal sites, such as within the lung. These effects are influenced by host histamine receptor expression and the expression of histamine degrading enzymes.

Treatment of severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma: Where we are heading

OBJECTIVE

We sought to highlight how our understanding of the pathophysiology of severe asthma has evolved over time and discuss the role of biomarkers in treatment advances and emerging new therapies.

DATA SOURCES

Nonsystematic PubMed literature search.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were selected based on areas of relevance to the classification of asthma by endotype, with an emphasis on the evolution of current treatment guidelines for severe asthma.

RESULTS

Unlike older guidelines for the treatment of severe asthma, recent updates now distinguish between asthma severity and control. Moreover, asthma classification is shifting from phenotype to endotype with the development of biomarkers used to determine the mechanism driving a patient's disease. Many cases of severe asthma are associated with type-2 inflammation with elevated eosinophil counts in the airways. In recent studies, patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and high eosinophil counts respond to biologic therapies targeting the type-2 signaling pathway and eosinophils themselves (eg, anti-IL-5 therapy). New treatments that address the pathophysiology of asthma offer a promising alternative to control severe asthma for patients who do not respond to traditional therapies.

CONCLUSION

Understanding and using new treatment guidelines that separate the concepts of asthma severity and control may help clinicians to identify patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma who may benefit from new treatment options, such as anti-IL-5 therapies.