Predicting the impact of placing an overdose prevention site in Philadelphia: a mathematical modeling approach

MOUD 2.0: a clinical algorithm and implementation evaluation protocol for sublingual and injectable buprenorphine treatment of opioid use disorder

Background

Primary care is the initial contact point for most patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) but lacks tools for guiding treatment. Only a small fraction of patients access evidence-based care. Long-acting injectable buprenorphine has potential to improve medication adherence and program retention in low-barrier primary care treatment settings. We present the first clinical decision support algorithm incorporating long-acting buprenorphine (LAIB) in primary care. We include a protocol for a future evaluation of the algorithm's implementation process, "Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) 2.0," at a housing and integrated care clinic at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Methods

Literature review and expert consensus informed creation of the algorithm, which underwent iterative development with feedback from clinicians, staff, and patients. Patients are categorized by adherence to therapy and retention in the program, with recommendations for each category. Adherence is determined by urine screen supplemented by self-report. To ensure all patients in this high morbidity and mortality risk population are treated, we will treat patients as their own controls in the evaluation, with potential for multisite comparisons. We will present descriptive statistics for adherence proportion before and after MOUD 2.0 implementation, testing for differences using McNemar's test. We will then present pre- and post-implementation unadjusted six-month survival curves for retention.

Discussion

LAIB is incorporated as an alternative or adjunctive treatment for patients refractory to sublingual buprenorphine and as an initial treatment for selected patients. We developed an algorithm with 4-, 8-, and 12-week decision points to guide treatment for patients with varying levels of response to sublingual buprenorphine and LAIB. This clinical decision tool incorporates LAIB among treatment options for OUD in primary care settings. The protocol will evaluate the algorithm's implementation, presenting a replicable method for assessing adherence and retention among high-risk patients in similar settings.

Multinational appraisal of the epidemiological distribution of opioid fatalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The global or multinational scientific evidence on the distribution of opioid fatality is unknown. Hence, the current study collects epidemiological characteristics to shed light on the ongoing global or multinational opioid crisis and to promote the development of public health prevention/management strategies.

Method

All documents on PRISMA standards were retrieved via electronic databases.

Results

Among the 47 articles relevant to our studies, which depict a total population size of 10,191 individuals, the prevalence of opioid fatal overdose was 15,022 (14.74%). Among the 47 articles, 14 of them reported the gender of the participants, with 22,125 (15.79%) male individuals and 7,235 (5.17%) female individuals, and the age distribution of the participants that was most affected by the overdose was as follows: 29,272 (31.13%) belonged to the 18-34-year-old age group and 25,316 (26.92%) belonged to the less than 18-year-old age group. Eighteen studies qualified for the meta-analysis of the multinational prevalence of fatal opioid overdose, depicting an overall pooled prevalence estimate of 19.66%, with 95% CIs (0.13-0.29), I2 = 99.76% determined using the random-effects model, and Q statistic of 7198.77 (p < 0.0001). The Egger test models of publication bias revealed an insubstantial level of bias (p = 0.015). The subgroup analysis of the study design (cohort or other) revealed that others have the highest prevalence estimate of 34.37, 95% CIs (0.1600-0.5901), I2 = 97.04%, and a sample size of less than 1,000 shows the highest prevalence of 34.66, 95% CIs (0.2039-0.5234), I2 = 97.82%, compared to that of more than 1,000 with a prevalence of 12.28, 95% CIs (0.0675-0.2131), I2 = 99.85%. The meta-regression analysis revealed that sample size (less-than or greater-than 1,000), (p = 0.0098; R2 = 3.83%) is significantly associated with the observed heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Research-based findings of fatal opioid overdose are grossly lacking in middle- and low-income nations. We established that there is a need for opioid fatality surveillance systems in developing nations.